₦airaland Forum

Welcome, Guest: Register • Login • With Google • Trending • Recent • New

Stats: 3,345,220 members, 8,516,133 topics. Date: Tuesday, 10 November 2026 at 08:42 AM

Toggle theme

Philip0906's Posts

Nairaland Forum › Philip0906's Profile › Philip0906's Posts

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 (of 283 pages)

Science/Technology › Re: Car-Sized Prehistoric South American Turtle Was Built For Battle by philip0906(m): 3:29pm On Feb 15, 2020
Commentor:
The principles are used in detecting fossil fuels.

You can bury your head in the sands of dogma, it would all go away as you do so.
Nonsense!

I was waiting for you to provide emperical proof na. If I quote Bible for you to support the Genesis timeline, you'll write it off and ask for factual, logical, visible emperical proof (the hallmark of science) but you are completely bereft of ideas to do same in favor of carbon dating aside quoting formulas given to you by scientists.

Even the method of carbon dating has been called into question by a research done by scientists from Cornell University who say the significant change in the atmosphere, can impact timeline dished out by anti creationists.

This is just one of the of the numerous flaws and question marks on carbon dating issued by scientists. No sane person takes such as an absolute, except ofcourse people like you thinking they're woke.

I repeat, provide PROOF that there was a 330 million years ago? Science cannot eat her cake and have it.
Science/Technology › Re: Car-Sized Prehistoric South American Turtle Was Built For Battle by philip0906(m): 3:07pm On Feb 15, 2020
dazzlingd:
Waiting for the scientifically illiterate nigerians to start asking how did the scientist know all these
Ofcourse no scientist not even your uneducated azz, can provide FACTUAL proof aside chemistry theories and jargons posited as formula that NO ONE can and HAS validated.

There's absolutely NO WAY any human can provide emperical proof that there was ever
330 million years ago
Science is great and has done well but science does have clear limitations that even goes against the principles science has always advanced--Emperical, Factual,Validation,Visible etc

Carbon dating does not FALL in any of that category which makes it questionable.
Science/Technology › Re: Car-Sized Prehistoric South American Turtle Was Built For Battle by philip0906(m): 2:50pm On Feb 15, 2020
Sirheny007:
The other one was 330,000,000 million years ago.
This one is 13,000,000million years ago.
Please,
How accurate is carbon dating?
It's complete bullocks...Aside jargons written down on a piece of paper as theories, there is no logical, visible, factual and valid way to validate carbon dating used to get these numbers scientists reel out.
Romance › Re: Mentally- Challenged Couple Spotted Celebrating Valentine's Day In Edo (photos) by philip0906(m): 7:47pm On Feb 14, 2020
Edo people...Tufia!!
Crime › Re: Fatimo, Olalekan Bashorun's Wife Raped By 4 Armed Robbers, Marriage Crashes by philip0906(m): 11:49am On Feb 14, 2020
BackToLife:
[s]Obviously, you are shallow-minded. The scripture has been recently scientifically confirmed that your wife is your blood and you are her blood. Forget the fact that devil has used his agents in the media to manipulate majority to think sex is just a play thing, you and your wife are supposed to be the ones that disvirgined each other. Haven't you noticed that after some years that a couple has been married, they start looking so much alike, unlike initially. That's because blood has mixed with blood Marriage=Sex, and sex is Blood Covenant.[/s]
Rubbish!!

Scientifically proven that my blood and a random woman's blood has mixed?? grin grin
Even churning out a senseless formula about blood mixing marriage yada yada , only known to you and your fellow superstitious people...

Common gerrarahere!!
Crime › Re: Fatimo, Olalekan Bashorun's Wife Raped By 4 Armed Robbers, Marriage Crashes by philip0906(m): 9:30am On Feb 14, 2020
prettyliz:
Yes that's because you're probably not a Christian who believes that he and his wife is one flesh and that he should love her like his own body...go and meditate on it...thats deep.
The Bible's definition of "one flesh" is Ofcourse literal and only used to define husband and wife relationship. There is absolutely no practical way me and a woman who's not my blood, can be one.

My daughter is my offspring and blood (for life and in death) reason incest is considered vile and condemned/outlawed by society and religious books alike. I can never have an "ex" daughter.

