₦airaland Forum

Welcome, Guest: Register • Login • With Google • Trending • Recent • New

Stats: 3,345,109 members, 8,515,531 topics. Date: Monday, 09 November 2026 at 06:49 AM

Toggle theme

Naptu2's Posts

Nairaland Forum › Naptu2's Profile › Naptu2's Posts

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 1320 1321 1322 1323 1324 1325 1326 1327 1328 (of 2581 pages)

Politics › Re: IPOB Not On List Of Terrorist Groups, Says UK by naptu2: 10:15am On May 07, 2022
It seems it's very difficult for some people to understand simple English. It's either that or they are desperately trying to shift the goalpost. This is what I wrote on the other thread.


I have read it. So? How does it contradict what was previously posted? How does this, "UK Won't Grant Asylum To Violent Members Of Pro-Biafra Groups Like IPOB" mean that the UK has proscribed Ipob?

Can you read and comprehend simple sentences? Do you know the meaning of the word proscribed?

Read this, especially the fifth paragraph.
Good God in heaven! Is this sentence too difficult to comprehend? It's quite simple and short.


"UK Won't Grant Asylum To Violent Members Of Pro-Biafra Groups Like IPOB"


OK, I'll spell it out for you.

In 2021 the UK Government initially published an advice which stated that they would grant asylum to Ipob members. They withdrew that advice after protest from the Nigerian Government. That advice was published on Nairaland.

In 2022, the UK Government published another advice which stated that Ipob has been declared a terrorist organisation by the Nigerian Government and that there have been reports that it has been involved in violent attacks. Therefore, it advised its officials not to grant asylum to Ipob members that have been involved in violent attacks.

Is that too hard to understand?
How does any of that mean that the UK has proscribed (the word proscribe means ban) Ipob (as the former thread claimed) or designated Ipob as a terrorist group (as this thread claims)? English is not that hard.

(I don't respond to childish rantings and I will always report insults to the mods).

Sports › Re: 2022 Women's U20 World Cup: Nigeria Drawn Against France, Canada & Korea by naptu2(op): 8:14am On May 07, 2022
Aystarz:
grin Even Coach Danjuma dares not vouch for these ladies' ages the way you just did.
Let me ask you naptu2, when you see Mercy Idoko, with all her years of experience playing local football in the South, do you see a 19-year old?
As I type, one can't even access some of these ladies' LinkedIn profiles.
1) FIFA now conducts MRI scan on the players (they have been doing so for years). Anybody that passes the scan is of age to compete.

2) It's easy to assemble the players of the Falconets to play friendly matches and bond (because most of them are based in Nigeria). Do you think the Super Falcons can achieve anything when the NFF does not organise friendly matches or training camps for them in almost two years? How do you expect them to compete with teams that play regularly and understand themselves.

This issue of overage players is overrated and is not the problem
Sports › Re: 2022 Women's U20 World Cup: Nigeria Drawn Against France, Canada & Korea by naptu2(op): 7:47am On May 07, 2022
Aystarz:
Two-time finalist at this stage but never a semi-finalist at the senior level tells us one thing :
Na age-cheating dey help us in all these cadet tourneys, male and female!
Not necessarily. The development of players is closer at cadet level, but the developed countries have better facilities and programmes to take the raw talent of the kids and convert them to world beaters, while our NFA/NFF always end up sabotaging our teams (for example, the England team slept in hyperbaric chambers ahead of South Africa 2010, while the Nigerian team had zero preparation for the altitude. Danny Shittu told the BBC that he almost died on the pitch because he had not air. How can the Nigerian team compete in such circumstance?).

There have been cases of age cheating by Nigerians in the past, but Nigerians overhype that issue and believe that every Nigerian player at cadet level is overage or that it is the main problem with our football. That is not true. There's is no way that the Falcons would have gone far at France 2019 with the kind of preparation that they had.
Sports › Re: 2022 Women's U20 World Cup: Nigeria Drawn Against France, Canada & Korea by naptu2(op): 7:08am On May 07, 2022
Do not write the Falconets off. We have qualified from similar groups in the past and we are two-time finalists.
Politics › Re: IPOB Not A Proscribed Organization In UK, Says British High Commission In Nigeri by naptu2: 6:44am On May 07, 2022
Ebubu2:
“violent members”


Are all of the members of IPOB violent ?

The members of the group who can prove they’re not violent shall be granted asylum.
I added this to my last post, since it seems very difficult for you to understand.


naptu2:
OK, I'll spell it out for you.

In 2021 the UK Government initially published an advice which stated that they would grant asylum to Ipob members. They withdrew that advice after protest from the Nigerian Government. That advice was published on Nairaland.

In 2022, the UK Government published another advice which stated that Ipob has been declared a terrorist organisation by the Nigerian Government and that there have been reports that it has been involved in violent attacks. Therefore, it advised its officials not to grant asylum to Ipob members that have been involved in violent attacks.

Is that too hard to understand?

How does that contradict this: UK Won't Grant Asylum To Violent Members Of Pro-Biafra Groups Like IPOB
Politics › Re: IPOB Not A Proscribed Organization In UK, Says British High Commission In Nigeri by naptu2: 6:39am On May 07, 2022
Ebubu2:
…”advises that persons who have committed human rights against the public will not be granted protection”.


I’m certain that that does not include IPOB members who no records or proofs proves they have committed human rights abuses against the public.


In essence, IPOB members without human crimes abuses will not be denied protection.
Good God in heaven! Is this sentence too difficult to comprehend? It's quite simple and short.


"UK Won't Grant Asylum To Violent Members Of Pro-Biafra Groups Like IPOB"


OK, I'll spell it out for you.

In 2021 the UK Government initially published an advice which stated that they would grant asylum to Ipob members. They withdrew that advice after protest from the Nigerian Government. That advice was published on Nairaland.

In 2022, the UK Government published another advice which stated that Ipob has been declared a terrorist organisation by the Nigerian Government and that there have been reports that it has been involved in violent attacks. Therefore, it advised its officials not to grant asylum to Ipob members that have been involved in violent attacks.

Is that too hard to understand?
Politics › Re: IPOB Not A Proscribed Organization In UK, Says British High Commission In Nigeri by naptu2:
Ebubu2:
Ishilove and naptu2 just read this topic
I have read it. So? How does it contradict what was previously posted? How does this, "UK Won't Grant Asylum To Violent Members Of Pro-Biafra Groups Like IPOB" mean that the UK has proscribed Ipob?

Can you read and comprehend simple sentences? Do you know the meaning of the word proscribed?

Read this, especially the fifth paragraph.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 1320 1321 1322 1323 1324 1325 1326 1327 1328 (of 2581 pages)