Nextt's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Nextt's Profile › Nextt's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 (of 21 pages)
jaephoenix:Restrict your questions to the Bible. I will not answer any questions pertaining to the practices and beliefs of several churches that have no connection with what is expressly revealed in the Word of God. |
jaephoenix:First, why did you selectively skip the part where I asked how it all came to be? Your answer about life on the planet venus is horse dung or lazy researching. There is only a possibility of life but it is uncertain. Are the words 'possibility' and 'certainty' synonyms in your dictionary? Life, human life, plant life, don't you know the meaning of life? Venus cannot support either with its hot temperatures and clouds of sulfuric acid below its atmospheres. Please, 'potential' to support life is a huge contrast from 'life found in a planet'. The nebula is a cloud of gas and dust from which the solar system emerged - hypothesis. Are you trying to deceive yourself or your hearers? It is a theory. Besides, if the universe sprang from nothing I guess you are okay with the fact that a cloud of dust and gas sprang from emptiness. You should be the one questioning your knowledge which makes you question everything but accept everything science says without questioning it to the extent of parading theory as fact. |
jaephoenix:Why are you jumping from one spontaneous thought to another without addressing anything that has been answered which leaves gaps of knowledge that should be filled regarding the subject of discussion? That is a character trait of someone who only wants to hear himself. |
jaephoenix:God is the judge of that. He knows your heart and your motives. He will judge that. |
Mumben:Merry Christmas to all nairalanders. Your son is a big man. He arrived in style on Christmas day. May the Lord Jesus Christ bless all his days on earth, and bless you and your family. Merry Christmas. |
Jewessgratitud3:Recall it is where I found him at fault for bringing the matter to public consumption as well as making reputation scarring allegations against his ex. Uncle, I'm sorry to say @ bold that you are the one sounding biased here now. Why would you say the son should have stayed out of it because he said the father was at fault? If he had pointed to the mother, would you have still made this statement? Oh.. now because it's the man, the boy should shut the hell up! Forgetting that the son is also man and would never stab his fellow man at the back if that dad was truly innocent. Abeg leave the boy jare. like someone rightly said, only the children can say the truth of all that happened between their parents.I want to ask, Jewess. Do you think other celebrity families have it rosy with their celebrity parents? So many know it takes a sentence, a word to destroy the fragments binding the family. If family means anything to you you will be unapologetically stingy with the information you feed the public regarding your family's flaws. Besides, Emeka Ike (not taking his side) did not mention he had any issue with his son to justify his son's appearance alongside his mother. Am I biased for suggesting they beat down the intensity with which they are stripping themselves naked through their family feuds? In paraphrase, would you be satisfied to see that your kids and their father's relationship has breaken down irreparably because you needlessly brought them into a fight between you and their father? Whatever the boy said his father said to him can always be sorted privately between him and his dad. Then, what bearing does his issue with his dad have on the matter between his mum and dad? Not saying he should be mute but was that the proper way to go about it? His father will still be his father and there is always room for reconciliation even if it doesn't look promising at the moment but taking this step is widening the gap between where they are and that possibility. It is easy to tell the boy to air his father's flaws to the world but if your family ties is as thick as that between you and a distant neighbour by all means bring down the hammer on your relationship. They don't need any round table discussion for the womans safety Biko and Emeka is not ready to forgive from the look of things. So let everyone go their separate ways and let sleeping dogs lie otherwise Emeka should be brought in for questioning as to why he's reopening a "forgotten" issue and what he plans to achieve by doing that.Perhaps, but I hope you know you are critically judgemental regarding Emeka Ike. His side of his story has easily been discounted because his ex-wife refuted his claims while their son spoke up regarding separate issues he has with his father. I am a neutral observer in their case and have not formed any opinion because truth is fragile and can easily be drowned out by the voice of the person who speaks louder. Time will tell. I come in peace.I know you do. Merry Christmas to you and have a wonderful celebration. |
