₦airaland Forum

Janosky:
Who dey fleece their members & stash away in offshore secret tax Havens (alias storing treasures in heaven?)

Did Russell's wife ever alleged her husband had mistresses?
NEVER!!
Can we make similar claim about the Pastorpreneur divorced by his wife/business partner?
Capital, NO !!
The con man neglected his wife dey nack his mistresses steady while under "anointing"

Can we make similar claim about the Pastorpreneur divorced by his wife/business partner?..... Janosky

Janosky:
Cry me a river, sifia pained 3 gods worshipper

MaxInDHouse:
You may be annoyed because i'm saying what is not favorable about your pastor but you're still a million times better of than fugitives who have nothing to show for their faith.
So continue publishing Chris at least you're better off than them!

but you're still a million times better of than fugitives who have nothing to show for their faith..... MaxInDHouse

Emusan:
Now it has become spurious claim



Shameless lying liar JaNosense the son of his darling father the devil

Emusan:
As usual, No Sense!



I bet you didn't know about Russell and his affair with Rose Ball

That's an assignment for you





The same thing Russell did to his wife and even forcefully broke into her apartment

Maestro21:
You sef see am?

I have never seen such shamelessness.

Maestro21:
All of a sudden new monickers just "discovered" this thread after Russell's marriage was exposed. To defend their cult.

I have never seen this type of shamelessness before.

Any story about Russell is spurious but the one about any other man is TRUE.

Some people are just scum of the earth and I make bold to say it, JWits take the cake.

The most shameless cult on God's earth.

petra1:
so?
anything wrong with the message

achorladey:
Discrediting the works and activities of others and raising their religious leaders and organisation above others is the name of their game


They call all christians denominations apart from their own in pidgin LIE LIE CHRISTIANS. Na their way. The foundation of the religion was based on CRITICISM. Russell and Rutherford knows and understand what such CRITICISM mean

petra1:
Did the departure of judas make jesus a failure to lead? Did the departure of Demas make Paul a failure to lead?
Teaching and counselling is by the word and the spirit. Not by life experience

petra1:
its a issue of Departure. a wife leaves. a desciple leaves . does it make one a failure in ministry?

Kobojunkie:
There is Everything Wrong with his message..
One being, God and Jesus Christ no send am message .

Two, a man whose own marriage failed, rather than step to learn from his own mistakes, chooses to install himself as marriage counselor, against God, between God and His own.... is very wrong!

Kobojunkie:
It is no the same issue at all.

A departure does the necessitate the breaking of a contract but a divorce does.

Maestro21:
You must not have an opinion on everything. Most real christians see your bible takes as laughable when not stupid.

1. An objective person may ask "when was this audio recorded?" before airing his errant and asinine view. That person can never be you.

2. Next, I don't see how your folly did not help you ask on what grounds should Paul have taught on marriage since he had no opinion to leverage on?

3. Okay, let us leave Paul aside. When is a marriage regarded as successful? At what point is a minister allowed to teach on marriage? So as long as a minister has no divorce certificate he is qualified?

4. So why should you qualify to determine if any minister should speak or not?

5. What ministry credentials do you have? How would you know what God told a man or did not tell a man?

Maestro21:
So who departed and who broke a contract?

Did Jesus not state that there were possible grounds on which a contract could be broken?

Did Paul not re-echo same?

Maestro21:
I have never seen such barefaced hypocrisy and folly.

The man straight up tried to show a disparity between "divorces" and when he was found out, decided which story to believe and which was spurious but only the "bad" part of another man's story is true.

achorladey:
You see that particular one you refer to has said all of what they see as Jehovah’s viewpoint in their publications are ARCHAIC IDEAS, IDEAS to be MOCKED and are made irrelevant based on recent biblical evidence.

Na him way

achorladey:
You see that particular one you refer to has said all of what they see as Jehovah’s viewpoint in their publications are ARCHAIC IDEAS, IDEAS to be MOCKED and are made irrelevant based on recent biblical evidence.

