shadeyinka:

Go back and quote me properly where I said that which you are insinuating or remain a compound irredeemable liar!

I better serve a CPU cos it exist

Dtruthspeaker:


I do not do nullities!

Because your god created your white bloods cell to look like that of a rat

Workch:
I better serve a CPU cos it exist

Like your spirit father: an unrepentant pathetic liar!

shadeyinka:

Like your spirit father: an unrepentant pathetic liar!

CPU don’t lie about his existence, he’s real

Workch:
CPU don’t lie about his existence, he’s real

Dumb!
Liar!!

Workch:
Because your god created your white bloods cell to look like that of a rat

same as yours!

Dtruthspeaker:


same as yours!

What a great god you serve that makes you so related to rats.

shadeyinka:

Dumb!
Liar!!

Why are you insulting me? �

Workch:
Why are you insulting me? �

Sorry
I didn't mean to. But you were peddling untruths without shame

Workch:
What a great god you serve that makes you so related to rats.

As I always tell you, That is what it means to be A Creator.

And that is what it means to not have created yourself!

Workch:
The only way I can accept that humans and other animals didn’t evolve from a common ancestors is when I cut the flesh of other animals and that of human, analyze their cells in the flesh and blood under a microscope and they cells don’t look exactly the same.

So far, I have done this severally by viewing the blood cells of a rat and that of humans under the microscope and they always appear the same.
So why are they looking the same if humans were created specially in the image of a god?

If you can show me that they are not the same under a microscope, I will accept creation

Facepalms all over on your behalf. Don't accept, who that one affect? Your acceptance and otherwise is as insignificant as the rat that died on June 19.
The body was rightly created from dust as clearly stated by the Bible. They have almost same composition.
Man is tripartite like God the trinity is three in one. That is the basic, while you struggle to grasp that, further efforts to teach you year one or grade six reasons will be a waste of time and talent.

Workch:
I don’t understand, when did I say humans are better than rats.

I use god beg you, don’t ask me irrational questions

Workch:

Damn, it’s hilarious that you can’t differentiate your cells from that of a rat, you both share common ancestry. What kind of God creates his people with similar compositions of dogs and rats.

@bolded implies that there's something intrinsically inferior about rats and dogs that makes it's somewhat wrong for a creator to use similar building blocks with them, in building his own people.

If that's is not what you were implying, would you mind stating what you were really implying with your statement.

jamesid29:



@bolded implies that there's something intrinsically inferior about rats and dogs that makes it's somewhat wrong for a creator to use similar building blocks with them, in building his own people.

If that's is not what you were implying, would you mind stating what you were really implying with your statement.

dont you think you need to work on English comprehension?

Dtruthspeaker:


As I always tell you, That is what it means to be A Creator.

And that is what it means to not have created yourself!

and then he created you to be similarly to rats. What a wise creator. Lol

shadeyinka:

Sorry
I didn't mean to. But you were peddling untruths without shame

I was affirming your comparison of your god to softwares and CPU.

That’s how low your god can be

Workch:
dont you think you need to work on English comprehension?

Maybe...but that's irrelevant to the question at hand.

Workch:

What kind of God creates his people with similar compositions of dogs and rats.

This sounds like you are repulsed by the idea that a creator would use similar building blocks used in creating dogs and rats to also create people.

Why is that such a repulsive idea to you?

Workch:
I was affirming your comparison of your god to softwares and CPU.

That’s how low your god can be

I can see that some people's intelligence is so low that they see no difference between the manufacturer/programmer and the CPU/software.
These are Irredeemable like their father satan who is a liar from the beginning .

shadeyinka:

I can see that some people's intelligence is so low that they see no difference between the manufacturer/programmer and the CPU/software.
These are Irredeemable like their father satan who is a liar from the beginning .

I agree with you, so intelligence is high and your god can be equivalent to a secret software.

jamesid29:

Maybe...but that's irrelevant to the question at hand.


This sounds like you are repulsed by the idea that a creator would use similar building blocks used in creating dogs and rats to also create people.

Why is that such a repulsive idea to you?

