.

Born2winKingOG:
.





Everything about the game play.... is a proper attitudes mind without thoughts then you are left like those Simps out there.

I asked a lady out, last week.. which she did snubbed me....after viewing my WhatsAp status for some days now..yesterday night she chatted me up..


Her: are you free tomorrow.

Me: no girl, am expensive everyday.


I just told her "No" bro....in a cocky way..

I do the asking.... not the other way round.

.





Always be the boss...be "untop"....of your game.

doggy

missionary


I can't remember the last time, I told my girl to ride me.

CaveAdullam:


Polyamory is not a new thing bro. If you know Janet Hardy and Christopher Ryan you will know that that such form of sexual relationship has been on the rise though snail paced. Even Rollo Tomassi has words about it.

Is as if you've never read anywhere here where I mentioned positive masculinity must dovetail with positive femininity? Anyways, you're so much interested in the sex/game aspect making you have most views that's circulates around sex. There's more to just fvcking!

But as for me, I like to see beyond the horizon of game/sex and the effects at large. And if you call that overdose on redpill, blackpill or whatever it is, I will CONSUME IT MORE! Everything must be laid bare for all to see and make their own decisions.

And if you're aren't comfortable with any post of mine---too overdose redpill, too blackpill, too evil women---let me know about it and we'll dissect it.

Well done.

PS: I've never spent a serious time on coachgregadams, even though I hear his name around the sphere. You see, you didn't make a good research on me, no wonder you're so off it. Let me stop here.

You're all talking about Janet Hardy. Did you do a simple Google search on polyamory and the name pop up on top?
When I say you're following @coachgregadams I'm saying you're listening to him or his type because they're the one's who like to talk about women doing yoga and stuff after hitting the wall.

Here's the thing, The Red Pill is a group of concepts that especially on this thread are used to explain female nature. But Don't rely on these concepts to explain everything about females because female nature is changing and adapting at a faster pace than new concepts can be formulated. Women are adaptive. And the pace of change in the West is brisk and women are right behind that change adapting every year. Meanwhile red pill concepts take time to be formulated by the Red pillers and the result is that red pill concepts are wayyyy behind.

You're fond of mentioning hypergamy, but that hypergamy it's not as absolute as redpillers think. Sometimes Female Masculinity takes over and women, instead of seeking higher value men, simply go 50/50 with men on their level. Which is another movement gaining ground in the West that redpillers will have to reckon with. You said it yourself one time that a change is coming and men have to be ready. But guess what! With the current concepts of the Red Pill, most men won't ever be able to face that future.

Finally red pillers like to speak of the movement as about survival. But it's really not. Because if it was, red pillers wouldn't mind exploiting women for their own gain. Which they can't in reality. Which is where the IZM comes in. Which is about real survival. Ask yourself why the Lion is the king of the Jungle but red pillers like to describe thems as a Wolf. Which is much lower than the lion.
It's because the red pill is not ready to play the game to perfection. Which would make them lions. Guys of the IZM are the ones calling themselves Lion's. I love the redpill but the game is larger than this. I try to stick to it but here and there I do drop IZM concepts.

Redpillers are afraid to win.

ubunja:
If two girls love each other more than sisters, if a guy plays his cards right, they can share him and make him their man.
#Polyamory
#AreYouReadyForThisLevelOfGame
#WhereImHeaded

I can't relate.

@Ubunja

Please, can you explain this IZM stuff?

Martinez39s:
@Ubunja

Please, can you explain this IZM stuff?

the Red Pill teaches men how to win with women.

The IZM is men teaching WOMEN how to win with men.

Financially.

Imagine the Female Miseducations, being taught by a guy to a girl who then uses those lessons to make money from men which she brings to him.
Here the man is a Manager of the woman and trains her to win. Everything about the Red Pill is flipped here. There's no Masculinity and no Femininity here and any talk of the Red Pill will get you mocked and laughed at.

