₦airaland Forum

+

TO KNOW THE LAW IS FAULTY

If the Accusers can use the Law to find fault or condemnation against the righteous and blameless, it means the righteous can also find fault in the Law. If you intent on following this to the end, then understand it's about how to know existing Laws are faulty Laws themselves and abusive/abused Laws. Ways to know if a law is faulty/dysfunctional:

●1● Relationship between the Law and Righteousness:

[1 Timothy 1:8-10 web] — "But we know that the law is good, if a person uses it lawfully, as knowing this, that law is not made for a righteous person, but for the lawless and insubordinate, for the ungodly and sinners, for the unholy and profane, for murderers of fathers and murderers of mothers, for manslayers, for the sexually immoral, for homosexuals, for slave-traders, for liars, for perjurers, and for any other thing contrary to the sound doctrine;"

If the Law is against righteousness or against relationship between the righteous and the Most High God, then it's a faulty law. Examples, the Law condemned the most righteous Man in all ages to death just because the righteous Man told the truth of His relationship with God, saying, “I am the Son of God;” and the Law condemned Him for blasphemy. Another example, the Law condemned a righteous and faultless man, Daniel, to death by being thrown into the Lions for dinner because the righteous man prayed faithfully in relationship with the Most High God above the king.

●2● Relationship between the Law and Life:

[Proverbs 13:14 AKJV] — The law of the wise is a fountain of life, to depart from the snares of death.

It not about the nature of the Law, but about the relationships with the Law and those the Law favors against the others. A Law maybe holy and good in nature, but in relationships the law favors death, not life. Example, the Law of Moses gave life to sin than it gave life to people:

[Romans 7:9-14 LBP] — "Formerly I lived without the law: but when the commandment came, sin came to life and I died. And the commandment which was ordained to life I found to be for death. For sin, finding occasion by the commandment, misled me and by it killed me. Wherefore the law is holy and the commandment holy, and just, and good. Has then that which is good, become death to me? Far be it. But sin that is exposed as sin and works death in me for that which is good, will be the more condemned by means of the law. For we know that the law is spiritual: but I am of the flesh enslaved to sin."

●3● Relationship between the Law and Liberty/Freedom:

The use of the Law supports condemning sin in the Law, by the Law. And many condemn sin in the law that condemns the sin; but their flesh is weak. Then the Son of God, Jesus Christ, came and did what the Law could not do or do it differently from how the Law does it in condemnation. He didn't come to condemn the world, but that through Him the world may be saved: however, He came to condemn sin to take away the sin of world as the Lamb of God.

To take away the Sin of the world without condemning the world in the process, He did not condemn sin in the Law, rather He condemned sin in the flesh: Do you know the difference between both?

He did not condemn sin in the Law or by Law; infact, in the Law or by the Law, He was made Sin for us and became the Sin condemned in the Law Himself for us: For in the Law, Cursed is any man that hangs on a tree: and He was hanged on a tree (cross) in crucifixion.

Therefore, the Son of God did not condemn sin in the Law but became sin in the Law, and yet He loves righteousness and hated sin, making God to anoint Him with the Oil of Gladness (Joy) above all His men and angels. How did He hate or condemn sin, when He did not condemn sin in the Law or by the Law?

Example: A woman caught in adultery was brought to Him, and the Law condemned her or stood to be condemned in the Law or by the Law of Moses. But the Son of God did not condemn her in the Law or by the Law. But after He made the Law useless or powerless to condemn her, He told her “Go and never sin again.” Thus, He hated her sin but would rather condemn her sin in the flesh, than in the law.

[Romans 8:2-4 Web] — "For the law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus made me free from the law of sin and of death. For what the law couldn’t do, in that it was weak through the flesh, God did, sending his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh and for sin, he condemned sin in the flesh; that the ordinance of the law might be fulfilled in us, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit."

Did you see “Condemned sin in the flesh” in that Bible reference? Before then, did you see ‘made me free from the law of sin and death?

True Liberty or Freedom sets you free from the bondage or captivity of the Law, but the same Liberty condemns sin in the flesh. If the Son of God sets you free, you are free indeed; but beware of the flesh in your freedom, for He condemns sin in the flesh. So, freedom has new foe, which is the flesh works against the Spirit, not the law as before.

[Galatians 5:13-21 web] -"For you, brothers, were called for freedom. Only don’t use your freedom for gain to the flesh, but through love be servants to one another. For the whole law is fulfilled in one word, in this: “You shall love your neighbor as yourself.” But if you bite and devour one another, be careful that you don’t consume one another. But I say, walk by the Spirit, and you won’t fulfill the lust of the flesh. For the flesh lusts against the Spirit, and the Spirit against the flesh; and these are contrary to one another, that you may not do the things that you desire. "But if you are led by the Spirit, you are not under the law. Now the deeds of the flesh are obvious, which are: adultery, sexual immorality, uncleanness, lustfulness, idolatry, sorcery, hatred, strife, jealousies, outbursts of anger, rivalries, divisions, heresies, envy, murders, drunkenness, orgies, and things like these; of which I forewarn you, even as I also forewarned you, that those who practice such things will not inherit God’s Kingdom.""

These works or deeds of the flesh are among the sin He condemned in the flesh.

●4● Relationship between the Law and Healing/Deliverance:

It appeared the Law of Moses condemned Healing and deliverance on the Sabbath day. Imagine the Healer and Savior becoming handicap to heal or deliver His own on a Sabbath day just because of a Law. Or imagine the king of kings then, with all the power God gave him over the earth, could not rescue or deliver the man he loved and wished to deliver, not because the king lacks the power or authority or means to deliver him with just a single word of his mouth, but because of a law.

(Daniel 6:14 - CGV) — "Then the king, when he heard these words, was intensely displeased, and set his heart on Daniel to deliver him; and he labored until the going down of the sun to rescue him."

(Daniel 6:14 - LBP) — "Then the king, when he heard these words, was very much grieved, and made up his mind to deliver Daniel; and he labored till the going down of the sun to deliver him."

♨️♨️♨️♨️♨️♨️♨️

In this Main Bible verse in Red, the king of kings with the highest powers and authority and dominion in the entire world could not do:

■A■ The king displeased himself, couldn't do as He please for a law:

Looking at it from this Bible reference below, makes it even alarming:

[Ecclesiastes 8:2-4] "I say, “Keep the king’s command!” because of the oath to God. Don’t be hasty to go out of his presence. Don’t persist in an evil thing, for he does whatever pleases him, for the king’s word is supreme. Who can say to him, “What are you doing?”"

Can a king, even a king of kings have such power, supremacy and still be impotent or unable to do as he please? That's doing of a faulty Law

■B■ The king labored till the going down of the sun to deliver Daniel and laboured in vain:

Can a king of kings that has all things in the world, at his command all nations of the world bring him whatever he commanded, still labor talkless of laboring in vain, just to stop a man from being death Sentence? That's doing of a faulty Law.

The Faulty law was not just against Daniel, but also against the King himself. Before he signed and endorsed the that Law, he was seeing himself as a god who had all powers to grant all requests, and to whom all prayers and petitions must be forwarded to in 30 days. Now, he had signed the law, and he's caught here, he now knows how hard or difficult for him to grant his own single request or petition to deliver a man from the law. So, the king who claims to be god of prayers for 30 days by law, suffered and labored grant his own prayer for deliverance from the same law that empowered his claims.

SCHEMING TO POSSESS THEIR AWOL BROTHERS’ ESTATES

In the first half of “Ezekiel Eleven,” the LORD and the Spirit of the LORD both spoke against or over what Jerusalem Cabal were saying or thinking about themselves and the city.What were they saying or thinking about themselves and the city, addressed in the first half?

●1● They were saying/thinking:
“The City is the Cooking Pot and Meat inside it.”

But the LORD and the Spirit of the LORD addressed that “saying or mindset” with the prophecy of Ezekiel as the Spirit gave him to say.

………

In the second half of “Ezekiel Eleven,” the Word of the LORD spoke against or over what Jerusalem people were saying or thinking about themselves and the entire land of Israel.What were they saying or thinking about themselves and the entire land of Israel (the promised land), addressed in the second half?

●2● They were saying/thinking:
“The Rest of the Israelites (Northern Israel or Samaria) were cast out into captivity/exile far from the LORD, and therefore they (Southern Israel or Jerusalem) will automatically inherit or possess the land.”

But the LORD and the Word of the LORD addressed that “saying or mindset” with the prophecy of Ezekiel as the Word gave him to say.

………

(Ezekiel 11:15 - NIV) - "Son of man, the people of Jerusalem have said of your fellow exiles and all the other Israelites, ‘They are far away from the Lord; this land was given to us as our possession.’

(Ezekiel 11:15 - NKJV) - “Son of man, your brethren, your relatives, your countrymen, and all the house of Israel in its entirety, are those about whom the inhabitants of Jerusalem have said, ‘Get far away from the Lord; this land has been given to us as a possession.’

♨️♨️♨️♨️♨️♨️♨️

It's like a man wishing or rejoicing that his brother is gone and never coming back either soon or alive, and therefore the man claims even his brother's properties as his own, calling himself landlord over both his own properties and his jailed/lost brother’s property.

You see the people who were in Jerusalem were feeling they're better or more righteous than their brethren that were arrested and taken into exile/captivity. Recall that when Ezekiel was prophesying, one of the twenty-five Cabal died, and Ezekiel cried to the Lord in protest, saying, “Lord, will you completely destroy the Remnant of Israel…”

Note how Ezekiel called the people of Jerusalem, “Remnant of Israel” and that was the second time: while the first time he said similar prayer was in Chapter 9:

[Ezekiel 9:8 BSB] - While they were killing, I was left alone. And I fell facedown and cried out, “Oh, Lord GOD, when You pour out Your wrath on Jerusalem, will You destroy the entire remnant of Israel?”

So, Ezekiel saw Jerusalem people as “Remnant of Israel” or the hope of Israel, just as those who were in captivity with Ezekiel saw their brethren in Jerusalem and were praying for them in captivity. But while the Northern Israel (Samaria) in captivity in Babylon wished their brethren at home Southern Israel (Jerusalem/Judah) well as the Remnant of Israel, who remained in the land of their father when they were taken away from there; those in Jerusalem (Southern Israel) did not share mutual feelings for their brethren in captivity, but instead saw them as brethren taken into prison far away from the Lord and are never coming back, making them possess their lands and wish they never return again.

So, in the main Bible verse in Red, the Word of the LORD revealed to Ezekiel what those he was praying for as so-called 'Remnant of Israel’ were saying or thinking about Ezekiel and his people that were in exile behind their backs. So, as Ezekiel knew this about them, I don't think Ezekiel bothered to ever pray for them again calling them their hope or remnant of Israel. They were claiming “One Israel” with those in Jerusalem, whereas those in Jerusalem no longer count them Israel, but as the lost or Samaritans that became mixed with Gentiles.

How would you feel if after something that happened and kept you away for so long, you return home thinking your brothers are longing for you, but realize they wished you never returned and had divided your properties or taken over your house? The brother of the prodigal son never wanted the prodigal brother to ever return. You think a man's brother cannot be this wicked to drive him away or keep him away as Joseph's brothers sold him away into slavery in Egypt? Read:

[Isaiah 66:5 AFV] — Hear the Word of the LORD, you who tremble at His Word, "Your brethren who hated you, who cast you out for My name's sake, said, 'Let the LORD be glorified.' But He will appear to your joy and they will be ashamed."

A man's foes shall be members of his own household. But this may not be the case with you and your brethren until the Lord reveals their heart to you as He does to those He will protect from wicked brothers.

As for we Christians, the Lord warned through Paul that we should not say or think about Israel like Jerusalem were saying or thinking about Israel in the main Bible verse in Red. We must not gloat or glory over them because they were cast off so that we might be grafted into the Tree instead of them: It is still their inheritance and also our inheritance in Christ, for God will bring them back again:

[Romans 11:11-23 NKJV] — For I speak to you Gentiles; inasmuch as I am an apostle to the Gentiles, I magnify my ministry, if by any means I may provoke to jealousy those who are my flesh and save some of them. For if their being cast away is the reconciling of the world, what will their acceptance be but life from the dead? For if the firstfruit is holy, the lump is also holy; and if the root is holy, so are the branches. And if some of the branches were broken off, and you, being a wild olive tree, were grafted in among them, and with them became a partaker of the root and fatness of the olive tree, do not boast against the branches. But if you do boast, remember that you do not support the root, but the root supports you. You will say then, “Branches were broken off that I might be grafted in.” Well said. Because of unbelief they were broken off, and you stand by faith. Do not be haughty, but fear. For if God did not spare the natural branches, He may not spare you either. Therefore consider the goodness and severity of God: on those who fell, severity; but toward you, goodness, if you continue in His goodness. Otherwise you also will be cut off. And they also, if they do not continue in unbelief, will be grafted in, for God is able to graft them in again. For if you were cut out of the olive tree which is wild by nature, and were grafted contrary to nature into a cultivated olive tree, how much more will these, who are natural branches, be grafted into their own olive tree? For I do not desire, brethren, that you should be ignorant of this mystery, lest you should be wise in your own opinion, that blindness in part has happened to Israel until the fullness of the Gentiles has come in. And so all Israel will be saved, as it is written: “The Deliverer will come out of Zion, And He will turn away ungodliness from Jacob; For this is My covenant with them, When I take away their sins.”

THOSE INDICTED IN THE ACCUSATIONS

One of the things one can find in a Devilish Accuser is that even when the Accuser is accusing one man, he tends to also directly or indirectly accuse or affect those connected to that man either by tribe, religion, family, friendship, party, or helper.

When we know that those who accuse us also implicate our family, friends or faith, we will learn to bargain like the Lord Jesus did, saying, “If you want me, let these ones go free or keep them out of your mouth in your accusations against me.” You know, like saying, keep my family, my wife, my children, my tribe, my religion, etc. out of this between you and me only. I call it, “Let my people go” from your accusation, arrest, implication or contention against me. But the Lord Jesus Christ put it this way,

[John 18:8-9 BSB] — “I told you that I am He,” Jesus replied. “So if you are looking for Me, let these men go.” This was to fulfill the word He had spoken: “I have not lost one of those You have given Me.”

Do not lose or harm those God has given you by getting them implicated or affect in accusations or persecutions against you. Do not be like Mordecai, for whose sake the Accuser called Haman the prince got the entire Jews (his kinsmen) about to be wipe off the face of the earth by the decree of Medes and Persia that cannot be changed as signed by the king of kings then in favor of the Accuser of Mordecai that became the accuser of the Jews because of Mordecai the Jew. The children of Job were wiped out because of the Accuser of Job their father. But the Lord Jesus Christ was so careful to the extent that even though He was so hated that much, yet none of His haters considered harming Mary the mother of Jesus because of Jesus, or arresting His brothers, or even arresting any of His disciples to get to Him. The only disciple that went to them on his own accord to betray Him was Judas; but apart from that, there was no death threat or arrest warrant against any of Jesus’ disciples or believers while He walked this earth: The only threat was that whoever confesses Him as the Christ or Son of God would be excommunicated or cast out of the Synagogue or fired from the sect of the Chief Priest, Pharisees, Scribes etc. and so men like Nicodemus secretly believed on Him but did not make their faith open then. Absolutely no persecution or accusation came to any associate, family or kinsmen the Lord Jesus Christ while He walked on earth inspite of all those who hated Him, accused Him and wanted Him dead and crucified.

So, you see how the Lord Jesus Christ managed the situation that made all his accusers or enemies to channel their hatred only on Him, forgetting about all His tribes, kinsmen, disciples or friends except in these two occasions:

*1* - One, when they also planned to kill Lazarus that He raised back to life because Lazarus’ life from the dead made many converts to the Lord Jesus Christ.

(John 12:10-11 KJV) - But the chief priests consulted that they might put Lazarus also to death; Because that by reason of him many of the Jews went away, and believed on Jesus.

