Kanunta, Nnamdi Kanu's Brother Blames Simon Ekpa For Killing Of FRSC Officials.
Kanunta kanu @MaziKanuntaKanu
I want to inform @StateDept @UN @BruceFeinEsq @FCDOGovUK that the latest killings of @FRSCNigeria agents has nothing to do with #IPOB. #SimonEkpaGunmen (SEG) are responsible for this atrocities. #IPOB is committed to peace in Biafraland. @Ulkoministerio caution your citizen.
This is the DOS faction of Ipob (the faction that is supported by Nnamdi Kanu's family). Most of the people listed here are members of the Autopiloters faction of Ipob (the faction headed by Simon Ekpa) and Ebube Agu (the security organisation set up by south-eastern state governors). After this list was published, Simon Ekpa made a broadcast in which he accused the DOS of being behind the violence and also accused them of releasing the names of Ipob commanders so that the government can kill them.
IPOB Publishes Names Of Militants, Commanders Behind Killings In South-East
A list of militants and commanders terrorising people of the South-East region has been published by the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB).
This was contained in a statement signed by IPOB’s spokesman, Emma Powerful, on Tuesday, according to DailyPost.
According to Powerful, the unknown gunmen are members of the local Ebubeagu security team and self-acclaimed members of the Eastern Security Network (IPOB’s military wing).
He listed their names as Chibuike Igwe; Paul Udenwa; Okwudili Dim (aka) One Nigeria; Sky from Umutanze Orlu and a man nicknamed 2men from Umuna.
Others terrorising Orlu in Imo State include Chinedu Agbaradu-Amagu commander; Cheta odinkenma – Amagu; Uchenna Nwachukwu; Chibyke Gezek Amagu and Chukwudi Odimegwu.
He further listed impersonators of ESN members in Oru East and Njaba LGAs of Imo State as Akiriko Atta; Kingkom. The impersonators of ESN members in Orsu-Ihiteukwa are, The man called Uru; Sky; No one; the Double lion and a man called Commander.
IPOB also placed a bounty on the head of the aforementioned persons.
The statement added, “IPOB is hereby declaring them wanted, and anybody who can give useful information about them will get a handsome reward”.
It also noted that “IPOB has always told the public that the above-mentioned hoodlums are part of the criminalities going on in our land.
“No criminal should be allowed to demonise IPOB. These agents of darkness and their sponsors should be brought to book to pay for their atrocities.”
We see a clip of Mrs Igwenagu. She is on a street in London as she makes her broadcast. She says (in Igbo), "Ogidi youths, all of you that were involved in the protest, you are like a chicken that laid eggs, but after laying the eggs, breaks them open and proceeds to eat them. This is what you did. All of you are not supposed to be alive".
This is her broadcast from London in late 2021. Her target are a youth group in Ogidi, a town in Anambra State. They had organised a march to protest Ipob's order that people shut down businesses and schools every Monday in solidarity with imprisoned Ipob leader, Nnamdi Kanu.
The Ogidi youth leader was also singled out by other Ipob supporters.
We can see Simon Ekpa making a broadcast. He is saying, ". . .are not known to be coward. Ogidi. . ."
Here is Finland based lawyer, Simon Ekpa, who has thousands of followers.
Simon Ekpa says, "Who ever. . .the president of the youths of Ogidi, who ever he is, where ever that he is coming from and who ever is paying him to bring pump action and start walking on the street, they should retract immediately. He should retract his steps and don't go further with this.
This is not a threat, but it is a fact".
They show the obituary poster of the president of the Ogidi youths association.
A few weeks after these comments, the youth leader of Ogidi was shot and killed. Those responsible remain unidentified.
We contacted Simon Ekpa and Nneka Igwenagu for their comments. Mrs Igwenagu did not reply. Mr Ekpa replied, but declined to give a routine response.
We can see and hear Omote Biafra shouting into the camera,
Go after all these mighty mighty saboteurs. Leave all these saboteur ITK, go with the mighty mighty saboteurs. Go after those ones. Those are the people that need to be beheaded. Those are the people that need to be burnt to ashes. Those are the people that their houses need to be invaded!