Here's its about the survival of the Man. Women are just chess pieces.

ubunja:
Remember guys what has been said over and over and over on this thread:
WOMEN MARRY FOR STABILITY AND FINANCIAL SUPPORT NOT SEX. THEY FIRST HAVE ALL THE SEX THEY WANT THEN MARRY AFTER THEY GET TIRED.

The focus of my game, what all my writings and contributions are all about, is to get you gents to be in the position where it's YOU who's having all these no strings attached sex and eating these girls before they settle down. That is why my message is heavily focused on sex.
I would rather you be the ones getting it fresh not the cleanup men who have to marry these used-up females.

no shame again in dis female wrld
For those relationship boys ND religion boys: no girls is innocent, always open ur eyes

ubunja:
Remember guys what has been said over and over and over on this thread:
WOMEN MARRY FOR STABILITY AND FINANCIAL SUPPORT NOT SEX. THEY FIRST HAVE ALL THE SEX THEY WANT THEN MARRY AFTER THEY GET TIRED.

The focus of my game, what all my writings and contributions are all about, is to get you gents to be in the position where it's YOU who's having all these no strings attached sex and eating these girls before they settle down. That is why my message is heavily focused on sex.
I would rather you be the ones getting it fresh not the cleanup men who have to marry these used-up females.

And yet u wanna marry a virgin SMH!!

Drenimarcus:
Man, KS needs to be protected at all cost! These women delusional AF! How can a woman with a 10 year old kid at 29 years old, weighs almost 200 pounds, tats and piercing want a man who earns 6 figures and she doesnt wanna have kids anymore.

Mean while, she got pregnant for a man who earns 30k yearly. You cant just make this shit up.

I'm currently watching the video

Black western ladies are delusional as fvck

ubunja:
If two girls love each other more than sisters, if a guy plays his cards right, they can share him and make him their man.
#Polyamory
#AreYouReadyForThisLevelOfGame
#WhereImHeaded

Polygamy has been existing in Africa culture for millions of years so it's not a biggy

The men who are at the top of the social hierarchy of men are high value patriarchs who are polygamous

Everybody wanna be the first to someone
Pro Girls love to fvck virgin boys ND is easy to manipulate dem

[color=#006600][/color]

Drenimarcus:


This shit is the new game now brother, even the Caucasians are into it. WTF is going on?!!!

Biblical prophecies coming to fulfillment.

DEMZEE:


Polygamy has been existing in Africa culture for millions of years so it's not a biggy

The men who are at the top of the social hierarchy of men are high value patriarchs who are polygamous

Some village farmer's even have 3 wife's.

Na to use style style introduce us to LGBT

Talking about westerner's using black Americans as a yardstick. Eww

ubunja:

You're all talking about Janet Hardy. Did you do a simple Google search on polyamory and the name pop up on top?

Janet Hardy was the first I know of that came up with the stuff back then. But whatever, there are different evolutionary background that has been attached to it to prove its validity because it hasn't been welcomed by the masses.

Monogamy is the norm as scientists like Helen Fisher, Charles Darwin, David Buss etc has proved. However, polygamy and monogamy has also been part and parcel of different hunter gatherers households.

When it comes to polyamory, the most credible account always postulated by the "polyamorous scientists" e.g Christopher Ryan is the Bonobo ape; Homo sapiens ape cousins, where the female bonobo have sex with different males, and the males don't care about paternity unlike the chimpanzees and gorillas.

ubunja:
When I say you're following @coachgregadams I'm saying you're listening to him or his type because they're the one's who like to talk about women doing yoga and stuff after hitting the wall.

