|
Christianity Etc › Re: Mr Seun, I Think Now Is The Right Time To Stop Swearing On Islamic Threads. by naptu2: 7:45pm On May 16, 2022 |
OK, I'll try and type this from memory. It's been a very long time, but I'll do my best. The thread that contained this explanation was deleted the last time I tried to explain it, but let's see what happens here. Someone wrote a letter to Nairaland's admin to tell him that he was doing a good job with Nairaland, but to remind him that he was the only person on Nairaland that was well known. The person said that Nairaland was a faceless forum, but the admin was not faceless. The person said that a lot of trolls insult the prophet and this annoys Muslims. He said that he could be calm about it, but he can't guarantee that others would be calm. He said that the people that make these insulting posts are faceless, but the admin is not faceless and that others might decide to take out their anger on the admin. Nairaland's admin came and posted the letter on the site and said that he was going to have to take measures to protect himself and to stop the troll posts against Islam. He decided that he was going to ban all mentions of Islam, the Prophet Muhammad, the Quran, etc. Some people complained that this would be discrimination against Muslims. There were a lot of suggestions by Nairalanders. Someone suggested that he should create an Islam section and only Muslims would be allowed to post there. Nairaland's admin asked how he would know who is a Muslim and who is not. He said that he was not a Muslim, so there's no way that he would know. Aha! I have found one of my old posts. I'm just going to quote it. naptu2: Why =
1) Someone writes Nairaland's admin telling him that, although he is doing a good job with nairaland, he is the only identifiable member of nairaland and that, with the way people are saying offensive things about Islam, someone might put a fatwa on his head.
2) The admin bans the use of the words islam, muslim and any discussion of islam on nairaland.
3) Nairalanders protested against the ban (that it would be discrimination against good muslims who want to discuss their religion) and came up with alternatives. Someone says that the admin should hide any comment that's offensive to islam. The admin asks, "how would I know what's offensive to islam? I'm not a muslim."
4) Someone else suggests that a section that's exclusively for muslims should be created. Non-muslims and those who are against islam should not go there. That will be the only place where islam is discussed.
5) Questions arose: how would you know who is a muslim and who isn't? How would you know what's offensive and what isn't? The final solution was to make a known muslim the moderator of that section.
To be continued. . . . naptu2: 6) Someone complained that christians who unknowingly go to the Islam for Muslims section and make posts that are offensive to islam are getting banned. A christian suggested that a notice should be put in the Islam for Muslim sections alerting people to the fact that they'll get banned if they make posts that are offensive to islam.
7) Someone created a thread in which she demanded that a "Christianity for Christians" section should be created. Majority were opposed to that suggestion. Some said that it would make it seem like christians were intolerant and violent. Others said that it was left to God to deal with anybody who made offensive statements against Him. Someone said that no christian has threatened to place a fatwa on the admin's head. After this, some Muslims created a thread to appeal to other Muslims to stop sending threatening letters to the admin. https://www.nairaland.com/144628/open-letter-muslim-brothers-sistersThe admin also created new rules and added this to them: 17. Don't post anything that could be considered offensive to Islam, especially in the muslim section. Many people created threads to complain about rule 17. They said that it gave Muslims a special status and that Muslims were free to come to the Religion Section and offend Christians, so why should there be a rule 17? Due to these complaints the admin eventually removed rule 17, but replaced it with the Shahada on the Islam for Muslims section. Someone once created a thread to complain about the Shahada, so I wanted to post the letter that was sent to the admin, but I discovered that the thread had been deleted. I found the letter on a blog and posted it on that thread. Anyway, on that new thread the admin said that he placed the Shahada on the Islam for Muslims section in order to prevent violence. He said that there had been cases in which people offended Islam and this led to violence. He said that he wanted to prevent that and that's why he placed the Shahada there. The person that created the thread then said that the admin should create a Christian section and place restrictions on it, but the admin said that Christians have not been known to get violent and that he wanted to protect freedom of speech. Mac had always expressed his opposition to the restrictions on the Islam for Muslim section because he said that it gave Muslims a bad reputation and that he didn't believe that it was necessary. |