It has become a pattern. What happened to Obiora Agbasimalo, the Labour Party candidate in the Anambra governorship election?
The people that are calling for people to be beheaded believe that all politicians, religious and traditional leaders from the East are saboteurs and any wealthy person that does not contribute money to their madness is a saboteur. To them, any government official, like an Inec worker or a security operative from the East is also a saboteur.
Ose Anenih is the son of the former minister of works, Tony Anenih. He was defeated by Lewis Osobase in the PDP primaries for the Esan North-East and Esan South-East Federal Constituency in the House of Representatives.
Ose Anenih @ose_anenih
Thanks for all the support guys; but I found the dreaded delegate hill to high to hurdle.
The experience was priceless; & I’m grateful I went through the @OfficialPDPNig grindstone.
Almost did an Orubebe but thank God for the fear of Twitter dragging.
This is just happening now in Anambra State @CCSoludo
#IPAN have been working behind the scenes for peace and dialog but perhaps maybe that's not the solution. It's becoming increasingly clear we may not be dealing with rational human beings.
Udemzy05: He may be right,how come all this is getting worse since soludo took over?
Because one of the first things that Governor Soludo did was to try and stop the sit-at-home protest. These terrorists see it as a challenge against them and they want to prove that they have more power than the governor. That is the precise reason why they are attacking anything that has to do with the governor.
This is the exact thing that they have said on their social media platforms.
Dorwadora: Good evening ..... I guess it must be quite hard digging 2013 posts out? .
I've wanted to mention you yesterday when you posted some of the circumstances that surrounded the oath swearing issue but I got distanced for some reason .
While it now obvious that the measures and guard taken by the community leader some years ago is not okay by everyone anyone..... Who do you suggest we do?
I wanted to post about 2 threads since Saturday (I slept off on Saturday night while searching for one of them) but I still can't find a particular one.
1) Muslims in the Islam for Muslims section were searching for a solution to this problem. Some of them suggested that threads from that section should not be on the home page. They said that the threads always attract trolls and troublemakers when they are on the home page. Other Muslims said that the threads should continue to appear on the home page because some Muslims might not be aware of the Islam for Muslims section and putting the threads on the home page would create awareness and attract new Muslims (or new members that are Muslims) to the section.
After a lot of argument and back and forth, it was eventually decided to make home page links to threads from the Islam for Muslims section to be invisible to members, but visible to non-members. This was tried for a while and I'm not sure why it was eventually abandoned. (I am searching for the thread in which this was discussed because it is a long time ago and I might have forgotten some of the details).
2) The admin tried a lot of measures between 2008 (when he got that email) and 2014, but every measure met with protests from members. We've gone from
A)To having a single Religion Section for all members, regardless of whether they are Atheists, Christian, Muslim, adherents of African Traditional Religion, etc.
B) To creating an Islam for Muslims section.
C) To having this warning on the Islam for Muslims section: To avoid being banned, please ensure that your post is not offensive to Islam.
D) To having rule 17: 17. Don't post anything that could be considered offensive to Islam, especially in the muslim section.
E) To having the Shahada on the Islam for Muslims section: "I believe that there no god/God but Allah." "I believe that Muhammad is God's Holy Prophet." "I believe that Islam is the Only True Religion." "lā ʾilāha ʾillā-llāh, muhammadun rasūlu-llāh."
Every one of these solutions (and others too numerous to mention) have been met with protests. There are other solutions that were proposed by either members or the admin, but they were discarded because too many people were opposed to them.
The simple fact of the matter is that you will never please everyone and what ever solution you propose will be vehemently opposed by others.