That means he also made dogs in his image

Workch:
That means he also made dogs in his image

So I do not misinterpret you.
Are you making a one to one equivalence between humans and dogs?

Workch:
I agree with you, so intelligence is high and your god can be equivalent to a secret software.

It's confirmed that some dumbness is irredeemable!

shadeyinka:

It's confirmed that some dumbness is irredeemable!

God must have created this mistake bro. He created me not to believe he exist, smart god

jamesid29:

So I do not misinterpret you.
Are you making a one to one equivalence between humans and dogs?

As long as organisms are concerned, everyone is equal in the ecosystem. We all have a role we play

Workch:
The only way I can accept that humans and other animals didn’t evolve from a common ancestors is when I cut the flesh of other animals and that of human, analyze their cells in the flesh and blood under a microscope and they cells don’t look exactly the same.

So far, I have done this severally by viewing the blood cells of a rat and that of humans under the microscope and they always appear the same.
So why are they looking the same if humans were created specially in the image of a god?

If you can show me that they are not the same under a microscope, I will accept creation

Science is the human explanation of what the creator did.
The old scriptures are inaccurate, not because of deceit but because of the limitation of the human mind.

For example, imagine my iphone gets teleported back in time to 100BC. After spending 24 hours with a scholar, the phone gets teleported back to the present time. I am pretty sure the scholar who receives it would write about the phone with the limited the knowledge they have.

"A shiny stone landed on my table this morning, it was so smooth I could see my reflection on it.
Suddenly, it starts to vibrate and I see the face of the son of man" bla, bla, bla

Or imagine the scholar seeing a vision of present day 2021.

The scholar can only write based on their own brain capacity.

The scriptures we see today, are a representation of visions seen by people long gone.

The humans I foresee, are capable of creating universes (maybe in another 2 billion years)

If humans are not the most advanced beings, then something capable of unimaginable things could exist somewhere (remember we are limited by time and space but not everything is contained in time and space - think of the black hole, where physics mean nothing).

To be an atheist, it means you believe we humans are the most advanced being in the universe.

Workch:
God must have created this mistake bro. He created me not to believe he exist, smart god

So be it!

shadeyinka:

So be it!

why are you furious?

thinkingaloud:


Science is the human explanation of what the creator did.
The old scriptures are inaccurate, not because of deceit but because of the limitation of the human mind.

For example, imagine my iphone gets teleported back in time to 100BC. After spending 24 hours with a scholar, the phone gets teleported back to the present time. I am pretty sure the scholar who receives it would write about the phone with the limited the knowledge they have.

"A shiny stone landed on my table this morning, it was so smooth I could see my reflection on it.
Suddenly, it starts to vibrate and I see the face of the son of man" bla, bla, bla

Or imagine the scholar seeing a vision of present day 2021.

The scholar can only write based on their own brain capacity.

The scriptures we see today, are a representation of visions seen by people long gone.

The humans I foresee, are capable of creating universes (maybe in another 2 billion years)

If we are not the most advanced beings, then something capable of unimaginable things could exist somewhere (remember we are limited by time and space but not everything is contained in time and space - think of the black hole, where physics mean nothing).

To be an atheist, it means you believe we humans are the most advanced being in the universe.

There is no evidence that god exist

Workch:
why are you furious?

Furious!?
You don't know me!

Workch:
There is no evidence that god exist

You are not wrong to say that.

I believe in science.
I also believe in maths, the probability that a supreme being exist is not 0.

thinkingaloud:


You are not wrong to say that.

I believe in science.
I also believe in maths, the probability that a supreme being exist is not 0.

Still, that is not evidence. Probabilities are not evidence

shadeyinka:

Furious!?
You don't know me!

At least you are one deluded dude that believes in sky daddy

Workch:
As long as organisms are concerned, everyone is equal in the ecosystem. We all have a role we play

That wasn't my question. My question wasn't about roles in the ecosystem


You said both dogs and humans would essentially be images of God if they share similar building blocks, right?
For that to hold true, dogs and humans not only have to share similarities in some part, there has to be a one-to-one equivalence between dogs and humans in all other parts, for you to make such a sweeping claim, going by our conversation thus far.
Is that the claim you are making? Or are there differences