Jewessgratitud3:Jewess, there is only one reason I will make a reply to this post of yours. You have a reputation to me of being brutally honest and sagacious in your posts. Things I admire a lot, but I will implore you not to toe the path of biased and gender-bashing nairalanders (whether male or female). When I read their comments I never dignify them with a reply. I don't know who is weaving lies between Emeka Ike and his wife. All he said was refuted by the wife. I mean all. Even then, the wife made claims that Emeka Ike has always denied. One of them is lying. I won't judge until the facts are clear and the truth is out. concerning the son, he should have stayed out of this drama. He claimed he wanted peace but he is damning his father publicly. How can a person seek peace and pour gasoline on gradually erupting flames? Again, all families (excluding none) have their challenges but they many of them wisely put a blanket over their marital problems and try and sort them out privately like Omotola Jalade did with hers. The only action I would blame Emeka Ike for taking is spilling more information about his ex-wife than was necessary. They need a round table to discuss their past, their grievances, forgive each other and move on with their respective lives. |
LordReed:I have told you. My answer to you was not pulled from the air. It is in His Word. Six days He created the world. He could do that in the blink of an eye but He rather chose to do that in six days. He rested on the seventh day. Without a thinking cap you will say God creating the world with His words is hard work such that He needed rest. That is another mystery connected to why He views a day as a thousand years and the other way round. That is too much for your mind to relate so I just inserted it as a piece of info but you won't ever connect the dots. Nobody made it, which is the point. Your god remains an unevidence proposition. Saying that because scientists cannot replicate something proves a god is just as childish as saying Superman is real because no one else can fly faster than a bullet.In the same manner, demanding testable, observable evidence of the reality of everything as if all reality must fall under the scope of empirical evidence is fallacious thinking. It is like saying if I cannot see consciousness, hear consciousness, touch consciousness, or test consciousness in a lab then consciousness is not a reality. Really? With the powers you attribute to your god why is it taking the advent of human technological progress to effectively spread his message? Why doesn't the god use his ocean creating powers to flood the earth with his message? It doesn't happen because your god is as real as Superman, existing only in the imagination and pages of a book.God has entrusted the work of the Gospel to man, to those who come to Him. The Bible says He did not entrust this work to angels otherwise you would see angels preaching and not needing slow means of transportation like planes or vehicles to travel round the world. The gifts and callings of God are without repentance. You meaning the stupidity of the idea that this god wants everybody to know something but instead of making everybody know by himself, he's just gonna fold his arms and wait for human beings, the same human beings he has already condemned as worthy of destruction, to do all the work so he can blame them for failing. LMFAO! It doesn't take rocket science to see just how bad of an idea some of these things are. Just low down stupid ideas.The carnal man cannot understand the ways of God. Everything is coming to full circle and will not miss a fraction of his calendar of events that He has set in His timeline of events. Besides, if God did that why then did He have to give the gifts of the ministry and make many Apostles, Prophets, Evangelists, Pastors and Teachers? What master does the work of a servant? Do you have a househelp and still perform the duties of the househelp? We are ambassadors of Christ. We represent Him on earth. Is the concept of being an ambassador foreign to you? Without technology your so called word of god would have evaporated like many of the pre written word civilizations before. Your religion is the beneficiary of a series of human actions and inventions, it doesn't make it more special, the same way you aren't more special than all the people who died last night. Being the beneficiary of good fortune or fortunate circumstances doesn't make it true a god exists or make those fortunate circumstances the work of a god. One only has to read a wide breath of human history to see that if a god existed and was orchestrating anything, the god must be insane. I on the other hand realise it is all the doing of humans, no gods required.The bolded is really funny 😄. What human actions and interventions? Is it the intervention of the slaughter of hundreds of millions of Christians through the ages that still persists today? Is it the persecution and imprisonment of an unknown number of Christians to prevent the spread of the Word of God that you call interventions? Today, the