₦airaland Forum

SIRTee15:
U not in any position to teach anybody about Christianity. U very empty and knows nothing about Christianity.
Ordinary bible history, u don't know.
Confusing Antioch for Caesarea.
Mixing conspiracy theories with reality- serapis worshipper.
U need help.

You are the empty barrel that knows nothing about Christianity that comes from Chrestianity..
The book you are basing your life called New Testament was created for and by chrestians.
You don’t even know what “Christ” means.
Followers of serapsis are called chrestians, they are also the ones that burnt down rome.
Basing his life on Roman propaganda, yahweh worshipper.
You need chains

SIRTee15:
Good night. Your case is done and dusted. I warned u to go and learn from bible critics....now see how u've disgraced yourself.

Goodnight yahweh worshipper.
Bible critic that you are yet to send a link of when bart “finally admitted”.
Laughing stock.

The books you are basing your life on were written by Unknown Authors, and none of the authors were eyewitnesses to your Iesus chrestus.
Your Iesus chrestus only exist on the pages of NT.

SIRTee15:
At this point, u just making a fool of yourself. Your claim and evidence is ridiculous.

You are the making a mockery of yourself and yahweh.

SIRTee15:
Show me the name of Herod in the verse.

Who are chrestians?

SIRTee15:
So when u knew u were not going to accept chatgpt why did u tell me to screenshot it?
If I want to wicked to u I'll demand a public apology from u for defamation of character.

I didn’t know chatgpt is this limited.

What do you understand by defamation of character?

[quote author=SIRTee15 post=122814609][/quote]What does chatgpt say about chrestians?

SIRTee15:
I wont allow u hide anywhere even if it's behind one finger

Chat gpt, were followers of serapis ever called Christians?

Read response.

No, followers of Serapis were not called Christians. Serapis was a Greco-Egyptian deity that was worshiped in the Hellenistic period, and his worship was not related to Christianity. Christianity emerged as a distinct religion in the first century AD, and the term "Christian" was used to refer to followers of Jesus Christ and his teachings.

While there were some similarities between the worship of Serapis and early Christian beliefs, such as the concept of an afterlife and the use of symbolic rituals, the two religions were fundamentally different. The worship of Serapis was a syncretic religion that blended elements of Greek, Egyptian, and other cultures, while Christianity was based on the teachings of Jesus Christ and the belief in one God.

F[b]urthermore, the use of the term "Christian" was not widespread in the ancient world until after the crucifixion of Jesus and the spread of his teachings by his disciples. Therefore, it is unlikely that followers of Serapis would have been referred to as Christians.[/b]

Screenshot the chatgpt saying it.

SIRTee15:
I think English language comprehension is part of your problem.
This is the Wikipedia source that you ve been quoting up and down.

It is traditionally translated as "a man from Nazareth"; the plural Nazōraioi would mean "men from Nazareth". The title is first applied to the Christians by Tertullus (Acts 24:5), though Herod Agrippa II (Acts 26:28) uses the term "Christians" which had first been used at Antioch (Acts 11:26).

It says Herod Agrippa used the term in acts 26.28 but had been used previously by other people in Antioch.

It’ was agrippa ll that called them chrestian at antioch.

SIRTee15:
Show me where Herod's name is mentioned in that verse.
U just drowning and holding to anything to safe face. Nobody knows it all but u atheist are something else, u want to proof u are the best and never wrong. Nobody here cares, the only thing we have for u guys is pity.
U guys get caught and u start damage control.
U were wrong on John copying mark
U were wrong on serapis being called Christians
And u wrong that Herod called Jesus followers Christians in Antioch.

You are a pathetic liar, I never said serapis was called christian. Serapis is called chrestus, followers of serapsis are called christians.

John was written by an unknown authors years after mark was written.. where did john get the work he used to write his own? This is basic thinking
Or do you think John wrote book of john.

You theist are always afraid of facts. You’ve been goofing since on here.

SIRTee15:
Paul was standing trial in Caesarea not Antioch.

It was Agrippa ll that called them chrestian in antioch.

SIRTee15:
U obviously reading the bible upside down.
Paul was defending his case in front of Herod Agrippa 2, Festus and Bernice in Caesarea. Read acts 25, I'm not quoting anything.

It was Agrippa ll that called them christian first in antioch, the funny thing is he called them “Chrestians”.

SIRTee15:
He never lived in or governed over Antioch. Antioch was outside of jurisdiction.
He lived in caesarea and Jerusalem when he was king.
His initially ruled Chalcis which is in modern day Syria. Later he ruled over some areas in Galilee and Palestine including Jerusalem.
He had no business with Antioch and wasnt the first person to call Jesus followers Christians in Antioch.
U reading your Wikipedia evidence wrong.

Where was Agrippa ll talking to paul?

SIRTee15:
Herod aggripa 2 never lived in Antioch. He lived in Palestine.

He governs outside of judea.
Can you show me where he lived in palestine.
In AD 66 he fled FROM Jerusalem.

SIRTee15:
In Antioch? That's my question. Did he call Jesus followers Christian in Antioch?

Yea, Agrippa ll was talking to paul in antioch.

SIRTee15:
Definitely not Herod, read the sentence properly. U can ask jaephoenix for help.