When this happened, the Lord Jesus moved on to where the Life of Lazarus would no longer be in dangers on account of Him. And so, the haters and accusers forgot about Lazarus.

*2* - Two, when Herod killed little children in Bethlehem when targeting to kill the Lord Jesus. That was not the Lord Jesus’ negligence that got those little children killed but the wisemen’s error that was developed by Herod into killing those little children and thereby the scripture was fulfilled.

Therefore, the Lord Jesus Christ achieved all these without losing any of His sheep and without putting of the sheep in harm’s way: He was a true Shepherd that laid down His life for the sheep, and not the sheep laying down their life to protect or honor Him while He walked this earth. He was so efficient to a point that His friends and disciples longed to suffer because of Him but did not have any persecution or harassment because He coordinated and took all suffering and accusation upon Himsef, until after He ascended into heaven the disciples for the time were persecuted because the Lord Jesus Christ; and they rejoiced for that first:

[Act 5:40-42 BSB] — At this, they yielded to Gamaliel. They called the apostles in and had them flogged. Then they ordered them not to speak in the name of Jesus, and released them. The apostles left the Sanhedrin, rejoicing that they had been counted worthy of suffering disgrace for the Name. Every day, in the temple courts and from house to house, they did not stop teaching and proclaiming the good news that Jesus is the Christ.

Persecution of His People and Disciples began only when He is ascended into heaven and somehow the leaders of the Church and Stephen helped the cause that made every disciple or believer of the Lord Jesus Christ to become a potential target for arrest, persecution.

In the accusation against Daniel, See the way the Accusers presented the accused and the accusation before the king:

(Daniel 6:13 - CGV) — "Then they answered and said before the king, That Daniel, who is of the sons of the captivity of Judah, does not regard you, O king, nor the interdict that you have signed, but makes his petition three times a day."

(Daniel 6:13 - LBP) — "Then they answered and said before the king, Daniel, who is of the exiles from Judea, has not regarded you, O king, nor the decree which you have made, but he makes his petition three times a day."

♨️♨️♨️♨️♨️♨️♨️

** In Presenting the Accused: They described him, Daniel, by his basest or most derogatory tribal/ethnic identity that has some flavor of racism or racial discrimination against his people, tribe or ethnic origin. They did not even describe Daniel as his excellency or the one with Excellent Spirit, President of the Kingdom of Persia; instead they described Daniel as that Daniel, who is of the children of the captivity of Judah. Whereas Daniel was the most popular/known president then

You see the hate, not just against Daniel but against his tribe or ethnic group, just by mentioning his people as children of the captivity of Judah to the king as if the king does not know who Daniel was just by mentioning his name only. You've seen the Accusers of Daniel here maliciously tagged along his people and nation with their branding as slaves or captives of Judah; you will also see how the table turned and Accusers together with their wives and children shall be implicated also instead of Daniel to the Lions: He who dug a pit shall fall into it.

** In Presenting the Accusation: They first painted the charge black before they mentioned the charge. In painting the charge black, they told the king that Daniel does not regard him and does not regard his law or decree, trying to make the king take it personal against Daniel or trying to sow some discord and ill feelings in the king towards Daniel. Then they stated the charge they first painted black or terrible, saying Daniel prays three times a day. Thus, three times count charges.

Well, atleast they observed him the whole day, and did not just take the only time they found Him praying and ran with that. I mean, they presented the charges against Daniel as his “Manner or Habit” (Three times a day) and not just as his action. It takes repeated actions to form a habit.

THE WORD OF GOD: A PERSON OR A STATEMENT

In “Ezekiel 11” the Godhead spoke in the capacity of the Trinity to Ezekiel as:

● The LORD said to me, (Ezekiel 11:2)

● The Spirit of the LORD fell on me, and said to me, (Ezekiel 11:5)

● The Word of the LORD came to me, saying, (Ezekiel 11:14)

(Ezekiel 11:14 - GWN) - "Then the Word of the LORD came to me, saying,"

(Ezekiel 11:14 - LBP) - "And the Word of the LORD came to me, saying,"
♨️♨️♨️♨️♨️♨️♨️

In this Main Bible verse in Red, the Word of the LORD came to Ezekiel who was there with the manifest LORD, Throne and Cherubim, and also there with the Spirit of God. The LORD of glory had spoken, the Spirit of the LORD fell upon Ezekiel and had spoken thus says the LORD in words of prophecy, and this time the Word of the LORD came to Ezekiel, saying…

The Word of the LORD is the Word even before He speaks or spoken. It not because He's spoken that He's the Word of God, but He is the Word of God that speaks saying. The Word of God comes to men, and men come to the Word of God. The Word of God is a name of Person, not just name or description of a speech or statement: the Word of God wears clothes or robe, and the Word of God is His name.

[Revelation 19:13 AFV] — And He was clothed with a garment dipped in blood; and His name is The Word of God.
[color=#006600][/color]

Add

BEWARE ACCUSERS

Let us compare two or more different kinds of accusers based on “Caught in the Very Act:”

.1. The Accusers of the Woman Caught in the Very Act of Adultery, and the Penalty based on the Law of Moses.

.2. The Accusers of Daniel Caught in the Very Act of Praying, and the Penalty based on the Law of Persia.

Well there are other Accusers, like Accusers of Shadrach, Meshach and Abednego, based on the decree concerning the burning fiery furnace, Accusers of the Jews based on Law of Persia during days of Esther and Mordecai, Accusers of the Lord Jesus Christ, Accusers of Paul, etc.

But I compare wisdom between the Accusers of the Woman caught in the very act of Adultery and the Accusers of the Daniel caught Praying.

** CALIBER OF PERSONS PLAYING THE ACCUSERS’ ROLE: In both cases, the caliber of persons that form the Accusers were the Elites in the society where they were doing the accusation: Those accusing the Woman caught in Adultery were “Pharisees, Scribes, Religious Leaders” and those accusing Daniel caught Praying against the Law were “Presidents, Governors, State-Actors.”

** MOTIVE OF PERSONS PLAYING THE ACCUSERS’ ROLE: In the case of Accusers of the Woman caught in Adultery, the motive of the Accusers was to also accuse the Lord Jesus Christ and not just to accuse the woman caught in adultery: They were content with having accusation against the woman (against the sinner), but wanted to develop it into accusation against the Lord Jesus (against the righteous and blameless). Therefore, the accusers of that sinner caught in adultery were figuratively also the accusers of the Righteous/Perfect who was never caught in any sin.

On the other hand, the motive of the accusers of Daniel were obviously to accuse the righteous or faultless Daniel, but they caught both Daniel and the King of Kings by the Law that cannot be changed.

** CONSEQUENCES ON THE ACCUSERS’ FOR TRAPPING THE KING OF KINGS IN THEIR ACCUSATION QUEST/SCHEME:

For trapping the King of Kings, the Lord Jesus Christ, in their accusation quest using the law of Moses, the Pharisees and the Scribes were exposed to be sinners themselves, because if those religious leaders and preachers of the laws of Moses were without sin they would have cast the first stone.so they all left in shame, and their shame was never wiped away because they did not receive the Benediction from the King of kings, Jesus, saying, “Neither do I condemn you, go and sin no more:” So, they still stood condemned and they did not receive the grace to go and sin no more.

On the other hand, for trapping the king of kings, Darius, in their accusation quest using the Law of Persia, the Presidents and Governors were exposed to be accusers of the innocent because the Lions couldn’t harm the innocent. I pray I find occasion to expansiate on how God justifies or exonerates even those caught in the act of breaking the Law or sinning, but not breaking His Law: How “caught in the act” alone does not condemn nor justify a man, but heaven judges men with both “Caught in the Act” and “Motive of the Act” – Evil act may be driven by Good Motive, and good act may be driven by evil motive. Besides, when the Law condemns a man, he is still not condemned until judgment or penalty condemns the man: You see why you should not judge so that you will not be judged, and don’t condemn so that you will not be condemned? If you understand this lesson the way I understand it, even if you find a man/woman in the very act or fact of doing something that is evidently a sin or crime to do by an existing law or rules, you will still be afraid to accuse or condemn that man/woman, but leave judgment to God.

I say, even when the existing law out-rightly condemns a man as sinner or offender, the penalty or the sentence or the judgment meted against him for commiting that crime still has to prove whether that man is considered sinner or innocent: This has nothing to do with whether that man was caught in the act or whether that man has broken the law. Examples, Daniel by praying was caught in the act or broke the law, and the judge followed the law to have him cast into the Lions’ den which is the penalty; but the penalty or lions did not harm him, proving he was innocent beyond whatever the law had said about him. The same way, the furnace of fire proved that Shadrach, Meshach and Abednego where innocent beyond whatever the decree said about them. Casting John in the pot of boiling oil or refinery in condemnation was overruled by the fact that the oil did not kill him or proved him innocent by not harming him. Condemning and crucifying the Lord Jesus Christ to death and ensuring He was buried and His tomb sealed so that men would not have Him come out to the dungeon grave, and yet the grave could not hold Him captive neither could death and hell endure having Him dead, was the greatest declaration of Innocence and Righteousness and Holiness.

So, if the evidence you have or what you are falling back on to condemn a man or woman is what the letters of the law said about what you caught him/her doing, you are grossly ignorant of what the Works of God can be. The coming condemnation on those who accused and condemned any men to die for any reason will be in the day of the resurrection: If any man you condemned to death is eventually raised to life, you become guilty of condemning the innocent or the righteous because if he was a sinner, he would not be alive nor raised to life when he faces or passes death. Therefore, the fact that Daniel, who was caught in the act of breaking the law and worthy of death by the lions, was thrown into the lions according to the penalty of the law, but yet he lived over the night and was harmless – declared the innocency of Daniel by the deliverance from death by the lion: This also means all those who condemned him or accused him of being guilty would also be thrown into the same lions for the lions to also verity or authenticate whether they also were innocent: for the law of Persian failed since whom the law condemned to death is alive beyond the law.
To condemn the righteous or to accuse the innocent is one the worst mistake a man can make on the surface of the earth, and yet people do this almost every day. There's a realm and a truth in which “Righteousness is Life” or “Life declares Righteousness.” If you doubt a man is righteous or a sinner, and you see the man alive in that realm your doubts are cleared because being alive in that realm means being righteous, but being dead in that realm means being a sinner. Those who use life or death to know the righteous from the sinners on that realm, do not bother with details such as “Caught in the act” or “The Law” for declaration of innocence or guilt.

But let's see men who are low, and who rely on “Caught in the act” and “The Stipulations of man made Laws” for justification and condemnation in the Main Bible Verse:

(Daniel 6:12 - CGV) — "Then they came near, and spoke before the king concerning the king's interdict: Have you not signed an interdict, that every man that shall make petition to any god or man within thirty days, except to you, O king, shall be cast into the den of lions? The king answered and said, The thing is true, according to the law of the Medes and Persians, which does not alter."

(Daniel 6:12 - LBP) — "And they came near and said before the king, O king, live for ever! Did you not decree and sign, O king, that whosoever shall ask a petition of any god or man within thirty days, except of you, O king, shall be cast into the den of lions? The king answered and said, The decree is true, according to the law of the Medes and Persians, which cannot be altered."

♨️♨️♨️♨️♨️♨️♨️

One thing these Accusers of Daniel did wiser or better than the Accusers of the Woman caught in the act of Adultery, was this in the main Bible verse in Red. They did not yet reveal the offender, or they did not arrest Daniel and drag him to the king because they caught him in the act, before having this conversation with the king concerning his judgment on anyone who violates that law of Persia. In contrast to them, the Accusers of the Woman caught in Adultery took it upon themselves to arrest her, publicly defame or shame her, and dragged her to the King of kings based on the Law (of Moses). So, technically, the Accusers of the Woman had already began taking law into their hands or displaying jungle justice, before hearing from the Judge. Thus they acted in folly, presuming on the Law enforcement.

One advantage this wisdom of Daniel's Accusers gave them, but the folly of the Accusers of the woman caught in adultery did not give them, was that by not yet revealing whom they caught or who is affected, they wisely consulted the Judge (the king) and had him determine or judge the case before presenting the accused. They did what is like “Mock Exam” or “Mock Trial” of the case with the judge.

It's like how Nathan presented a mock trial case or parable for David the king to judge before revealing the true accused in the same case, and capitalizing on the judgment the king himself used to impertially judge the case. Nathan told David there was a rich man who had many sheep and flocks, but he violently took the only ewe a poor man had to use as welcome feast for the rich man's visitor. David the king gave his judgment and condemned the rich man to death and to four fold restitution. Then after Nathan the prophet got the king to judge the case before knowing who the accused was, Nathan knowing the judgment of the king/Judge beyond knowing the Law, then revealed the accused, saying to David, “You are that man” but you will not die as you judged because God took away your sins; nevertheless the four fold restitution you must make shall be the four the sword shall consume in your house: These four included the death of that child conceived in adultery between David and Uriah wife and no DNA test for Paternity was necessary, the death of Amnon who raped his virgin sister and defiled her in fornication, the death of Absalom who was in fornication/adultery with all his father's concubines publicly as the people watched their sexual acts, and the death of Adonijah who was lusting after David's wife that was still a virgin even though she was a widow of David because David never had sexual intercourse with her though they were married.

Even so, the Accusers of Daniel had the King gave his mock trial over the man who violates the Law he signed, and cannot be changed to ultimately mean no going back from casting that man into the Lions den. Then, the Accusers of Daniel, holding the king by his judgment, later revealed who the accused was — Daniel. Had it been they accused Daniel first before hearing the judgment of the king on the law, the king may have denied he was in his right frame of mind when he signed the law or made a way of escape for Daniel.

But you see the Accusers of the Woman caught in Adultery already revealed the accused, revealed the law they were standing on to accuse her, the Lord Jesus Christ Himself being who He is already knew what was in all their hearts. He indeed had His way of freeing the Woman caught in Adultery, and her Accusers lost.

WHEN SOMEONE DIES DURING PREACHING/PROPHESYING

Hearing God speak directly to them outloud could have killed people around Mount Sinai, but they resorted to Moses hearing directly from God and conveying the message to them:

[Exodus 20:19 BSB] — “Speak to us yourself and we will listen,” they said to Moses. “But do not let God speak to us, or we will die.”

So, God continued speaking to men through His prophets, messengers men of God, and by His Holy Spirit in them. However in Scriptures, there are cases of instant/sudden death of man or woman upon hearing a message, statement or a declaration of his sin by a man of God filled and moved by the Holy Spirit in speaking. Even when they were not hearing God directly in loud audible Voice but by a man of God, yet they died upon hearing the message of God. Examples:

●1● Ananias and Sapphira heard Peter speaking by the Holy Spirit, declare their hidden lies against God, and they instantly died inside the church. [Acts 5:5, 10]

●2● Twenty-five Cabal heard Ezekiel spoke by the Holy Spirit, declared their hidden lies and God's sentences upon them, and then one man out of the twenty-five men instantly died by the temple eastern gate [Acts 5:5, 10]

(Ezekiel 11:13 - GWN) - "While I was prophesying, Benaiah's son Pelatiah died. I immediately bowed down and cried out, "Almighty LORD, will you completely destroy all the remaining people in Israel?""

(Ezekiel 11:13 - LBP) - "And it came to pass, when I prophesied, that Pelatiah the son of Benaiah died. Then I fell down upon my face, and cried with a loud voice, and said, Ah, LORD God! wilt thou make full end of the remnant of Israel?"

♨️♨️♨️♨️♨️♨️♨️

While this man of God, Ezekiel, prophesied, a man among his hearers died instantly. Then, the man of God fell down to intercede for Israel, as Moses did. He was a prophet of God to the people, but He was also an intercessor for the people to God. Yes, one may be the prophesier and still pray against his own prophecy from completely destroying the people of God. When we bring the message of judgment and death to the people of God, we intend for just a small scale of impart and not a large scale and definitely not a complete or total destruction to the people of God even if all the people of God are sinners.