Christianity Etc › Re: Mr Seun, I Think Now Is The Right Time To Stop Swearing On Islamic Threads. by naptu2: 7:10pm On May 16, 2022 |
thatigboman1: God bless you plenty. Naptu2, see the man I'm looking for. Maclatunji. That's why I asked you if he was a mod. Mac was the mod of the Islam for Muslims section, but he wasn't the one that led to the Shahada. |
|
Christianity Etc › Re: Mr Seun, I Think Now Is The Right Time To Stop Swearing On Islamic Threads. by naptu2: 6:22pm On May 16, 2022 |
thatigboman1: noo, not naptu2. Naptu2 is a correct guy naa. The one I'm talking about always feature only on Fridays, a big time fundamentalist. Mention Islam or anything negative about islam, he will flay up and start threatening everybody and everything. I enjoyed poking him those days, though I don't insult person or religion. Are you referring to a mod? |
Christianity Etc › Re: Mr Seun, I Think Now Is The Right Time To Stop Swearing On Islamic Threads. by naptu2: 6:22pm On May 16, 2022 |
The original thread that led to the introduction of the Shahada has been removed from Nairaland. I remember the story very well. Someone created a similar thread to this in 2012 and I told the story, but people didn't believe me, so I went in search of it and found it on a blog. I published the story on that thread, but that thread was also subsequently removed. I suspect that this thread will also be deleted if I tell the story here, so I'll keep it to myself. |
Sports › Re: Asisat Oshoala Wins Golden Boot With Barcelona Female Team by naptu2: 6:14pm On May 16, 2022 |
meobizy: Nairaland is always posting her achievements. Why then did she catch depression? Second post. naptu2: She was very demoralised and depressed when she got injured a second time because it seems like she was very hungry for the Pichichi and the injury made it seem like she would not get it. She posted the first tweet yesterday after the game against Atletico.
(Many people didn't understand her tweet when she got injured and some people did not understand yesterday's tweet).
Picture 2: Asisat Oshoala and Rasheedat Ajibade during yesterday's game between Atletico Madrid and Barcelona.
|
Sports › Re: Asisat Oshoala Wins Golden Boot With Barcelona Female Team by naptu2: 6:12pm On May 16, 2022 |
meobizy: Nairaland is always posting her achievements. Why then did she catch depression? It's right there on the first page. She was scoring a lot of goals this season and it seemed certain that she would be the highest goal scorer. Then she got injured and was out for 2 months (she was injured in November and came back in January). Asisat Oshoala Injured, To Be Out Of Action For Two MonthsShe scored a few more goals then she was injured at the Super Falcons camp in Abuja in February. It was the day after that injury was confirmed that she tweeted in frustration. She had only just come back from a 2 month injury and now she was facing another 2 month injury. https://www.nairaland.com/6993500/wafcon-qualifier-ify-onumonus-brace#110349448She came back in April and yet she still won the Pichichi. She tweeted about it again yesterday. Check out the next post for yesterday's tweet.
|
|
|
|
|
Politics › Re: Schools, Markets Shut As Sit At Home Berths In Asaba, Others (Pix, Video) by naptu2: 4:04pm On May 16, 2022 |
fx45: Naptu2 is a government sponsored agent. His brief is to cover Simon Ekpa activities and the Lying Mohammed creation known as Autopiloters Oh God! Why will you stop there? I am not only a government sponsored agent. I am also a BBC sponsored agent! You've also forgotten the fact that the MI5, MI6, CIA, NIA and Shin Bet are involved. Then again, you mustn't forget the Fulani herdsmen. They are also important. In fact, I am being sponsored by everybody, including you. You are my major sponsor! Don't you dare deny it, because I have proof that you sponsor me. That fact has been broadcast on Radio Biafra and Enter Biafra. |
Politics › Re: Full Text Of The BBC Documentary About IPOB by naptu2(op): 3:57pm On May 16, 2022*. Modified: 4:41pm On May 16, 2022 |
naptu2: Do you know the interesting thing about that BBC documentary? The reaction proved the BBC right. Ipob came out with their full troll farm to try and discredit it and shut down people that are talking about it, but they could not defend themselves against any of the issues raised in the documentary. That's because the most damaging issues were revealed by Ipob members.
