₦airaland Forum

Godx:
This may be the worst transfer in football history considering his fee, expectations and he was in the last year of his contract, cost around 140m and has just 1 goal.

lmao at this rate it sadly one of the worst transfers ever,I just don't understand all these injuries considering he was one the fittest/injury free players on Earth just before joining madrid.,this one na village people oh

Melvyn11:
Hensben come and Carry your fraud from my club please and to Madrid5 I repeat , come end of season if hazard don't produce anything sensible we shall wear one trouser.

if you mention my monicker again,na thunder go fire you,I don warn you oh

I was here

Lampard seems to have destroy the ability to beat and press and press that Chelsea had under sarri

OJURONGBE1:
When i objected Havertz signing, some people said he's a generational talent, he's the best young player in bundesliga, he's this, he's that.
This lad is a striker, that is where he performed best for Leverkusen. He has played 3 matches against strong oppositions yet he was no where to be found.

Werner has never been a centre forward, he plays behind a 9, Lampard knew this but went ahead. Werner has been playing on the left wing, a position filled by Pulisic last season . Where will he play if the American comes back?


We needed a centre forward to challenge Tammy

An attacking midfielder who can play as a 10, initiate attack from the midfield, dazzle us with his eye catching long and short range passes and fill in the centre midfield as well.

A centre back who can lead our back line and dish out instructions not a washed Thiago Silva.

A left back who can cover Alonso defensive lapses and send wicked crosses to the box and lastly
A goalkeeper who can replace Kepa.

But no, he wasted fortunes on Werner, Havertz and Thiago Silva.

I feel like slapping you through phone,this is a very moronic take,if una not see something talk make una dey shut up abeg

Arteta is a better coach than Frank lampard ,imagine if he had Chelsea's squad

Itsceejay009:
People think this is PES or FIFA, Lampard makes his selections based on what he sees in training and games played, not a 3-minute highlights video on YouTube. CHO has been dog shit since he came back from the injury, because he scored in this match people ridicule Lampard for not starting him. Why didn't CHO perform against fvcking Barnsley? CHO has done nothing to justify a start ever since he returned. Mount isn't as good a winger as a midfielder but he's performed better than CHO in that position to warrant a start. If Pulisic and ziyech are fit, do you think Lampard will play mount on the wings? He has no other choice

he didn't perform against Barnsley because he was placed on right where he was limited to crossing,on the left he can cut back

Neobulletzz:
May I ask you who should have played yesterday, if you don’t want Mount?

any body put giroud,Abraham , even Barkley, Hudson odoi and we have more chances to score

odizeey:
Me I will give Lampard 5 years to prove his worth.

I give lampard 5 games,he should also stop favouring his gay partner(mount)

9900 baby

Ibime:
No width in this team at all.

i genuinely believe lampard is foolish man wentin he see for Mason mount,kilode,I see comfortable liverpool win

yakubudivine:
This is one of the most credible and peaceful elections in the history of Nigeria.

Edo is a very peaceful place the last 10 years in general

gesundheit:
This is crap going by the fact that no other senate have engage in partisan gerrymandering. Harry Reid should have even start earlier, the outrage by progressive is solely because Mitch McConnell and GOP thugs stalled on Obama SCOTUS nominee for 9 fuuuucckking months plus they stalled the nomination of Debo Adegbile to the DOJ. The Harry Reid rule did not extend to SCOTUS nomination, Moscowmitch extend it during the Kavs battle.

okay now I get

gesundheit:
Waste methylhead are richer than blacks and latino? Hop on a plane dude. You can look up food stamp stat to get a head up.

guy latinos and afros are the bottom of the food chain in literally everything ,look it up

donjazet:
I'm having a hard time understanding your post but as to the minor difference, that is because the major third parties which are an offshoot of the democrats siphon votes from them.

those "uneducated whites"have a higher level of education and Income that blacks and Latinos,a 3rd party siphoning votes away took Clinton to white house,so that one nor be excuse

gesundheit:
It's obvious you don't live in the USA. Good bye Felicia. The 18 midterms send her greetings.

Blue collar folks and soccer moms are big on abortion rights, wanna see how y'all wanna win them over with the SCOTUS fraud.

no live in the US but don't bring American issues to sports and expect me not to drop an opinion on it, especially if I dey bored

gesundheit:
Dude you surely have not live in the dixies or Appalachia. Wanna tell me about those methylheads that rob folks for sneakers to buy a fix. The trailer park folks? Dude, you really need to see those places and see why the opioid crisis is a top GOP concern.

those people still have higher rate of education and income to blacks and latinos Yes or No?

gesundheit:
I'm sick of y'all GOP with the half throat talking point on all subject. Mitch McConnell was blocking everything Obama put forward, that was the reason Harry Reid the senator from Nevada upturn the Nuclear option.

Y'all are quick to throw in the DNC 94 crime bills in debates, but y'all will sudden develop amnesia to tell us about the genesis of issues. Bush Snr used the soft on crime to annihilate Micheal Dukakis in the 1988 election.


The GOP was using the convicted killer Willie Horton to run campaign ads all through that campaign as the face of the DNC, they still use the same thingy against Clinton in the 92 generals.

The 94 crime bill was a DNC response to acting tough on crime. But y'all go on with false narrative on all subject.