** Ezekiel protested even against his prophesy when he thought God was intended to completely destroy all the remnant of Israel.

** Moses protested even against God's instruction when Moses heard God was intended to completely destroy all the remnant of Israel and raise the offspring of Moses into a better people.

** The Lord Jesus allowed only one from His Twelve to be taken out, just for the scriptures to be fulfilled; but when there was attempt to take out another the Lord Jesus protested. The point is that even the greatest Savior Himself didn't save all His twelve chosen men and followers for the scriptures not to be broken but for His Body to be broken. For the Scriptures not to be broken, His Body must be broken.

Why small scale destruction may be allowed by ministers of Justice among the people of God, to whom salvation and the covenant is given, is to restore discipline, correction and restitution of the people to their God in reconciliation of purpose and path. But it must be as a father scolding his children with gentle spanks, and not too much on his children otherwise the mother must step in and protest. Both are necessary for the children to see both the Goodness and the Severity.

Back to the Main Verse:

In this Main Bible verse in Red, the son of Benaiah, Pelatiah, was neither the only sinner that heard the same prophecy, nor was he the only one targeted, seeing there were 25 of them the prophecy targeted.

*** Why then was he the only one who died instantly on hearing the Spirit inspired Prophecy of Ezekiel?

This is example of “Fair-Hearing” that is not “Hearing-Fair.” In hearing the Word/Spirit of God, Fair Hearing is not Fair to all hearers. Examples:

◇ — All hearers in hearing would hear, but some will die more than others and some will live more than others by hearing.

◇ — All hearers in hearing would hear, but some will not understand.

◇ — All seers in seeing would see, but some will not perceive.

There are those whose eyes are blessed because they see well, and whose ears are blessed because they hear well [Matthew 13:16]. Faith comes by hearing, and hearing by the Word of God [Romans 10:17]. However, faith is not the only thing that comes by hearing, and hearing by the Word of God. All good things come by hearing the Word of God. Yet, some men are appointed by God to die by hearing, and hearing by the Word of God, so that others will learn of fear by it.

In nutshell, men who died by hearing the Word of God spoken by men of God moved by the Spirit, while they were not the only hearers, died as signs to others. Prophecies and Messages do come with signs that authenticate they are true and inevitable: and sometimes the sign is the sudden death of someone in the congregation, someone on the pulpit or even the instant death of the direct speaker while speaking, in the way people give up the ghost after speaking their last words, such as Jacob spoke to his twelve sons and then died in their congregation as a testament to authenticate his words in “Genesis 49.”

However, don't take all such death in a congregation as a sign: for some sudden death may not yet be the sign until the dead is raised back to life before the sign is completed to authenticate the message. Examples, the death of the widow's son did not authenticate Elijah's words to her until Elijah raised the dead son back to life. So it was also with the death of the rich woman's son when she had her husband, for she insisted she told the man of God not to deceive/lie to her, until Elisha raised her dead son back to life - as long as her son was alive, Elisha's words to her was true and authenticated; but if her son died before her, the man of God's word to her became a lie even if it was true before. To her, or to the widow of Zeraphath, her son being alive was the authentication of the Words or Prophecies of the Man of God. So, it is with Paul in this Bible reference below, wherein while he preached in a vigil, a man died, but the authentication of his message was not in the death of someone in the congregation unlike it was for Peter concerning Ananias and Sapphira; rather Paul had to raise the dead back to life like Elisha and Elijah did.

[Act 20:7-12] — Paul was speaking on the first day of the week as we gathered together to break bread. He was planning to leave in the morning, and went on speaking until midnight. (The upstairs room where we were meeting was lit by many lamps.) A young man called Eutychus was sitting in the window, and he began feeling very sleepy. As Paul went on speaking he fell sound asleep and tumbled down from the third story. When they picked him up they found he was dead. Paul went down, stretched himself out upon him, and hugged him. “Don't worry, he's alive,” he said. Paul went back upstairs, broke bread, and ate together with them. He went on talking with them until dawn came, and then he left. They took the young man home alive and well, and were very thankful for this.

As for Ezekiel, you've seen where he was prophesying and someone's son died, wait until you see him prophesying and dry Bones rise from the dead and the dead became alive standing an exceeding great army.

FOUND PRAYING, NOT SEEN PRAYING

There were days in which Quest makers became anti-Request-makers in order to find their Quest. And their Quest was to find fault, guilt or accusation against their counterpart.

The Quest makers against the Request maker — They made quest against the man who made requests: see this in the main Bible verse herein:

(Daniel 6:11 - CGV) — "Then these [prominent] men assembled together, and found Daniel making petition and supplication before his God."

(Daniel 6:11 - BSB) — "Then these men went as a group and found Daniel petitioning and imploring his God.

♨️♨️♨️♨️♨️♨️♨️

Behold the use of the word, “Found” instead of “Saw.” They found Daniel praying is more than they saw Daniel praying: The former means they were both seekers and seers of the man praying, and the latter means they were only seers but not seekers of the man praying.

Further differences between “Found Praying” and “Seen Praying” — To be seen by men praying makes one lose his rewards, but to be found by men praying increases one's rewards.

● 1 ● Example of Seen Praying:

[Matthew 6:5-6 BSB] — And when you pray, do not be like the hypocrites. For they love to pray standing in the synagogues and on the street corners to be seen by men. Truly I tell you, they already have their full reward. But when you pray, go into your inner room, shut your door, and pray to your Father, who is unseen. And your Father, who sees what is done in secret, will reward you.

● 2 ● Example of Found Praying:

[Mark 1:35-37 BSB] — Early in the morning, while it was still dark, Jesus got up and slipped out to a solitary place to pray. Simon and his companions went to look for Him, and when they found Him, they said, “Everyone is looking for You!”

You see the use of the word “Found” because there was quest, search or a sought for the man who was eventually found praying.

[Act 9:10-18 BSB] — In Damascus there was a disciple named Ananias. The Lord spoke to him in a vision, “Ananias!” “Here I am, Lord,” he answered. “Get up!” the Lord told him. “Go to the house of Judas on Straight Street and ask for a man from Tarsus named Saul, for he is praying. In a vision he has seen a man named Ananias come and place his hands on him to restore his sight.” But Ananias answered, “Lord, many people have told me about this man and all the harm he has done to Your saints in Jerusalem. And now he is here with authority from the chief priests to arrest all who call on Your name.” “Go!” said the Lord. “This man is My chosen instrument to carry My name before the Gentiles and their kings, and before the people of Israel. I will show him how much he must suffer for My name.” So Ananias went to the house, and when he arrived, he placed his hands on Saul. “Brother Saul,” he said, “the Lord Jesus, who appeared to you on the road as you were coming here, has sent me so that you may see again and be filled with the Holy Spirit.” At that instant, something like scales fell from Saul’s eyes, and his sight was restored. He got up and was baptized,

Now, whether there's a law against prayers or not, be found praying like Daniel rather than being seen praying: For men ought always to pray supercedes any Law of Persia or Prince of Persia against prayers. However, greater than “Found Praying” is “Found Faith.” Written —

[Luke 18:1-8 WEB] — "He also spoke a parable to them that they must always pray, and not give up, saying, “There was a judge in a certain city who didn’t fear God, and didn’t respect man. A widow was in that city, and she often came to him, saying, ‘Defend me from my adversary!’ He wouldn’t for a while, but afterward he said to himself, ‘Though I neither fear God, nor respect man, yet because this widow bothers me, I will defend her, or else she will wear me out by her continual coming.’” The Lord said, “Listen to what the unrighteous judge says. Won’t God avenge his chosen ones, who are crying out to Him day and night, and yet He exercises patience with them? I tell you that He will avenge them quickly. Nevertheless, when the Son of Man comes, will He find faith on the earth?”"

KNOW THE LORD: DIFFERENCE IN “THE LAW” & “HIS LAW”


Let us pay attention to these: —

●1● We are not under the Law but under grace, and we are under His Law. There is difference between “THE LAW” and “HIS LAW.”

●2● “The Law” came by Moses, but “His Law (Grace and Truth)” came by Jesus Christ. [John 1:17].

●3● The LORD Himself is Law and Law-giver: Lordship means Law. To say you are not under any law is to say you are not under any Lord

●4● You don't have to keep the Commandments or the Law, but you must keep His Commandments or His Law.

●5● By the deeds of the law shall no flesh be justified, but by deeds of His Law shall all Comers be justified.

●6● By the Law came the knowledge of sins, but by His Law came the knowledge of the LORD.

There's a scam that makes people think or believe they know the Lord without keeping His Law. Knowing the LORD, even knowing Jesus Christ, is beyond knowing His, His earthly History or story, or songs sang about Him etc., — Knowing The Lord Jesus Christ is rooted in keeping His Law or His Commandments. A man is a liar, deceiver, or scammer, if the man says he knows the Lord but does not keep the Lord's Law/Commandments. Please pay great deal of attention to the next two Bible references:

[1 John 2:3-4 Logos] — "Now by this we know that we have come to know Him, if we keep His commandments. He who says, "I have come to know Him," and does not keep His commandments, is a liar, and the truth is not in him."

[Luke 6:46-49 Logos] — ""But why do you call Me 'Lord, Lord,' and do not do the things which I say? Everyone who comes to Me, and hears My words and does them, I will show you to whom he is like: He is like a man building a house, who dug and went deep and laid a foundation on the rock. And when a flood occurred, the stream burst upon that house, and could not shake it, for it was founded on the rock. But he who hears and does not do is like a man building a house on the ground without a foundation, against which the stream burst upon; and immediately it fell. And the destruction of that house was great.""

Again, calling Him LORD is recognizing Him as Law and Law-giver: if you are not keeping His Law or Commandments you do not know Him as LORD, but maybe you know Him as Savior, Miracle-Worker, Healer, Awesome, Sweet Jesus, no one like Him etc., as found in many of the Christian worship songs and praises that now flood waves. Of all the titles or descriptions you know of the LORD or Jesus Christ, He is more interested in you knowing Him as “The LORD” — YHWH. Know Him as the LORD or as YHWH — This means knowing Him as LAW, LAW-GIVER, COMMANDER OR THE JUDGE. Every other thing you know or call Him bows to knowing Him as the LORD.

Knowing, calling or describing Him as Savior, Miracle-Worker, Healer, Awesome, Sweet Jesus, no one like Him, and the titles used to refer to Him in almost 80% of the songs and testimonies that now fill churches and Christians community are inferior to this one Title or Knowledge of Him — The LORD or YHWH. And no man knows Him as the LORD in truth without that man keeping or obeying His Commandments or Law. This is also the same Title or Knowledge of Him — The LORD — He shall force every man to know in Judgment and by Force of War. He bound by oath to make everyone know Him as the LORD and to make all Tongues confess Him as the Lord.

He swore that oath as the Lord, saying:

[Romans 14:11BSB] - It is written: “As surely as I live, says the Lord, every knee will bow before Me; every tongue will confess to God.”

[Philippians 2:11 BSB] — and every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.

This is more serious than keeping the laws or ethics or codes of conducts of all the nations — until one keeps His Commandments or His Law. You see why even if a man keeps all the laws of morality, all the laws of religion or laws of nations, so that the man is righteous, blameless, upright and a man of integrity, like some Muslims are, but the same man does not know Him as the LORD because the man did not keep His Law/His Commandments though the man is righteous — still He will judge the righteous man who kept the laws and destroy that righteous Muslim, that righteous Buddhist, that righteous Pagan, that righteous Atheist, that Ethics/Ethical Professional, that Moral law doer etc, to make such man to know Him as the LORD by keeping His Law, not just any laws or righteousness principles.

(Ezekiel 11:12 - FBV) - "Then you will know that I am the Lord. For you didn't follow My rules and you didn't keep My laws. Instead you kept the laws of the nations around you.”"

(Ezekiel 11:12 - LBP) - "And you shall know that I am the LORD; for you have not walked in My statutes, neither executed My judgments, but have followed after the ordinances of the Gentiles that are round about you."

♨️♨️♨️♨️♨️♨️♨️

The people targeted in the main Bible verse in Red were keepers and doers of the laws, ordinances, customs, traditions and ethics, of the people and nations where they were. As professionals they kept the ethics of professional practices; as religious they kept religious rituals and ordinances; as traditional and customary they observed the ways of the people and of the lands, as citizens they abide by the statutory provisions and constitution of the nations — They were Law Abiding.

But all their righteousness is as filthy Rags because they kept the Law but did not keep “His Law” neither knew Him as the LORD.

Therefore, the Judgment that shall befall them will fulfill execution of the Law or Commandments of the LORD upon them and when they shall know Him as the LORD shall also be when they shall be destroyed for their lack of knowledge of Him as the LORD. My people are destroyed for the lack of knowledge of the LORD, YHWH.

Imagine of I give my wife a command to do “A,” but a pastor/priest, her boss or her biological father/mother/friends tell her to do “B,” which is also good or better than doing “A” which I her husband commanded her to do: If she eventually do “B” instead of “A,” she will still be a good listener to advice or counsel or obedient: but there is a problem she kept the commandment but not my commandment — she succeeded but not by my instruction. I will severely deal with her to a degree that whatever success or achievement she gained by doing “B” would be totally consumed and destroyed, and she will regret it, and she shall know I am her lord, and not any other man on earth.

You see, to know the Lord involves His Laws or Commandments. One of the Promises of the New Covenant is that people will come to a point where they no longer need any teacher to teach them to know the Lord because they shall all know the LORD by His Laws written in their hearts. By His Law/Commandments written in their Hearts is their knowledge of the Lord, and the knowledge of the Lord shall fill the earth as the waters cover the seas.

[Hebrews 8:10-11] — "For this shall be the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel; After those days, said the LORD, I will put My law into their minds, and I will write it on their hearts: and I will be their God, and they shall be My people. And no man shall teach his neighbor, neither his brother, saying, Know the LORD: for all shall know Me, from the youngest to the oldest."

+

MIND—GAMES AND DANIEL'S FAITHFULNESS IN PRAYERS

I cowardly panicked and fear at the sound of raiders, and by fleeing in fear I forsook the instructions of the Spirit of the LORD to me. I will never again be cowardly, nor will I ever be manipulated by fears from the devils. The LORD did not give me the spirit of fear, but gave me the Spirit of Love, Power and Sound Mind. My mind shall be in peace even in the greatest tumult, storm or threats. Try me again, and see.

Satan with his mind games: Each time Satan destroyed Job's wealth and children, Satan destroyed also their keepers but allowed one to escape just to report the bad news to Job because Satan preferred to do mind-game on Job than to also kill each of those he allowed to escape to tell Job. See his mind games on Job beyond seeing his afflictions or destruction of Job's:

◇1◇ — Satan killed all Job had and servants, but for mind game he spared one servant of Job from various departments of Job's wealth to use those he spared to taunt Job with the terrible or tragic news, so that Satan might get into Job's mind. But Job overcame the mindgame

◇2◇ — Satan afflicted Job with terrible boils and sores, and inspired Job's wife to taunt her husband, Job, into cursing God and die than to be existing in his condition because he was better of dead to her.

◇3◇ — As if those were not enough, three of Job's friends that came to comfort him suddenly had their mouths or tongues manipulated into accusing Job, tormenting Job with words and increasing his miseries by words of their mouths instead of the comforting ministry they earlier scheduled to administer to Job.

Satan and his Accusers in their mind games would press to make bad news, insults, painful words, threats, evil communications, gossips about you, naggings from your wife/sister/friends/children, unpleasant and bitter speeches that basically add to your hurt or wounds to get through your ears into your heart or mind, and they wait to manipulate or capitalize on your reactions and feelings from the poisons you hear.

I caught some lines in a book where a man in cell, trying to catch a sleep, wished the mosquitoes tormenting him in the cell would just bite him and suck his blood without singing in his ears. He was more tormented by the mosquitoes that were loudly sounding into his ears than those mosquitoes that were biting and sucking out his life. I did not understand why he preferred they bite him rather than bark at him.