For example, this thread has reminded me of 3 people. One of them is an atheist, the other is a Christian and the last one is a Muslim. These three people believe that it is their duty to provoke, attack and mock anybody that does not agree with their beliefs. The atheist is so disruptive that Nairaland's admin openly wished that the guy would leave the forum and never return. He was so bad that I had to personally take out time to punish him. The Christian was responsible for one of the most insensitive posts that I have ever seen in my life. This guy attempted to derail a thread on which people were mourning! The Muslim believed that everybody should do only what he wanted and that nobody should ever disagree with him. His fight with the admin was one of the most unbelievable threads that I have ever seen.
Tell me, how can you have a solution that would be acceptable to everybody if you have these 3 people on the forum? And there are many more people like that.
The fact is that the demands of Nairalanders are opposing and pleasing some people will always lead to you annoying some other people. Personally, I prefer things the way that they were at the beginning, but that will also annoy some people. Every solution will annoy some people.
For example, believe it or not, all the restrictions that have been placed on the Islam for Muslims section actually annoy some Muslims. They don't want any warning or restrictions on the section because they believe that these warnings and restrictions give Islam a bad name (I actually know one particular fellow that wrote that he would not post on the section as long as there are restrictions on it). Similarly, many people have proposed that there should be a separate Christian section with restrictions on it, but some Christians have protested against such an idea. Besides, the imposition of the Shahada on the Islam for Muslims section has not stopped Atheists and Christians from posting on that section and I don't believe that creating a Christian section and imposing similar restrictions on that section will stop Muslims and Atheists from posting on the section.
Dorwadora, thatigboman1: This is the post that I was searching for. Luckily someone liked it this morning and that helped me to find it.
You can see the email that was sent to the admin. I saw it when the admin originally posted it on Nairaland sometime around 2008 or 2009, but it had vanished by 2013, so I had to take it from a blog. You can see the email and the admin's response to it.
Considering clergy 1 in general, political activity is not their responsibility, but that of the laity.2 Consistent with this, Canon Law not only commands clergy to acknowledge and promote the mission of the laity in the world,3 but forbids clergy to assume public office.4 Granted: clerics may, with the permission of their superiors, play an active role in political parties or trade unions in order to defend the rights of the Church or to promote the common good.5 However, this kind of activity is clearly exceptional, justified only when the laity is unable to act effectively without direct clerical assistance. Such circumstances have existed and continue to exist from time to time in different places, but they do not now exist in Canada.
Bishops 6 do not exceed their authority or competence simply by commenting upon political issues. Faith and morals are a bishop?s proper and primary concern. But marriage, divorce, pornography, abortion and euthanasia are all moral issues which are the subject of intense political debate; so is the just distribution of earthly goods. The Church has not only the right but the duty “to pass moral judgements even in matters relating to politics whenever the fundamental rights of man or the salvation of souls requires it.”7
Neither of these concepts can be narrowly defined. Among the fundamental rights which popes and bishops have defended, for example, one finds private property, life, health, religious freedom, the right to form unions, the right to a just wage and decent hours of work, and the right to be free of excessive taxation.8
The goal is to help shape public policy that is in conformity with the law rooted in our nature that governs us all no matter what our religious belief. Thus, politicians are called to try an ensure that the laws that govern us protect human life, respect the human person, preserve the unique nature of marriage, support family, ensure the safety of children, guarantee religious freedom and make it possible for all citizens to share in the conditions that are necessary for humane living.9
However, here we must try to differentiate politics in general from party politics. In some countries mostly in Latin America such as Bolivia, Honduras, El Salvador, Mexico and others, priests are constitutionally barred from becoming presidents. Many priests in the United States contested for political posts in the past, something the Church frowned at due to the separation of Church and State. In the 1917 Code, it was stated that no clergy should contest for political office without the permission of his competent ordinary or superior. Finally, in the 1983 Code, the clergy were definitively barred from party politics (cf. Can 285 §3). This was an aftermath of John Paul II´s public condemnation of priests holding political offices in 1980.
Hence, the case of Fr. Moses Adasu contesting a gubernatorial post means not being in good stand with the Church. He was later reinstated. This was not the only case. In 2008 when Bishop Fernando Lugo became the president of Paraguay, he was laicised from the clerical state.
