₦airaland Forum

Janosky:
Your claim on the Catholic Church and Mormon church is NOT true.

Janosky:
"Marketer of the good news" brother MaxinDHouse said.


Go delete am from this public forum.

tctrills:
If I present every newspaper clip criticism of your church as an argument what would you say?
A newspaper editorial against the Catholic church is the best you can do to discredit it?
I bet you did not read the article yourself.
What about the Mormon church are you not going to post a newspaper clip?

Janosky:
Are you aware Paul quotes from parts of the Bible in the old testament?
Did Paul believe those parts he quoted were not inspired in the old and new testament?

achorladey:
Make I help am answer the part in bold

He will tell you sey na MISINFORMATION, LIES, DECEPTION, NEGATIVE REPORT AND FALSEHOOD about his religious organization and leaders.


Janosky, wetin you go give me for this response?

Emusan:
See broad day lie, where did I reference anything to a BUSINESS FIRM ON THE PUBLIC STOCK EXCHANGE?

You can see that you're the very person who lack simple comprehension.

Mr LIENUS, LYING genius,
in the two screenshots supported by several Mumu, what did you post @10:08pm & 10:48pm?

I repeat:
"I don't know who or what tampered with your comprehension skills"

tctrills:
He is trying to condemn others from a newspaper clip, I don't accept that.

tctrills:
I don't understand your question. Paul did not quote songs of Solomon. The Old testament has lots of inspired words.
Did you also know that bible writers quoted book of the Wars of the Lord (Num. 21:14); book of Jasher (Josh. 10:13; 2 Sam. 1:18); book of the acts of Solomon (1 Kgs. 11:41); book of Samuel the seer (1 Chr. 29:29); book of Gad the seer (1 Chr. 29:29); book of Nathan the prophet (1 Chr. 29:29; 2 Chr. 9:29); prophecy of Ahijah (2 Chr. 9:29); visions of Iddo the seer (2 Chr. 9:29; 12:15; 13:22); book of Shemaiah (2 Chr. 12:15); book of Jehu (2 Chr. 20:34);
Are these not inspired books?

tctrills:
you just lied. As a child, we had the JW children's bible in our house. it happed to seek songs of Solomon. the wise writers did that for a reason. the bible contains more than the word of God but we can't argue on everything. and paul was long dead when the bible was compiled so clearly his statement to timothy was not referring to the bible as we know it today. the bible did not exist in Pauls days

Janosky:
They were inspired and served a purpose.
Romans 15:4 & 2 Timothy 3:16.

The bolded were the basis for both questions.
Here:
Are you aware Paul quotes from parts of the Bible in the old testament?
Did Paul believe those parts he quoted were not inspired in the old and new testament?

Janosky:
They were inspired and served a purpose.
Romans 15:4 & 2 Timothy 3:16.

The bolded were the basis for both questions.
Here:
Are you aware Paul quotes from parts of the Bible in the old testament?
Did Paul believe those parts he quoted were not inspired in the old and new testament?

tctrills:
what Paul quoted was 100% inspired.
So you accept that we have other inspired books not included in the bible. End of argument. We all agree.

tctrills:
If I present every newspaper clip criticism of your church as an argument what would you say.
A newspaper editorial against the Catholic church is the best you can do to discredit it?
I bet you did not read the article yourself.
What about the Mormon church are you not going to post a newspaper clip?

Janosky:
To this day, the Catholic Church adherents & hyerarchy are not in accord with the charismatic movement in their midst.

The Mormon church has it's own issues of disagreement about its name and doctrinal matters.

Achorladey & his crew have proven time and again, that JWs are different
1 John 2:9-11 & Romans 15:5-6, JWs have the same line of thought.

tctrills:
what Paul quoted was 100% inspired.
So you accept that we have other inspired books not included in the bible. End of argument. We all agree.

Janosky:
They were inspired and served a purpose.
Romans 15:4 & 2 Timothy 3:16.
The bolded were the basis for both questions.
Here:
Are you aware Paul quotes from parts of the Bible in the old testament?
Did Paul believe those parts he quoted were not inspired in the old and new testament?

MaxInDHouse:
Tctrills came to this thread for a mission:

To attack the man (Maximus) who proved to him that there is just one group practicing pure worship but he carefully chose his words and i smartly played along with him.
I calmly treated him with mildness until he lost it and began using abusive speeches!
I still made him feel relaxed until he couldn't find any fault with Jehovah's Witnesses but ended up faulting God's word!

According to Tctrills, the confusion in religion today is God's fault as He failed to monitor His inspired writings some of it we're not compiled along with the Bible therefore if anyone comes up with any form of teaching contrary to what is written in the Bible such teaching is UNQUESTIONABLE unlike what Paul said {Galatians 1:8} because the Bible itself is not the complete word of God!
So i left the thread for him with his friends!

Janosky:
The Bible in it's entirety is inspired of God.
The particular aspects referenced of other books reference in the Bible are true & genuine, like the examples you gave.