Women resulting to religion or yoga in their epiphany phase is what a layman can easily know without browsing YouTube or waits for it to be peer reviewed and validated by the likes of coach Greg Adams.

ubunja:
Here's the thing, The Red Pill is a group of concepts that especially on this thread are used to explain female nature. But Don't rely on these concepts to explain everything about females because female nature is changing and adapting at a faster pace than new concepts can be formulated. Women are adaptive. And the pace of change in the West is brisk and women are right behind that change adapting every year. Meanwhile red pill concepts take time to be formulated by the Red pillers and the result is that red pill concepts are wayyyy behind.

There is difference between "a change in nature" and "adaptability" in regards to organisms. Nature is constant but base on environmental factors organisms can easily adapt to new changes. It's interlocked in the DNA.

For example: A Kalahari man can survive the cold weather of Canada not because there was a change in his nature, but because it has already being encoded in his DNA to survive any weather conditions provided there is food and security. Ditto for women.

Women are able to adapt to different circumstances because biology has shaped them to be more resistant and enduring, hence, female mortality is lower when compared to male mortality at birth and life expectancy.

ubunja:
You're fond of mentioning hypergamy, but that hypergamy it's not as absolute as redpillers think. Sometimes Female Masculinity takes over and women, instead of seeking higher value men, simply go 50/50 with men on their level.

Yeah, hypergamy isn't absolute. Women won't marry a 4 figure man today and skip to a 6 figure man tomorrow. But understand this: it was hypergamy that choose the 4 figure man when she was unable to get a 6 figure. Back and forth, women select for the best or settle down for what is available if they can't get the best. Hence, 50/50. From an evolutionary perspective, women don't want less because of her upkeep and welfare of her children especially when it comes to sexual relationship.

Female masculinity is on the rise not because women choose to become masculine but as a result of the economic problem, liberal culture etc. Except such women were highly masculinize in utero. Even the most richest women had the most richest fathers or husbands to their sides. Never a time was 50/50 acceptable by women both subconsciously and cerebrally.

ubunja:
Which is another movement gaining ground in the West that redpillers will have to reckon with. You said it yourself one time that a change is coming and men have to be ready. But guess what! With the current concepts of the Red Pill, most men won't ever be able to face that future.

Yeah, there is a change, sure. But all these changes are different ways to stir humans away from their natural disposition as per sex and the intersexual dynamics.

Culture and tradition, neglects of core values are the changes happening, not human instinct(nature), because at the end, biology will always triumph and everyone will fall back to it and start from the scratch.

The redpill has really exposed major concepts when it comes to these changes. To be forewarned is to be forearmed, and as far as one is not oblivious of the major tenets of the redpill, no matter the zephyr of changes that occurs regardless of its intensity, he will survive.

ubunja:
Finally red pillers like to speak of the movement as about survival. But it's really not. Because if it was, red pillers wouldn't mind exploiting women for their own gain. Which they can't in reality.

That is what it looks when it's explained on paper. But survival happens subconsciously. You don't consult your brain before carryout many functions, you just act. But when a neurosurgeon begins to explain all the processes involved in that action, it fills a motley of dossiers.

Women don't decide to act hypergamy because it's biological, subconscious, they just act it which still boils down to survival.

ubunja:
Which is where the IZM comes in. Which is about real survival. Ask yourself why the Lion is the king of the Jungle but red pillers like to describe thems as a Wolf. Which is much lower than the lion.
It's because the red pill is not ready to play the game to perfection. Which would make them lions. Guys of the IZM are the ones calling themselves Lion's. I love the redpill but the game is larger than this. I try to stick to it but here and there I do drop IZM concepts.

The little I know about IZM has to do with p!mping which is still part of the game. Yeah, men can decide to live off women and it's fine. But IZM/p!mping is only game, not natural or biological to both sexes.

Men provide and protect for their women and children, and that's it. If the order is reversed, there will always be disorder. Homo sapiens DNA is related to apes like chimpanzees, gorillas etc. not wild cats like lions and wolves.

ubunja:
Redpillers are afraid to win.

Game is game. Redpillers aren't afraid to win if they understand the nature of the game and are ready to bear all the consequences in loses and profits; short term and long term; IZM/p!mping.