After God delivered all that Job had to Satan, and Satan destroyed all the children, wealth of Job, and almost all his servants, then Satan shared the news to Job, ensuring Job knew or heard of the terrible things.

But we are beholding the glorious “True Worship” reaction of Job, after Job knew the deeds that were done. We are also beholding the glorious “True Prayer Faithful” reaction of Daniel, after Daniel knew the decree against prayers was signed and the dangers of the lions:

(Daniel 6:10 - CGV) — "And when Daniel knew that the writing was signed, he went into his house (now his windows were open in his chamber toward Jerusalem) and he knelt on his knees three times a day, and prayed, and recognized [his] indebtedness before his God, as he did previously."

(Daniel 6:10 - LBP) — "Now when Daniel knew that the writing was signed, he went into his house, and the windows of his chamber were open toward Jerusalem; he knelt upon his knees three times a day, and prayed and gave thanks before his God, as he had done before."

♨️♨️♨️♨️♨️♨️♨️

Behold, when Daniel knew the writing was signed — means Daniel already knew about the writing before it was signed: he was aware of the plot from his counterparts or fellow presidents and governors. But in the main Bible verse in Red, Daniel got to know the Writing or Bill was eventually signed into Law.

Notice Daniel's reaction after knowing the Law: — He did not fall into the mind game, but also he did not fall into hardened mind: He was neither fearful nor rebellious in his mind concerning his knowledge of the law against prayers. In other words, nothing changed in Daniel even though something changed in the Laws — That's faith.

The prayers Daniel made in the Bible verse were neither reactional nor rebellious: They were as they were before the law changed. It was not like Daniel started a new habit of praying, or Daniel changed or stopped his previous habit of praying. His windows facing Jerusalem were Open, not were Opened: — He did not open his windows in reactionary to this knew development, neither did he shut them up. They had always been open towards Jerusalem, even before the writing was signed against prayers. What I intend to be learned from Daniel here is how to know faith by faithfulness, rather than by reactions. Learn this: Do away with “Reactionary Faith, ” but abide with “Faithfulness.”

●1● Reactionary Faith — is basically a new/changed attitude, method or approach to a sudden event or sudden appearance or emergency.

●2● Faithfulness — is basically faith that is constant, unchanging and stable.

If you have to develop faith to face new challenges, new emergency etc., your faith is reactionary and little. Those that trust in the LORD are not just called to move mountains, but more importantly they are called to be unmovable like Mount Zion that cannot be move though other mountains be move:

[Psalms 125:1, 46:2] — Those who trust in the LORD are like Mount Zion. It cannot be moved; it abides forever. — Therefore will not we fear, though the earth be removed, and though the mountains be carried into the middle of the sea;

The reason I was cowardly before was because I was reactionary in response to the sudden threat or danger that emerged at my gate. I should have remained as calm and steady as I was before the threat or danger. You see Christians that would see a demon, a devil, a danger, a threat, a witchcraft object, a cobweb/spider, a Serpent or scorpion, etc., and they begin to sprinkle Anointing oil, holy water, pray, fast, bind and cast, calling blood of Jesus, etc. If they were doing the same things regularly before whatever event or appearance emerged, good they are faithful; but if they were not doing before what they are now doing because of what they saw or heard, then they are reactionary.

The foolish virgins were reactionary, but the wise virgins were faithful in that it was when the foolish virgins heard the Lord is almost here that they suddenly went to find oil for their lamps. If the LORD Jesus Christ is coming in the next twenty four hours, and you suddenly feel there are things you quickly need to fix or do in preparation for His coming, you are reactionary and not faithful. I tell you, if the LORD Jesus Christ is to come in the next hour or the world is to end in few hours time, I will be comfortably doing similar things I've been doing years back. I am as ready for the LORD today as I was years ago.


Sometimes I get rebuked when I try being reactionary based on sight: Example: I wanted to go from one two to another, and I simply said, “The Peace of God prevail” and I went there and came back. And later I wanted to travel interstates or very long distance of over a thousand miles, and I was praying more fervently before I travel. I got rebuke because though it appears I was being more prayerful, I was judging by sight (distance) and reactionary or I was displaying little faith masked in much prayers. In my teaching, being prayerful is not the same as being faithful — Some pray much but have little faith, and some pray little but have much faith. I was rebuked because I was reacting at the longer distance with more prayers than I was with the short distance. The way I should pray for a journey of 100 meters should be the same way I should pray for a journey of 1 billion miles. The way I should react in the presence of a tiny ant, should be the way I react in the presence of lions, dogs, serpents or any beast. They way peace keeps my heart and mind in the time of peace, so should peace keep my heart and mind in the times of tribulation and wars.

There are deceptions of mind-games. Faithfulness is not reactionary.

(Matthew 13:47-51) — Once more, the kingdom of heaven is like a fishing net thrown into the sea that caught all kinds of fish. When it was full it was dragged ashore. The good fish were put into baskets while the bad ones were thrown away. That's the way it will be when the end of the world comes. The angels will go out and separate the evil people from the good, and throw them into the blazing furnace where there will be weeping and grinding of teeth. Now do you understood everything?” “Yes,” they replied.

Continue in the Screenshot photos

TAKE HEED — HOW YOU MAKE LAWS OR APPROVE THEM

Did king Darius eventually granted their prayer and signed the bill into Law against prayers in his kingdom for 30 days? Well, let's see:

(Daniel 6:9 - CGV) — "Therefore king Darius signed the writing and the interdict."

(Daniel 6:9 - LBP) — "Then King Darius signed the writing and issued the decree."

♨️♨️♨️♨️♨️♨️♨️

Some may have faulted king Darius for approving and signing this Antichrist or Anti-Prayer law to make it a Medes and Persian Law that cannot be changed nor reversed. Kingdoms and kings who are influenced and dependent on the wisdom and counsel of those surrounding his throne are bound to be manipulated by them. Excellent Spirit was not in Darius, but in Daniel whom Darius elected.

He was wise at perceiving the Spirit in Daniel, but unwise at not perceiving the spirit of the law or decree before him. He should have applied the same search for the Spirit he used in appointing Daniel to the Laws, Decrees, Counsels and Prayers/Requests brought him also.

I have compared the Accusers coming to king Darius to Satan coming to God against Job. So what's the difference between God approving Satan's new policy concerning Job and Darius approving the Elite's new law concerning Prayers?

■1■ Difference ■1■ — So, the LORD God knew that Satan coming to Him is not about Him, for even when Satan as Lucifer led the praises and worship before God, Lucifer was not fully doing them all about God alone. It's not hard to spot worship songs and praises that purports to be before God but are not all about God. But Darius deception led him into thinking this was all about me, and I do not even see how this legislation or law benefits these elites that are praying me to sign this: they are not padding any hidden benefits to any of them in this law, but are instead subjecting themselves to be bound by these laws also or be cast into Lions Den. Therefore Darius thought this was about him, especially when it seemed to him that all the senators, elites and aristocrats, celebrated him as the only one to whom all prayers must be made and directed to.

■2■ Difference ■2■ — The wisdom of God already knew this was against Job: Immediately God saw Satan had left his business of going to and fro, up and down, the earth to come among sons of God to present themselves to God, God already knew this was against Job: Satan had not mentioned Job yet, but God brought up Job as the subject because beyond what Satan was hiding God already knew his mind and reasons for coming was against Job. — Darius on the other hand only considered about whom their gathering was for, without considering whom their gathering was against. He had already signed the writing and law before he later realized he signed death against his most trusted and excellent president, for he was not looking beyond himself and beyond those gathered for him to approve or sign the law.

If you are a law maker, rule maker, policy make, regulator etc., consider whom the legislation would benefit/build and also whom the legislation would destroy/rob. For a woe/tragedy hangs against any who writes or prescribes or signs any law, regulation, rules or policies that oppress the righteous, rob the poor or do injustice. As it’s written:

[Isaiah 10:1-3 FBV] — Tragedy is coming to those who pass evil decrees and who write laws to harm people. They pervert the legal rights of the needy, and rob justice from the poor of My people. They steal from widows and cheat orphans. What are you going to do on the day you're punished, when disaster falls on you from far away? Who are you going to run to so you can get help? Where are you going to leave all your wealth?

APPOINTED HOW TO DIE AND TO BE JUDGED

[Hebrews 9:27 AKJV] — And as it is appointed to men once to die, but after this the judgment:

This is true for those asking “How many?” But what about those asking “How?”

HOW MANY TIMES ARE THEY APPOINTED TO DIE?

All men have one common number of appointment with death and judgment after death — This number of appointment is “One time” or “Once.” However, there are special cases wherein some men or women died and were still raised back to life from the dead. Or some had appointment with death and somehow their appointment with death was postponed by the Grace of God in extension of life. In these cases, those who died had not faced their final judgment yet and were raised back to life. For if their final judgment was set after they died, no more for them to be raised back to life. So, resurrection must come before final judgment otherwise after final judgment there shall be no more resurrection of the dead.

HOW ARE THEY APPOINTED TO DIE?

Though all men have one time appointment with death and final judgment, all men do not have the same way to die, neither do all men have the same appointed death nor appointed judgment. There are many different ways different men are appointed to die. Look at this main Bible verse in Red for further illustration:

(Ezekiel 11:10 - GWN) - "You will die in battle. I will judge you at Israel's borders. Then you will know that I am the LORD."

(Ezekiel 11:10 - LBP) - "You shall fall by the sword; I will judge you in the border of Israel; and you shall know that I am the LORD."

♨️♨️♨️♨️♨️♨️♨️

In this Main Red Bible verse, those targeted were appointed to die in battle by Sword, and to be judged within the borders of Israel, and at the end they shall know the LORD. What will kill them will neither be from where they were coming nor from where they shall die or be judged: for they are sold to strangers, and the sword of strangers or foreign sword will kill them within the borders of Israel but outside the city of Jerusalem. Imagine, what will kill a man is already determined to come from a strange country, the man it will kill must be from a different country, and the day they meet or see each other shall be the day the man will be killed by it, etc.

In this case, the LORD Himself appointed how they must die, where they must die, what must be used to kill them, and where He must judge them. Sometimes, men appoint or decide the way they die or the way other men they kill in murder will die, and those decisions on how those men must die were not appointed by the LORD but by men

Examples: women aborted their children in the womb, or killed them afterwards, men make their children pass through fire in offering to other gods which is not appointed by God [Jeremiah 32:35], people do rituals with people in which they do ritual killings, etc. These are not basically the LORD’s appointed ways for them to die, but of men.

The Father appointed how the Son must die, including where + when He must die to glorify the Father and to fulfill all things. And after the Son had satisfied all His appointments with death, He in turn appointed how Peter must die to glorify God. So, even the greatest Savior and Life-Giver Himself appoints how His own should die to glorify God and to find far better and eternal life.

PRAYER FASHIONED AGAINST PRAYERS

■ Even when it was a law against prayers, it required prayer to the king to accent or establish the law. It's a law that would forbid all prayers from being channeled or directed to any other person but only to the king himself for a thirty Days “Prayers Shutdown” period.

(Daniel 6:8 - CGV) — "Now, O king, establish the interdict, and sign the writing, that it may not be changed, according to the law of the Medes and Persians, which does not alter."

(Daniel 6:8 - LBP) — "Now, O king, establish this decree and let it be put in writing, that it be not changed, according to the law of the Medes and Persians, which cannot be altered."

♨️♨️♨️♨️♨️♨️♨️

The statement in this main red Bible verse is a prayer speech to the king, and simply call it a prayer to establish the Law against prayer.

■ Some people's Prayer would shutdown or prevent many other people's prayers if those some people's prayers are granted. In this case, if the king grants this prayer made by those elites in the bible verse above, the king granting their prayer would legally be shutting down, preventing, silencing or killing the prayers of all other men in his kingdom for the specified period. Therefore, it's prayer fashioned against prayers: few men's prayer divided/devised against the potential prayer of the masses.

The Medes and Persians operated laws that stood against prayers of Daniel to God in divers ways: If not this Law of Persia forbidding the prayers of Daniel for 4 weeks, it may be Prince of Persia withholding the answer or angel to the prayers of Daniel for 3 weeks.

But it's important to see how some people's prayers or wishes will be the end or destruction of other people's prayers or petitions by how it played out here. Granting their prayers would mean danger to other poor people's prayers. It's like someone's prayer is for God not to regard or grant some other people's prayers. When God granted Satan's prayers concerning Job, Job's prayers for his children were off: and indeed prayers of Satan the Accuser are opposed to prayers of Job and the reason preference was given to Satan's prayer over Job's prayers particularly over his children, was because Satan came to God and prayed to God, but Job only prayed to God. Similar thing almost played out concerning Peter, over whom both Satan and the Lord Jesus prayed to have. Satan desired Peter to sieve him like a wheat, but the Lord Jesus also prayed for Peter so that his faith will not fail nor will he end up as Judas Iscariot. Watch and pray not to enter into the temptation. But you cannot beat in prayers a man who comes closer to God's Throne in prayers than you are as close to the Throne.

I am telling you that in prayer “Calling upon the Lord” is behind “Coming to the Lord” in ranking. It was Paul's teachings and epistles that emphasized “Calling upon the Lord either to be saved or to be heard.” Paul was not as much a preacher or emphasizer of “Coming” as much as he was of “Calling.” But in the teachings and preaching of the Lord Jesus Christ Himself, He was much more a preacher or emphasizer of “Coming” more than of “Calling.”

Examples, Paul would tell the sinners to “Call upon the Lord Jesus Christ and be saved,” but the Lord Jesus Christ would tell the sinners to “Come to Me all you that labor and are heavy laden, and I will give you rest,” “All the Father gives to Me will come to Me, and as many as come to Me, I shall in no wise cast out,” “Whoever is thirsty let him come to Me and drink, and whoever believes in Me as the scriptures say, out of his belly shall flow living Waters.” The Spirit and the Bride say Come, and let him who hears say come, and whoever wills may drink of the fountain of the water of life,” “Let little children come to Me, and do not hinder them; for of such is the kingdom of God,” “My Sheep hear My Voice and come to Me,” “He who does truth Comes to the Light that his deeds may be manifests, but he that does evil does not come to the light for his deeds are evil,” “NO man can come to Me unless the Father draws him to Me,” “It is written in the prophets, And they shall be all taught of God. Every man therefore that has heard, and has learned of the Father, comes to Me.” ‘I am the Way, the Truth and the Life, no man comes to the Father except by Me.”

Okay, I am trying to show that Paul's teachings emphasizes more of people “Calling upon the Lord” (Prayers in His Name), but the Lord Jesus Himself emphasizes more of people “Coming to the Lord” (Coming in His Name, not just praying in His name). Like Peter said to Him on the sea, “Lord if You are the One, bid me to come to You” and the Lord replied Peter, “Come to Me” and therefore Peter walked on the seas or waters to come to the Lord. But because Peter lost the focus of “Coming to the Lord” he was reduced to “Calling on the Lord to save him from sinking.” Yes, when Peter was drowning, he was reduced to Calling upon the Lord to be saved; and whoever calls upon the Lord shall be saved as Peter was by the little faith he had left. But before he was walking above just calling upon the Lord when he walked in Coming to the Lord even on the same sea or waters.

Now which of these two would you rather walk with between Calling Him and Coming to Him to be saved or to have eternal life?

A.■ [Romans 10:12-14] — For there is no difference between the Jew and the Greek: for the same Lord over all is rich to all that call on Him. For whoever shall call on the name of the Lord shall be saved. How then shall they call on Him in whom they have not believed? and how shall they believe in Him of whom they have not heard? and how shall they hear without a preacher?

B.■ [John 5:40] — And you will not come to Me, that you might have life.

Would you say, “Blessed is he who calls upon the name of the Lord.” Or would you rather say, “Blessed is he who comes in the name of the Lord, Hosanna in the highest.”

