Masterviolence's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Masterviolence's Profile › Masterviolence's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 (of 61 pages)
23jerryking:I maintain my stance that your comprehension of English remains inadequate. It is well understood that for Russian forces to fully capture a strategic stronghold, multiple offensives are often required before achieving that objective. However, if they begin repositioning troops from that sector of the frontlines to another, it clearly indicates a shift in strategic priorities, precisely the point I have been trying to convey. Therefore, remain patient; Russia will seize Pokrovsk when their focus is firmly directed toward it. If I may inquire, where do you believe the soldiers engaged in the Kursk stormtrooping operation originated from? |
23jerryking:I believe the issue lies with your understanding of English. If you truly grasp the meaning of 'priority,' you would not have made this comment. By the way, priority refers to something you desire at this moment, not because the other matters are insignificant. Yes, the Ukrainians have demonstrated remarkable resistance in the Pokrovsk area, "but I assure you, there is no location along the front lines that Russia genuinely desires that it cannot ultimately conquer." |
Gbadebo19:Listen, I have followed this war for a long time and developed a profound understanding of its dynamics. I can recognize propaganda when I see it, whether it originates from a pro-Russian or pro-Ukrainian source. Throughout this conflict, I have called out misinformation from both sides with equal scrutiny. You’ve been seeking my attention, and now you have it. Since the second week of January 2025, even the most unobservant analysts could discern the noticeable decline in Russian offensives toward Pokrovsk. This shift is a direct result of Russia’s strategic redeployment and assault planning. Your incessant claims about Russia’s inability to capture Pokrovsk are misguided because Pokrovsk is simply not Russia’s current priority. Since January, a significant portion of Russian forces in that sector has been reassigned to the Kharkov and Kursk regions. The consequences of this redeployment are now undeniable so evident that even the blind could perceive what is unfolding in Kursk. You presented a paid, propagandized article as evidence, yet it offers absolutely no substantive proof that 80% of Russian personnel involved in the Kursk stormtrooper offensive were eliminated. In reality, the battle for Kursk stands as one of the most audacious military maneuvers of this war. Over 100 men traversed a pipeline just 1.4 meters in diameter, undertaking a grueling 12-kilometer journey over several days, a feat that is nothing short of extraordinary. I have yet to see evidence of the so-called mass liquidation of Russian forces. The only verifiable losses, as reported by both Russian and Ukrainian sources, are those suffered by the Ukrainian side particularly the heavy toll exacted during their costly retreat from Kursk. |
I wonder why we're all mute regarding the situation in Kursk. I'll be back with my analysis. |
petesunday:It's difficult to convince someone to look beyond their limited perspective without encountering resistance. Statements like these often overlook key facts. It's important to note that Russia's negotiator in Istanbul took several steps toward peace with Ukraine. One of these steps included the withdrawal of Russian troops from Kyiv, which they carried out and was later confirmed by the Pentagon. Yes, Ukraine dealt Russia a significant blow, but no modern military would expect to invade a country the size of Ukraine using just 200,000 troops and capture Kyiv with only a small group of paratroopers and an unprotected convoy of tanks advancing toward the capital without firing a shot. For perspective, Kyiv is more than twice the size of Malta and nearly the same size as Berlin. A historical comparison is useful here, during World War 2, the Soviet Union deployed about 2.5 million troops and over 6,000 tanks to capture Berlin a city roughly the same size as Kyiv. Interestingly, the same people who claimed Ukraine was winning and that Russia was running out of troops and weapons also argued that Russia intended to capture Kyiv and all of Ukraine within a three-day operation. |
JerryStellar: ![]() |
Alamkiir:These are undeniably qualities of strong and patriotic leadership that you’ve highlighted in describing Putin. His unwavering commitment to national sovereignty, emphasis on stability, extensive experience in governance, and strategic decision-making all converge in a single figure. Whether one admires or despises him, the way this invasion unfolded prompting nearly all of Russia’s neighbors to unite against it underscores the significance of his leadership. Without Putin’s capabilities, Russia might have fractured and faced a fate similar to that of the Soviet Union. Though he is far from perfect and undoubtedly entangled in various controversies, his influence operates on an entirely different level. |