He sought the approval of the church to venture into partisan politics. However, the church withheld its approval, quoting section 287, paragraph 2 of the Canon Law, which states that the clergy are not to play an active role in partisan politics or in directing trade unions unless, in the judgment of the competent ecclesiastical authority, this is required for the defence of the rights of the church or to promote the common good.
However, Fr. Adasu insisted and ventured into partisan politics on the platform of the SDP, where he contested in the Benue State gubernatorial elections in 1991and defeated Mr. Ignatius Ayua of the National Republican Convention (NRC). He served as Governor, Benue State from 1992 to 1993.The military interrupted with the administration and Fr. Adasu returned back to the pulpit as catholic priest where he served at Adikpo and Ikyogen.
This is an article by an American priest that explains the situation quite well (this article was written ahead of the 2016 US elections).
Priests have to tell people how to vote, not whom to vote for
Fr. Dwight Longenecker
Aug 11, 2016 CRUX CONTRIBUTOR
They say you should not discuss religion, sex or politics in polite company, so when a priest discusses sex or politics, two of the three explosive topics are on the table, and the third’s there implicitly.
It seems there are two places the faithful do not want their priest: the bedroom and the voting booth. Unfortunately, we cannot turn off our faith once we leave church. A priest’s duty is to advise his flock on every aspect of life-and that includes both sex and politics.
When it comes to politics, there are some clear guidelines. As a private citizen, a priest is entitled to speak his mind about candidates and say whom he might vote for, but he should be clear that he is merely voicing his own opinion.
In a priest’s official capacity, he should speak out against injustice, corruption, violence, greed and lust, and he should speak out against clear violations of human rights on particular issues.
Is is not only a priest’s right, but also his duty to speak out against Nazism, Communism, abusive Capitalism, Jihadism and every other ungodly ideology. Priests should also speak out against particular issues like war, capital punishment, abortion, slavery, unjust wages, and crimes against marriage.
If need be, a priest can speak out against a particular candidate when that candidate takes an open stance on these issues. He must be careful, however, not to speak against the person in particular, but against the candidate’s or their party’s positions.
Priests are called to be courageous witnesses in the public square, and church history is full of priests who have stood up to the powers of this world. Whether it’s Poland’s St. Stanislaus and Jerzy Popieluszko, England’s Thomas Becket, El Salvador’s Oscar Romero, Germany’s Bishop von Galen, they have spoken against the crimes of corrupt leaders and paid the price.
To put it simply, Catholic priests have a duty to tell people how to vote, but not whom to vote for. This sounds like a tightrope, but it is not a difficult one to walk. The rule is that a priest advises his people on issues and principles that inform their conscience as Catholics, and then encourages them to vote responsibly.
As Americans go to the polls in November, most are conscious of the two presidential candidates. Given their records, personal character and party platforms, it is difficult for faithful Catholics to be completely enthusiastic about either.
However, voters should remember that they are not only electing a president. A total of 469 seats in the U.S. Congress (34 Senate seats and all 435 House seats) are up for election. Also twelve states will elect governors, not to mention elections to state legislatures elections for mayor to major cities and a multitude of local elections.
The presidential candidates get the most attention, but great good can be accomplished through the election of reliable and virtuous congressmen/women and local and state officials.
To help American citizens, the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops has published Forming Consciouses for Faithful Citizenship a two part summary which can be used as handouts in parishes and are available on the USCCB website. Pastors and people should make use of these resources in order to choose wisely.
Catholic Bishops ban priests from engaging in partisan politics 12/07/2018
The bishops gave the order following the public altercation that ensued between Rev. Fr. Ejike Mbaka and Peter Obi.
The Catholic Bishop Conference of Nigeria (CBCN), ahead of 2019 general elections, has banned its members from participating in partisan politics including joining any political party. CBCN gave the order on Thursday, December 6, 2018 in Abuja following the public altercation that ensued between Rev. Fr. Ejike Mbaka and the former governor of Anambra, Peter Obi, who is also the vice presidential candidate of Peoples Democratic Party (PDP).