It was herod Agrippa ll.

Read!

SIRTee15:
Herod couldn't have been the first to call Jesus followers Christians. He doesn't live in Antioch.

I'm talking about our Wikipedia evidence that talked about Herod aggripa

Herod Agrippa ll was the one that called paul and his followers christians in antioch.
He governs outside judea.
This is a christian site please read, https://www.gotquestions.org/Herod-Agrippa-II.html

SIRTee15:
This is the one I want to share.

In his book "Jesus, Interrupted: Revealing the Hidden Contradictions in the Bible (And Why We Don't Know About Them)," Ehrman writes:

"Despite the differences in detail and perspective among the Gospel accounts, the core message of Jesus and his followers remains constant: God's kingdom is at hand, and people need to repent and prepare for its coming."

He didn’t say anything about manuscript here.

SIRTee15:
But have we settled the matter on the identity of early Christians or u want to argue with artificial intelligence.

Which identity of early Christians? That they were called Nazarene?
Better ask chatgpt about what christ means.

SIRTee15:
I asked chatgpt if Serapis were ever called Christians.
Here is the response:
.

Ask chatgpt about israelite god, yahweh and his wife, Asheerah.
It will fasten the education.

SIRTee15:
Bart Erhman didn't finally admit, he was consistent in his writings that the core message was the same in all manuscripts.
Note, he didn't say it was accurate or true but that the core gospel message was stable in all manuscripts over the years. These has been the central theme in all his works.
Get his book, misquoting jesus, Jesus interrupted, triumph of Christianity. Not sure if their are free pdf.

This is an except from misquoting Jesus, conclusion chapter.

To be sure, of all the hundreds of thousands of textual changes found among our manuscripts, most of them are completely insignificant, immaterial, of no real importance for anything other than showing that scribes could not spell or keep focused any better than the rest of us'
Bert Erhman.

In Jesus interrupted, chapter 2 of the book, titled "The Historical Jesus: What We Can Know and How We Know It," Ehrman writes:

"At the heart of Jesus' message was an announcement that God's kingdom was soon to arrive on earth. This was a time of cosmic crisis, when God was going to intervene in history to overthrow the forces of evil and establish a new order of righteousness and justice. In order to prepare for this coming of God's kingdom, people needed to repent of their sins, turn to God, and live a life of holiness and devotion."

He didn’t finally admit again according to what you said earlier?

SIRTee15:
This statement is wrong, very wrong. U may want to correct yourself.
Even your evidence says you wrong.

It’s right.
Point the evidence out

SIRTee15:
Christianity, on the other hand, emerged several centuries later in the 1st century CE in the Roman province of Judea. The term "Christian" was first used to describe the followers of Jesus Christ in the city of Antioch in the early years of the movement, as recorded in the New Testament book of Acts.

Who was the person that used it to describe followers of jesus?

SIRTee15:
I asked chatgpt if Serapis were ever called Christians.
Here is the response:

Were Serapis ever called Christians

No, Serapis was not called Christians. Serapis was a syncretic deity created by Ptolemy I of Egypt in the 3rd century BCE by combining elements of Greek and Egyptian religion. Serapis was associated with the underworld and the afterlife and was often depicted as a bearded man wearing a modius (a type of Egyptian headdress).

Christianity, on the other hand, emerged several centuries later in the 1st century CE in the Roman province of Judea. The term "Christian" was first used to describe the followers of Jesus Christ in the city of Antioch in the early years of the movement, as recorded in the New Testament book of Acts.

While there were many different religious and cultural influences present in the Roman Empire during this time, including the syncretic religion of Serapis, there is no evidence to suggest that early Christians were ever associated with this deity or called by this name.

So if Herod lived in Judea, how was he able to travel to Antioch in far away turkey looking for those to call Christians..

I said followers of serapis are called christians.
Agrippa was reigning over territories outside of judea.

BloomingDale:
Just go to the internet and Google interracial divorce stats.

Most i see her was talking about usa..
Is your chat only for that country?

[quote author=BloomingDale post=122807913][/quote]Send a link to your picture.
Which country did they conduct the survey?

BloomingDale:
Angry ke? I’m just disappointed cos you guys are failures out of all the races of men.

If you already know we are failures out of all races of men, why you still disappointed?

[quote author=OLAADEGBU post=122808302][/quote]Who told you, the blood or heart came first?
See illiterate talk. “When did the blood evolve”.
What about when saliva evolve?

[quote author=OLAADEGBU post=122808240][/quote]Where did the “body” evolve from?

OLAADEGBU:
The Bible Stands

It’s a pity waiting for a jewish man to come save you and take you to heaven.

[quote author=OLAADEGBU post=122808136][/quote]If we evolve why do you think the evolution started from a whole heart, whole lungs and whole kidneys?
Something evolved into that heart, lungs and kidneys we needed it.
Fish also got what they needed for survival, trachea lol

See what religion is doing to you, laughing stock!

[quote author=OLAADEGBU post=122808001][/quote]Who told you any came first?
Do you attend biology class in school?

When your creator died who was running the world?

[quote author=OLAADEGBU post=122807920][/quote]“Those who say There’s no evidence of hygieia and her sisters must not know what hygiene, cleanliness etc is”
Theist logic