Masterviolence's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Masterviolence's Profile › Masterviolence's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 (of 61 pages)
Gbadebo19:Your claims without reasons makes me laugh. FYI, Russian forces have captured the strategic town of Kurakhove. This will help the Russians to lunch offensive attacks on the north of pokrovsk creating a pinser formation for attack on your darling pokrovsk. I'll take it upon myself to update you on any strategic development in the pokrovsk direction. |
Lawag3:I am not here to criticize you or your assertions, but this piece seems to lack authenticity. A compelling analysis should reflect a touch of personal sentiment, including the inevitable bias that comes with human perspective. What you’ve presented, however, feels more like a regurgitation of a system's brochure, merely reiterating well-known facts rather than offering fresh, insightful perspectives. That said, I do appreciate the motivation behind your write-up and the effort put into it. |
Gbadebo19:If no diplomatic resolution is achieved upon Trump’s assumption of office, Pokrovsk will face a catastrophic downfall similar to avdiivka and the others. Having closely monitored this war, I have gained a profound understanding of the tactical and strategic methodologies employed by the Russian military in orchestrating battlefield maneuvers. The last time I analyzed Pokrovsk’s situation, Russian forces were approximately 12 kilometers away from the city. However, recent Ukrainian battlefield intelligence indicates that Russian troops are now less than 2 kilometers from breaching this critical stronghold. The shift in Russian tactics has been pivotal. Instead of a direct assault on the city center which would have inevitably resulted in significant casualties, they have adopted a flanking maneuver, targeting supply routes from the south. This strategic adjustment has brought them perilously close to achieving their objectives. According to credible sources, Ukrainian forces now believe that Russia's primary aim is not to seize the city center but to encircle it a strategy that has been employed repeatedly throughout the conflict, albeit with varied and sometimes unexpected outcomes for the enemy. From my perspective, Russia, leveraging its doctrine of maskirovka, should consider opening new assault fronts in the Odessa and Dnipropetrovsk regions. With sufficient political and media hype, this maneuver could successfully divert Ukraine’s military resources away from Pokrovsk. Simultaneously, Russia could redeploy forces from the Kursk region to these secondary fronts as another element of maskirovka, allowing Ukrainian forces to regain marginally significant positions lost during Russia’s previous counter offensives, giving the Ukrainian military a sense of victory before the Russia planned disaster arrives. Such an approach would enable Pokrovsk to collapse like a chain of dominos, consolidating Russia’s strategic advantage. This analysis underscores actionable strategies rather than empty boasts.like yours, providing insights into the complexities of battlefield operations. Cities like Avdiivka and Bakhmut present far more formidable challenges to capture compared to Pokrovsk, largely due to their strategic geographical positioning. The delay in securing Pokrovsk can be attributed to its location; it was situated approximately 17 kilometers,if not more, away from the frontlines when the Russian military set its sights on it. Furthermore, the lack of robust air support has played a significant role, which is why assets like the FAB bombs have not been employed with the same intensity as they were in Avdiivka. Patience is key. Watch closely, and within the next five months, you’ll see if Russia does not successfully seize this stronghold. |
Gbadebo19:Not only glide bombs but the use of every single weapon systems on their side has reduced decidedly. Thanks to limited combat operations. The only part of the frontlines currently experiencing heavy concentration of gun power is the pokrovsk direction. |
Gbadebo19:If you live in Europe or know someone who does, it's evident that the European Union, particularly its big member countries, are facing a significant economic downturn one of the worst in decades. The news paints a clear picture: unprecedented numbers of workers being laid off and countless businesses, both big and small, shutting down each month. It's impossible to ignore that something is seriously amiss, even a tree will attest to this. Yet here you are, trying to defend the indefensible. Ask anyone currently living in any big EU country if they would prefer the pre-Ukraine war prices for goods and commodities, and their response will speak volumes. |
Gbadebo19:When you understand 'PPP' in economics, you'll stop making jest of yourself on this thread. Pick up a book and read. |
WriteerNg:In my entire life, I've never witnessed such a level of incompetence and doofustry perpetuated by these set of European leaders. The United States pushed your energy hub into a conflict that will inevitably drive energy prices through the roof. Instead of pursuing diplomatic solutions, you escalated tensions at the behest of your master, escalating hostility to your own detriment. They destroyed your energy route by physically sabotaging Nord Stream 2. After several sanctions imposed on it. Fast-forward to today, and they seem poised to take control of the very pipeline you built with your partner, forcing you to pay exorbitantly for its use. It's truly astonishing! After Ukraine, Europe especially Germany emerges as the biggest loser in this war. |