Bible is the most widely read book in the whole world. No one is forcing you to believe in God. That choice is yours and yours personally. But we won't fail to warn people of the consequences of neglecting God's outstretched arm of salvation through the death of His Son on the cross. The consequences are dire. It is the same way Noah built an ark but this ark of salvation was neglected by the people of his day who must have kept reminding him for the 75 years or so that he built the ark that he was delusional and that nothing had happened since he warned them decades back. That was until it was completed and God shut the door of the ark with Noah and his family safely inside. God is waiting for the completion of the number of saints in heaven before He unleashes His judgment on a disobedient world. |
LordReed:In other words, something can come from nothing, right? I know it is humans that do all these things because I know humans do it and not natural processes, that is how we distinguish between what we call natural vs what we call artificial. On one hand it can be demonstrated every day of the week and twice on Sunday that these are human creations while the other hand you cannot demonstrate in any meaningful way that a god has done anything. We know it is brushstrokes that are paintings because these are techniques developed by humans, you cannot tell me the techniques your god supposedly used to make anything. All you'll continue to do is make the claim, you are unable to evidence it.That means no painting is made through natural process. A human must be behind it. If, then, it takes humans, an intelligent class of species, to design a work of art that is admirable, logical, has order how then can the planets, sun, stars and the universe requiring more complex knowledge and skill than painting come about through natural process? Are you not shooting yourself on the foot? The Bible is a collection of stories some of which contain reflections of the cultural settings the stories are based in. Stories are not evidence or else every tale ever told is just as equally true as any other which is obviously not true. Your bible is not any more evidence for anything other the culture of its time than Cinderella or Grimm's tales. In order to show me that the Bible is true you need evidence outside of the stories. And one feature of stories is you can make them mean almost anything. The same book you claim says the world is a sphere is also the same book people say it is flat also quote so between you and them who is correct? Only external evidence can show who is correct. Simply saying something is true doesn't make it so.Talk full of air. Where in the Bible is it said that the earth is flat? Please quote the chapter and verse in the Bible that said the earth is flat. You have ignored the fact that the book of Isaiah was carbon dated to around 800 BC. This means it is almost 3000 years old. Even if the Bible was a collection of stories, you cannot be blind to the fact that it casually gave information that humanity had to wait thousands of years to be able to verify with technology. The Bible is replete with scientific facts that no one can contradict or refute. It is pulsating with accuracy. The prophecies of the Bible concerning the future are seen to be manifesting before your very eyes. Before 1948, there was no nation called Israel. In fulfillment of Biblical prophecies they returned to their land in ships as the Word of God declared and became a nation in 1948. Do these things sound like fairytale to you? The only way to be certain of anything is to have material evidence in my opinion. We have memory tests, we have intelligence tests, we have MRI that can show the brain at work and how it corresponds with your thinking process but you want me to ignore all of this and accept your conjectures based off of the writings of more primitive people. No thank you sir. I will stick with science and the results it produces, your conjectures don't count for anything in comparison.You are just telling me how the brain functions. To this day, science cannot tell why we sleep. Can you? That shows you that truth and evidence do not always agree. Show me the imagination, not the brain at work. That is what I required from you. The human brain has been studied for centuries now yet no scientist can objectively monitor what a person is seeing in their imagination. What is the evidence that a person sees a man in white skirt and brown fur coat in his imagination? Is it with MRI scan? Lol. The only reason you can say outside time and space is because of science. The primitive writers you base your beliefs on thought heaven is in the sky which was why the tower of Babel was gonna intrude on the god's territory and he had to destabilize the plans of humans. Of course science can't prove an imaginary sky fairy that doesn't exist which is why you retreat your god to a place that cannot be investigated. Unfortunately for you, your insistence that a god is responsible for anything puts the onus on you to demonstrate it because you are insisting that this timeless, spaceless god is doing things in time and space. That means there must be evidence of the effect of this god's actions. Yet all the most prominent things the god supposedly did cannot be evidenced. It's not me who is being fallacious and shallow.