IKON360:

The same Modric that Fede Valverde has been outshining for the past two seasons?
Modric in his prime wasn't better than Gerrard or Scholes

GrammarNazi1:

Maybe we should say Ronaldinho too is a god. Yet, Ronaldinho won Ballon'dOr like Modric.

FirstbornWds:


Dribble success rate or end result?

GrammarNazi1:

They were over hyped. They are below Xavi and Iniesta.

GrammarNazi1:

He knows exactly your point but I, too, disagree with you.

It is not always about trophies, yet it is about your contribution to trophy wins.

Xavi and Iniesta contributed hugely to lots of club and international trophies. How then is it not about trophies and how the players contributed to them?

Kindly mention the lots of trophies that Scholes, Gerrard, and Lampard contributed hugely to.

Debroslink:


While Modric dragged less fancied Croatia to WC final by winning Golden Ball, Gerrard was busy making sure England were beaten at Euro 2004 by giving a back pass to Thierry Henry of France.

Modric at age 22 ensured that England with peak Lampard and peak Gerrard didn't qualify for Euro 2008. He helped Croatia beat England at Wembley.

How can NT flops be placed alongside gods like Xavi, Iniesta, Zidane, Pirlo, Kross, Modric

pu7pl3:


Ronaldinho wasn't a god bro...he was a mere mortal compared to Ronaldo and Messi

IKON360:

You won't use only the national team as basis to compare these players na, Modric has never won an international trophy and will most likely never do so. Gerrard was basically wallowing in a pool of badluck with Liverpool because for a lot of his career was freaking phenomenal for Liverpool, as an 8, as a 10 and as Deep lying playmaker, just for you to get his versatility. And he was brilliant playing all these roles. So I don't get how you want to use only national team triumphs to criticize a phenomenal player

Debroslink:


Gerrard was actually the badluck and the weak point. He contributed massively to England's loss at euro 2004. When Liverpool was at the brink of league title, he made sure that that didn't happen by slipping in front of Demba Ba.

Just under 5 years of leaving Liverpool, they won the EPL and UCL.

Now that's the definition of badluck

Omo Modric is clear please

Debroslink:


Gerrard was actually the badluck and the weak point. He contributed massively to England's loss at euro 2004.
When Liverpool was at the brink of league title, he made sure that that didn't happen by slipping in front of Demba Ba.
Who can forget his header and pass to Uruguay's Suarez at the WC? A world class blunder!

Just under 5 years of leaving Liverpool, they won the EPL and UCL.

Watch this video below if you have forgotten.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yVPypAiIXLI

Debroslink:


While Modric dragged less fancied Croatia to WC final by winning Golden Ball, Gerrard was busy making sure England were beaten at Euro 2004 by giving a back pass to Thierry Henry of France.

Modric at age 22 ensured that England with peak Lampard and peak Gerrard didn't qualify for Euro 2008. He helped Croatia beat England at Wembley.

How can NT flops be placed alongside gods like Xavi, Iniesta, Zidane, Pirlo, Kross, Modric

myami:
modric was a fringe player in 2007. Kranjcar and co stopped england

myami:
modric was a fringe player in 2007. Kranjcar and co stopped england

Lmaooo, this one no even watch the match

pu7pl3:


Ronaldinho wasn't a god bro...he was a mere mortal compared to Ronaldo and Messi

myami:
Ronaldinho was a god on his own right. Ronaldo, Messi dominated football at a time when there was not much competition in the game. Scoring goals aplenty with reckless abandon. Gaucho on the other hand played among the best of the best in order to be the best among his peers.

myami:
Ronaldinho was a god on his own right. Ronaldo, Messi dominated football at a time when there was not much competition in the game. Scoring goals aplenty with reckless abandon. Gaucho on the other hand played among the best of the best in order to be the best among his peers.

pu7pl3:


This is a myth, if Ronaldinho and the rest were in their prime at the same time with Ronaldo and Messi they wouldn't still smell the Balon d'Or, this gap would have still existed

Debroslink:


Gerrard was actually the badluck and the weak point. He contributed massively to England's loss at euro 2004.
When Liverpool was at the brink of league title, he made sure that that didn't happen by slipping in front of Demba Ba.
Who can forget his header and pass to Uruguay's Suarez at the WC? A world class blunder!

Just under 5 years of leaving Liverpool, they won the EPL and UCL.

Watch this video below if you have forgotten.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yVPypAiIXLI

myami:
Ronaldinho was a god on his own right. Ronaldo, Messi dominated football at a time when there was not much competition in the game. Scoring goals aplenty with reckless abandon. Gaucho on the other hand played among the best of the best in order to be the best among his peers.

IKON360:



I think, you don't just like Gerrard. That's it, you don't like him at all.

patrickmuf:
When someone lets his hate for a player get the better for him in an argument, you just let him be...

He isn't any different from Devvy (when he is hell bent on discrediting Messi) at the moment...

TLona1:


Chill bro, so according you to you it makes sense to put Gerrard in the calibre of Iniesta, Xavi and Pirlo.

Is this what you're trying to say?

pu7pl3:


This is a myth, if Ronaldinho and the rest were in their prime at the same time with Ronaldo and Messi they wouldn't still smell the Balon d'Or, this gap would have still existed