Thanks.

Good morning
Happy Sunday Redpillers

Redpill with regards to inter-gender dynamics is a praxeology ( loose science) which describes the behavior of men and women, individually and when they are in relationship with one another, because it's not based on scientific empiricism ( peer studies from academia from research methodology) but rather it's a collection of observations from men in different demographics and with different experiences who observed general patterns with regards to women behavior ( AWALT- Solipsism, Hypergamy( even based on women's ovulatory shift), Machiavellianism, Rationalization hamsters, blame shifting), which are all amoral and apolitical in nature because they are the closest approximation to the truth due to fact that they are generally similar heuristics gotten from behavioral patterns of women collectively in different cultures, religions, Societies observed originally by PUA's initially to get laid but later morphed into the redpill we know today, the tenets of redpill are amoral and descriptive in nature explaining objective reality with regards to inter-gender dynamics but it is up to the individual to make his own personal prescriptions due to his life's circumstances, subjective biased world view based on his personal ideology, principles, religion, experiences and philosophies


The redpill is not a cult, echo chamber, groupthink, ideology,political or social movement but rather it's an objective descriptive praxeology of human behaviors and conducts with respect to inter-gender dynamics, it's up to you to decide what you want with it

DEMZEE:


Polygamy has been existing in Africa culture for millions of years so it's not a biggy

The men who are at the top of the social hierarchy of men are high value patriarchs who are polygamous

In African polygamy, men have the authority. In a polygamous home, the women only fvck that one man.(Though there can be cases of infidelity but it's not tolerated).

In Polyamory, a couple (husband and wife) allow an extra partner, male or female to come live with them. Or, the husband/wife or both have leeway to explore their sexuality without feelings of infidelity. Unlike African polygamy, the husband only has virtual authority over the wife/extra partner.

I'm concerned about polyamory in a first of all heterosexual relationship(male and female) and don't give a fvck about the LGBTQ+ involved in it too.

Thanks.

CaveAdullam:


In African polygamy, men have the authority. In a polygamous home, the women only fvck that one man.(Though there can be cases of infidelity but it's not tolerated).

In Polyamory, a couple (husband and wife) allow an extra partner, male or female to come live with them. Or, the husband/wife or both have leeway to explore their sexuality without feelings of infidelity. Unlike African polygamy, the husband only has virtual authority over the wife/extra partner.

I'm concerned about polyamory in a first of all heterosexual relationship(male and female) and don't give a fvck about the LGBTQ+ involved in it too.

Thanks.

Ohhh

Polyamory is trash

I support polygamy not polyamory

neyoohhh:


Some village farmer's even have 3 wife's.

Na to use style style introduce us to LGBT

Talking about westerner's using black Americans as a yardstick. Eww

LGBTQ is dead on arrival in Nigeria

ubunja:
the Red Pill teaches men how to win with women.

The IZM is men teaching WOMEN how to win with men.

Financially.

Imagine the Female Miseducations, being taught by a guy to a girl who then uses those lessons to make money from men which she brings to him.
Here the man is a Manager of the woman and trains her to win. Everything about the Red Pill is flipped here. There's no Masculinity and no Femininity here and any talk of the Red Pill will get you mocked and laughed at.

Here's its about the survival of the Man. Women are just chess pieces.

Thank God you verified IZM not to be REDPILL. It's all about the game of p!mping and it's funny the way you're using it to counter REDPILL when both of them don't correlate. And I deem it (IZM) incoherent and illogical to uphold it on a strictly redpill thread when it diverts from the main tenets of the redpill. And neither will I dispute with any man that decides to play the game of IZM, because it is still game.

I very well understand that give or take, IZM still boils down to understanding female psychology as stipulated by the Redpill, and how a man can leverage it to his advantage. IZM from your narration has 3 pieces in play---The manager(who may be likened to the alpha), the woman and beta simp, than the normal redpill two pieces: Alpha or/and beta male and the woman.