It was Omote Biafra that called for Ipob members to behead people, burn them to ashes and invade their homes. How will they respond to that?
It was Nnamdi Kanu that told his followers to kill security agents and burn any car they see from midnight till 5am. How will they defend that?
It was Simon Ekpa and Nneka Igwenagu that said that the Ogidi youths do not deserve to live. Shortly afterwards the Ogidi youth leader was killed. How will they defend that?
It was Omote Biafra that clearly said that they were being paid and that she shared the money among the Ipob warriors. How will they react to that?
It was Uche Mefor, a former deputy leader of Ipob that said that Ipob was involved in spreading disinformation and lies and he also told us how it started. What will they say about that?
It was Uche Mefor that said that, "It is not even fighting against the enemy. It is now fighting and killing our people". How will they respond to that?
It was George Onyeibe, a former Africa representative of Ipob, who told us that Ipob has troll farms and that the members of these troll farms are being paid and given phones and laptops to post propaganda on behalf of Ipob. How will they respond to that?
It was Okenna Okechukwu (Biafran Child) that explained that he speaks in his dialect so that his Facebook page would not be taken down. He was telling his followers to behead an Ipob critic and he didn't want Facebook to take down his page for that.
So how can they respond to this. They can't. That's why all you see on this page are people talking about Sokoto, as if it is OK to kill people in the South East just because people are being killed in Sokoto, or making up ridiculous conspiracy stories that the UK, BBC, CNN and in fact the whole world is against them, or you see them insulting people and basically just trying to derail the thread. That is simply because they cannot address the issues that were raised in the documentary. |
|
|
Sports › Re: Asisat Oshoala Wins Golden Boot With Barcelona Female Team by naptu2: 1:46pm On May 16, 2022 |
|
Politics › Re: Schools, Markets Shut As Sit At Home Berths In Asaba, Others (Pix, Video) by naptu2: 1:31pm On May 16, 2022 |
Afonjakid: That's Simon Ekpa not naptu2 The person that you are quoting is an Ipob member. That's one of their tactics, to accuse people of being Ipob members in order to scare them so that they will stop posting about and exposing Ipob (it's not going to work). He knows exactly what he's doing and I know exactly what he's doing, which is why I do not read his posts anymore (I've got no time for nonsense). |
|
Politics › Re: Full Text Of The BBC Documentary About IPOB by naptu2(op): 1:13pm On May 16, 2022 |
MadamExcellency: I am not a ghost that you should accuse and get away without a response.
You accused me in your post of making an obnoxious and infantile statement below which is false [s]What I know is that you said that they were Cameroonian Fulani DSS. Are you now saying that you lied? Who is paying you?[/s]
I never said this nor that
I didn't accuse you of anything, just asking questions.
Secondly, the BBC article you lifted claimed to have contacted the families of the deceased but nowhere did it mention a precise location of these people for verification and they went further to contact IPOB social media personnel on a supposedly hit and paid hit job/junk journalism.
It's s a total shame what BBC has become and how corruption and politics have eaten them up.
What is the significance of the article you posted than taking a hit on IPOB activists and social media influencers? Mtschew. You should know by now that I know exactly what you are doing. OK, let's play this game. 1) The BBC has said that it contacted the family members and gotten a statement from them. Do you have any proof that this is not true? https://www.bbc.com/pidgin/tori-613761322) It's not only the BBC that has claimed to contact them. Others have also claimed to contact them and they got the same statement. Do you have any proof that this is not true? On The Willful Denial Of The Gruesome Murder Of Gloria Matthew & AM LinusBut, like I said, I know exactly what you are trying to do. You are trying to derail the thread. That is the exact reason that I said that we can assume that they are Cameroonian DSS Fulani or whatever you want. Now, can we address the issue that is actually in the article (because as I wrote earlier, no where was the origin of the soldiers mentioned in the article). As I said before, why are you running away from the subject of the thread? What do you have to say about this? naptu2: However, like I said before, this is an attempt to change the subject. Why don't you address what is actually in the post, for example, Omote Biafra saying that people should be beheaded, burnt to ashes and their houses invaded, or Nneka Igwenagu saying that the youth leader of Ogidi does not deserve to be alive (and he was later killed). naptu2: Their usual method on Nairaland.