Back to main Bible Verse on Red: They Accusers came to the king of kings and then prayed him to endorse a law against prayers to any God or man except to the king, which requires coming to the king first.

In conclusion, prayers can also be hindrance to prayers: prayers can kill or silence prayers in contradiction or opposition: and in such cases those who come closer to the Lord or King have better advantages or preference over other contrary/opposing prayers. Laws/Legality can also be hindrance to prayers as we see in laws of Medes and Persians both in Daniel's days and Esther days when the law prevented her even as Queen to come to the king her husband to prayer. The Prince of Persia, not those human governors or princes, but the spirit being in charge of Persia also hindered prayers even without laws but powers. Praying outside the will of God, praying without faith, praying with malice, and maltreatment/dishonoring your wife also hinders prayers.

CASTAWAY, CAPTIVES, SLAVES AND DAMNED

Have you noticed the difference between the Judgment of God upon a man in the City of God and that of Judgment of God upon a man that requires banning/bringing the man out of the City of God first? Let's assume God's will eventually kill 3 men with the same weight, but:

]1[ — One of the three men, the Judgment of God killed him inside the city of God;

]2[ — Another of the three men, the Judgment of God brought/cast him out of the city of God and killed him outside the city of God;

]3[ — The third of the three men, the Judgment of God brought/cast him out of the city of God, then delivered him to strangers as slave/captive and still killed him outside the city of God as delivered strangers;

Though the Judgments of God brought death to all three, obviously the one whose death was in the city and buried inside the city of God is still considered redeemed and still have access in the Holy City, as clean meat still have access in the holy Pot even though the meat is butchered, sliced or carcassed. Many prophets and apostles wished they died inside Jerusalem and were buried in Jerusalem, and Joseph in Egypt together with all the tribes of Israel, wanted to be buried in the promised land and not outside the inheritance of the People of God. The man of God from Judah was banned from being buried in Judah or Jerusalem, though he was buried in Israel or Samaria.

The second man in the list was banned or cast from the Holy City like the man of God from Judah was.

The third-man's situation is worst of them all because he was both cast away, banned from the City of God, and then sold (delivered) to Strangers under the judgments. His condition involves slavery of soul.


(Ezekiel 11:9 - GWN) - "I will force you out of the city. I will hand you over to foreigners, and I will punish you."

(Ezekiel 11:9 - LBP) - "And I will bring you out of the midst of it and deliver you into the hands of strangers, and I will execute judgments upon you."

♨️♨️♨️♨️♨️♨️♨️

In this Main Bible verse in Red, the three things God would do to the targeted will make them become these three Losers:

◇A◇ Cast-Away — Forcing/Casting them out of His Holy City in their final days will make them a form of losers called - Castaway.

◇B◇ Captives/Slaves/Sold — Delivering them into the hands of strangers in their final days will make them a form of losers called - Captives/Slaves/Sold. The salvation, freedom or redemption they once had is reversed into bondage/captivity. The Redemption of God delivers/buys people from strangers, but the reverse to redemption is to deliver people to strangers or to sell them into the hands of men.

◇C◇ Damned — Still executing judgment of God on them after God delivered them into the hands of strangers will make them a form of losers called - Damned or the Damned. This is because, God after delivering them to strangers is still executing Judgments on them, and punishing them. If a man delivers something to another person, that thing is no longer in the man's hands but now in the hands of the person to whom it is now delivered or sold. But contrary to this, when God delivers someone/something to men or strangers, that someone or something is still in the hands of God even though it is also in the hands of those men/strangers. The idea is that none can deliver any out of the hands of God, or none can pluck any out completely from Him. God is feared more in hell than Satan and Demons are.

[Isaiah 43:13] — "Yes, from the first day I am He; and there is none that can deliver out of My Hands; what I will do, who can stop it?"

[Hebrews 10:31] — It is a fearful thing to fall into the Hands of the living God.

[Hosea 2:10] — I will strip her naked while her lovers watch; no one will be able to deliver her out of My Hand.

ANTICHRISTS:— LEGALITY, LEGALISM OF THE ACCUSERS

The Strength of sin is the law [1 Corinthians 15:56] — Accusers of Brethren use Legality and Legalism to put stumbling in the path of the Brethren. Know this: Some of the ways the Antichrists and the Accusers will fight the saints will include “Changing Laws” and Changing Times.” There ability and authority to change/amend/alter the laws and times are some of their greatest tools against the saints.

[Daniel 7:25 AFV] — And he shall speak words against the Most High, and shall wear out the saints of the Most High, and think to change the set times and the laws. And they shall be given into his hand until a time and times and one-half time.

You see that we are not just affected by who grabs the political power over us, but also affected by who makes or changes the laws that defines our legality, legalism or illegality, criminal offenses.

In John Bunyan's framework (Pilgrim's Progress), "Legality" serves as a tool for the Accuser of the Brethren, Satan—by promoting distorted view of righteousness that focuses on strict adherence to the law. The Accuser uses legalism to instill guilt and shame. By emphasizing failures to meet legal standards, individuals are made to feel inadequate, fostering despair and discouragement in their faith.

Example, imagine the Accusers of Daniel setting up this law/legality: — By law, praying to God or requesting any petition from neighbor, except from the king, becoming a capital crime punishable by death:

(Daniel 6:7 - CGV) — "All the presidents of the kingdom, the deputies and the satraps, the counselors and the governors, have consulted together to establish a royal statute, and to make a strong interdict, that whoever shall ask a petition of any god or man for thirty days, except of you, O king, he shall be cast into the den of lions."

(Daniel 6:7 - LBP) — "All the governors of the kingdom, the princes, the generals, and the lords have consulted together to establish a royal statute and to make a firm decree that whosoever shall ask a petition of any god or man for thirty days, except of you, O king, shall be cast into the den of lions."

♨️♨️♨️♨️♨️♨️♨️

In Bible verse, the distinct actions and elites involved are as follows:

ELITES:
1. **Presidents**: High-ranking officials in the kingdom.
2. **Deputies**: Assistants or representatives of the presidents.
3. **Satraps**: Governors of provinces, overseeing regional affairs.
4. **Counselors**: Advisors to the king, providing guidance and recommendations.
5. **Governors**: Officials in charge of specific territories or regions.

ACTIONS:
1. **Consultation**: The elites came together to hold lawmaking or law changing legislation over the entire realm, but to target a saint.

2. **Establishing a Royal Statute**: They propose a new law they made to the king, intending to establish the law from just Executive Order to a more binding law called “Royal Law” if it contains the King of Kings’ endorsement on it be unchangeable law or immutable.

3. **Creating a Strong Interdict**: They design a Capital Punishment for disobedience — which would be, getting thrown into Lions Den.

This demonstrates how the Accusers among principalities, powers, rulers of darkness of this world and wickedness in high places can manipulate time-sensitive laws to control behavior and eliminate faith or opposition:

◇LAW: — The Changes the Accusers/Antichrists made in the Law was outlawing/criminalizing prayer or petition from any man to any God or from any man to any other man, except praying to the King.

◇TIME: — The Changes the Accusers or Antichrists made in the times — 30 days or one month was criminalizing and shutting down prayers during those days. E.g. times when if any stranger request for directions to a place from another man, or if a man begs his neighbor, or if a child petitions his parents, or if a man prays to God, etc., which ever the case, that man shall be cast into the den of lions.

The Accusers/Antichrists did these by manipulation+use of Legality: making laws that didn't benefit the people but their accusation agenda.

APPLICATION OF THE SWORD

1. [Job 3:25] — For the thing which I greatly feared is come on me, and that which I was afraid of is come to me.

2. [Job 20:24] — He shall flee from the iron weapon, and the bow of steel shall strike him through.

3. [Proverbs 10:24] — The fear of the wicked, it shall come on him: but the desire of the righteous shall be granted.

4. [Isaiah 24:17-18] — Fear, and the pit, and the snare, are on you, O inhabitant of the earth. And it shall come to pass, that he who flees from the noise of the fear shall fall into the pit; and he that comes up out of the middle of the pit shall be taken in the snare: for the windows from on high are open, and the foundations of the earth do shake.

5. [Jeremiah 42:16] — Then it shall come to pass, that the sword, which you feared, shall overtake you there in the land of Egypt, and the famine, whereof you were afraid, shall follow close after you there in Egypt; and there you shall die.

(Ezekiel 11:8 - GWN) - "You are afraid of swords, so I will bring swords to attack you, declares the Almighty LORD."

(Ezekiel 11:8 - LBP) - "You have feared the sword; and I will bring a sword upon you, says the LORD God."

♨️♨️♨️♨️♨️♨️♨️

Sword applies in revenge upon a man by any of these four principles:

◇1/A◇ The fear of the wicked shall come upon the wicked [Proverbs 10:24] — Especially if the wicked feared sword against him/her, the sword he feared shall be on him to accomplish on him what he feared.

All the sinners among the people of God may be praying or saying no evil will come upon them, but still yet the Sword must kill the sinners:

[Amos 9:10] — All the sinners of My people shall die by the sword, which say, The evil shall not overtake nor prevent us.

◇2/B◇ He that kills with the sword shall be killed with the sword or he that takes the sword shall die by the sword [Revelation 13:10, Matthew 26:52]

◇3/C◇The Judgment or Justice bears the Sword and Scales/Balances:

[Job 19:29] — Be you afraid of the sword: for wrath brings the punishments of the sword, that you may know there is a judgment.

[Romans 13:4] — For he is the minister of God to you for good. But if you do that which is evil, be afraid; for he bears not the sword in vain: for he is the minister of God, a revenger to execute wrath on him that does evil.

◇4/D◇The Application of the Sword for Division or Peres/Upharsin:

[Matthew 10:34-39 BSB] — Do not assume that I have come to bring peace to the earth; I have not come to bring peace, but a sword. For I have come to turn ‘a man against his father, a daughter against her mother, a daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law. A man’s enemies will be the members of his own household.’ Anyone who loves his father or mother more than Me is not worthy of Me; anyone who loves his son or daughter more than Me is not worthy of Me; and anyone who does not take up his cross and follow Me is not worthy of Me. Whoever finds his life will lose it, and whoever loses his life for My sake will find it.

[Jeremiah 4:9-10] — "“And it shall come to pass at that day,” says the LORD, “the king’s heart will perish, and the heart of the rulers; and the priests will be amazed, and the prophets will be astounded.” Then I said, “Ah, Lord GOD! Surely You have greatly deceived this people and Jerusalem, saying, ‘You shall have peace,’ whereas a sword reaches to the soul.”"

+

COME TO GOD, COME TO THE KING: YOUR ACCUSERS DO

There are Accusers of the blameless, upright, faultless or the pure; and on the flipped side, there are also Intercessors/Advocates. Satan is the Chief Accuser of the brethren, but the Lord Jesus Christ is the Chief Advocate and Intercessor for the brethren.

In the account of Satan accusing the blameless Job before God, there was an Accuser against Job but there was no Advocate for Job in those transactions. None raised any objection on behalf of Job to counter the Accuser's shifting the goalposts against him. You know how it can be in law courts among men when the accused has no advocate/attorney while the accuser/prosecutor has very vocal and convincing prayers to the Judge. None of the Sons of God gathered could raise any objection for Job, while Satan in their midst pressed for shifting the goalposts by advocating that poverty, affliction, losses, tragic death, sicknesses and bitterness, be laid on the blameless man to improve his temptation or trials for no reason.

Before then, temptations did not have to come with poverty, pain, losses, affliction, sicknesses, distresses or persecutions all at once. It was usually one thing at a time when tempting or trying men. Temptation before then was like a man sitting for example but just one paper or one subject per day or even per week/month. But since Satan shifted the goalposts and God approved it against Job, Temptation became like a man sitting for two, three…ten papers or different subjects in the same hour or day. Before, a man does not have to be in poverty, in sickness, in multiple problems and sufferings to prove his faith or fear of God. One could be living comfortably, and just tempted in one area, such as Adam and Eve were comfortable in the garden and tempted with just one forbidden tree. But the devil brought the idea of for instance a very sick, poor, lonely man, worrying about robbers, worrying about bills, worrying about health, etc and still being tested/tempted to remain faithful to God in divers afflictions. See all the things Job had to suffer and carry at once in his temptation to prove to Satan what God already knew about Job.

The reason it happened that way was because Job's Redeemer Lives but was waiting for the last days to stand up for Job, Job's Accuser or Adversary was already standing against Job in days when Sons of God gather to God. Why should your Redeemer/Advocate be waiting for the latter day to stand up for you, while your Accuser/Adversary is only waiting for any day or opportunity to stand before God against you?

And since Job knew his Redeemer Lives, but though He lives He will not stand for Job until the last day when the all time living Redeemer will suddenly become relevant to Job: — Why didn't Job himself also present himself among the sons of God as Satan did? I mean, if Satan could attend without invitation, surely Job whom God called “My servant that fears me” should have attended also. Didn't you see that it was the absence of Job but presence of Satan in that meeting that initiated all those things? What did God ask Satan? Where have you been? The same question applied to Job as it applied to Satan — where are you Job or why is Job not here? I did not say God asked Job that, but said God somehow recalled or talked about Job with Satan as soon as Satan stated that he came all the way from earth to attend the meeting — but Job that was on earth as Satan couldn't make it there whereas he became the subject each time Satan came but he didn't.

Look, I am not analyzing this because of Job, but because of us today who have better grace and opportunities to always come before God in spirit to His Throne far better than Satan going to and fro, up and down, on earth has to attend or come before God. Don’t allow your Accusers to beat you to it at coming to God in Heaven or in the Spirit realms, because the Accusers have you in mind and God will question them to reveal what they have in mind, making the conversation about you. Yes, the Lord Jesus is the Advocate for us before God, but even with Him interceding for us, we still need to always come boldly to the throne of grace to secure our inheritance, to find grace and mercy above or against whatever the Accuser/Adversary has against us.

Do not be like some religious folks, who ask Mary, Saints and Angels already there in heaven to pray for them: Rather I enjoin you to come into heaven yourselves in the grace and Spirit of the Lord Jesus Christ and come to the Throne of Grace and Mercy yourselves. The Bible reference I will cite next shows that even though we already have a High Priest in heaven who feels what we feel and is touched by our pains, we should still come to the throne of Grace in heaven: we should not be asking the High Priest in heaven to advocate or pray for us or to represent us there in heaven on our behalf: Yes, we have Him as High Priest, and yes we as connected in feelings or nerves with Him in heaven while we are on earth — Yet, our coming to heaven to present ourselves as sons of God should present themselves to God is always necessary and must not be assigned to the High Priest, Mary, Saints or Angels, to do the presentation/representation for us to God:

[Hebrews 4:14-16 AFV] — Having therefore a great High Priest, Who has passed into the heavens, Jesus the Son of God, we should hold fast the confession of our faith. For we do not have a high priest who cannot empathize with our weaknesses, but One Who was tempted in all things according to the likeness of our own temptations; yet He was without sin. Therefore, we should come with boldness to the throne of grace, so that we may receive mercy and find grace to help in time of need.

You see how having a High Priest in heaven, an Advocate in heaven, having Mary and the Saints and Angels in heaven, means you should always come boldly into heaven, not always stay out because they are there to represent you. I told you that spirits are represented in their presence, not in their absence. You can represent a man in his absence, but not represent a spirit person in his absence. E.g. To represent Christ, He must be present or it must be in His Presence you represent him.

Many of us are like Job, praying for our children and making offerings on earth and doing religious activities, but we are not presenting ourselves among sons of God in presentation to God in heaven. We barely come before God in Spirit and in heaven.

The Accuser seem wiser than us, because no matter how much walking to and fro, up and down, business he does on earth, he rarely misses the chance to also present himself to God among the assembly of the sons of God in heaven.