@ the bolded - lies. Lies with the properties of ignorance. There was no matter or space or universe until God created it. There was no measure of time until it was created by God through as Day and Night in verse 3 of Genesis chapter 1. He also created the Sun, moon and stars to give light and to act as measurement of time in seasons, days and years. Isn't it ignorance to think God dwells in time and space, and then created it? Science has nothing to do with that. It is said that the universe began from a tiny matter or energy that exploded popularly known as the Big Bang theory. The fact is it is just a theory you wholeheartedly accept as true without investigation or question. For example, what was the moment before the Big Bang? If energy cannot be created or destroyed how did the energy that exploded materialize from nothing? What caused the explosion? The Big Bang theory only addresses evolution of the universe, not its creation. What about the law of entropy which is the second law of thermodynamics? It clearly refutes the theory of the Big Bang. According to it, without an external force, a system or natural process will find disorder or entropy staying the same or increasing as time goes on. This clearly sinks the idea of order arising from randomness. Of course there are other theories but there lies the issue. You have no evidence for the explanation of the universe and yet you say it is the only way you can objectively verify anything. This is exactly what God said in His Word that He will catch the wise in their own craftiness in Job 5:13. LMAO! DNA is a chemical, a protein, they simplify the language used to describe it has confused people like you into making these kinds of childish conjectures. Dude we used to use chemical formulas to spell our names back in secondary school, it would be stupid to claim that because I can spell a name with chemical notation it means that thing exists.Of course, the chemicals or acids, adenine, cytosine, guanine and thymine are the four building blocks of the DNA which contain the genes that determine what is and what will be. They are paired with each other this way; adenine with thymine (A-T) while guanine is paired with cytosine (G-C). A DNA molecule is made up of two segments known as double helix. In each segment, the acids held together by hydrogen bonds connect with the sugar and phosphate backbone to form a nucleotide which forms a spiral staircase. These segments form a bridge in a particular sequence. A bridge is formed, 10 segments later another bridge is formed, 5 segments after another bridge is formed, 6 segments later, then 5 segments later a bridge is formed. This pattern, according to my research, keeps repeating in this pattern. The number sequence 10 5 6 5 represent the letters YHWH in Hebrews which is also known as Yahweh. Can you refute this discovery? Please paste it here for all to see. And again, please use the ATCG base pairs to spell your name if you can like you claimed. |
Dtruthspeaker:My brother in Christ, we are not called to insult unbelievers. Preach to them having the fear of God. Let your gentleness be known to all men. May the good Lord guide you as you consider these words. |
jaephoenix:Simple, the accuracy of the Word of God cannot be swept aside with argument or denial. Look into the Quran, or Hindu religious texts you will see erroneous depictions of the earth as well as history that is shrouded in mystery. Not so with the Word of God. In Isaiah 40:22, it says God sits enthroned above the circle of the earth. This is more than 3000 years before the exploration of man into space. If the text had said otherwise you atheists would have found extreme pleasure in dragging believers with that very verse, but now you have found it accurate you have become mum. Does your god, the Spaghetti Monster, or Allah, Krishna, etc have any such accuracy to their name? Wait, it gets even better. The Greeks believe the earth is carried by Atlas on his shoulders. The Muslims believed the earth was flat according to their book, and there was no indication of what the earth looks like in outer space. Not so with the Bible. In Job 26:7, it says He spreads out the northern skies over empty space; he suspends the earth over nothing. The book of Job is one of the oldest books in the Bible. It is more than 3000 years old. We are only able to know this through the satellite launched to space and the earlier space exploration. In the time of Job, there were no such mechanisms. How much more accurate can that get? Wait, there is more. In verse 5 it says: The earth, from which food comes, is transformed below as by fire We all know that tectonic shifts or plate motion is the reason for the formation of continents from one super continent called Pangea. This tectonic shifts arise from the heat in the earth's crust which also causes earthquakes. That way, the earth is being transformed. Now, Job was not a scientist. This text has been around for millenniums. This tells you that God exists. There was no way for mere men, without advanced science as we have today are accurately able to specify facts that agree with empirical evidence today. Lastly, Archeological discoveries have never contradicted the Word of God. Rather, they have proven the accuracy of the texts in the Bible. This points I have raised are incontrovertible proof that God made all that there is. |