1) Try to derail the thread by talking about other things.
2) Accuse you of doing the exact thing that they are doing. Some of them will even accuse you of being one of them (that is, being an Ipob member).
3) Try to provoke and insult you so that they can derail the thread with fights.
4) They will cook up conspiracy theories and use their usual misinformation to try and discredit you. naptu2: Now, check out the posts on this thread and read what I wrote earlier.
1) Have they addressed the issue of Efe Uwanogho asking her followers to behead traditional rulers, religious leaders and government officials from the South East? The video of her saying so is right there on the first page. Have they addressed the fact that she said that these people should be burnt to ashes and that their houses should be invaded?
2) Have they addressed the fact that Simon Ekpa and Nneka Igwenagu threatened the leader of the Ogidi youths (who had brought out the youths to protest against the sit at home order)? Have they addressed the fact that that same leader of the Ogidi youths was murdered after Simon Ekpa and Nneka Igwenagu made those threatening videos?
3) Have they addressed the fact that Ipob members in the video admitted that they are being paid to post on social media?
4) Have they addressed the Ipob posts that call for people to carry out violent acts and the posts that celebrate such violent acts?
No
What they have done is to deflect by talking about other things that are not related to the video.
Accuse the BBC, Britain and everybody else of running a conspiracy against them
Insult people. That statement about me making an allegation about you is just laughable. What's the matter? You can't take what you dish? What's the meaning of the nonsense that you wrote about me being paid? I simply repaid you in your own coin, get over it. Now, note this important information, I shall put you in my ignore list if your respond without answering my questions and addressing the issues that are actually in the article. Furthermore, I will report you to the mods if you derail the thread. |
Politics › Re: Full Text Of The BBC Documentary About IPOB by naptu2(op): 1:03pm On May 16, 2022 |
Aidejay: naptu2 you sent them to overdrive this hot afternoon. Multiple accounts activated! Drowned the thread in denial and virtue signaling. I expected that. There are also two other reasons why I expected it. 1) The documentary is not so new. It was initially posted 4 or 5 days ago and Ipob members have been angry about it since then. I have watched as they have exchanged messages to their members, calling on them to report the video to Facebook in order to have it deleted, invade any social media platform that has the video and dominate it, etc. That's exactly why I predicted what they will do and it's why I am not taking them seriously. 2) I created this thread very early in the morning. That's when they are most active. |
|
|
|
|
Politics › Re: Full Text Of The BBC Documentary About IPOB by naptu2(op): 11:42am On May 16, 2022 |
MadamExcellency: Stop acting. It's contained in your post. Moreover, the Military command made a press release to this effect and posted the invite containing the pictures of the bride and the groom.
Just tell us who is bankrolling your services as part of the disinformation campaign.
The most important thing to Nigerian regarding these deaths is to identify the culprits as well as the victims. You don't know more than Southeast Governors that are exonerating IPOB and pointing to politicians. A documentary serves as exposure for details of the dreadfulness and the actors.
Pointing fingers to social media activists, is somewhat taking side with the Nigerian Government who is massacring Southeast youths and burning their villages.
