Masterviolence's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Masterviolence's Profile › Masterviolence's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 (of 61 pages)
LordAdam16:This is one of the unspoken truths about the war in Iran. While Russia retains the capability to restock missiles and other military hardware used in Ukraine, the U.S. cannot do the same at full capacity. TBH, the demilitarization plans NATO had for Russia boomeranged. There's a reason Trump and his military gang keep blaming Biden for giving Ukraine hundreds of billions of dollars in weaponry without payment or plans to restock. Russia effectively demilitarized the U.S and NATO in Ukraine. If Russia empower Iran militarily, by December Trump might be going back to the Mar-A-Lago or perhaps prison according to some in-house analyst here. |
SonOfWords: All while being the self acclaimed greatest military with supersoldiers that works from home. ![]() |
LordAdam16:I strongly believe they'll go for mainland Iran in other to secure the kharg island from heavy bombardment. Either way, the u.s military should get a body-bag vendor because they'll be needing a lot of it. |
LordAdam16:Russia was ready for every eventuality. Why send oil to Cuba with a naval escort when you can do it without a naval escort? I strongly believe WWIII will start with something like this. On the flip side, there's a strong evidence that Trump might lunch a ground invasion of IRAN within the next 10days. |
WriteerNg:They always want to appear tough. They forgot to mention that Russia sent a state owned ship with naval escort. Satellite imagery show the presence of a frigate and I am 100% certain a submarine was indeed present too |
sainttwist1:Stop wailing. You think threatening and attacking small and weak nations make the U.S a superpower? Russia and China can equally do what the u.s does. But, what does that make of them? No doubt, the u.s still maintain the position of a global superpower solely because of the u.s dollars and not military power nor economic power. We are no longer in the 90s. The u.s military is not a stronger military than Russia nor does it maintain a better economy than China's. Since the beginning of the 20th century till date, the u.s have never fought and won any war on their own against a third tier adversary let alone with a near pear one. Having shiny toys and bullying small nations with no ability to strike back does not make you the greatest. The craziest myth of this modern day is the strength of the u.s military. Take away the u.s.d and those foolish allies (Europeans) who do uncle sam's bidding without question and watch them reduce from being a global superpower to the superpower of North America. |
seunny4lif:You're not serious ![]() Is that not a German name? ![]() |
Kingsnairaland:Give us 3 reasons for this assertion. No jokes. I'm ready to be educated on this topic. |
ariesbull:Personally, I don't think Europe is weak. What I see is a leadership problem. Europe lack pragmatic leaders, we can see this from the recent turn of event in the geopolitical space and how they talk and talk about becoming independent especially militarily but end up running back to the Americans. In Europe today, France is the only country with pragmatic leadership at a certain scale and this is enough to be head and shoulders above the other E.U countries. While many of us have made certain assumptions about Europe, either from hate or love, I still maintain a stance that neither the Russians or Americans will be crazy enough to go to war with Europe. |
When will Trump send his Rambo's to Iran. I'm getting tired of waiting. With a budget of $1trln, he should've done that in day 1. I want to see how his supersoldiers will perform in an urban warfare. |
Talking about freedom. Do you think there's more freedom in Saudi Arabia than in Iran? Iran clearly have freedom related problems just like the U.K and many other countries in the world but some of you who have never spent time outside your state in Nigeria will be wailing about freedom online. Y'all are wailing about freedom in Iran because that's what the msm (u.s) tell you. If iran agree to everything the u.s tell them, Iran will become the most free country in the world overnight. |
dvkot: TBH I clearly don't understand your point. Is Iran Russia? Is Iran powerful enough to take on the U.S and it group of blood suckers? Do you expect Iran to sit back and allow themselves to be annihilated by the same group of people who see themselves as higher being than the Iranians? Listen carefully, this war was unavoidable as the U.S and Israel has made it obvious that Iran must be bombed to smithereens just to make Israel the sole power in the middle east. Bro wake up, they've gone into Iran under the pretext of freedom. The same freedom they gave Libyans and same freedom they gave Iraqis etc. How are they enjoying the freedom today? They attacked because they believe if not now, it will be impossible in the future. If I may ask: what exactly should Iran have done or do now that the u.s is striking them, what will be your reply? Should Iran give up it missile program that is clearly for sovereignty defense or give up enriched uranium that the u.s said they've destroyed. Many of you know very little about patriotism. The problem with the Iranian leadership is lack of foresight. All they had to do was go all in and get that nuke. The only other option was to find a way to sign a defense pact with Russia. Iran is not Russia. They don't have a capable navy nor air force. What they have are missiles and drones. Let them use what they have to defend their sovereignty. |
