Mohammed Hijab is a popular Islamic apologist who debates a lot of christians, Jews and atheists.

However, TheApostateProphet, a popular apostate of islam, has posted a thorough refutation of Mr Hijab.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WyraOSPI6X4

Come and see your hero!

cc Empiree, Lanrexlan, udatso, tbaba1234, stalwert, tintingz, imaliyu, usermane

^^^
Come and see how Mohammed Hijab, the muslim apologist, has been destroyed

Xmuslim, pervertprophet, theguided

GracieX3:
Come and see your hero!

What? I have no affiliation with this clown. Spare me of him.

usermane:


What? I have no affiliation with this clown. Spare me of him.

I know, I just wanted you to be aware of the refutation.


However, have you seen Mohammed Hijabs videos before?

GracieX3:


I know, I just wanted you to be aware of the refutation.


However, have you seen Mohammed Hijabs videos before?

Yes, he is a Sunni Muslim pseudo-intellectual.

GracieX3:
Come and see your hero!

cc Empiree, Lanrexlan, udatso, tbaba1234, stalwert, tintingz, imaliyu, usermane

I'm very sure you know I'm not Muslim?

Don't mention me with that foól M.H.

GracieX3:
Mohammed Hijab is a popular Islamic apologist who debates a lot of christians, Jews and atheists.

However, TheApostateProphet, a popular apostate of islam, has posted a thorough refutation of Mr Hijab.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WyraOSPI6X4

I'm don't remember ever being a fan of his. I don't see the point of mentioning me.

tintingz:


I'm very sure you know I'm not Muslim?

Don't mention me with that foól M.H.

IMAliyu:


I'm don't remember ever being a fan of his. I don't see the point of mentioning me.

Yes. I know. I just wanted you guys to see a good refutation of his nonsense.

GracieX3:
^^^
Come and see how Mohammed Hijab, the muslim apologist, has been destroyed

Xmuslim, pervertprophet, theguided

Destroyed indeed! Fact is that you don't use one side of a story to conclude. The Rizvan guy seemed to be hurt with series of profane languages used by Hijab when he himself kept calling him "Mojo", "Dumb" etc.

And there's a good point made by Hijab (in the video played by Rizvan) when he says that Rizvan shouldn't be bothered with profane languages since he claimed to be free speech champion. Fact is that the way these atheist guys go about attacking Islam, the Prophet of Islam and the Qur'an is not civil at all. And once they are fired back like Hijab did, they get offended. Is that not hypocrisy?

I remembered David Wood's series of mocking and denigration of Islam on his channels. If that is freedom of speech, then what is it when such people are paid back in same coin?

AlBaqir:


Destroyed indeed! Fact is that you don't use one side of a story to conclude. The Rizvan guy seemed to be hurt with series of profane languages used by Hijab when he himself kept calling him "Mojo", "Dumb" etc.

And there's a good point made by Hijab (in the video played by Rizvan) when he says that Rizvan shouldn't be bothered with profane languages since he claimed to be free speech champion. Fact is that the way these atheist guys go about attacking Islam, the Prophet of Islam and the Qur'an is not civil at all. And once they are fired back like Hijab did, they get offended. Is that not hypocrisy?

I remembered David Wood's series of mocking and denigration of Islam on his channels. If that is freedom of speech, then what is it when such people are paid back in same coin?

You are wrong. Very wrong. False equivalence.

1. Freedom of speech is limited by libel and slander. Your rights stop where it infringes on another's rights. Freedom of speech stops when it is a threat to human life or a false accusation to another person. Freedom of speech applies to people and not religion. Criticising religion does not go against freedom of speech.

2. Mohammed Hijab said that Apostate prophet's wife should be raped. He has also defended the killing of apostates. Is this the person you want to defend?

3. David Wood is another person. I am not a fan

GracieX3:



You are wrong. Very wrong. False equivalence.

1. Freedom of speech is limited by libel and slander. Your rights stop where it infringes on another's rights. Freedom of speech stops when it is a threat to human life or a false accusation to another person. Freedom of speech applies to people and not religion. Criticising religion does not go against freedom of speech.

2. Mohammed Hijab said that Apostate prophet's wife should be raped. He has also defended the killing of apostates. Is this the person you want to defend?

3. David Wood is another person. I am not a fan

@bold, Okay, "people" are not the ones practising religion, it is stones. You are free to abuse and talk bad about their religion, but not "them." Does that make any sense to you? If it does, then I salute your hypocrisy.

AlBaqir:


@bold, Okay, "people" are not the ones practising religion, it is stones. You are free to abuse and talk bad about their religion, but not "them." Does that make any sense to you? If it does, then I salute your hypocrisy.

Is it that you cannot see the difference between people and religion?

GracieX3:



Is it that you cannot see the difference between people and religion?

I kind of agree with Albaqir on that part. Apostate Prophet need to accept insult to him & his wife from Muhammad Hijab in this case. Hate speech & blasphemy are the same thing.

usermane:


I kind of agree with Albaqir on that part. Apostate Prophet need to accept insult to him & his wife from Muhammad Hijab in this case. Hate speech & blasphemy are the same thing.

What the fvck?

Hate speech and blasphemy are not the same thing.

Calling for death and injury of someone is different from criticising works written in a book.

GracieX3:



What the fvck?

Hate speech and blasphemy are not the same thing.

Calling for death and injury of someone is different from criticising works written in a book.

Oh, did Muhammad Hijab call for violence? Calling for violence is where I draw the line. But insult constitute free speech.

usermane:


Oh, did Muhammad Hijab call for violence? Calling for violence is where I draw the line. But insult constitute free speech.

He said that Apostate Prophet's wife should be raped by muslim men and that apostates should be killed.

Insult is part of free speech. Blasphemy is not always insult.

Hijab just destroyed Piers Morgan, like he did David Wood - TenQ 's mentor and source.

@GracieX3