WriteerNg:I hope Zelensky remains strong enough to resist the temptation of signing away Ukraine's wealth to the U.S. If he does go through with it, he could quickly fall from hero to villain in the eyes of his loyal supporters. What would be the ultimate gain after fighting against your own brother for a distant ally, only to lose your country's resources to that same ally without even securing a true guarantee of protection? Meanwhile, your brother given the opportunity, takes the richest part of your state, and a decade from now, Ukraine could end up under the leadership of a pro-Russian president, undermining everything you falsely claimed to protect. |
JerryStellar:This war has been prolonged due to Zelensky and those who seek to weaken Russia. Russia’s invasion of Ukraine mirrors its actions in Georgia, with NATO expansion being the underlying issue. I see many arguments claiming that Zelensky must defend Ukraine to prevent Russia from capturing and destroying it. However, that claim is highly impossible. In January 2022, Russia had approximately 1,014,000 active military personnel. The invasion of Ukraine began with around 200,000 troops roughly 20% of its active forces. Before Hitler’s invasion of Poland on September 1, 1939, Poland had an area of 388,000 square kilometers and a population of 35 million. Ukraine, in contrast, is significantly larger, covering 603,500 square kilometers, and had a population of about 41 million, making it even stronger. Yet, Hitler invaded Poland with 1.5 million troops and over 1,000 aircraft, launching a relentless bombing campaign that left destruction in its wake. Russia, on the other hand, entered Ukraine expecting a swift resolution, similar to Georgia. It would be misleading to compare Russia’s operation in Ukraine to historical invasions. Russia initially sought a quick roundtable negotiation, but the West had different plans. They even pushed Zelensky to sign a decree banning negotiations with Putin, despite knowing he had just secured re-election. The real strategy was to exhaust Russia’s military strength before deploying Western forces on the ground. Recognizing this, Putin adapted, shifting to a prolonged, attritional warfare strategy that could last a decade. |
JerryStellar:I sincerely like the way you put your statement together. Logically, is the way to go. |
Let's make this thread an interesting one today. To all pro-russian, pro-western, pro-truth and pro-neutral fans here. Given the current geopolitical situation the world is facing today. Would you prefer A Putin or A Zelensky to be your president? Choose one and give me a reason why. |
emmaodet: This is 100% spot on. There are several ways they arm terrorist across the globe. Considering the fact that the USAID doesn't directly fund terrorist from it pocket but rather through a medium to secure pseudonymity. |
WriterrNg: Little Napoleon at it again ![]() Trying hard to stay relevant. ![]() |
Personally, I want zelensky to give Trump and America nothing. You cannot fund wars far from home and expect to reap the spoils of war undermining the deaths and destruction your actions have caused. There's no rare earth for trump and america they can go fvck themselves. I know in the long run, zelensky will succumb to America's pressure. But, if he doesn't, then this will be the only positive thing I've seen from the clown. |
DystopianMuse:Of course. I agreed to your perspective that Europe should do something. They can't continue to be the toothless dogs that they've been for decades. They should teach Russia some lessons, perhaps invading Russia should be the starting point. Capturing Moscow and turning it into a farm land should also be their number one strategic objective, and if any nation dare call for a ceasefire be it the u.s, china, India or Iran, these countries should be nuked to oblivion. This is the best way Europe can show the world they're a collection of ancient Powers and not a collection of jokes. |
DystopianMuse:[color=#006600] Let me guess Another copy and paste ![]() |
WriteerNg:Little Napoleon feeling like this is 1812. ![]() If Putin can prepare a long table before you when your relationship with him have not deteriorate, I wonder the length of table he'll be preparing now. ![]()
|
WriteerNg:Always the Chihuahuas. Unfortunately for them, Trump is not Putin who will overlook this disrespectful act. |
23jerryking: ![]() |
seunny4lif: ![]() |
Regex:The most corrupt nation in Europe for a reason. The lowest IQ in Europe for a reason. I don't feel sorry for them. My sympathy goes to the innocents that did not participate in the orange revolution and are scared of coming out to protest. |