In today’s world, modern warfare has completely changed. War is now won by three clear factors: The first and most important is a very determined, motivated, and fearless troops. Secondly, the ability to produce quality weapons at a very low cost. And thirdly, a clear and attainable objective. Even the smallest nation on earth can become extremely difficult to defeat if it is able to employ these three principles effectively. What is happening in the Middle East is a clear indication of this. Throughout history, casualties during wars involving Middle Eastern countries have rarely been a decisive factor for any invader or aggressor. I see a lot of jubilation from U.S. supporters when the U.S. was unloading a barrage of missiles on Iran and shooting down many Iranian missiles. But hitting a bicycle with a Lamborghini is not sustainable. TBH, I have never, at any point, held the Iranian military in particularly high regard, although there's a lot to work to be done. However, in light of all that I have witnessed thus far, they have unequivocally earned my respect. But We'll all know who is truly winning the war by the fifteenth day and beyond. |
IRAN |
23jerryking:I'm in Tehran Don't believe everything you see on the media |
dvkot:No one is arguing that the U.S. lacks overwhelming firepower or the ability to devastate Iran militarily. That’s not the point. The issue isn’t whether America can glass Iran, but whether doing so achieves any political objective without triggering strategic overextension. History shows that superior military power doesn’t guarantee strategic success Vietnam, Somalia, and Afghanistan are reminders that wars are lost not because the stronger side can’t destroy things, but because it can’t convert destruction into sustainable outcomes. Iran wouldn’t need to land a missile on U.S. soil to impose costs. Through asymmetric warfare, regional escalation, economic disruption, and long-term attrition, it could turn any intervention into a pyrrhic outcome where the U.S. wins tactically but loses strategically. So this isn’t about craziness or bravado. It’s about deterrence, cost-imposition, and whether starting a war creates more problems than it solves. |
WriteerNg: Did china read my last comment? Iran is currently being prepared to take on a much larger role. The U.S will meet their Waterloo in Iran. 📝 |
I am exhausted by the endless pageantry of diplomacy. At this juncture, decisive posture matters more than empty dialogue. Why can Russia, China, and North Korea not immediately dispatch a naval armada to the Red Sea and patrol the Strait of Hormuz? Why have Russia and China not deployed advanced air-defense battalions to Iran, including formidable systems such as the S-400 and China’s HQ series? The situation has deteriorated to the point where any external power should hesitate, if not recoil at the prospect of attacking Iran, fully aware that Iran’s allies are neither weak nor inconsequential. Deterrence must be unmistakable. Must Russia and China wait until conflict reaches their own borders before recognizing that this threat is existential in nature? Russia, at least, appears to be quietly preparing, the recent evacuation of Russian diplomats from Israel strongly suggests strategic recalibration behind the scenes. China’s silence, however, is perplexing, an appearance of passivity at a moment that demands resolve. Action must precede diplomacy, not follow it. Even now, a coalition of some EU forces is positioned near Greenland as a contingency should the United States choose military escalation. Whether or not conflict ultimately materializes is secondary, the signal has already been delivered to Washington. |
WriteerNg: Going into Venezuela with the hope of making money by military force is a foolish decision. The u.s will spend more than they'll make from Venezuela. Pressure on Maduro would've yielded positive results. Greatest deal maker in the mud ![]() |
There's a huge problem with today's America's missile program. Deep dive on this topic tonight. Stay tuned! |
LordAdam16:At some point, Pres. Putin said fvuk it but after series of negotiations he tracked back on those steps. But watch out. |
Someone said the U.S is not fully involved in Ukraine. Who was that and how did you come to that conclusion? I have strong evidence so speak and get schooled immediately. |
The next theater of war is the Sahel region. The U.S is planning to counter Russia's growing influence in Africa. I've been saying it that war is coming and it's about time. Those military juntas should brace up. First step. Assassination attempts. |
LordAdam16:Escalations can be managed when both parties involved come to the realization that "if they don't stop, not only will they destroy themselves but also the world." When it comes to Moscow, Washington acts very rational. They can only become unhinged to small countries that they can bully. Don't let this ship issue make you believe that the U.S is ready to carryout provocative measures that will lead to a direct confrontation with Russia. I still maintain my stance and I'll wait patiently for Russia's counter to these geopolitical games. |
OkpaNsukkaisBae:Over the years, I've become adamant to expressing my fact based opinions because many folks here are emotionally underdeveloped. I'm saying it today. Europe will enter into Ukraine to fight Russia with the backing of the u.s either overtly or covertly. In response, Ukraine will cease to exist as a state. Russia will strike Poland and other European nations, when they fully experience the might of the Russian federation, the U.S, NATO and Russia will come to the negotiation table. But Ukraine will lose it statehood. Time is my weapon. |
LordAdam16:It seems my analysis have been top-notch since I returned. In the coming months, Russia will respond to all geopolitical developments will a strong show of force. I hope these escalations can be managed. Watch how msm will go crazy with the usual "nuclear" narratives. |
The ship is currently around Scotland and I guess the u.s can get to it from the u.k before the Russians arrive. |
Alamkiir:Where's the armada? With over 10k u.s troops, battles ships, cruisers etc around Venezuela, how did a slow moving ship suddenly become an herculean task for the supposedly great military in the world to capture. Trump needed that ship for publicity stunt, with continuous regurgitation to the "greatest military tag" on the u.s military and then release it on Putin's call, but Putin is not buying it. |
Gerrard59:Capture or kill Putin? Only when I think I've heard it all, something new will just drop. |
Obedience40:You did not get it. |
!