I have two things to say to you
1.i hate long shelaye,abeg don't long post for me abeg
2.your first paragraph illustrate my piont,because Obama wasn't getting his way you had to change the rules,if Republicans change rule so that their president can get the ways,you start screaming "threat to democracy",u see as life nor gree balance,please stop calling me "y'all GOP"am a Nigerian not American. The reason why I commented on this issue is because it was brought to this thread ,you won't see me in foriegn politics.

donjazet:
Democrats do have the higher support. As a matter of fact, the major third parties like the green party and others are offshoots of the democrat party. You think it's by chance that the last two republican presidents lost the popular vote and won only by the margins? The vast majority of black people, brown people and immigrants all vote democrats. While the republicans are predominantly white uneducated voters.

does "uneducated"white people are still more education by far than blacks,latinos,apart from that you are right,I just checked previous popular votes though the difference is miniscular,like 51-49

donjazet:
Well, if politics has thought us anything, it is that change is constant.
The republicans will leave the democrats little choice but to do this and if the democrats do make this massive change, it is certain that every election will now have massive stakes, one that ties directly to the Supreme Court appointments.
This will inevitably drive up election participation and you know that the democrats do have higher number of supporters than the republicans.

the democrats have higher number of supporters is just audio lol,you mistake Twitter noice to supporters

donjazet:
You both still don't get my point.
The number of Supreme Court justices being only 9 is not a constitutional law but simply a tradition. One that can simply be altered by congress. As a matter of fact, there were once 10 Supreme Court justices in the 1800's. If the republicans ditch their honor and pick a conservative justice to replace RBJ, nothing will stop the democrats from increasing adding at least two Supreme Court justices to the bench to make it 11 once they regain the majority

and nothing will stop Republicans from increasing the number of judges to make sure they have a majority once they retake the majority somewhere in the future,na democrats go suffer last last before you know number of judges go reach 50 lmao,where was democrats "honor" when they introduced the nuclear option to make sure a simple majority of Senate is enough to appiont judge instead of the usual 2/ 3,they did it to silent the Republican senate minority back in Obama second tenure thinking they won't lose election in the future only for Trump admin to use the same simple senate majority to appiont 3 judges in 4 years,( likely 3),if Trump wins again na die democrats die be that,keep creating laws that your opponent will use against u in the future.

BlueMann:
Hear Lamps and Cech are still interested in Rice, but are unwilling to meet the €80m price tag.

Also hear West Ham are interested in Emerson and Barkley.

Barkley has function in Chelsea oh,don't sell that nigga

Skimpledawg:
Let's not go over this. Lampard is some people's darling here.


Arteta messed Lampard up big time.

messed lampard by giving pulisic injury giving pulisic hamstring and kovacic red card?Damm arteta is such a genius

DeadPresidents:
Only glory hunters claim to support two clubs equally especially when either clubs are buzzing at the moment.

That's classic glory hunting behavior like a hoë with a niggä on the side.

Stay one place make thunda faya you abeg.

shut the Bleep you olosho,and who told you that i stand "on the fence"do you know me before,una go just dey open mouth waaaaaaaaa like uncircumcised goat

DeadPresidents:
Just another Shekpite doing attache to glory as Dayo talk am.

Na them way.

between me and raumdeter he is the biggies plastic fan on this forum,considering his first club was arsenal and he had to run to bayern,so the irony of "dayo's statement". suddenly Madrid is "glory" am sure opke like yourseft where saying we were dead and buried after Ronaldo left.

Leyqute:
Lol. These people are already manufacturing shalayes for Havertz for when he flops. Kai! It’s a makanaki something.

havertz is already better than all your midfielders so shut the up and Bleep off to your thread

hensben:
I understand what you’re trying to say but my statement wasn’t referring to shouting as passion but the will to want to make something happen on the pitch is what I am talking about. This wiliness is not about talent but mental determination to want to cause positive change,it is called X factor and what I saw in Bruno’s game. Pogba lack that reason the club have been spending in same area to unlock him. Havertz kind of has it but still on the potential stage for a club like to Chelsea and he is still very young. Havertz is good no doubt and will come very good if managed properly.

abeg let person hear word ,player wey you don watch once for your life you don dissect finish,X factor or Y axis Bruno fenandes not get,na pk my guy tey dey survive

Leyqute:
The good thing about Lampard is that he has the balls to make huge decisions. However, what’s important is if those big decisions are the right ones.

And you’re right. Sometimes he just doesn’t have the answers - like how Arteta completely nullified him vs Arsenal in the FA Cup final and he couldn’t find a solution.

Thing is he’ll be good if he learns on the job. His main problem is the defense. If he can sort that out you guys will be okay.

he couldn't find a solution to arteta in the FA cup final because his best attacking player got injured on his way to a goal that would have made the match 2-1 and his player of the season got sent off for no reason,kuldos to arsenal in that final performance but Chelsea was hindered by circumstances even the greatest tacticians couldn't avoid a defeat

United fans jusy ruin this place,una nor get thread again?abi una nor get thread again

ShitStain:
I no just understand Chelsea fans o
See as you guys are already labelling havertz a flop and talking shit about lampard forgetting we barely had any preseason and these players just played their very first match in a fuckiiiing new league.
We won for bleeps sakes.it might not have been a dominant display but matches like yesterday's could have went either way.
We'll surely get better as the season progresses.

most Chelsea fans are not jumping not conclusion and the team itseft doesn't look fit,the idiots in this thread are yoonited fans,me see nor know wentin dey worry dem

weedtaker:
yea, he will be alright shaa, got lots of talent, its almost impossible for him to fail, problem is he'll always be compared with Bruno as they play similar position.

Bruno na penalty merchant,when havertz starts his own I don't think Chelsea fans will give a Bleep about portugese ratface

patrickmuf:
They won't admit it now, not when they know you're lurking...Give it time, maybe tomorrow or next and you'll see them asking questions of the mega acquisition...Havertz is too slow to play as a winger in the EPL, at best he is a 10 but even at that, he needs to quicken things up. The EPL is not the Bundesliga, he needs to understand that he won't have all the time in the world to do his thing...

Ziyech to me is the best signing Chelsea have made.

una too dey talk,season just dey start,I remember the rubbish people here said about pulisic