Dijita: Are you saying a student graduated from university in 1985 and this is all the proof you can muster. No picture in graduating gown with some of his class members.
What are you saying?
I have never worn gown in my life, even though i have done, BSC, PGD and Masters (I changed field)
I never attended any matriculation or convocation even though i'm always present in the environment. Its not a must, my friend.
I need design suggestions for a Guest House with this given details:
Total Land Size - 50x100ft Number of expected Rooms - 8 rooms, all ensuite, Type of Building - Bungalow Other information - Reception Area with Restroom, Mini office, Other suggestions are welcomed.
Easyinfoguide: UPDATE 🚨: You Asked, I Listened (Over 7,000 Views Already 😳)
I honestly didn’t expect this post to get this much attention, but wow... Over 7,000 people have viewed it in less than two days. That tells me one thing — many Nigerians are seriously looking for correct info on how to legally process the tinted glass permit without wahala.
Now, based on the questions I’ve received (over 50+ messages and counting), I want to clear a few things for everyone following:
✔️ Yes — the Police Tinted Permit is still active and free to apply for online. ✔️ Yes — you can apply yourself, but there are some technical steps that usually confuse people (especially the medical report part, document upload, and appointment issues). ✔️ No — you don't need a “connection” if you follow the proper process, but you do need to be careful not to make mistakes that delay approval or trigger rejection.
Can a Medical certificate from a private clinic work or must be a government Hospital.
What to prepare before applying • Your NIN • Car particulars (valid and matching) • A medical or security-related reason for needing tint — especially in Lagos • A scan of your driver’s license • Your medical report (not just anything written, a proper one o)
Once you gather these, you can start the process from the police portal. If done right, you’ll get your Application Code and move through the approval stages. Some people even get the full permit within 3 to 7 working days.
Again, I’m not here to “sell” anything — just to guide and share what I’ve already tried myself and helped others with.
If you’ve started but got stuck, feel free to drop your experience or question below. I’ll reply based on what I know or have seen work.
Let’s keep the thread clean, helpful, and avoid spammy posts so it doesn’t get removed again. 🙏🏽
callmeDDD: Trust me, she will file for part or share from that money sighting that she contributed to the lottery success. She won't give up without a fight even if she will lose. Just wait and see. No be American women again?
See, forget, Nigerians are only rich on social Media but suffering in real life.
Before you will earn 500k on any job, aside from the very few lucrative ones, you will have between 8-10 years of experience with a Masters' degree.
A university lecturer don't even earn up to that amount in a month.
Also, lots of Masters student in Nigeria go for Masters because they don't have a job. If not that Peller was condescending, 500k is a very good salary.
emkz: If this is true, how come the order on her contempt is not binding that she appealed it?
According to the CTC released by the court, some points are reproduced below.
What the judge clearly said is that the suspension was excessive. She then advised the senate to utilize their own powers to review and amend the provisions of their own rules which she considered excessive and overreaching.
She finally said she believed the senate has the power to recall the plaintiff, and she believes they should do so. Please where is the specific order there? Let us express it commonsensically: "I believe Peter Obi has the power to amend his position from 2023. For balance, I am of the opinion that Peter Obi should amend his stand and deputize Atiku so that their merger will be optimum". Please is that an order binding on Peter Obi or a friendly advise that Peter Obi is not liable to take?
Natasha, try and resume please.
By the way, they asked her to publish an apology in two national dailies and Facebook. She has refused to do so.
Due to her stubbornness, she might spend that six months suspension and even more.
Senate suspended activities to honour Buhari. After that, they'd proceed on their two month vacation.
Natasha is incorrigible. Therein lies her fundamental issue.
The judgement was an Order.
On the first page, after the list of Lawyers you see JUDGEMENT ORDER then followed by the list of what the orders are. What it means is that all the items under that Topic is an Order.
Also, the Judgment clearly states that the suspension was excessive, and stated that she should be recalled.
I dont understand why people are defending what the court has said it excessive. This issue has also been trashed several times.
It looks like the major problem with Nigeria are actually the masses and not the Politicians.
If the court has said something is wrong on different occasions, why is the Senate still doing it and you find people defending that same thing?
How is someone's stubbornness a problem, is been stubborn against the law?
Wallade: I can bet you have never been to court room before and you don't even have a lawyer that advises you on legal matters. That explains your ignorance and ineptitude.
To make your situation even more ridiculous, you are on nairaland trying to prove that you are knowledgeable on legal matters but it is so obvious that you are shallow in the mind and know little or nothing about basic processes in litigation matters.
Okay back to the matter that you are trying to dodge.
What do you understand by the summary or brief of the judgement that you have seen or read.
Please quote the source of your summary version.
Don't dodge this one, if you do then you should shut up on this matter going forward.