Are you a paid activist? I did not see anything about the place of origin in that post, so what the hell do you mean by it is contained in my post? If it is contained in my post, then go and ask the BBC. If the military high command said something, then go and ask them. What I know is that you said that they were Cameroonian Fulani DSS. Are you now saying that you lied? Who is paying you? However, like I said before, this is an attempt to change the subject. Why don't you address what is actually in the post, for example, Omote Biafra saying that people should be beheaded, burnt to ashes and their houses invaded, or Nneka Igwenagu saying that the youth leader of Ogidi does not deserve to be alive (and he was later killed). There is no where in my post that the place of origin of anyone was mentioned. Don't try and derail. It won't work. If you want to know the place of origin of those people, go to threads where that is discussed. You and I know that there are people that claim to know them and they have created posts and threads about that. naptu2: Their usual method on Nairaland.
1) Try to derail the thread by talking about other things.
2) Accuse you of doing the exact thing that they are doing. Some of them will even accuse you of being one of them (that is, being an Ipob member).
3) Try to provoke and insult you so that they can derail the thread with fights.
4) They will cook up conspiracy theories and use their usual misinformation to try and discredit you. naptu2: Now, check out the posts on this thread and read what I wrote earlier.
1) Have they addressed the issue of Efe Uwanogho asking her followers to behead traditional rulers, religious leaders and government officials from the South East? The video of her saying so is right there on the first page. Have they addressed the fact that she said that these people should be burnt to ashes and that their houses should be invaded?
2) Have they addressed the fact that Simon Ekpa and Nneka Igwenagu threatened the leader of the Ogidi youths (who had brought out the youths to protest against the sit at home order)? Have they addressed the fact that that same leader of the Ogidi youths was murdered after Simon Ekpa and Nneka Igwenagu made those threatening videos?
3) Have they addressed the fact that Ipob members in the video admitted that they are being paid to post on social media?
4) Have they addressed the Ipob posts that call for people to carry out violent acts and the posts that celebrate such violent acts?
No
What they have done is to deflect by talking about other things that are not related to the video.
Accuse the BBC, Britain and everybody else of running a conspiracy against them
Insult people. |
|
Politics › Re: Full Text Of The BBC Documentary About IPOB by naptu2(op): 11:11am On May 16, 2022 |
MadamExcellency: We are yet to know the village of the bride and the families as allegedly confirmed by BBC.
Have you any information on that? You mean that there was a bride and a family? I didn't know that o! I thought it was DSS and Fulani from Cameroon that staged a play. |
|
Politics › Re: Full Text Of The BBC Documentary About IPOB by naptu2(op): 10:53am On May 16, 2022 |
omenka: You've done marvelously well sir. What you've been able to do in the last couple of months far surpasses what our mainstream media put together have done regarding the scourge called ipob.
God bless you. Thank you. |
|
Politics › Re: Full Text Of The BBC Documentary About IPOB by naptu2(op): 10:01am On May 16, 2022 |
I'm going to post it again so that you can assess the posts on this thread. naptu2: Their usual method on Nairaland.
1) Try to derail the thread by talking about other things.
2) Accuse you of doing the exact thing that they are doing. Some of them will even accuse you of being one of them (that is, being an Ipob member).
3) Try to provoke and insult you so that they can derail the thread with fights.
4) They will cook up conspiracy theories and use their usual misinformation to try and discredit you. naptu2: Now, check out the posts on this thread and read what I wrote earlier.
1) Have they addressed the issue of Efe Uwanogho asking her followers to behead traditional rulers, religious leaders and government officials from the South East? The video of her saying so is right there on the first page. Have they addressed the fact that she said that these people should be burnt to ashes and that their houses should be invaded?
2) Have they addressed the fact that Simon Ekpa and Nneka Igwenagu threatened the leader of the Ogidi youths (who had brought out the youths to protest against the sit at home order)? Have they addressed the fact that that same leader of the Ogidi youths was murdered after Simon Ekpa and Nneka Igwenagu made those threatening videos?
3) Have they addressed the fact that Ipob members in the video admitted that they are being paid to post on social media?
4) Have they addressed the Ipob posts that call for people to carry out violent acts and the posts that celebrate such violent acts?
No
What they have done is to deflect by talking about other things that are not related to the video.
Accuse the BBC, Britain and everybody else of running a conspiracy against them
Insult people. |