Gbadebo19:You really doubt something that I am personally experiencing? It's time you understand that anything or anyone in support of Russia in any western platform is immediately silenced. Same way you'll be tagged antisemitic when you point out Israel's bombardment of Syria all these years unprovoked. Zero regards to sovereignty. |
WriteerNg:Exactly the point. There's nothing feasible personally, that they can point at, to say Russia is what they say it is. |
WrriterNg:Whenever I make an opinionated comment on a less observed topic, the very minute I'll be suspended. I can decide to create 10 accounts today. |
WrriterNg:The dwindling of my activity on this thread can be attributed to constant suspension from nairaland bots. I hope they make changes. Btw, welcome to a New Year. |
Gbadebo19:Why do people always seem triggered by anything related to Russia? Every powerful nation, especially those with many enemies, inevitably has strategic targets in mind in the event of an all-out war. If I were to bring up topics about several leaked documents from the United States detailing plans to strike countries like Iran, China, or Russia, even in scenarios involving a war with only Russia, the conversation would suddenly shift, and the criticism would become invisibly to you. |
nigeriansamurai:I once made a comparison comment about NATO weapons particularly between the U.S and Russia's, and I was banned immediately including deleting the comment I made. I guess they're triggered by factual data. |
nigeriansamurai: ![]() What do you except from the commander of the 44th brigade of the nairaland division. Keyboard warriors ![]() |
Gbadebo19:A media outlet owned by an American. You're not serious. |
freakyamanda: ![]() |
WriteerNg:While the Russian counterparts of this particular weapon, such as the Lancets, are performing remarkably on the battlefield, the American Switchblade drone has earned the notorious distinction of being one of the most ineffectual tools on the frontlines. Similarly, the American JDAMs, deemed practically obsolete in the Ukrainian conflict, suffer from staggering inaccuracies, largely attributed to the sophistication of Russia's electronic warfare systems, rendering them ineffective at an astonishing rate of 94%. Conversely, the mere mention of FAB bombs sends Ukrainian soldiers scrambling for the refuge of underground shelters. Were I to delve into a detailed comparison of the effectiveness rates between U.S. and Russian weaponry, I suspect the bots of this thread would swiftly silence me, likely banning me for days, the usual phenomenon each time I go too deep. |
nigeriansamurai:Bless up man |
shoodboi2:I don't want to be a nitpicker but he is fond of bringing jargons together just to sound intelligent. |
Gbadebo19:If you understand this, why then are your masters always screaming on top of their voices when someone else does the same thing? |
obedience4:You've failed to comprehend my points simply because you expect me to behave according to your perception. I am not a sheep. |
WriteerNg: ![]() Coke is a hell of a drug. Seriously speaking, this man is gone, medically one can clearly see that he's always on something. |
obedience4:Comprehension is often a weakness among individuals who lack the ability to think for themselves. To clarify, I never once compared the platforms in China and the U.S. in terms of direct competition. What I’m suggesting is that creating a homegrown alternative is always best for the sake of sovereignty. Any country that seeks to establish itself as a global powerhouse, now or in the future, will never allow a foreign company to control its national affairs. Not only is this unreliable, but it also poses a security risk. Without being specific, we can see how certain powers raise alarms about national security when a foreign company, not under their influence, begins to gain global traction. Take TikTok, for instance. It’s being targeted simply because some believe it’s connected to China. This is largely because TikTok holds the record for the highest social media engagement rate per post, making it the most engaged social media platform in the world. Similarly, Huawei, a technological powerhouse, was banned from certain markets because it wasn’t part of the Western sphere of influence, like Apple. It was falsely labeled as a security threat, even though the same Western internet infrastructure was originally developed for military purposes before being opened up to civilian use. Smart individuals understand that all Western tech is essentially spyware, but what choice do people have, especially in Africa, where alternatives are scarce? China and Russia have developed alternatives to Western tech both software and hardware not out of competition, but due to concerns about security and reliability. Just months ago, a global outage affecting Microsoft led to the cancellation of over 5,000 flights worldwide, but neither Russia nor China was affected. You see my point? I’m not comparing the U.S. to any other country, as they clearly maintain a technological edge, particularly in the software sector. However, their pursuit of dominance, backed by the power of the U.S. dollar, which gives rise to sanctions, stifles competition from other nations globally. When a country outside the Western sphere of influence creates a competitive product, the U.S. will either force them to sell out or use espionage allegations as a form of blackmail to drive them out of the market. They control global media, and anything they say is easily accepted by those with feeble minds. You might find this as a bias assertion geared towards your masters, but it doesn't rule out the collective facts my friend. |