According to the secretary general, Catholic Secretariat of Nigeria, Rev. Fr. Ralph Madu, the bishops condemned the incident that occurred at the Adoration ground, Enugu, adding that without reservation that it does not have the support of the CBCN.
He said, "As has always been our stand, the Catholic church in Nigeria, as clearly stated in their August 7, 2018 directives, remains apolitical and does not support or subscribe to any political party. Our concern is for a peaceful election process seen to be free, fair, credible and just, and a democratic governance that guarantees peace, justice, equity, among others.
"On behalf of the conference, we wish to reiterate their obligation as teachers of faith and morals, to educate the faithful on their role in the political life of the country, mindful of the present charged political atmosphere of Nigeria.
"With the ongoing campaigns of political parties gathering momentum, we deemed it necessary to again remind all priests and religious to keep to the position of the church on the issue of nonpartisan politics."
He hinted that the Enugu Diocese where Rev Mbaka is incardinated is taking the necessary measures on the incident.
Madu added that, by obeying the Canon Law of Catholic, no Catholic priest is allowed to participate in partisan politics.
Mbaka, during a service on Sunday, December 2, 2018, declared that the PDP's presidential candidate, Atiku Abubakawill fail in 2019.
The priest made the declaration following the refusal of the PDP Vice-Presidential candidate, Peter Obi to publicly announce a donation to his ministry.
CBCN Ban Political Endorsements Published: 07 August 2018
The Catholic Bishops’ Conference of Nigeria (CBCN) on Tuesday, August 7, 2018 issued a communique to ban all Catholic Clergy, Major Superiors of Institutes of Consecrated Life, and Lay faithful from publicly endorsing any candidate for political office. In an explicit press release, the CBCN stressed the Catholic Church’s apolitical nature especially with the tensed Nigeria’s political atmosphere.
The Nigeria political scene has seen a trend of key political figures switch alliance across varying political parties and urged their supporters to do same. Having observed all these happenings, the CBCN consequently declared that “no Catholic clergy or religious should publicly endorse any candidate for political office. Liturgical ceremonies must never be used as an opportunity for political campaigns. Similarly, ecclesiastical properties should not be used as places for support for any political candidate or party. All priests and religious should avoid giving the impression that the Church favors one candidate over another or one political party over another”.
Within the same proclamation, co-signed by Most Rev. Augustine AKUBEZE (President, CBCN) & Most Rev. Camillus UMOH (Secretary, CBCN), the Catholic Bishops’ Conference also claimed Nigeria is currently in distress and witnessing a difficult time in its history. Consequently, they went on to urge people of faith to work hard and pray for the future of the country. They also called on Catholics to recite the Prayer for Nigeria in Distress at all masses and other liturgical celebrations.
The Catholic Bishops’ Conference of Nigeria, CBCN, is the organ of unity, communion and solidarity for the millions of Catholics spread across the thirty-six states of Nigeria and the Federal Capital Territory. It is the forum wherein the collegiality of the Nigeria Catholic bishops, as successors of the Apostles in union with the Pope, is expressed and where the idea of the Church as family is signified.
naptu2: Here’s why senior catholic figures are cautioning Father Mbaka (By Naptu2)
(Please, don’t just react to the title of the thread or to what you think the thread is about or to what you’ve heard before. Try and take some time to actually read the posts and understand what’s written in them. Thank you).
Father Camillus Ejike Mbaka has caused controversy in the past 20 years by hobnobbing with politicians and predicting the winners of governorship and presidential elections. This led to serious controversy in 2018 when he had a verbal altercation with Mr Peter Obi, the vice presidential candidate of the PDP.
Many senior figures in the Catholic Church have often cautioned and criticised Father Mbaka because of his political activities. Here are some examples:
Some people have claimed that these bishops only criticised Father Mbaka because they support a different candidate from the candidate that Father Mbaka endorsed. Is this really the reason? Of course it’s not. So what’s the reason for their criticisms?