Thanks.

ubunja:
the Red Pill in the West can not keep up with what is happening and hardly any Redpiller that side is talking about it.
But recently there has been a steady and quiet rise in the polyamory movement in the west, namely polygyny. (for the uninitiated-- polyamory means one person loving many people at the same time. Polygyny specifically means loving more than one woman at a time).
So in the West, while feminism is wreaking havoc, marriage rates plummeting, men going their own way and women being general hoes, there's been a gradual interest in sharing romantic partners.
Now there are two movements gaining popularity at the moment: polyandry and polygyny. Polyandry is many men for one woman. That movement is very small.
Now by far, polygyny (many women for one man) is the most popular of the two movements. It has more adherents. And here's the strange part: IT'S DRIVEN BY WOMEN. This movement has a shitload of females pushing it. I used to think it was about hypergamy until I went through the many pages of these women and groups and the guys these women were sharing were not in any way special or rich. Just average dudes. the crux of the movement seems to be the "family" aspect. Many women just want to be part of something that they can help build. Another strong aspect of polygyny seems to be female bisexuality. Many women want a woman also but don't want to leave their men, so they invite a woman to join their relationship and both them and the man then share the woman. And strangely the GFs/wives all want the setup to be permanent like that with no outside interference. It's crazy times.

Its like it's the jungle out there with women congregating around the Alphas.

One woman was even saying she wouldn't mind being part of up to 4 sister wives to one man. Its crazy man. And definitely deserves a closer study.

ubunja polygyny is not what our forefathers practiced before the whites invaded our lands

as for me i am a strong supporter cause i dont see myself settling down it one 403all in the name of religion and "society said"

There is no difference between what Ubunja is saying and what MrColdsweat was saying the only thing is that each wanted different outcomes, MrColdsweat wanted to rationalize his blackpilled hopes while Ubunja want to justify his pimping/ gold digging choice

The tenets of redpill like Hypergamy are rooted in evolutionary biology, psychology, sociology and saying women have evolved above their genetically hardwired instincts to seek a better mate is nothing but fallacious and very misleading


Women's mating strategy is Hypergamy PERIOD!!!!, for Fvck sake their Biological ovulatory realities proves these, there is nothing like a MASCULINE woman or 50/50 EGALITARIAN woman,a WOMAN is a WOMAN, social conditioning , social re-engineering, social construct, egalitarian theories don't adhere to reality

Like illimitable Men says, BIOLOGY trumps PSYCHOLOGY

Culture adapts to Nature not Nature adapting to Culture

POLYGYNY is not new as high valued men in every civilization have shared harems of women, LGBTQ+ are deviations from evolutionary norms

Ubunja your radical views should be taking to another thread not these thread, here we deal with redpilled evolutionary facts and trusted social observations as CaveAdullam has repeated over and over not delusional social-constructed egalitarian utopian dreams starting from Feminism of 100rs to mordern day LGBTQ


Women making more money doesn't change their primal instincts to seek the best,they may exhibit Masculine traits especially with the generation of fatherless women in Western but their core biological Hypergamous make up exists, they would always want stronger and better

JESHAL:
There is no difference between what Ubunja is saying and what MrColdsweat was saying the only thing is that each wanted different outcomes, MrColdsweat wanted to rationalize his blackpilled hopes while Ubunja want to justify his pimping/ gold digging choice

The tenets of redpill like Hypergamy are rooted in evolutionary biology, psychology, sociology and saying women have evolved above their genetically hardwired instincts to seek a better mate is nothing but fallacious and very misleading

Women's mating strategy is Hypergamy PERIOD!!!!, for Fvck sake their Biological ovulatory realities proves these, there is nothing like a MASCULINE woman or 50/50 EGALITARIAN woman,a WOMAN is a WOMAN, social conditioning , social re-engineering, social construct, egalitarian theories don't adhere to reality

