₦airaland Forum

Image123:
Someone asked me if it was proper to ride a bike without safety helmet. Same question, same answer. No, nahhh, it is not proper.

Image123:
From your link, it clearly showed that trousers belong to the masculine gender. A few quotes.

"Despite being worn by both sexes in ancient times, trousers were a “masculine” garment for hundreds of years. Instead, women wore long, voluminous skirts.

But, in the nineteenth century, women started wearing a form of trousers again. These were worn only for horse riding, although they wore full skirts on top of them to keep them hidden.

By the 1880s, women in the West finally started wearing trousers for leisure activities. They were safer to wear when cycling, as the trousers were far less likely to get caught in the wheels. They also allowed greater freedom of movement. Additionally, they were considered healthier to wear than the cumbersome skirts they usually wore.

Yet, despite their increasing popularity, trousers weren’t considered acceptable women’s attire until the 1970s."


BTW, trousers were worn in the Bible far before your link dates.

missimelda01:
Any woman that wears a man's trouser is maybe insane

There are trousers meant for women only
Don't confuse yourself brethren, stop trying to be an assistant Jesus. I come in peace

Righteousness89:


Who defined what you put on?
Who Defined how to Eat to you?

I Believe God Created us with "Common Sense"

Emary:
The first recorded reports of trousers were made by sixth century BC Greek geographers. They noted the appearance of Persian, Eastern and Central Asian horse riders. The comfort they provided from extended periods on horseback made trousers a practical choice.

Images of male and female horse riders wearing trousers can be found on ancient ceramics. You can see an example of this on the vase to the left, depicting an Amazon woman. - [url=https://kingandallen.co.uk/journal/2016/a-brief-history-of-trousers/]A brief history of trousers[/url/].

Righteousness89:
The Bible is clear on that!
Deuteronomy 22:5
Revelation 21:27

We all know what is Men's Clothing!
We all Know what is Women Clothing!

We Live in a Generation where we love to DECIEVE ourselves, Modify the Truth and Give Reasons for what we wanna do..

GOD is Almighty! HE is not a Man! No Man/ Woman Can DECIEVE Him. HE is Coming!He will Judge according to our Works..

Revelation 22:11-12
11 He that is unjust, let him be unjust still: and he which is filthy, let him be filthy still: and he that is righteous, let him be righteous still: and he that is holy, let him be holy still.
12 And, behold, I come quickly; and my reward is with me, to give every man according as his work shall be.

jmoore:
There is no mention of the word 'TROUSER' in the Bible.

Jones4190:
The reason why I said that women should not wear trousers is that we read “A woman shall not wear a man's garment, nor shall a man put on a woman's cloak, for whoever does these things is an abomination to the Lord your God” (Deuteronomy 22:5). 
there is no reason provided for this rule, but it occurs within a series of rules about public behaviour and respect for others, so it is probably a rule against breaking down accepted sexual barriers to the detriment of social attitudes about purity and respect between men and women. This is certainly a biblical principle.

In the New Testament, Paul writes that...women adorn themselves in modest apparel, with propriety and moderation, not with braided hair or gold or pearls or costly clothing, but, which is proper for women professing godliness, with good works. (1 Timothy 2:9-10).

The biblical principle is that, in whatever culture we may live, we should observe high standards of public decency and especially keep our dress standards free from any overt and tempting sexual message.
the Bible is direct when it come to things like this

jmoore:
Trouser covers unclothedness.

Skirt is 'risky'. Someone might peep from below.

Jones4190:
no because the bible said no

xaliujokes:
Interested, pm sent