But my wife? she's not my blood and we're only one in theory, not practically. She can be mine today and be another's tomorrow reason society allows for divorce and the Bible allows for seperation of husband and wife on certain grounds. Reason I can have an "ex" wife. Even in death, I can choose to get married to another woman and that woman's chapter is completely closed in my life and would only matter to her loved ones parents, siblings, children(blood)
Technology Market › Re: House Clearance Sales.. Come In Here!!!! by philip0906(m): 8:33am On Feb 14, 2020
kiekie1:
It amazes me how some say they're very busy but scout around unnecessarily on NL ! I just replied you on inverter thread which doesn't correlate with clearance thread ! If you start calling out monicker as an Igbo man who I dont owe a denari nor have we transacted in past , most will be dismayed why channel positive energy in absolutely nothin just because you culled out 2 out of 100 stories on a thread tho
My guy! Slow your roll. E no dey hard make dem run your business down for nairaland, from the Auto section to the Property section to the Business section, people wey get mouth pass you, dem don run them down....Them no even day here again

For your own good, stop all these your grammar and strong head (you come across as a proud person though I might be wrong) for the sake of your business (except say you no wan chop through nairaland) reach out to all those who have grievances with you and at best, openly address their grievances that way, everybody go see am say, you dey plain and open.

In all your posts on the allegations, you're yet to clearly address what was raised against you...even your apology was clearly half mouthed.
Crime › Re: Fatimo, Olalekan Bashorun's Wife Raped By 4 Armed Robbers, Marriage Crashes by philip0906(m): 8:15am On Feb 14, 2020
dominique:
If your daughter was raped in front of you, would you send her packing?
Unfortunately, you didn't make a like for like comparison.

My daughter is my blood and will be my daughter even in death (Nothing can change her from been my daughter)...My wife on the other hand can always seize to be my wife and so cannot be put on the same plate as my daughter.
Crime › Re: Fatimo, Olalekan Bashorun's Wife Raped By 4 Armed Robbers, Marriage Crashes by philip0906(m): 8:07am On Feb 14, 2020
Wickedfacts:
Back in the late 90s, One Igbo trader travelling to the East with his wife was robbed and his wife raped in his presence. After the incidence, her husband changed towards her. The woman called a family meeting and told them to help talk to her husband that what happened wasn't her fault.

The man said that what pained him was not that they raped her, but that she was opening her legs wider while they raped her. The woman retorted that it is not her fault that the man has a small peepeee and he doesn't know how to do.

The meeting ended up with both families exchanging blows.

Politics › Re: Dickson Tells APC To Take Supreme Court Verdict In Good Faith by philip0906(m): 5:34am On Feb 14, 2020
MelesZenawi:
You too dey wail
He's actually right. You lots wailed all over the threads created then with all sorts of funny tales and lamentations...All of a sudden, the same supreme court you accused the senile old islamist of controlling, gives a verdict that goes PDP's way and y'all are dancing and salivating.

Bottomline, the hypocrisy displayed by y'all (APC ans PDP), is nauseating
Science/Technology › Re: 330-Million-Year-Old Shark's Head Fossilized In Kentucky Cave Found By Scientist by philip0906(m): 5:52pm On Feb 13, 2020
Aidejay:
Mr carbon dating is inaccurate please suggest to us how old the shark heard is using your own accurate methods.
I do not have any accurate date neither do I expect any sane person to believe a theory or method that CANNOT be proven in any tangible and verifiable way, aside pure jargons written down on a piece of paper.
Science/Technology › Re: 330-Million-Year-Old Shark's Head Fossilized In Kentucky Cave Found By Scientist by philip0906(m): 5:50pm On Feb 13, 2020
BlackAce31:
Lol I dont know how scientist publish their answers. Remember I already said I was using secondary school chemistry to explain. Ask the experts. Perhaps the potential errors were already factored into calculations. Possibly they published the lower limit of the range gotten from calculations. But saying their answers should not be taken as absolute is funny cos most science theories and inventions are not accurate (in the sense you're implying)
This is your assumption. Carbon dating is a scientific method that is ONLY written on a piece of paper as a theory and has absolutely no visible or tangible way to prove.

This method/theory/ has severally been called to question by scientists

Science has proven a number of things that can and are applied in our every day life that cannot be questioned. How do you validate as proof something that happened years back, aside jargons?

Why is ur generator having an average power rating and a maximum power rating. Does that mean generators shouldnt be taken seriously??
This comparison does not make ANY sense as it's not like for like. I mean, I can see the generator and can see the effect of changing the power ratings as against tales written down in a book, that CANNOT be proven, aside jargons written in a book...which is exactly what scientists have against the bible.

