₦airaland Forum

A001:
Yes, I'll also be agnostic and skeptical if you can't provide the evidence for Thanos' existence.

So yahweh worshippers are agnostics?

A001:
Yes, I'll also be agnostic and skeptical if you can't provide the evidence for Thanos' existence.

And also if i say that i am creator of god?
You’ll be a skeptic?

A001:
Ode, am I the one you should be asking what the origin of God is? You should direct your question to religious people that say they know God exists with certainty.

Even religious people are not this dumb.

What’s the definition of this thing that exists?

A001:
Ode, a theist says a god (whatever the name) exists and has so-so-and-so attributes, the agnostic asks for a proof, and since such a proof is unavailable, the agnostic takes his position as a skeptic.

The agnostic position is a response to whatever claims about god that the theist makes without a proof.

It seems it will take you years to understand what's simple as 1 plus 1.

A yahweh worshipper came to meet you and say yahweh is the creator and so and so attributes, the agnostics asks for a proof, and since such a proof is unavailable, the agnostics takes his position as a skeptic. Is that right?

Then if i tell you that thanos has so and so attributes and it exists, you’ll also be a skeptic?

A001:
God is a Yoruba word. Lols, the fool just got to know the origin of the word God and he's asking stupid questions all about to sound intelligent.

Please Tell me more on the origin of the word “god”, so we can know if it’s something that has the ability to exist or not.

A001:
Direct your question to Google. A machine (search engine) of low intelligence may be able to cure your stupidity after all.

Maybe they'll have to break your head and stuff knowledge into it when you're too dumb to understand simple things.

The fool is asking a skeptic to define god for him when the concept of God and his attributes are known to all as stated in religious texts.

Asking stupid questions to sound intelligent, but he's only embarrassing more and more.

Religion texts has different concepts of their gods.
Allah is different from yahweh and yahweh is different from El and El is different from Zeus, Zeus is different from Odin, yet they are all called GOD.


It seems you are using the monotheism concept and attributes of their god.
The god in bible is yahweh
The god in vedas is brahma
The god in quran is allah.
So are you saying you don’t know if allah, yahweh, zeus and over 1000000 gods in various religious text can exist or not?
Is that your position?

You lack the definition of “god”, then how did you arrive that it can exist or not.

Workch:
nope, I don't. It's why I left atheism. I lost

I Just want to know the truth

You never understood the definition of atheism.

Workch:
Stop responding to him, he will continue to repeat whatever he thinks that is correct irrespective of your replies.

First know the origin of the word “god” before thinking it’s something that can exist or not.

When you don’t understand the origin of the word “god” or the meaning you think you are smart.

God is an English word.

A001:
Keep asking me a silly question. I would ignore your posts henceforth because your stupidity is incurable.

Ode, an agnostic isn't the one to define a god or gods because they don't believe in a god or gods. The theist defines what they mean by a god and the agnostic or skeptic takes his position based on a lack of evidence. Simple.

I don't have the time to engage fools.

If the agnostic doesn’t know the definition of god, then why is he saying it can exist or not?
Shouldn’t you know what something is before saying it can exist or not?

What if “god” is a marvel character?

A001:
If you're smart you'll have found your answer here, but keep asking me a silly question.

The average stupid African will see something written clearly in black and white and still be asking a silly question because they don't read.

A god is a title not a person.
Which of the gods can exist or not?

Why do you think a thing called “god” has effect on nature, universe or planet?
Why do you think a thing called “god” is more powerful than a bull?
Why do you think a thing called “god” has the ability to exist?
Is just like me saying thanos has the ability to exist.

Define what “god” is and its attributes.
Are you using the monotheistic definition for “god”?

Workch:
😂😂😂

Otilo, not every atheist is smart o

Atheist from Atheos.
What’s “theos”?

A001:
I don't know what point you're to prove here. Mr divine light, lols, asking an agnostic to provide a proof for a claim they didn't make.

Atheists reject all gods.
An atheist can say alien or santa exist, that doesn’t stop him from being an atheist.
He just reject all gods whether christian god called yahweh or muslim god call allah. Etc

What has my divine light got to do with “god”?

A001:
I don't know what point you're to prove here. Mr divine light, lols, asking an agnostic to provide a proof for a claim they didn't make.

God is a title not a person.
The moment an agnostic say they don’t know if any “god” can exist or not, they have already ascertain that a “god” has the ability to exist.

A001:
Quote the religious text that calls "God" a title and let's see. Religious people don't see God as a title, dumbo.

“God” is an English word.
Which religion original text use “god”? Maybe in the English translation.

Religious people have different deities. A Sango is a god.
Yahweh is a god
Allah is a god.

A god is a title not a person.

Trollronaldo:
mtcheew

God is not a person, it’s a TITLE!

A001:
Keep embarrassing yourself in public, ode. An agnostic should give you reasons why a god can exist when he says the nature of God's existence is unknown.

Better go back to religion. It's where a retard like you can thrive.

You're a disgrace to atheism.

“when he says the nature of God's existence is unknown.” God is not a person, it’s a TITLE!
Oponu, if the thing is unknown then how do you know its called god and it exist, it also a nature?
How do you know all these?