Moreover, your madam Natasha Apoti did not show up at the Senate as promised yesterday. Did she start to reason properly owing to some brain reset or.......
Madam Natsaha has since resumed her duties. She does not necessarily need to go the National Assembly, wherever she is, she is a senator, recognized by law, No permission required from internet urchins like you. She has already defeated you and your lords, and she maybe need to drink some water on the victory as you people go about to bury your heads in shame.
The matter was clear from the beginning, legal intellectuals like us already know where the pendulum will swing and yes, what the court said was not surprising at all.
As i have been schooling you, the judgement is not out, the judge only gave a recap which is not all clear but what is certain is that Natasha is going back to the senate and urchins have been put to shame. What more evidence are you looking for, this is how you people fail your exams, i have posted a video of the lawyers of both National Assembly and Natasha on National TV, what evidence are you looking for. They confirmed it was a summary as i said, but you are still arguing. Please learn to pause, listen when smart people are talking so you can pick one or two things to enrich yourself, don't be proud.
Natsaha has defeated your bosses, That is the most important thing.
Stop being confused and uninformed. It is okay if you don't know much about legal proceedings, just ask about what you don't understand so it can be explained to you.
The judgement is out already.
The judge must have read the judgement out to everyone listening in the court on that day.
Upon the final judgement, both parties lawyers can request for the Certified True Copy (CTC) of the judgement, by applying to court to print and issue the CTC copy to them, for them to study and understand the extent of the judgement and determine if an appeal is needed or accept the judgement.
The unsatisfied party has 3 months to appeal the judgement after which the judgement becomes binding on both parties.
Point of information: the judgement is pronounced and out already. It is the CTC that the parties involved can apply for subsequently.
However, from that brief that you probably read, what did you deduce?
Or would you want to laugh at your own ignorance and ineptitude now?
Lol, you that dont know anything want to teach someone that is more intelligent, schooled and informed than you.
Its the audacity for me.
Let me take a little time to educate you, Judges don't necessarily need to read out all the judgement, they could give a summary of the judgment and then release the copy of the full judgment later which was what happened in this case. You are not informed and you don't want to admit that you are not.
Yes, the full judgement is not out, and that is why parties are contemplating on the exact thing that the judgment stated, they are not sure yet until they get hold of the judgement which of course includes what the judge considered to give judgment. This is the interview by the Lawyer of Natasha https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sVSWhUePhLk, this is the interview on channels between Senate lawyer and Natasha https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VvNrenAJYGE
Both lawyers are not 100% certain of what the judgement is because it was only a recap in court.
Wallade: I asked you to read it, it is available on the internet and you have the data to do WhatsApp, Facebook and other things on internet but you don't create the time to educate yourself before misleading and misinforming other people on internet.
If you want to remain illiterate about some matters, that is up to you but to come on public platform to argue about something you lack information about is ridiculous and despicable, to say the least.
If you are expecting me to copy and paste it here for you, you are wasting your time.
Lol, now I catch you.
The judgement has not been released yet.
The judges gave a brief of the judgement in court but the full judgement is not out until this week.
Wallade: It is you and some media organizations, maybe sponsored ones, that think it is in her favor.
In my opinion, the court didn't opine that she can't be punished. The court expressly recognized the powers of the Senate to punish disorderly senators.
Go and read the court judgement
Did you read the judgement? What did the court say?
Wallade: You will be abreast with the news as it breaks:
The Senate will not reduce or terminate the suspension.
I can bet that the Senate will file an appeal. The Senate will:
1. First refuse her entry into the chamber or resumption in office. 2. Take almost 3 months to study the judgement. 3. Appeal the Judgement in a court of appeal, if need be, or assume there was no binding order of the court on the Senate to terminate the suspension.
This case may run till the end of Natasha's tenure as a senator of the FRN.
Mark my words!
OK, senate lawyer. But they have not appealed yet. If they do, they will loose again.
It's established already, you cannot suspend a legislature for more than 14 days, the court has declared severally.
Dino VS house of Reps Omo Agege VS senate Ali Ndume VS Senate
Etc.
She's resuming already, the issue of terminating suspension is out of the way. Find something meaningful to say
Wallade: The court has no such jurisdiction to determine the activities of the Senate.
Make no mistake about that, fbe Senate has its rules and regulations, if a senator goes contrary to the rules, there will be consequences, that is the fate of Natasha.
She must take responsibility for her actions and pay the penalty.
Did the court excuse her offence? Did the court say the Senate can't punish the disorderly senators?
Take some time to think objectively on the subject and stop being emotional about it.
Lol, the court has done that already by saying that she should resume her duties and that the senate does not have power to suspend her for six months.
Yes, the court can rule on those rules if they are contrary to the provisions of the constitution.