jaephoenix:Did Jesus heal every blind person, every deaf, every mute, every paralytic He came across? He healed only those who had faith to be healed. The miracles of God are not like magic you can learn by purchasing a Magic Made Easy Guide or Do It Yourself Book of Magic. Without faith, nothing happens even if a person prays for months. |
MrPresident1:Calm down, boss. Spiritual veil of blindness can only be lifted by God. I engage with them in the hope that the mercies of God may find them as they found me. I am not better than them. I have only seen the Light which I hope they see, too. |
jaephoenix:So, your definition of 'salvation' is keeping someone (anybody who calls himself a Christian) from dying and being buried? Let me understand your train of thought. Are you actually saying that salvation means God will keep destruction from the world and keep people or Christians from experiencing death or persecution? |
jaephoenix:You claim to be scientifically inclined but this question proves otherwise. The presence of a product is evidence of a maker. What other evidence do you need? Can order arise from random occurrence? Throw ingredients into a pot and let egusi soup with its distinct flavour merge from the random mix. It is scientific ignorance to think every kind of reality is subject to obversable method of verification. Please, while you are at it, give me evidence, testable, observable evidence of the imagination or human mind. |
Donsheddy:Winner o o o winner Winner o o o winner Donsheddy you don win o winner Kpatata you go win again o winner 🇳🇬 😄😄 |
realone12:Without a doubt he is a verified skilled and successful trader. |
LordReed:Please reread the post I made in reference to the bolded to verify whether I asked the question or not. When you see a work of art, a paint or picture you do not ask who painted it but you subconsciously accept the fact that a painter is behind it. The painter may be anonymous, he may be dead or alive, he may be black or white. You don't care or seek evidence of a painter behind a paint because you know brush strokes cannot move on their own to create a logical picture. You just know someone is behind it though that someone may not be known to you. You can admit testimonial and documentary evidence in the court of law but when it comes to the bible you consider it hogwash. This double standard is glaring. As with the painter, who may leave a note through an agent to verify his ownership of the paint such written evidence is admissible or considered authentic enough to lay his claim to the paint. This is exactly what happened thousands of years ago before any exploration into space was made, He who formed the earth said it is a circle in His Word. A manufacturer has a manual of how a product or device operates. The bible is also God's manual of his creation. Galileo would have been saved the stress of proving that the earth is round if only he had simply made reference to the book of Isaiah. It is gross fallacy to think empirical evidence can match every kind of reality. For example, do you have any explanation for how the imagination can be objectively observed? You can't see mine neither I yours. Does that mean it doesn't exist? Science can tell there is imagination but cannot prove it. Maybe you can provide the empirical evidence of memory, consciousness, and morality. On the nature of the existence of God, who created and exists outside time and space, asking evidence of His existence is simply shallow thinking. Scientific methods used to verify the existence of anything is severely limited to phenomena subject to time and space. It is like fitting the entire universe into your little laboratory. As impossible as it is there is more hope for that than to fit God, who created the universe and exists outside it, into observable, testable methods. It is like looking for the evidence of the presence of a matchbox company in the matchbox product itself. Lols. Finally, an artist signs his name on his paint. That is his badge. You can read this last bit up and make your findings. DNA mapping has been discovered to include the name of God in every living thing. The numerological DNA sequence reads YHWH in the Hebrew language. It is encoded in the DNA of all living things. That is the artist signing His work. |
Nairaland should disable comments on frontpage threads to reduce online ethnic clashes to the barest minimum. |
Bathroom should be trending on X |