Na him way

petra1:

Janosky:
LIARS wey no get conscience.
Tueh !

Maestro21:
All of a sudden new monickers just "discovered" this thread after Russell's marriage was exposed. To defend their cult.

I have never seen this type of shamelessness before.

Any story about Russell is spurious but the one about any other man is TRUE.

Some people are just scum of the earth and I make bold to say it, JWits take the cake.

The most shameless cult on God's earth.
Maestro21:


I have never seen such barefaced hypocrisy and folly.

The man straight up tried to show a disparity between "divorces" and when he was found out, decided which story to believe and which was spurious but only the "bad" part of another man's story is true

This one wey call himself Maestro21 dey think say he get SENSE. Kai !!!!!!
The screenshot proven Your bigotry is luminous.
For the same reason, in 1908, the US Court of Law awarded damages of #15,000 US dollars in favor of Mr Russell against The Washington Post for libel & character defamation, you Maestro21 moniker is proven your st✓pidity on this forum.
Emusan LIENUS ,Coman follow your friend continue WAILING upandan.

achorladey:
My LIES are your TRUTH

Iyen ko?

achorladey:
Atleast you no fit deny that your Jehovah’s viewpoint are ARCHAIC IDEAS, to be mocked and are irrelevant as a result of recent biblical.

Janosky:
@ 8:43pm, I responded that Achorladey and his friend, are "LIARS wey no get conscience."

@ 8:53pm, you Achorladey, SHAMELESSLY resume the same LYING claim you have already been called out for doing @ 8:43pm.
Can a leopard change it's spots?
"Some sons are like that"
Nairaland Moderators, take note.

Emusan:
Now it has become spurious claim



Shameless lying liar JaNosense the son of his darling father the devil

Janosky:
This one wey call himself Maestro21 dey think say he get SENSE. Kai !!!!!!
The screenshot proven Your bigotry is luminous.
For the same reason, in 1908, the US Court of Law awarded damages of #15,000 US dollars in favor of Mr Russell against The Washington Post for libel & character defamation, you Maestro21 moniker is proven your st✓pidity on this forum.
Emusan LIENUS ,Coman follow your friend continue WAILING upandan.

Kobojunkie:


1. Why should the date of the recording of this audio matter as far as any of what I stated?

2. Paul's supposed teachings on marriage were wrong and against Jesus Christ's own teachings and commandments. So you tell me, did God call you to emulating Jesus Christ or Paul?

3. Jesus Christ was clear that we are only to teach those in the world the Gospel of the Kingdom of God.. not marriage. The laws he gave us are all we are allowed to teach the world... nothing else.

4. I am a follower of Jesus Christ and I know what we were commanded by Him to doing. Anyone who is doing anything contrary is not of Him, so said Jesus Christ. Hence the reason why I am able to call this one out as such.

5. Ministry credentials? I am afraid you have been fooled by these fools and their lies. There are no credentials necessary for those who are of Him. We are all called as servants to the Master and those who belong to the Master are those who do as He commands.

Kobojunkie:
Marriage is a contract/Covenant, and the contract is broken at divorce. Whereas what existed between Jesus and Judas was a level of friendship, not a contract. And so the two relationships shouldn't even be compared at all.

It doesn't matter what Paul said since Jesus Christ is God's Law and Truth, the King in the Kingdom of God by whose Word we will be judged.

Maestro21:
Did Jesus not explain that there were grounds for divorce? If a contract is broken who broke it - the one who asked for the divorce or the person who did not?

Maestro21:
1. Pretend like you have sense a little. If this audio was done when he was still married does it not make your post irrelevant?

I should have known. lol

lol

2. what proof do we have that you are a follower of Jesus? Jesus told us the signs that will follow those who believe in him? Where are yours? If you have none, then we have no reason to listen to you.

3. Who said the below?

Kobojunkie:
It doesn't matter who broke the contract. What matters here is that a contract existed in the one relationship type where it did not exist in similar manner in the other and so, the two relationships shouldn't even be compared at all.