In the case of Daniel, he was also faithful in prayers as Job was, but Daniel was beaten by his Accusers who knew importance of presenting themselves or coming often to the king of kings more than Daniel. In the whole chapter, you barely see where Daniel (one of the presidents) visited or came to the king of kings, and the only time he met with the king in the record was when the king came to Daniel by the lions den. So, the king came to Daniel, but Daniel never came or went to the king, whereas his Accusers were frequently coming to the king of kings, Darius. And even when Daniel knew the decree against prayers was signed by the king of kings, forbidding every one from praying to God but that everyone should come to the king to make any request, Daniel still did not go or come to the king of kings to redress the law, but instead Daniel still prayed with windows opened. But the Accusers of Daniel came more often to the king of kings.

(Daniel 6:6 - CGV) — "Then these presidents and satraps assembled together to the king, and said thus to him, “King Darius, live forever."

(Daniel 6:6 - LBP) — "Then the governors and the generals came before the king, and said to him, “King Darius, live for ever!"

♨️♨️♨️♨️♨️♨️♨️

They came to the king of kings as Satan also came to God among the sons of God, but Daniel did not come to that king of kings until the Accusers succeeded and Daniel was in the pit and the king he bare came to became the one coming in deliverance to Daniel just as God eventually came to Job in his captivity in a whirlwind.

But understand the Accusers power increases by his access and coming to the King of Kings, while the advocate/Intercessor power is inhibited or none by his inaccess or not coming to the king of kings.

The entire Jews were about to be wiped off the surface of the earth because their Accuser, Haman, had access and do come before the king of kings, whereas Esther the queen and advocate for the Jews, together with Mordecai, were afraid they would die if they come before the king uninvited. Haman the Accuser could come any time to the king of kings then, but the very wife and queen to the king feared for her life to come before the king — and therefore, the Accusers were gaining more power and right of destruction over the brethren. Meanwhile, Esther, Mordecai and the brethren, were praying and fasting instead of coming to the king of kings. It was when Esther took the risk and courageously decided to come or show up before the king of kings, so that even if she perish she rather perish in coming to the king of kings than cowardly perish by the Accusers, that the goalposts were also changed and the situation addressed in their favor.

[Esther 4:15-16 BSB] — Then Esther sent this reply to Mordecai: “Go and assemble all the Jews who can be found in Susa, and fast for me. Do not eat or drink for three days, night or day, and I and my maidens will fast as you do. After that, I will go to the king, even though it is against the law. And if I perish, I perish!”

JUDGMENT OF THE POT AND KETTLE

Supposing what the kettle is saying about the pot is true or factual, is the kettle in position to say it especially when the kettle is dwelling inside the pot that it's labels black?

Okay, the kettle feels it is also part of the meat inside the pot, not knowing that God does not consider it as meat in the pot but as kettle in the pot. Therefore, God would remove the kettle from the pot, but leave the carcasses or meats which the kettle delivered into the pot in the pot. For the pot is not a Microwave wherein other pots or kettles may be housed to cook the kettle/pot that in-turn Cooks the meat. The Lord would separate the kettle from the meat or carcass of the kettle, leaving the kettle's carcasses as meat in the Pot but forcing the kettle out from the pot entirely.

(Ezekiel 11:7 - GWN) - "So this is what the Almighty LORD says: The corpses that you put in the middle of the city are the meat, and the city is the cooking pot. I will force you out of the city."

(Ezekiel 11:7 - LBP) - "Therefore thus says the LORD God: Your slain whom you have laid in the midst of it, they are the meat, and this city is the caldron; but I will bring you forth out of the midst of it."

♨️♨️♨️♨️♨️♨️♨️

So, the LORD did not disprove or deny the saying that the city was a Cooking Pot, but only had issues with those saying it and those they claim are the meat inside the cooking pot.

◇ Is the City of Jerusalem then a Cooking Pot (Cauldron)? — Yes.

◇ Are Living People in City of Jerusalem then meat in the pot? - No.

◇ Are Naturally dead ones in City of Jerusalem the meat in it? - No.

◇ Are the Killed ones, those slain or killed by men in City of Jerusalem the meat in it? - Yes.

Those who died naturally are not the meat, neither are those living in the city the meat in it as a Pot or Cauldron. Rather, only those killed by men or those murdered were classified as meat in the City Pot.

[Micah 3:1-3 GWN] — "Then I said: Listen, you leaders of Jacob, you rulers of the nation of Israel. You should know justice. You hate good and love evil. You strip the skin off My people and the flesh off their bones. You eat My people's flesh. You strip off their skin. You break their bones to pieces. You chop them up like meat for a pot, like stew meat for a kettle."

Common Holiness Sense will tell you:

◇1◇ If those living are considered the meat or carcasses in the City Pot, than it would be evil in the pot because it is evil to cook or eat any meat that is alive or with its blood (its life) in it. So, those living in the city are not the meat in the pot.

◇2◇ If those that died naturally are considered the meat or carcasses in the City Pot, than it would be uncleanness in the pot because it is unclean to cook or eat any meat that died naturally or died by sickness. So, those naturally dead in the city are not the meat in the pot.

◇3◇ But if those killed by men are considered the meat or carcasses in the City Pot, than it would be proper in the pot because it is only clean meat killed by a man that you should cook or eat in your pot. So, those slain by men in the city are those God called meat in the pot.

That does not mean God would eat human flesh, neither does it imply cannibalism: Rather these are all parable to imply or illustrate that those killed by men in Jerusalem were more holy, cleaner and more worthy of the City Jerusalem than those living in Jerusalem and those who killed them. It's like a saying, “The wicked/sinners are killing or swallowing those who are more righteous than them, even in that ancient city of Jerusalem.”

[Habakkuk 1:13 GW] — Your Eyes are too pure to look at evil. You can’t watch wickedness. Why do You keep watching treacherous people? Why are You silent when wicked people swallow those who are more righteous than they are?

The kettle that swallowed or killed those more righteous and cleaner than they are shall be forced or removed from the city or from the pot, because predators or carnivores that kill other meats are not clean meat themselves in that City Pot.

However, even the City of Jerusalem as a Pot must be purged from bloodshed and from uncleanness of being Cooking Pot for clean meat. The Lord would put that pot empty on a fire of oven, without adding any water or liquid or substance into the burning pot, so that the pot will burn on the fire until all its impurities are gone and it's refined. As it is written concerning the purification of that City Pot of Meat:

[Ezekiel 24:2-14 GW] — “Son of man, write down today’s date. The king of Babylon has surrounded Jerusalem this very day. Tell these rebellious people a story. Tell them, ‘This is what the Almighty LORD says: Put the pot on the fire; put it on. Pour water in it. Cut the meat into pieces, all the best pieces, the thigh and shoulder. Fill the pot with the meatiest bones selected from the best sheep. Pile wood under the pot. Bring the mixture in the pot to a boil. Cook the bones that are in it well. “‘This is what the Almighty LORD says: How horrible it will be for that city of murderers, for that tarnished pot. Its tarnish will not come off. Empty the meat out of it piece by piece without choosing any particular piece. Blood is still in that city. The blood was poured on a bare rock. It wasn’t poured on the ground where dust would cover it. In order to stir up My fury so that I would pay that city back, I put the blood of its victims on a bare rock. Now that blood can’t be covered. “‘This is what the Almighty LORD says: How horrible it will be for that city of murderers. I, too, will pile the wood high. Pile it high, and light the fire. Cook the meat thoroughly, stir the mixture, and let the bones burn. Then set the empty pot on the coals so that it gets hot and its copper glows. Its impurities will melt away, and its tarnish will burn off. “‘I have worn Myself out trying to clean this pot. Even the fire can’t take away its thick tarnish. I tried to clean you of your filthy lust, but you wouldn’t clean yourself from your filth. You will never be clean until I unleash My Fury on you. I, the LORD, have spoken. It will happen, and I will do it. I will not ignore you, pity you, or change My plans. I will punish you because of the way you lived and because of everything you have done,’ ” declares the Almighty LORD.

/

+

THEIR METHODS OF FINDING FAULTS IN FAULTLESS MEN

Perhaps we must now know these things about the “Accusers of Brethren,” particularly the Chief Accuser of Brethren, Satan himself:

☆1☆ Being found blameless, innocent or faultless, does not still stops the accusers that is hell bent on accusing the brethren. So, even if a man's all round declared righteous, blameless, upright, faultless, pure, etc., by God Himself, Satan would still not give up at accusing the blameless, upright, faultless, pure etc, man. Example was in the case of Job: God Himself told Satan that Job was upright and fears God, and yet Satan wouldn't still give up, in more occasions than one.

☆2☆ How does the Accusers seek to still attempt to accuse a man that's already found blameless, upright, faultless, pure etc? There are basically two methods the Accusers may employ to persist at it:

☆2~A☆ The Accusers would either use “False Accusation Method” to accuse a man they already know is blameless, upright, faultless or pure etc. Example Potiphar’s wife used this method to accuse Joseph. This method, “False Accusation,” has limits to which the Devil who is both father of lies and chief accuser can use “False Accusation.” Satan cannot use “false accusation” in Heaven or in communicating with God and higher angels: Satan never dares to lie to God, even if Satan lies to himself or is the father of lies. So, because he cannot use false accusation before God, Satan would use the second method before God in trying to still accuse a man declared blameless, upright, faultless, pure etc.

However, Satan uses “False Accusations” or “Lies/Falsehood” when he's in communication to men or in connection with the tongues of men. Someone had asserted that “Satan is still learning work where some people who tell lies/falsehood are.” Implying those people told lies that even Satan would not have told or imagined. Well, Satan is the father or originator of lies and falsehood, but indeed there are lies Satan can only use the tongues of men or women to tell to people, after laying the lies or falsehood in the hearts of the deceivers.

Notice that sometimes a mad man/woman, that is, one possessed by demons/evil spirits, may be saying things that are true or factual, while a man/woman that seemly is not possessed by any demon/evil spirits would be saying things that are lies or false. Am not saying evil spirits or demons don't lie, but saying they have to possess the mouths or tongues of men to be able to tell certain lies or falsehood to men. Two Bible references:

Reference 1 — A spirit that cannot tell lies in heaven could possess the mouths of even prophets or pastors, and become a lying spirit only in the mouth or by tongues of men.

[1 Kings 22:22-23 AKJV] — And the LORD said to him, “With which?” And he said, “I will go forth, and I will be a lying spirit in the mouth of all his prophets.” And He said, “You shall persuade him, and prevail also: go forth, and do so.” Now therefore, behold, the LORD has put a lying spirit in the mouth of all these your prophets, and the LORD has spoken evil concerning you.

Reference 2 — concerning the days of the Antichrist, False Prophet and the red Dragon, the prophecy said God will send to the world a strong delusion, deception or lies, so that the world would believe the lies of Antichrist, false prophet and the dragon to their damnation, because the world rejected the Truth that God earlier sent to them. Billy Graham in “1974” told a story of a man who lied to a church and the church believed him and received him; and then later he confessed to the church that he had lied to them, and showed them the truth, and the church cast the man away from them. Then the man said “This is a strange church: I told them lies and they received me, and I told them truths and they discarded and rejected me.” So, God sent truth to the world and they rejected the truth, seeking and making researches especialy scientifically to disprove the truth of God. So, God will send them lies and strong delusion for them to receive:

[2 Thessalonians 2:9-12 AKJV] — Even him, whose coming is after the working of Satan with all power and signs and lying wonders, And with all delusion of unrighteousness in them that perish; because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved. And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie: That they all might be damned who believed not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness.

But my objective here is to point out the lying spirit in the mouths of the Antichrist, False Prophet and the Dragon. Now read about it here:

[Revelation 16:13-14 AKJV] — And I saw three unclean spirits like frogs come out of the mouth of the dragon, and out of the mouth of the beast, and out of the mouth of the false prophet. For they are the spirits of devils, working miracles, which go forth to the kings of the earth and of the whole world, to gather them to the battle of that great day of God Almighty.

So, according to this reference, spirits of devils also work miracles, signs and wonders, and yet are lying spirits in mouths of false prophets. They are there for people who want miracles but do not want the truth.

Now, we must advance to the second method of the Accusers insisting on accusing a man who they know is blameless, upright, faultless, etc.

☆2~B☆ The Accusers may either use “Shifting the goalposts” to accuse a man they already know is blameless, upright, faultless or pure etc.

Shifting the goalposts differs from false accusation because it does not involve lying or false assertion, but involves manipulation of criteria or standards of requirements to become more difficult for the other party and more favorable to the party of the Accusers. Examples of shifting the goalposts by the Accusers of the blameless, upright, faultless or pure men in the scriptures include — Satan asking God to struck out the hedge of protection around Job, and take away Job's wealth and health as a drastic policy change, making the criteria or standards more difficult for Job but giving Satan more opportunities. — Making the Lord Jesus Christ that was judged by Roman's Laws and found blameless, upright, faultless or pure, to be condemned by another law of the Jews while still using the Roman's Law to crucify the man that the Law did not find guilty. That is, he used the laws of Moses (Jewish law) to establish the Lord Jesus as worthy of death, but applying that law in a jurisdiction of a different (Roman) law that found Jesus Christ blameless and worthy to live.

Okay, take Him and crucify Him according to your Jewish Law, because by my Roman's law He is found blameless, upright, faultless or pure. But the people said “No, we only apply our Jewish to condemn Him for claiming to be Son of God, but we want you to apply your law to crucify Him based on what our law said of Him even though your law says different things about Him. — Shifting Goalposts or Double-standards:

[John 19:6-8] — When the chief priests therefore and officers saw Him, they cried out, saying, “Crucify Him, crucify Him.” Pilate said to them, “You yourselves should take Him, and crucify Him yourselves: for I find no fault in Him.” The Jews answered him, “We have a law, and by our law He ought to die, because He made Himself the Son of God.” When Pilate therefore heard that saying, he was the more afraid;

Meanwhile, Satan could not earlier find any cause of death for Him even in the Law of Moses: Satan used men with false accusations, and yet the witnesses or false accusers couldn't establish fault in Him, until the Lord Jesus Christ gave them the only truth they were to use and crucify Him — That is - Declaring He's the Messiah, Son of God.

[Mar 14:55-64 BSB] — Now the chief priests and the whole Sanhedrin were seeking testimony against Jesus to put Him to death, but they did not find any. For many bore false witness against Jesus, but their testimony was inconsistent. Then some men stood up and testified falsely against Him: “We heard Him say, ‘I will destroy this man-made temple, and in three days I will build another that is made without hands.’ ” But even their testimony was inconsistent. So the high priest stood up before them and questioned Jesus, “Have You no answer? What are these men testifying against You?” But Jesus remained silent and made no reply. Again the high priest questioned Him, “Are You the Christ, the Son of the Blessed One?” “I am,” said Jesus, “and you will see the Son of Man sitting at the right hand of Power and coming with the clouds of heaven.” At this, the high priest tore his clothes and declared, “Why do we need any more witnesses? You have heard the blasphemy. What is your verdict?” And they all condemned Him as deserving of death.

You see, even in the laws of Moses or Jewish law, the Lord Jesus Christ was blameless, upright, faultless or pure that they had very hard time to find any fault worthy of death in Him. He only gave them “I Am the Son of God” as their bases for condemning Him to death on grounds of blasphemy — But even that was true, not blasphemy.

However, the main bible verse in this thread that contains an example of shifting the Goalposts that Accusers use against blameless, upright, faultless or pure etc., is this:


(Daniel 6:5 - GWN) — "These men said, "We won't find anything to accuse this man, Daniel, unless we find it in his religious practices.""

(Daniel 6:5 - LBP) — "Then these men said, We shall not find any occasion against this Daniel unless we find it against him in connection with the law of his God."

♨️♨️♨️♨️♨️♨️♨️

In this Bible verse above, they have exhausted all there were in the Persian Laws and all human laws, but found Daniel blameless, upright, faultless or pure etc., and they affirm they cannot continue to depend on any of the available laws to accuse Daniel because they would fund none. So, they say they will go for a law that can accuse him on the grounds of his relationship with God or the laws of God.