LordReed:It is easy to say the gravitational pull of the sun causes the movement of the earth. It is easy to say nuclear fusion of hydrogen atoms to form helium is the reason for the sun's self-sustaining energy over billions of years. That is like saying a car moves when the engine burns fuel and converts the heat of the fuel into traction by which the car can operate. What company designed the car? If I wanted a sun or moon with my name on it and customized to my desire where do I go to have one made for me? What designed it? Did the sun create itself? Did the earth create itself? Did life create itself? If so, why is life absent on other planets we know? These are the questions you have skipped skillfully. |
LordReed:You have artfully dodged the question. The Word of God said a thousand years is like a day in the sight of God and a day is like a thousand years. Going by that, two days (two thousand years) is well within the context of 'soon' or 'quickly'. You can't deny knowing how people usually describe the passage of weeks and months as fast by saying, "Days are fast!". It is not even two days (two thousand years). The issue here is you said he hasn't returned since then as if He gave a specific timeframe. I hope you will specifically point that fact out, and leave no room for guesswork, not by hanging your argument on an abstract adverb - 'quickly' Yes, your god seems to be waiting for technological innovation to spread his message. It wasn't your god that made the ocean going ships that brought Christians from Europe to Africa, the Americas, Australia and the Pacific Islands. That took more than a 1000 years after Jesus had died for that to happen. Why?Who made the waters for the ships to sail? Can you or any scientist living create an ocean? Do you have the technology to create a star like the sun much less billions of stars in the galaxy? Who made the heaven for the planes to fly? Can you create the clouds to give rain and float in the sky? Every cloning attempt has suffered fatal failure following a very short spell of success. You think creating man and animals na beans? Why can't your scientists replicate the feat? I cannot begin to highlight the complexity behind the 'simple' creations you see that makes your so-called planes, ships and technological innovations look like primitive devices in comparison. The wisdom with which God created the comet, the galaxies, the planets, the seasons - which one can primitive science accomplish? The technology alone to make the earth from nothing is trillions of light years away from what science is able to achieve and can ever dream of achieving and you gloat on the use of ships and plane. Gosh. Lol. Like the Being who created the seas needs your wooden or metal ships to cross the seas? Lol. This error of logic is beyond me. There are many places civilisation has already shone and yet the god still hasn't passed his message across, who shall we blame for that? A universe creating god that created everything in a week needs 2000 years of human progress before he can achieve this spread of his all important message? Please.And there are yet many places still living in the darkness of ignorance. God is a just and righteous God. God does not count time the way you do. After the fall of Adam, He did not send Jesus immediately to die for the sins of mankind. It would take more than 5,000 years later for the Lord Jesus to appear from the time of Adam. When the Israelites were enslaved by the Egyptians God waited 400 years to send a deliverer to them. If the Lord Jesus had returned before now, how would the prophecy about the Antichrist and the completion of the third temple in Israel be fulfilled? We see that already happening in our time but the end will not be until this is done. God has laid a calendar of events that must be fulfilled before the end. That is the reason for the delay besides His mercy and grace of repentance. Lastly, before technology God spread His Word; without it His Word will still be spread by leaps and bounds. Nothing can hinder its progress. Nothing and you know it. |
Geovanni412:You deserve your space and peace of mind. Can't wait to see you return. Just make sure you take all the break you need. Next year will be greater by God's grace. |
Geovanni412:Boss, ha fa na? What happened? You just went ghost on us. Hope you are good. |
GabsonFX2:Congrats, brother. More grace and success all the way. |
LordReed:No one said God is depending on any technological advancement to have His Word spread to all the earth. Phillip was translocated to the path of the Ethiopian Eunuch so that He could explain the scriptures to the Ethiopian. Paul went by ships to different nations to preach. Besides, I also mentioned people where the light of civilization has not shone. Do they read books, watch TVs, surf the internet? In the midst of this technological advancement, there are billions without formal education. Many must have heard the word preached in the language they can understand but books and the internet are useless in propagating the gospel to reach this class of people. Again, you mentiond 'nearly 2000 years of history...' as if Christ gave a timeframe of His return and has failed to do just that. I will like to see that evidence now if you don't mind. |