Basically, their criticisms are based on Canon Law. Canon Law is the code that guides the behaviour of priests and other ministers in the Catholic Church all over the world. Canon Law states that:
Can. 283 (3). Clerics are forbidden to assume public offices which entail a participation in the exercise of civil power.
Can. 287. (2). They are not to have an active part in political parties and in governing labour unions unless, in the judgment of competent ecclesiastical authority, the protection of the rights of the Church or the promotion of the common good requires it.
These sections have always been interpreted to mean that priests must not tell voters who to vote for. They must not get involved in partisan politics that supports one candidate against another, except with the permission of their bishop.
This does not mean that priests cannot be involved in politics at all. Priests can criticise governments, condemn corruption, advocate that government should help the poor, etc. They can also vote in elections, but they must not tell their congregation to vote for politician Y or to vote against politician X. This is because it is believed that the Catholic Church exists to serve all people, no matter the party you belong to or what race you are and so the church must not be seen to be promoting one group over the other or dividing the congregation. Basically, the Catholic Church is politically neutral.
This is the reason for the criticism of Father Mbaka, because he seems to be supporting one candidate over another and this is against Canon Law.
Due to this, the Catholic Bishops Conference barred all priests from supporting politicians ahead of the 2019 elections (see second post below).
After the altercation between Father Mbaka and Peter Obi, the Church issued another warning to priests and banned them from allowing any politician to use any pulpit, altar or church property to make political statements. (see third post below).
This is a very serious issue around the world. The Catholic Church in America also issued directives to priests ahead of the 2016 election over there (so other posts below) and some Catholics in the US also complained (ahead of the 2012 election) that some priests and bishops were using their pulpits to campaign against Barrack Obama.
This is not the first time that the Catholic Church in Nigeria is facing this kind of challenge, neither is it the most serious case.
President Ibrahim Babangida appointed two Catholic priests to the Constituent Assembly in 1989 (this is not against church law). However, one of those priests, Reverend Father Moses Adasu, decided to get involved in partisan politics. He asked his bishop for permission to contest the Benue State governorship election on the platform of the SDP. The bishop (in obedience to Canon Law) refused to grant permission to Adasu. Father Adasu contested anyway and he was excommunicated by the church.
Father Adasu went on to become the civilian governor of Benue State from January 1992-November 1993, when General Sani Abacha removed all civilian governors from office.
Years later, Father Adasu was reinstated as a Catholic priest (the Church is meant to be a forgiving church).
Catholic priest suspended for joining Benue gov race
Kayode Oyero 21 May 2022
The Catholic Diocese of Gboko in Benue State has suspended a priest, Rev Fr Hyacinth Alia, for joining the governorship race in the state.
Alia had picked up the N50m governorship form of the All Progressives Congress and had been cleared by the ruling party to participate alongside 11 successful aspirants in the party’s primary.
But the Bishop, Catholic Diocese of Gboko, William Avenya, in a letter dated May 20, 2022, announced the suspension of Alia from public ministry “after series of admonitions” to him.
Avenya noted in the letter sighted by The PUNCH that “the Mother Church does not allow her clerics to get involved in partisan politics on their own”.
The letter partly read, “I write to communicate to you the suspension of my priest, Revd. Fr. Hyacinth Iormem Alia from public ministry after series of admonitions to him.
“The Mother Church does not allow her clerics to get involved in partisan politics on their own.
“You are aware that my son, your brother and your priest has purchased the party forms to contest for the Office of the Governor of Benue State under the All Progressives’ Congress which is totally against our vocation.
“Therefore, to respond to the spiritual and pastoral needs of the Church in the Catholic Diocese of Gboko, I have suspended him from the exercise of sacred ministry.
“This canonical suspension takes effect from the moment it is communicated to him and lasts until he ceases from contumacy.”
This is not the first time that a Catholic Priest has contested an election for the governorship of Benue State. See the example of Reverend Father Moses Adasu (who was governor of Benue from 1992-1993) below.
Politics › Re: Umahi: Igbo People Are Responsible For Killings In South-East, Not Fulani by naptu2: 2:13pm On May 23, 2022