So, they would shift the goalposts, get the king to make a new law or policy to use in accusing Daniel, since there was no existing Laws or standard that currently favors any accusation of Daniel.

Well, they were not resorting to false accusation, but they resorted to shifting the goalposts in still insisting on accusing or condemning a man declared blameless, upright, faultless or pure etc.

KETTLE CALLING POT BLACK

There have been times that people accused Life, accused Society, accused Nature, accused the City or accused the Economy of being cruel and tough, whereas the same accusers were the ones who made Life, Society, Nature, the City or the Economy, cruel and harsh. A song writer said, “People cry/lament that the world has spoiled, but the world was spoiled by none others but people.”

Many do not know they are part in the cause of the problems around, but only know there are problems/ills around: — They see “These are the problems” but they do not see “They are the problems.” Examples

▪︎ ▪︎ The unrighteous and fraudulent man does not see himself as cause of the problems, but as a victim that must survive by any means/way.

▪︎ ▪︎ The Liar and Dishonest man does not see himself as cause of the problems, but as a victim that must survive by any means/way.

▪︎ ▪︎ The Robber and stealing man does not see himself as cause of the problems, but as a victim that must survive by any means/way.

▪︎ ▪︎ The non-virgins, the whores, and fornicating men do not see themselves as the problems, but say a body is wood/stone, it must eat.

▪︎ ▪︎ The idolaters, the abusers, the lazy and unproductive people, the bullying people, the extortionists, the revilers, the greedy, covetous and lustful, and all sinners, unrighteous and all selfish or self-centered people do not see themselves as the problems or damages in Life, in the world, in the society, in the city or on earth; they only blame devil, nature, politicians in government, security officers, parents, poverty, hunger, bad economy, wicked neighbors or badluck as the problems.

Listen: When you try and make someone see better than you can see, you are a kindness, a lamp or light; but when you try or see someone better/clearer than you can see yourself, even if you're an optometrist, you are a hypocrite. As it is written,

[Luke 6:39-42 BSB] — Jesus also told them a parable: “Can a blind man lead a blind man? Will they not both fall into a pit? A disciple is not above his teacher, but everyone who is fully trained will be like his teacher. Why do you look at the speck in your brother’s eye, but fail to notice the beam in your own eye? How can you say, ‘Brother, let me take the speck out of your eye,’ while you yourself fail to see the beam in your own eye? You hypocrite! First take the beam out of your own eye, and then you will see clearly to remove the speck from your brother’s eye.

We all need to see ourselves better in the Mirrors of self evaluation and Mirrors of self judgment in righteousness and truth, more than we can see others in the light of judgment and truth. Light is for seeing others, but Mirror in light is for seeing oneself. Don't just have light, but also have mirrors: not rear view mirror, but self-scanning Mirror.

Those 25 men and their team of Cabals were pointing accusing finger to the city or system as the Cooking Pot that Fries/Cooks the people in the city as meat or carcass in the pot. But by the Spirit of God in words of prophecy, their hidden sins were exposed, and they were the cause of the City being the Cooking Pot because they were the killers or hunters that had killed/slain the people in the city or meat in the pot.

(Ezekiel 11:6 - BSB) - "You have multiplied those you killed in this city and filled its streets with the dead."

(Ezekiel 11:6 - LBP) - "You have multiplied your slain in this city, and you have filled its streets with the slain."

Is it pot calling kettle black or kettle calling pot black? How do they use that saying?

The dead bodies in the Mortuary were basically those you killed, why then would you speak evil of the Mortuary saying it's turns the living into dead, and the dead into very dead? You killed or atleast butchered or sliced the animal into the cauldron (pot on fire) and yet you the kettle that supplied all in the pot is accusing the pot of its contents and meat therein?

Now look at the prophecy in the main Bible verse above: Can you tell whether it's true that those men literally multiplied those they killed to extent of filling all streets in the city with the dead bodies of those they killed literally? How is that even possible literally? Yet, the Holy Spirit of Truth declared it so. Not literally in this realms, but in figure.

It's like a woman that has more than one body-counts: and the number of extra body-counts she has above one is the number of men she killed even though they still walk among the living. This is bible:

[Proverbs 23:27-28 GW] — A prostitute is a deep pit. A loose woman is a narrow well. She is like a robber, lying in ambush. She spreads unfaithfulness throughout society.

[Proverbs 2:16-19 GWN] — "[Wisdom will] also save you from an adulterous woman, from a loose woman with her smooth talk, who leaves her husband, the closest friend of her youth, and forgets her marriage vows to her God. Her house sinks down to death. Her ways lead to the souls of the dead. None who have sex with her come back. Nor do they ever reach the paths of life."

[Revelation 17:1-6 GWN] — "One of the seven angels who held the seven bowls came and said to me, "Come, I will show you the judgment of that notorious prostitute who sits on raging waters. The kings of the earth had sex with her, and those living on earth became drunk on the wine of her sexual sins." Then the angel carried me by his power into the wilderness. I saw a woman sitting on a bright red beast covered with insulting names. It had seven heads and ten horns. The woman wore purple clothes, bright red clothes, gold jewelry, gems, and pearls. In her hand she was holding a gold cup filled with detestable and evil things from her sexual sins. A name was written on her forehead. The name was Mystery: Babylon the Great, the Mother of Prostitutes and Detestable Things of the Earth. I saw that the woman was drunk with the blood of God's holy people and of those who testify about Jesus. I was very surprised when I saw her."

How was she drunk with the blood of Prophets and blood of those who testify about Jesus? The said she's sitted on many waters, but she was in a wilderness where there was no water according to where the angel took John to see her. The waters she was sitting were the seven headed beast with multiple blasphemous name-counts on it, as mother of prostitute she's on-top riding the beast, not the beast on top of her.

She was drunk with blood as vampire, instead of the beast for blood.

Now back to the 25 men who figuratively killed and multiplied those they killed until they filled all streets and points in the city with their dead whom they killed. They did not literally do these things by use of weapons of war or destruction, but they did by “Devising Mischief, pushing evil counsels or propagating evil doctrines while religious from east gates of the house of God.” By just the use of their tongues:

[Proverbs 18:21 BSB] — Life and death are in the power of the tongue, and those who love it will eat its fruit.

[James 3:6-8 BSB] — The tongue also is a fire, a world of wickedness among the parts of the body. It pollutes the whole person, sets the course of his life on fire, and is itself set on fire by hell. All kinds of animals, birds, reptiles, and creatures of the sea are being tamed and have been tamed by man, but no man can tame the tongue. It is a restless evil, full of deadly poison.

ATTENTION MUSLIMS

[John 8:21-25] —
Jesus again said to them, “I am going away, and you will seek Me, and you will die in your sins; and where I am going you cannot come.”

The Jews said, “Why, will He kill Himself? for He says, Where I am going, you cannot come.”

And Jesus said to them, “You are from below, and I am from above; you are of this world, but I am not of this world. I told you that you will die in your sins; for unless you believe that I am He, you will die in your sins.”

The Jews asked, “Who are you?”

Jesus answered them, “I am Whom I said to you from the Beginning."

Have you considered this conversation between the Lord Jesus and the unbelievers? He told them they will seek Him and still die in their sins; and no matter how much they seek Him they never come to where He's going or where He is now.

Look, I have Muslims in mind in sharing this: Can any Muslim answer these questions from the Bible passage above:

(1.) Do you agree that Jesus was not of this world like the rest of men, and that He was from above?

(2.) Do you agree that where Jesus was going or has gone back to now, you or no man can ever go there to meet Him there?

(3.) Do you agree that no amount of seeking Jesus Christ can prevent you or any man from dying in their sins? And that no amount of religious practices will prevent a man from dying in his or her sins? And that at the end, all seeking or religious practices will end in death in sin, and no man can go to where Jesus Christ is presently?

(4.) In that Bible reference, Jesus Christ mentioned one exception that will ever change the doom or fate of all men to prevent them from dying in their sins and to enable them come to where Jesus Christ is now at the end: Which of these three options is the true only or one exception or one “Unless” that Jesus Christ mentioned that can change the doom or fate that awaits all men from death in their sins and from inability to come to where the Lord Jesus had returned to be:

.A. Unless they or men seek Jesus Christ, they shall die in their sins,

.B. Unless they or men believe Jesus is He, they shall die in their sins,

.C. Unless men repent and serve Allah, they shall die in their sins.

+

WORD AND SPIRIT OF PROPHECY

Okay. You may recall that I earlier try to separate the difference between “saying things against” and “prophesying things against.” Now, in trying to differentiate between saying and prophesying, we saw the context where the Lord God instructed, the son of man, Ezekiel, to prophesy against them. And though the LORD said that to him, or even though Ezekiel had that instruction to prophesy against/for, yet Ezekiel neither prophesied against them from his own thoughts, nor did he suddenly open his mouth and start saying anything he likes, until the Lord or His Spirit put the word of the prophecy in his mouth.

Even if God tells you to prophesy to/against someone or something, you are not just going to speaking anything you feel like saying. For even if the LORD sent or commanded you to prophesy, the words you say in your prophesying will still be your human sayings and not the words of God. So, it is not enough for God to tell to prophesy, but God has to also put the utterance in your mouth or give you the words of the prophecy.

Because if Ezekiel, even though he is under that instruction, spoke whatever that he is going to say from himself, it will still be him saying it. It will be against the rule. So, for you to qualify to be a prophesier against, or a prophecy, whatever that he has to say must be what the Lord God is saying or said. Hence, it must be beyond “God sent/told me to prophesy/speak” and must become "Thus said the LORD” or “This is what the Spirit is saying expressly.”

So something happened between the space when the Lord told Ezekiel to prophesy against them, and when Ezekiel began to prophesy, — That which happened was the Spirit of God came over him and gave him the words or utterance he was to say.

Now, sometimes people in praying or making declaration would say they are prophesying, but they are speaking their own words. They would be saying, “I prophesy, I prophesy to you:” But the words they are prophesying to you are their own words, their own human words, and not a revelation of words of God or the utterances by the Spirit of God speaking through them.

So, even though he is using I prophesy to you in quotes to cap what he is trying to say to you, or say to that thing, it is still him saying it because that use of “I prophesy to you” is not quoting or reciting the direct words of God, direct thoughts of the Lord, or direct words of the Spirit of God.

So, you are seeing an example of a man whom God instructed to prophesy against them, yet the man did not open his mouth to say anything, and suddenly the Spirit of God came over him and gave him the words to say in order to fulfill that instruction.

(Ezekiel 11:5 - CGV) - "And the Spirit of YHWH fell on me, and He said to me, Speak, Thus says YHWH: Thus you (pl) have said, O house of Israel; for I know the things that come into your (pl) mind."

(Ezekiel 11:5 - LBP) - "And the Spirit of the LORD fell upon me, and He said to me, Speak, Thus says the LORD God: Thus have you desired, O house of Israel; for I know the inclination of your thought."

♨️♨️♨️♨️♨️♨️♨️

Let's walk through the whole scenario again: The LORD (YHWH) had earlier mounted His throne above the Cherubim, and they had lifted from the yard of the temple towards the East Gate. While Ezekiel was left behind observing, the Spirit of the LORD (Spirit of YHWH) lifted up Ezekiel after the LORD and brought him also beside the LORD and the Cherubim by the East Gate where he was seeing 25 men and recognized two among them by names and surnames or their father's names and their leadership over the nation.

The LORD (YHWH) had instructed Ezekiel to prophesy against the 25 men, but did not tell tell him exactly what to say yet. But the Spirit of the LORD (YHWH) that was upholding or uplifting Ezekiel also fell upon Ezekiel He was uplifting, and whispered or told him from within him exactly what to say, using, “Thus says the LORD (YHWH)” in distinguishing whatever he says in the prophecy as the saying of the LORD (even though it is the saying of the Spirit of God)

I recall when I had to wrestle it out with some Jehovah's witnesses that say the Spirit of God is not a Person, but an “Active Force” — while I insisted in showing them the attributes of a Person of the Spirit of God, including the Spirit of God speaking or talking as you just read in the main Bible verse above.

The LORD is the Spirit (2 Corinthians 3:17). So, when the Spirit of the LORD fell on Ezekiel and began to speak or tell him what to say, there was no need for the Spirit to tell him to quote Me as in “Thus says the Spirit” rather the Spirit told him to quote Me as in “Thus says the LORD (YHWH).

What you witnessed in this main Bible verse above of the Spirit of God supplying the exact words/utterances His ministers/messengers need to say at a point where they are required to open their mouth and begin speaking as needed at the very time, was reiterated by the Lord Jesus Christ, saying:

[Mark 13:11] — "But when they shall lead you, and deliver you up, take no thought beforehand what you shall speak, neither do you premeditate: but whatever shall be given you in that hour, that speak you: for it is not you that speak, but the Holy Ghost."

[Matthew 10:19-20 AKJV] — But when they deliver you up, take no thought how or what you shall speak: for it shall be given you in that same hour what you shall speak. For it is not you that speak, but the Spirit of your Father which speaks in you.

[Luke 21:13-15 AFV] — But it shall turn to you for a testimony. Settle therefore in your hearts not to premeditate what you shall answer. For I will give you a mouth and wisdom that all those who are opposing you shall not be able to reply to nor resist.

Someone once wrote, saying:,
“Wisemen speak because they have something to say, but fools speak because they have to say something.”

But I testify that most of the times before I spoke in the word of God, I had nothing to say but had to say something; and then the faithful Spirit of God never fails to suddenly put the Words and Wisdom in my spirit or mind to say them, and they suddenly become so deep that people would think I knew what I said before, not knowing I did not even know those things I said about one hour or two hours earlier before I ever said them. That was like what Ezekiel received in the top bible verse above.

[2 Peter 1:21 AFV] — Because prophecy was not brought at any time by human will, but the holy men of God spoke as they were moved by the Holy Spirit.

In content of what the Spirit that fell upon Ezekiel told him to say when he had nothing to say but needed to say something to fulfill the Lord's instruction to prophesy against the people he just saw less than an hour earlier: — In the content, I say — The utterance of the Spirit of God in Ezekiel came with “Word of Knowledge” that knew what the people said and what the though, including knowing the things they have in their mind and what comes into their mind.

The Spirit of God in Ezekiel by then, Knew everything in the Words+Mind of God and at the same time knew everything in the words+minds of the people. How did Paul express this? He said it's the spirit of man that knows the things of the man, as the Spirit of God know the things God.

[1 Corinthians 2:10-12 AFV] —But God has revealed them to us by His Spirit, for the Spirit searches all things—even the deep things of God. For who among men understands the things of man except by the spirit of man which is in him? In the same way also, the things of God no one understands except by the Spirit of God. Now we have not received the spirit of the world, but the Spirit that is of God, so that we might know the things graciously given to us by God;

So how did the Spirit of God in Ezekiel both knows what God says (Thus says the LORD) and knows what the people say or think in the main bible verse above? The Spirit of God fills all men and knows all that spirits of men know.

YOUR OFFICE STEWARDSHIP AND ADMINISTRATION MUST COME UNDER PROBE, MAY BE AGAINST YOU

Children said, no weapon fashioned against me shall prosper. However, there are things (lethal) that are not weapons but yet can be used against the man on/in whom those things are found. A difference between weapons and those (lethal) things is that when a weapon is found with a man, the weapon is mostly fashioned against another man other than the man on/with whom the weapon is found; while on the other hand, when any of those lethal things is found in/on/with a man, it is fashioned against the man whom it possesses or by whom it's possessed and used.

These lethal things include: Corruption, Faults, Errors, Falsehood, Embezzlement, Mismanagement, Underperformance, Fruitless, Incompetence, Ignorance, Defilement, Evil, Iniquity, Sin etc.

◇1. **Self-Inflicted Challenges**: The challenges we face are not only external (like weapons) but can also stem from our own actions, words, and beliefs. These self-inflicted challenges can either work for us or work against us.