LordReed:Exactly my point. How did it come to be? Can the process be replicated? Why is the earth rotating on its axis and making a revolution round the sun which we call a year? A car moves and we know why but the planets also move and what fuels their movement? Why does earth support life but other planets don't? Is it a random occurrence or random selection? What made the sun, the earth, the stars? What governs their movement? Can you explain any of these? |
FRANCISTOWN:The same God who has reserved this world for fire? You talk about war, famines and pestilence. These are just the birth pangs of much greater destruction to come. The real destruction is doing press up. Fire, the kind that will guzzle the whole earth with everything in it and still be hungry is on its way, reserved, and you are lamenting about mere war and destruction. God will not exercise His power to appeal to your false sense of righteousness. Your (all men's) righteousness is like used and overused rags in His sight. As long as there is sin there will be destruction. That effect is only a cosmetic solution to present danger. God will not use His power to erase destruction while sin, the source of destruction, continues unabated. It is exactly like spraying perfume in an environment of garbage dump (sin) to eradicate a stench (destruction). The pleasing aroma lasts only seconds butnit won't take long reality will set in because the stench from the dump persists. This is why the world is reserved for fire to burn up the refuse (the world and all those who have rejected Christ). Until then, God is giving the grace, as long as you still breathe, to change your ways and turn to Him. |
LordReed:A pretty bold thing to say. You and I may die in the next 50, 60 years and Christ may not have returned by then. Why? The Gospel must first be preached to everyone in the world including those who are cut off from civilization. Secondly, the prophecies that precede His return have not come to pass especially the prophecy about the mountain of God (Christianity) being exalted above the world's system of living and His last effort to reach mankind by sending His Spirit of repentance to the whole world so that people will cry in repentance to Him without needing a preacher. As it is appointed for each and every one of us to stand before Christ in judgment, so shall His return. It is appointed and there is no going back. His delay is His grace of repentance to the world to turn from the sins that decay them to His light of salvation. |
LordReed:The very same thing Satan told Jesus, "Turn these stones into bread if you are the Son of God". He knew Jesus is the Son of God. Oga, God is not your entertainer and the works of God are not done for entertainment. You say God does not exist. The Bible says that you can't deny His existence as you are without excuse because God's invisible nature is seen in His created order. You are daily surrounded by it. You know that God exists but shut your ears to the truth. It beats me how anyone can witness Day turn into Night and the seasons follow each other without overtaking and at their appointed time, the wisdom that formed them has never been explained or duplicated by science to this day, yet the same person says something created it, not someone. Lol. |
jaephoenix:Sure, Christians should just wave their bibles like magic wands and everyone will be instantly healed. No need for the sick to have faith and repent from their sins. No need for them to seek God. They should also wave their bibles and Nigeria's economic woes will disintegrate in seconds. Everyone will be happy. No more sickness and suffering in Nigerian and the world all over. Yeah, we Christians can make the world a paradise on earth with our magic wands. |
FRANCISTOWN:Many man people die from malaria, HIV/AIDs, headaches, etcetera despite the advancement made in medical science over the centuries. Their deaths don't stop you from absolutely trusting science. Their deaths don't make you question the relevance or importance of medical science. You blame God for the death of millions of jews but you are ignorant of what He said in His word that nation will rise against nation, kingdom against kingdom. He said there will be war, famines and pestilences. You confuse your sentiments with God's agenda for mankind. Did God say in His word that He came to stop genocides from occurring? Did He say He has come to put a stop to human suffering on earth? You atheists like to quote the state of affairs to back up your claim of the non-existent nature of God, or the cruel nature of God if He exists. Nothing can be further from the truth. That brings me to another matter. The Op also asked who created God if God created something. Will address that in another post. |
Hahahahahahahahaha Loser no fit find any valid argument to make!