Like illimitable Men says, BIOLOGY trumps PSYCHOLOGY

Culture adapts to Nature not Nature adapting to Culture

POLYGYNY is not new as high valued men in every civilization have shared harems of women, LGBTQ+ are deviations from evolutionary norms

Ubunja your radical views should be taking to another thread not these thread, here we deal with redpilled evolutionary facts and trusted social observations as CaveAdullam has repeated over and over not delusional social-constructed egalitarian utopian dreams starting from Feminism of 100rs to mordern day LGBTQ

Women making more money doesn't change their primal instincts to seek the best,they may exhibit Masculine traits especially with the generation of fatherless women in Western but their core biological Hypergamous make up , they would always want stronger and better.

A wonderful summary.

Thanks.

JESHAL:
There is no difference between what Ubunja is saying and what MrColdsweat was saying the only thing is that each wanted different outcomes, MrColdsweat wanted to rationalize his blackpilled hopes while Ubunja want to justify his pimping/ gold digging choice

The tenets of redpill like Hypergamy are rooted in evolutionary biology, psychology, sociology and saying women have evolved above their genetically hardwired instincts to seek a better mate is nothing but fallacious and very misleading


Women's mating strategy is Hypergamy PERIOD!!!!, for Fvck sake their Biological ovulatory realities proves these, there is nothing like a MASCULINE woman or 50/50 EGALITARIAN woman,a WOMAN is a WOMAN, social conditioning , social re-engineering, social construct, egalitarian theories don't adhere to reality

Like illimitable Men says, BIOLOGY trumps PSYCHOLOGY

Culture adapts to Nature not Nature adapting to Culture

POLYGYNY is not new as high valued men in every civilization have shared harems of women, LGBTQ+ are deviations from evolutionary norms

Ubunja your radical views should be taking to another thread not these thread, here we deal with redpilled evolutionary facts and trusted social observations as CaveAdullam has repeated over and over not delusional social-constructed egalitarian utopian dreams starting from Feminism of 100rs to mordern day LGBTQ


Women making more money doesn't change their primal instincts to seek the best,they may exhibit Masculine traits especially with the generation of fatherless women in Western but their core biological Hypergamous make up exists, they would always want stronger and better

Executed with precision.

self discipline is the most important thing the Redpiller need the most

Don't be cheap, try to say NO something if a girl wanna use u for her personal gain

Not all girls who come freely for sex,u gonna fvck............... remember some girls said dat men are like dog when it comes to sex and Dem always fall for it

The reason I said those things, the OP no try at all
https://www.nairaland.com/6643478/just-packed-into-new-area

JESHAL:
There is no difference between what Ubunja is saying and what MrColdsweat was saying the only thing is that each wanted different outcomes, MrColdsweat wanted to rationalize his blackpilled hopes while Ubunja want to justify his pimping/ gold digging choice

The tenets of redpill like Hypergamy are rooted in evolutionary biology, psychology, sociology and saying women have evolved above their genetically hardwired instincts to seek a better mate is nothing but fallacious and very misleading


Women's mating strategy is Hypergamy PERIOD!!!!, for Fvck sake their Biological ovulatory realities proves these, there is nothing like a MASCULINE woman or 50/50 EGALITARIAN woman,a WOMAN is a WOMAN, social conditioning , social re-engineering, social construct, egalitarian theories don't adhere to reality

Like illimitable Men says, BIOLOGY trumps PSYCHOLOGY

Culture adapts to Nature not Nature adapting to Culture

POLYGYNY is not new as high valued men in every civilization have shared harems of women, LGBTQ+ are deviations from evolutionary norms

Ubunja your radical views should be taking to another thread not these thread, here we deal with redpilled evolutionary facts and trusted social observations as CaveAdullam has repeated over and over not delusional social-constructed egalitarian utopian dreams starting from Feminism of 100rs to mordern day LGBTQ