Workch:
you are correct naw 😂😂

Something is unknowable yet you KNOW it doesn’t interfere bwahahahah

it’s superior indeed

Workch:
LordReed, you guys should tell your militant to stop harrasing me with unintelligent replies 😂😂😂

You are the only unintelligent one here.
How did you arrive at a deistic god and his attributes?
Something is unknowable yet you know it doesn’t interfere bwahahahah

A001:
Stop asking me a silly question. Is everything okay with you?

Can you point to where I said a god means a creator? It seems you're imagining things.

I haven't made any claim about the nature of god on this thread. Religious people make a claim about god; if you're smart, you should know where to direct your question to: It's the claimant that'll substantiate their claim with evidence.

Religious people make the claim; they should provide the evidence for their claim. The agnostic says the claim (god) is unknown simply because the theist hasn't substantiated their claim with a proof.

Only a fool will leave those claiming that something exists with certainty and be asking skeptics a proof for a claim they didn't make.

But the religious claims that the theists make of theirVarious gods you agnostics already accepted it, they said a thing called god/deity can exist and is a supreme being.
Agnostics say they don’t know if that thing exist or not, then answer me, why do you think that thing has the ability to exist?

Workch:
the atheist in it is wrong.
It means that you are rejecting it without first disproving it.

Just leave it at agnostic else, na fallacy my guy.

We can also use this same logic for marvel characters?

Workch:
It's not every atheist that is smart.

Some are just following the bandwagon while some are sciolists. Some are just doing atheism because they are looking for reasons to justify their "ungodly" bahavoir.

The most scientific approach to the issue of God is Agnosticism.

Have you read the tanakh and see how a god called yahweh ordered for massacre of kids and women, is that the “godly” behavior?

Like i said agnostics are monotheists that are afraid of religion.

Workch:
Bros abeg leave me, I use diestic god beg you 😂😂

That you borrowed from monotheism? Isn’t this deistic god powerful and the creator that doesn’t interfere?
Then tell me the name. God is not a person, it’s a title.

A001:
Lols, I don't have time for a silly argument. As stated earlier, the agnostic position is a response to the "god" position by a theist.

The onus is on the person making the assertion (which is a mere claim) to substantiate their claim with a solid proof.

Don't waste my time with a silly argument, Mr "divine light", one of Nairaland's dumb religionists.

You yourself said this earlier “ Agnosticism, atheism, apatheism, and similar positions all exist because of theism.“
We also have monotheism and polytheism.
What I’m saying is the definition of god is different from a monotheist or a polytheist.
A sango worshipper is a theist.
A yahweh worshipper is a theist.
A allah worshipper is a theist.

If you claim “god” is a creator and has all this qualities and attributes, you are taking the monotheist definition.
If that’s so, they tell us the name of the monotheistic god.

Mr agnostic, you claim you don’t know if a god like zeus exist.
Why do you think a god like zeus has the ability to exist.

Workch:
Lol, LordReed my guy.

There's nothing wrong in being wrong. Think about it.

That guy properly followed you everywhere you were running to in thr argument. You know that he will nail you patapata if you engage in the deism debate.

Lazy deistic god

Workch:
Mosafejo 😂

The same way you think deistic gods are superior is the same way a yahweh worshipper thinks also.

An agnostic claim they don’t if a god like zeus can exist or not.
They should tell us why they think a god like zeus has the ability to exist.

Workch:
don't argue with a militant Atheist who knows nothing.
He doesn't even under basic science

What are the scientific composition of an omnipresent material?

Workch:
very correct 👍👍

Keep running deistic worshipper.

An agnostic claim they don’t if a god like zeus can exist or not.
They should tell us why they think a god like zeus has the ability to exist.

A001:
My post is based on key scientific facts, and I know as an ignorant person, those facts are garbage to you.

All this is obviously too much for your low IQ, just like calculus is garbage to a 2-year-old.

Before you engage in this sort of discussion and embarrass yourself in public, first read important books on science, especially Physics.

You clearly don't know the meaning of the word "agnostic". Just like a person can be atheistic to a specific god, you can also be agnostic about a specific god or deity or any or all gods.

Stop typing gibberish with confidence. You're embarrassing yourself.

Empty!
Base on scientific facts, then tell me, what are the composition of a omnipresent material?

An agnostic claim they don’t know if a god like zeus exist or not.
They should answer why they think a god like zeus can exist.

Workch:
The thing is,

Deism and atheism is superior to theism.

Deism and atheism fall flat in the face of Agnosticism.

Agnosticism will use each of them against each other to edge both.

An agnostic claim they don’t if a god like zeus can exist or not.
They should tell us why they think a god like zeus has the ability to exist.

Agnostics are afraid of their former religion gods.

Workch:
you are very correct 😂😂

Only fellow deistic worshippers think their argument is superior.
Tell them to tell us the origin of the meaning of god/deity, they fold

Trollronaldo:
what's your point?

Your idea of a thing that is a creator, that has all this power is gotten from monotheism.
Monotheist claim that their variou god can do this and that and give it ridiculous qualities and attributes.

You as a deist, accept that a thing called god is also a creator, you also give it ridiculous qualities and attributes.
How do you know any god is powerful?