Can anyone prove that the shark head is 330 million years aside theories written down on a piece of paper?
Science/Technology › Re: 330-Million-Year-Old Shark's Head Fossilized In Kentucky Cave Found By Scientist by philip0906(m): 5:37pm On Feb 13, 2020
DropsMic:
Go and read about carbon dating
I have answered already that carbon dating is inaccurate and has been called to question severally by scientists...So I can not use that as a definite and absolute fact.
Science/Technology › Re: 330-Million-Year-Old Shark's Head Fossilized In Kentucky Cave Found By Scientist by philip0906(m): 5:10pm On Feb 13, 2020
kevoh:
I reiterate it's quite straight forward. Questioning the accuracy of a method is part of science. Even at 100% efficiency, scientists will still question it's accuracy and reperfect the technique. That's the beauty of it. [s]The phone you are using to type right now was quite crude years ago[/s].
The stricken out makes no sense in the context of our discourse as it is comparing oranges with apples...it's not like for like.

There are so many things science has PROVEN beyond reasonable doubt, that NO ONE argues against or questions. So many theories that have been proposed and proven to be true tens of years back, no one questions.

BUT, once a theory is questioned by even the proponents i.e scientists with divergent views as to it's accuracy (been called into question), any one anywhere can disregard such theories since it's still up in the air in debate or still has grey areas.

In this case, scientists have said a shark head is 330 million years old, a sane person can decide to disregard that. An example:
A new research conducted by Cornell University could be about to throw the field of archaeology on its head with the claim that there could be a number of inaccuracies in commonly accepted carbon dating standards.

If this is true, then many of our established historical timelines are thrown into question, potentially needing a re-write of the history books.
Who knows how many more inconsistencies there is with this method.



I have not mentioned the bible. Let's not go there. The bible can only be used to validate the bible! Too many inconsistencies and most importantly, there's no room for questioning obvious errors and illogicality. Please let's not even go there.
It is not about the Bible...My point is, if there are still flaws with radiocarbon dating, there is absolutely no ground to disregard the other option, the Bible (I am not going into that arguement either, as I am limiting this to the scope of dating fossils and human life)
Science/Technology › Re: 330-Million-Year-Old Shark's Head Fossilized In Kentucky Cave Found By Scientist by philip0906(m): 4:42pm On Feb 13, 2020
BlackAce31:
Lol, I hope you asked this question with an open mind and not to argue.
Having said that, while I'm a science student (not the Olamide type, lol) I'm no expert on thus subject matter neither does my field relate to this but I'd try to use basic chemistry to explain the best way I can. I might not be really accurate
But with regards to how this carbon dating works, here's what I remember. There's something called half life. Most elements have a certain number of time for it to decay to half its size continually. Say like an hypothetical element P has a half life of 1 year. If there is 1000 P in a certain bag by this time by next year you'd meet just 500, by the year after just 250.
Now carbon has it's own half life (I think) which is very large (more than 1 year). Now,let's say its half life is 10yrs and on average a human bone contains 1000 of it. Since the body would stop functioning after death, if I see a corpse and check how many carbon is contained in its bones and it's just 500 I can safely say the corpse had been decaying for 10years.
But truth is not everyone has the same number of carbon. We would each have numbers different but close to the average that science specifies for each human being. While there is no way to surely know how many a particular corpse contains at the time of death, the average could be used and the time calculated would only be an estimate.
This is just the basic concept I can remember from secondary. Might not really be accurate but I believe is the general overview
Buttom line, carbon dating is NOT accurate and should not be taken as the absolute answer . Simples!!
Science/Technology › Re: 330-Million-Year-Old Shark's Head Fossilized In Kentucky Cave Found By Scientist by philip0906(m): 4:33pm On Feb 13, 2020
kevoh:
The method looks pretty straightforward and can be fine-tuned to be more accurate. Are there any other reliable and accurate technique of dating that you are aware of? If yes, please spill it here.
Firstly, there is NOTHING straight forward about the method, else it won't be prone to errors. Like I said, carbon dating several times, has had it's accuracy questioned by scientists.

Secondly, my point is, it is ridiculous to lampoon Biblical timeline on the grounds that it's accuracy is questionable, when the scientific alternative, is as questionable as the one we accuse.
Science/Technology › Re: 330-Million-Year-Old Shark's Head Fossilized In Kentucky Cave Found By Scientist by philip0906(m): 4:05pm On Feb 13, 2020
kevoh:
Google RadioCarbon dating! These things are taught as far back as secondary school!
Good! The question then is, how and why should we take radiocarbon to be the absolute and finite answer when severally, radiocarbon dating accuracy, has been called to question?
Science/Technology › Re: 330-Million-Year-Old Shark's Head Fossilized In Kentucky Cave Found By Scientist by philip0906(m):
DropsMic:
.. You are a black man... So no surprise here
You still did not answer the question.

How do they know that the fossil up there is 330 million years old? This is science, right? Science tells us to use PROOFs & FACTS to validate. What proof & FACT do we have available to definitely say, the fossil has been PROVEN (visible & tangible) to be 330 million years old?

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 (of 283 pages)