Women making more money doesn't change their primal instincts to seek the best,they may exhibit Masculine traits especially with the generation of fatherless women in Western but their core biological Hypergamous make up exists, they would always want stronger and better

supported

DieRich5:
self discipline is the most important thing the Redpiller need the most

Don't be cheap, try to say NO something if a girl wanna use u for her personal gain

Not all girls who come freely for sex,u gonna fvck............... remember some girls said dat men are like dog when it comes to sex and Dem always fall for it

The reason I said those things, the OP no try at all
https://www.nairaland.com/6643478/just-packed-into-new-area

.AOMINE IN DAA HOUSE,MY GEE THIS IS TRUE IN FACT YOU START TO HATE YOUR SEXUAL URGE WHEN YOU REALIZE WOMEN ARE AWARE OF IT AND USE IT TO MANIPULATE MEN ,CONTROL THAT SHIT KINGS

JESHAL:
There is no difference between what Ubunja is saying and what MrColdsweat was saying the only thing is that each wanted different outcomes, MrColdsweat wanted to rationalize his blackpilled hopes while Ubunja want to justify his pimping/ gold digging choice

The tenets of redpill like Hypergamy are rooted in evolutionary biology, psychology, sociology and saying women have evolved above their genetically hardwired instincts to seek a better mate is nothing but fallacious and very misleading


Women's mating strategy is Hypergamy PERIOD!!!!, for Fvck sake their Biological ovulatory realities proves these, there is nothing like a MASCULINE woman or 50/50 EGALITARIAN woman,a WOMAN is a WOMAN, social conditioning , social re-engineering, social construct, egalitarian theories don't adhere to reality

Like illimitable Men says, BIOLOGY trumps PSYCHOLOGY

Culture adapts to Nature not Nature adapting to Culture

POLYGYNY is not new as high valued men in every civilization have shared harems of women, LGBTQ+ are deviations from evolutionary norms

Ubunja your radical views should be taking to another thread not these thread, here we deal with redpilled evolutionary facts and trusted social observations as CaveAdullam has repeated over and over not delusional social-constructed egalitarian utopian dreams starting from Feminism of 100rs to mordern day LGBTQ


Women making more money doesn't change their primal instincts to seek the best,they may exhibit Masculine traits especially with the generation of fatherless women in Western but their core biological Hypergamous make up exists, they would always want stronger and better

what do you have to offer a woman who doesn't want your money and is not interested in marriage?

Can u help me with d link.

Drenimarcus:
Man, KS needs to be protected at all cost! These women delusional AF! How can a woman with a 10 year old kid at 29 years old, weighs almost 200 pounds, tats and piercing want a man who earns 6 figures and she doesnt wanna have kids anymore.

Mean while, she got pregnant for a man who earns 30k yearly. You cant just make this shit up.

ubunja:
what do you have to offer a woman who doesn't want your money and is not interested in marriage?

Again and Again I will repeat BIOLOGY trumps PSYCHOLOGY

A Woman primal instincts can't be curbed by her material success her education, her status


She will always be HYPERGAMOUS

Her MOMENTARILY LUST doesn't change her EVOLUTIONARY make up

ubunja:
what do you have to offer a woman who doesn't want your money and is not interested in marriage?

DICK!!!!!!!

JESHAL:



Again and Again I will repeat BIOLOGY trumps PSYCHOLOGY

A Woman primal instincts can't be curbed by her material success her education, her status


She will always be HYPERGAMOUS

Her MOMENTARILY LUST doesn't change her EVOLUTIONARY make up

and this the Nigerian man's problem... You WANT a woman to need you. You force it on her to need you. But not every woman will need you bro. Are you ready for that woman?
Like I told adallum, in some women hypergamy won't take. Then what?

Nigerian girls don't need commitment,they only need someone to leach on