Appleyard:Mr Gazprom is a well known clown on this platform. Taking him seriously is like pouring water into a basket, no matter how much effort you put in, it’s a pointless exercise that leads nowhere. Whenever I'm in Nigeria , there's no limit to what I can achieve online. |
Gbadebo19:You constantly pontificate on matters about which you have no understanding. When major nations make strategic decisions, you, from a place like Nigeria a country plagued by a lack of visionary leadership and forward-thinking expect these nations to adopt the shortsighted approaches your leaders often employ. For instance, the largest search engine in China is Baidu and not Google. The government prioritizes national security over competition in this sector. To clarify, if a country is deficient in a particular domain, foreign companies granted licenses to operate must comply strictly with the nation’s rules and regulations. Failure to do so will inevitably lead to restrictions. Even your shortsighted country does the same. |
Gbadebo19:I know you can't comprehend. YouTube losing the Russian market means it's a bad thing for them, as revenue will be lost. |
WrriterNg:If I quote disobedience, he's blind arguments can take us there. ![]() |
I hope Nigeria's current administration is preparing for the challenges all West African countries are about to face. By 2025, there is likely to be a major rise in terrorist activities across the region. This has been confirmed by intelligence reports from around the world for months. We cannot afford to be unprepared when this fight begins. God help Nigeria. |
WrriterNg:If putin sit on a negotiation table with the west on the outcome of this war, then putin need to be killed by the people of Russia. Any other option outside the total capitulation of the state of Ukraine will be a grave mistake. |
WrriterNg:Throughout my extensive years of geopolitical analysis, I have observed that we are currently in a transitional phase where those in power increasingly conceal critical information from the public. This has left many analysts appearing uninformed or, at worst, misguided. One topic that has long intrigued me is Russia's involvement in Syria. Opinions on this issue vary widely. Some argue that as a global superpower, Russia’s presence in Syria is a strategic necessity on the geopolitical chessboard. Others claim that Russia’s intervention was a direct response to an invitation from Syria’s legitimate president, making their involvement both necessary and justifiable. However, contrary to these narratives, I believe Russia’s primary motive was the preservation of Assad’s regime but not at it own detriment. Instead, it appears Russia’s role was constrained by the immense resources required to counter the opposing forces’ momentum and strategic preparedness. Turkey, often identified as the main backer of the so-called "moderate rebels," is merely one piece of the puzzle. The real orchestrator behind the attempted destabilization of Assad’s regime, in my view, is the United States. Turkey acts as the visible enabler, but the U.S. remains the mastermind. I am confident that Ukraine is also intricately linked to this larger geopolitical strategy. Although Russia is currently entangled in the conflict in Ukraine, it still retains the resources to support Syria against the "moderate rebels." Yet, recent developments suggest that Assad himself may have conceded his position. Recognizing the corruption within his regime and the futility of further bloodshed, he seemingly opted to relinquish power. The circumstances surrounding the Syrian army's rapid collapse where a force of over 200,000 was defeated by fewer than 50,000 rebels in just ten days are telling. The manner of their retreat, leaving behind ammunition, air defense systems, tanks, and even basic military equipment such as AK-47s and uniforms, suggests either a lack of will to fight or direct orders to stand down. Assad’s refusal to accept reinforcements from allies like Iraq, Iran, and Hezbollah who were the main ground forces while Russia was playing the role of air force in 2015 further supports this theory. The ousting of Assad appears to be a calculated move by the U.S. to stretch Russia’s military resources thin. However, Russia has not taken the bait, likely drawing lessons from the Soviet Union’s costly invasion of Afghanistan. What we are witnessing is a strategic chess game, with the U.S. and Russia actively countering each other’s global influence. For instance, just as Russia played a role in reducing U.S. and French influence in Niger, the U.S. appears determined to diminish Russia's presence in Syria and around the world. Despite these efforts, Russia’s sustained position in Syria undermines the U.S.’s strategy. By avoiding the diversion of resources from Ukraine or Africa, Russia has maintained its influence in the region. Should the "moderate rebels" eventually turn against their backers, a scenario that seems plausible, Russia would likely remain in Syria, observing the fallout with minimal engagement. Looking ahead, I predict that Africa will become the next major theater for regime change efforts. The geopolitical chessboard is shifting, and we are merely witnessing the opening moves. Bookmark this prediction: the U.S will orchestrate a regime change on those Russia backed military jutas in Africa using the countries opposition forces to fight. It doesn't matter if they are terrorist. "When the U.S wants something, they'll try every means possible even if it means sleeping with the devil. |
WrriterNg:I left for a few days and the next thing, Syria has fallen. Stay tuned, my opinion on thing is coming soon. |