God1000:This is utterly horrendous. It appears you harbor a personal vendetta against President Trump rather than critiquing the negotiating process he undertook. Were you not present when European leaders and other global representatives convened in Switzerland to discuss peace talks regarding the war in Ukraine, all while excluding Russia from the dialogue? Let us refrain from jumping to conclusions. Since the conflict escalated, no European delegation has convened to facilitate peace talks that include both parties. In fact, during their gathering in Switzerland, the discussions centered on safeguarding Ukraine's territorial integrity and expelling Russian forces from occupied territories. A dialogue that seems detached from reality, given Russia's formidable strength. It is important to note that the United States could pursue peace independently of European involvement and still achieve its objectives, provided Russia is willing to end the conflict. The Europeans failed to initiate negotiations during the early stages of the war and also lack the military capacity to prosecute the conflict, relying instead on distant U.S. support. Yet, they seek to sit at the negotiating table with the U.S. to dictate terms for Ukraine. Presently, Europe finds itself in a precarious position, the U.S. is wealthier and more powerful, capable of exerting significant influence over European nations without consequences because the Europeans are dumb. The U.S. instructed them to impose sanctions on Russia, and they complied, fully aware that such decisions would jeopardize their own economies, yet they displayed a lack of foresight. In the context of this war, Europe holds little sway, if the U.S. desires an end to the conflict, it will only materialize if Russia also wishes for it to conclude. But if Russia cease hostilities today, the war would come to an immediate end. I hope you see the difference. |
God1000:I cannot fathom the meaning behind your statement. Is Europe not being exceedingly foolish in its desire for the destruction of Russia? Do you truly advocate for the continuation of European support for the war in Ukraine, a conflict that seemingly leads to the complete devastation of Ukraine, especially considering their reluctance to deploy their own soldiers against Russia? The fact that a sanctioned Russia is performing better than some of Europe’s wealthiest nations is a compelling reason to hasten the negotiations |
Zelensky finds himself in a state of profound confusion. After being urged to partition Ukraine's wealth and allocate a portion to the United States as compensation for the extensive support received for his war efforts, support from which no discernible positive outcomes have emerged from the Ukrainian perspective. Zelensky initially resisted signing such an agreement. However, he now appears to have little choice in the matter. The pressing question remains: why did he not pursue negotiations at the outset of this conflict? He hesitated, swayed by advisors who assured him that he could confront Russia, yet these same individuals are unwilling to commit troops on the ground should the situation deteriorate. After years of protracted fighting, Ukraine has suffered immense losses: millions of lives have been lost, either through death or forced migration, the economy has been severely compromised, critical infrastructure has been devastated, significant territories have been relinquished, and a substantial portion of its natural resources has been depleted. To compound these tragedies, it appears increasingly unlikely that Ukraine will ever gain membership in NATO. |
WriterrNg:What stage of grief is this? |
Now that USAID has been unceremoniously yanked away, I anticipate a long-overdue restoration of decorum and sanity in the months ahead. However, I don’t expect an immediate transformation, after all, I suspect they still have a dwindling reservoir of funds to cling to, like a shipwrecked sailor rationing his last coconut before reality rudely reminds him that the island isn’t getting any bigger. |
WritterNg:Forget about the media propaganda. In real life, these people fear Russia even in their dreams. |
Gbadebo19:All the money invested in your education would have been better spent on purchasing seedlings and planting trees, ensuring that rational individuals could breathe high quality oxygen. Are you unaware that both statements convey nearly the same meaning, depending on their context? By the way, "one step away from madness" signifies that someone is on the verge of losing their sanity. In contrast, "one step closer to madness" suggests that a person is approaching insanity and has already begun exhibiting symptoms of it. The former describes an immediate and almost final state, while the latter illustrates a gradual descent into madness. By your reasoning, engaging in conversation with the Pro Russians here means you are already heading toward madness though you haven’t quite reached it yet but the signs are already evident. Take a look at what I found below.
|
WriteerNg:There are two people I don't take serious on this thread. 1. The fake lawyer. 2. Major general pillock the bright bulb. Taking these people serious is one step away from madness. |
Cancri: ![]() |
Appleyard:They should take Odessa and Dnepropetrovsk and negotiate an end to this conflict. A landlocked Ukraine would hold significant strategic value for Russia in the long run. If, after the war, reconciliation is achieved and Ukraine seeks access to the sea, Russia could grant it on a lease basis as an act of goodwill. Moreover, Ukraine must be fully disarmed once this war ends. |