◇2. **Leadership Accountability**: There is a particular focus here on those in positions of power, such as government leaders, accountability structures, Antigraft/Anticorruption Structures etc.

◇3. **Judgment and Consequences**: There will be a day of judgment where leaders will be held accountable for their governance. A Day wherein all leadership, governments, administrations, offices and Stewardship, shall be probed either knowingly to those who sat in them or unknowingly. This accountability is not limited to current actions but also includes past decisions and mismanagement.

◇4. **Be sure that as a steward, you are found faithful.


[Luke 16:1-2, 10-13 BSB] — Jesus also said to His disciples, “There was a rich man whose manager was accused of wasting his possessions. So he called him in to ask, ‘What is this I hear about you? Turn in an account of your management, for you cannot be manager any longer.’ ….Whoever is faithful with very little will also be faithful with much, and whoever is dishonest with very little will also be dishonest with much. So if you have not been faithful with worldly wealth, who will entrust you with true riches? And if you have not been faithful with the belongings of another, who will give you belongings of your own? No servant can serve two masters. Either he will hate the one and love the other, or he will be devoted to the one and despise the other. You cannot serve both God and money.”

Daniel was a president over atleast 40 states or 40 governors of states/provinces in Persian Empire. He was so transparent that even while he was in office, he was being probed by both the 120 governors under him and 2 other presidents with them. Daniel was not hiding under immunity clause to prevent his probe: He allowed his adversaries/enemies to probe him, search him thoroughly, even though they have wicked or ulterior motives against him. They could have framed him up or alleged he did something he didn't do, even in all their evil schemes — because Daniel was so clean that it was not possible to allege or attribute any corruption to him.

(Daniel 6:4 - FBV) — "As a result the other chief ministers and provincial governors tried to find a pretext against Daniel as to the way he ran the kingdom. But they couldn't find any cause for complaint or any corruption, for he was trustworthy. They could not discover any evidence that Daniel was negligent or corrupt."

(Daniel 6:4 - LBP) — "Then the governors and generals sought to find occasion against Daniel concerning the affairs of the kingdom; but they could find no fault or occasion because he was faithful to his God, neither were they able to find any blame or charge against him."

♨️♨️♨️♨️♨️♨️♨️

Perhaps I should put it this way: Joseph was accused of raping his master's wife in his office as household manager and general manager. Though Joseph was innocent and never did it, yet the false accusation had some evidence or facts that supported the lies. Joseph was not so transparent and separate to a degree that no woman would consider such false accusation of Fornication or rape against him.

But you see Daniel, it was even impossible to falsely accuse him even if that will earn him a temporary suspension from office to clear his name. He was so transparent, distinguished with high levels of integrity that everyone already preferred him and knew him by what was impossible to be attributed as what he did or did not do. Daniel was not unpredictable, but predicted. They couldn't accuse him of sleeping with women, for He was a eunuch (undefiled); not of fault, nor of blame, nor of negligence, public complaints, mismanagement etc. for He was faithful and trustworthy and of excellent spirit.

[Act 24:16 AKJV] — And herein do I exercise myself, to have always a conscience void to offense toward God, and toward men.

[Philippians 4:8 AKJV] — Finally, brothers, whatever things are true, whatever things are honest, whatever things are just, whatever things are pure, whatever things are lovely, whatever things are of good report; if there be any virtue, and if there be any praise, think on these things.

PROPHESYING AGAINST DIFFERS TO SPEAKING AGAINST


◇1. **Distinction Between Speaking and Prophesying**: There is great difference between an individual speaking against sacred entities (like the church or ministers) from personal opinion versus a prophet speaking against them under divine inspiration. The former is considered a grave error, while the latter can be a fulfillment of God's will.

◇2. **Role of Prophets**: Prophets, such as Jeremiah and Ezekiel, are depicted as having the authority to prophesy against the people of God, ministers, and sacred places when inspired by the Holy Spirit. Their prophecies serve to call out sin, warn against false teachings, and urge repentance.

◇3. **Examples from Scripture**: In “Jeremiah 23:32,” Jeremiah prophesied against pastors, priests, preachers or motivation speakers that prophesy from their own minds/dreams without God sending them to tell people those motivational, prosperity or goodwishful declaration or messages they release to people, because such messages makes the people of God more worthless and useless and carnal. In “Jeremiah 25:30,” Jeremiah prophesied against the people. In “Jeremiah 26:12,” God sent Jeremiah to prophesy against the house or temple or church building, and against the city of Jerusalem. In “Ezekiel 4:7,” God sent Ezekiel to prophesy against Jerusalem to its siege. In “Ezekiel 6:2,” he was to prophesy against the mountains of Israel. In “Ezekiel 13:2,” Ezekiel prophesied against prophets of Israel that prophesied from their own heart, from their own decree (I decree), from their own “I take authority…” In “Ezekiel 20:46,” Ezekiel prophesied against the Forest of the South field. In Ezekiel 21:2, Ezekiel prophesied against the land of Israel, the promised land.

4. **Caution Against Speaking Against, instead of prophesying against**: There is a strong warning against individuals, especially those not divinely appointed or inspired by Spirit of God, from speaking against God's anointed or sacred institutions. I stresses that such actions should only be taken if one is sent by God to prophesy.

5. **Divine Authority vs. Personal Opinion**: It is crucial to recognize the difference between personal criticism and divinely inspired prophecy. Only those appointed by God should speak against sacred matters, as they do so with authority and purpose.

Those twenty-five Cabal devising mischief and giving wicked counsel against the city, saying the city is frying pan to fire or the city is cooking pot and people in it are the meat heated in the cooking pot: — They were authorized to say or do those things to the city of God, but Ezekiel was authorized to say such things in prophesying against the city. Even though Ezekiel’s prophesying does not disprove or negate the facts in what they are saying about the city but instead collaborates their sentiment about the city, yet because they were not sent or inspired prophecy of God but by evil motives, prophesying is therefore against them.

(Ezekiel 11:4 - CGV) - "Therefore prophesy against them, prophesy, O son of man."

(Ezekiel 11:4 - FBV) - "So prophesy against them. Prophesy, son of man!”"

♨️♨️♨️♨️♨️♨️♨️


If you are about say anything from your mind, heart or feeling, and then notice it is a “Saying Against Them:” — Don’t say it.

But if you are about prophesy anything from the Word or Spirit of God, and then notice it is a “Prophesy Against Them:” — Prophesy it.

Do not say that because it is a “Prophesy Against Them” — you will therefore not prophesy. No! For whether it is Prophesy Against them or it is Prophesy For them — You must prophesy.

[1 Thessalonians 5:20 AKJV] — Despise not prophesyings.

Who was that you prophet that received “Prophesy Against” a high priest of Israel and the entire family of that priest, who was also his master or lord in the house of God, but he was afraid to prophesy against the high priest and his lord? Was that not Samuel in his first time of receiving “Prophesy or Message” from The LORD against Eli the high priest and his household? Thank God Eli made him to talk.

Again, whether it is Prophesy Against them or it is Prophesy For them — You must prophesy — even if they be the national leaders or rulers

(Ezekiel 11:4 - CGV) - "Therefore prophesy against them, prophesy, O son of man."

PREFERENCE IN BUILD-UP TO ELECTION

I have witnessed elections among men and most of the times people are looking at qualities, track records or parameters, that are basically carnal though they are still features or qualities of leadership. Here, you are to prioritize “The Spirit of Leadership or Spirit in a Leader” over the “Qualities of Leadership or Experience of a Leader in any build up to election or preference

Summary of Main Points:

1. **Qualities vs. Spirit**: I emphasizes that spiritual people should not assess leaders based on carnal qualities or track records but rather on the spirit within them. The focus should be his spiritual essence as leader rather than his qualifications or past achievements. Know this forever, “The Spirit is more important and more valuable than the Qualities in men to lead.’

2. **Spiritual Influence**: The world is governed by spiritual forces, and a leader's effectiveness is deeply tied to the spirit he embodies. A leader with a negative or evil spirit can fail despite having strong leadership qualities. Saul had leadership skills or qualities as king so that he kept Israel so well beyond average, and the only war he lost was the one destined for him to die by the Philistines pressures or strives. But because the Spirit of God had left him, and dwelt in David instead, evil spirit took over him in his administration. He committed blunders that may not be considered bad leadership, but are generational consequences upon his descendants and upon Israel in the next dispensation or generation: His blunders include, Amalekites he allowed to continue to live to score political points or favor from his people, but those he spared would in future attack and destroy more lives and things; priests of God he killed for their helping David whom he hated by envy or by the evil spirit inside Saul, for David was also God's anointed, and so Saul killed God's priests or God's anointed through his demonic hate; and Saul marginalized or killed a group of people living among them called the Gibeonites, to whom Israel led by Joshua swore an oath in possessing their promised land; and worse of them all was Saul's transgressions or rebellions against the Most High God and his consulting/use of witchcraft to invoke Samuel from the dead for a prophecy or message for tomorrow.

3. **Election Guidance**: In the context of upcoming elections in the United States or in any nation or level, I urge you to prioritize the spiritual condition of candidates over their policies, debates, or public personas. The Spirit of God within a candidate should be the primary criterion for selection.

4. **Manifestations of the Spirit**: Note that the Spirit of God can manifest in various ways, such as wisdom, knowledge, and excellence. You may have two or more candidates all having the Spirit of God in them: but in one candidate the Spirit of God manifests faith, miracles, healing, prosperity etc., while in the other the Spirit of God manifests wisdom, understanding, good counsel and knowledge. In this case, the candidate with wisdom is the man with excellent spirit by the Spirit of God, and he is the one that have the better spiritual qualities of leadership because of his Wisdom and Understanding better in leadership or governance than faith, miracles, healing, prosperity etc. Among two or more persons filled with the Holy Spirit of God, always choose Wisdom which is the principal thing above all, and choose understanding of Wisdom which is Excellent spirit: That is, when evaluating candidates to lead your spirit, soul or body, you should look for those who exhibit these spiritual qualities.

5. **Divine Authority**: All authority and governance come from God, and are spiritual. Therefore, a leader must have the Spirit of God or the Hand of God to be effective and to resist negative/evil spirit from hijacking his leadership/administration

Furtherance:

**Spiritual Assessment**: The selection of leaders should be based on their spiritual integrity and the presence of God's spirit rather than conventional metrics of leadership quality. **Importance of Wisdom**: Candidates who demonstrate wisdom and an excellent spirit are more suited for leadership roles, as they can navigate the complexities of governance effectively. **Awareness of Spiritual Forces**: Voters should be aware of the spiritual dynamics at play in politics, recognizing that leaders can be influenced by various spiritual forces that may not align with their promises. **Faith-Based Decision Making**: Christians are encouraged to make voting decisions grounded in spiritual discernment, seeking candidates who embody the Spirit of God and Wisdom (excellent spirit), which ultimately leads to better governance: Not presidential debates, not manifestos, not track records, not qualifications, not campaign promises etc.

How was it that Pharaoh, Nebuchadnezzar, Belshazzar and Darius, all promoted or elected Joseph and Daniel based simply on the Spirit of God and excellent spirit inside them, but we who say we have the Spirit of God in us are assessing candidates by carnal qualities or track records? If a man like Joseph stood before us as he stood the first time before Pharaoh, many would not have considered him for leadership or electing him on the following grounds: he was ex-convict or had criminal record of sleeping with a man's wife, he was a slave, he was a foreigner or was not from their tribe or nation as a dual-citizen or not eligible, or he had no track record on state or national levels as a public administrator except as houseboy, and/or he's not from their religion because he believes in a different God from the traditional gods of the Egyptians and
their ancestors. These did not matter either in election, selection or appointment of Joseph in Egypt or Daniel in Babylon/Persia; they only usually come up in contemporary carnal people. For example, recently in Africa, South Africans rejected a female national Beauty Constestant on the grounds that her father was a Nigerian, and her mother was having stolen identity and was not South African either, whereas the young Lady was born in South Africa. That was one of the highest level of foolishness and ignorance on international levels in recent times, for a people to reject someone born among them because of the origin of the person's ancestors. South Africans were foolish in doing that, and that will cost them in the days to come. You cannot say Ephraim or Manasseh are not Africans or Egyptians when they were born in Egypt simply because Joseph did not originate from Egypt. Neither deny the Lord Jesus Christ is a Judean even though His Father is from Everlasting and his mother, Mary, was a Levite, (only Joseph was from Judah), seeing the Jesus Christ was born in Bethlehem of Judah, hometown of David son of Jesse, and then the Lord became a Galilean or Nazarene in Nazareth.

Being born in any place makes anyone people of place irrespective of wherever his parents came from. Those who are reborn into the spiritual family of God are all born in Zion, making us all indigenes or people of Zion even when we before members of different gentile nations of the world. Hence, “A person was born there” is enough to cancel all arguments.

[Psalms 87:4-6 CGV] — "I will make mention of Rahab and Babylon as among those that know Me: Look, Philistia, and Tyre, with Ethiopia: This [man] was born there. Yes, of Zion it shall be said, This man and that man were born in her; And the Most High Himself will establish her. YHWH will count, when He writes up the peoples, This [man] was born there. Selah."

How was it that Pharaoh, Nebuchadnezzar, Belshazzar and Darius, all promoted or elected Joseph and Daniel based simply on the Spirit of God and excellent spirit inside them, but we who say we have the Spirit of God in us are assessing candidates by carnal qualities or track records?

(Daniel 6:3 - CGV) — "Then this Daniel was distinguished above the presidents and the satraps, because an excellent spirit was in him; and the king thought to set him over the entire realm."

(Daniel 6:3 - LBP) — "Then Daniel excelled above all the presidents and generals, because he was more spiritual; and the king thought to set him over his whole kingdom."

♨️♨️♨️♨️♨️♨️♨️

There were three presidents that were carefully selected to build the structure of accountability over the empire and kingdom of Medo-Persians to block all losses or damages from the kingdom. The three were all selected by proven track records or qualifications suitable for accountability and integrity that such structure or organogram demands. But one among the three, the one who was not even from that tribe, country, not even born there, but had gifts or knowledge of speaking in their tongues and interpreting so well that he qualified to be seen as them, and yet he had his own different religion and God to whom He prays to. That was Daniel in their midst, of different nationale but he was almost made the Lord of the whole Realms or lord of the entire Kingdom because the king was considering making Daniel Lord over all his kingdom, for the king and his people preferred Daniel over and above both the Structures of Authority and the Structures of Accountability to the Structure of Lordship over all.

Why?

☆☆Because Daniel saved, made or earned money for them? NO!

☆☆Because Daniel had integrity, honesty, never stolen nor mismanaged, and he is cutting down cost of Governance? NO!

☆☆Because Daniel reduced inflation, increased GDP and improved Per Capita or average human development? NO!

☆☆Because Daniel invested in education, agriculture, food, economy, security, infrastructure, technology? NO!

☆☆Because Daniel had or made better policies as president? NO!

What then was the reason Daniel was preferred or distinguished above the other presidents and generals or governors? What did he do that earned him the “Preference” and Potential “Election” among the king and his people?

It was not what he did, but what/whom he had in spirit/spiritual — Excellent Spirit. One of the Bible Translations I cite said it was because Daniel had “Excellent Spirit” and the other said it was because Daniel was “More Spiritual.”

Having the Holy Spirit of God in you makes you spiritual, but having an Excellent spirit by the Spirit of God in you makes you “More Spiritual.”

[1 Corinthians 2:12-15] — "Now we did not receive the spirit of the world, but the Spirit which is from God, in order that we might know the things freely given to us by God; which things we also speak, not in words taught in human wisdom, but in words taught by the Holy Spirit, comparing spiritual things with spiritual. But the natural man does not receive the things of the Spirit of God, for they are foolishness to him; nor can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned. But he that is spiritual discerns all things, yet he himself is discerned by no man."