However, others writings in conflict with the Bible, for instance, "the Acts of Paul and Thecla" have portions that are in direct conflict with the Bible.
God's spirit inspired 66 books, not others conflicting with the Bible irrespective of the names they bear.
These issues raise the red flag about their authenticity.

Janosky:
The Bible in it's entirety is inspired of God.
The particular aspects referenced of other books reference in the Bible are true & genuine, like the examples you gave.

However, others writings in conflict with the Bible, for instance, "the Acts of Paul and Thecla" have portions that are in direct conflict with the Bible.
God's spirit inspired 66 books, not others conflicting with the Bible irrespective of the names they bear.
These issues raise the red flag about their authenticity.

The particular aspects referenced of other books reference in the Bible are true & genuine, like the examples you gave

Janosky:
To this day, the Catholic Church adherents & hyerarchy are not in accord with the charismatic movement in their midst.

The Mormon church has it's own issues of disagreement about its name and doctrinal matters.

Achorladey & his crew have proven time and again, that JWs are different
1 John 2:9-11 & Romans 15:5-6, JWs have the same line of thought.

achorladey:
Jehovah’s witnesses don't have same line of THOUGHT. You should know better than this. No dey believe that ARCHAIC IDEAS, TO BE MOCKED AND ARE IRRELEVANT AS A RESULT OF RECENT BIBLICAL EVIDENCE.

achorladey:
Your publications over the years shows you are not different from those you condemn, label, demean and tag with all sorts of names.

Because JEHOVAH approved animal sacrifice in the old testament and changed it in the new testament, therefore for your mind, JEHOVAH's Witnesses today are no different from those who continue the practice in the old testament.
Continue WAILING oooo

tctrills:
Baba you left the thread why this na. You still want to influence others haba

tctrills:
I love prove not personal opinion. If you have prove of slitter groups let's have it. Anyone can say anything about any church. I hate that. I have defended your church in the past. I wouldn't allow you say shit about others without proof

MaxInDHouse:
Tctrills came to this thread for a mission:

To attack the man (Maximus) who proved to him that there is just one group practicing pure worship but he carefully chose his words and i smartly played along with him.
I calmly treated him with mildness until he lost it and began using abusive speeches!
I still made him feel relaxed until he couldn't find any fault with Jehovah's Witnesses but ended up faulting God's word!

According to Tctrills, the confusion in religion today is God's fault as He failed to monitor His inspired writings some of it we're not compiled along with the Bible therefore if anyone comes up with any form of teaching contrary to what is written in the Bible such teaching is UNQUESTIONABLE unlike what Paul said {Galatians 1:8} because the Bible itself is not the complete word of God!
So i left the thread for him with his friends!

MaxInDHouse:
Tctrills came to this thread for a mission:

To attack the man (Maximus) who proved to him that there is just one group practicing pure worship but he carefully chose his words and i smartly played along with him.
I calmly treated him with mildness until he lost it and began using abusive speeches!
I still made him feel relaxed until he couldn't find any fault with Jehovah's Witnesses but ended up faulting God's word!

According to Tctrills, the confusion in religion today is God's fault as He failed to monitor His inspired writings some of it we're not compiled along with the Bible therefore if anyone comes up with any form of teaching contrary to what is written in the Bible such teaching is UNQUESTIONABLE unlike what Paul said {Galatians 1:8} because the Bible itself is not the complete word of God!
So i left the thread for him with his friends!

tctrills:
Baba you left the thread why this na. You still want to influence others haba

Janosky:
Acts 2:42 , did Paul and Peter teach different conflicting doctrine?
John 17:22-23 & Acts 2:42, continue WAILING and console yourself.


Because JEHOVAH approved animal sacrifice in the old testament and changed it in the new testament, therefore for your mind, JEHOVAH's Witnesses today are no different from those who continue the practice in the old testament.
Continue WAILING oooo

MaxInDHouse:
Ọmọ, next time you come in contact with a JW try to meditate thoroughly before saying anything.
WHY?
Because there's no weapon formed against our faith that can have any success, any tongue that rises against us we will silence, that is our HERITAGE and as for our righteousness don't bother it's from our own God JEHOVAH! Isaiah 54:17

Learn from the way i outsmarted you knowing fully well that you came to support the critics and form alliance with them against God's people. But i pretended as if i don't know your mission until i pushed you to a corner where you lost it and condemned God's word instead of condemning God's people (Jehovah's Witnesses)

So according to you now all what your friends have been saying against Jehovah's Witnesses is meaningless because even God's word upon which everyone on this thread wants to build their arguments is NOT COMPLETE!

That's what smartness means and what it means to be one of Jehovah's Witnesses!

tctrills:
You are quite dishonest. You called me a liar because I disagreed with you. I said you asked a stupid question and you got all sensitive. I even apologize if I hurt your feelings.
And I made special effort to answer your question.
Then you came on my business thread which I was not comfortable with. I did not want to look unprofessional on a business thread.
Where have I wronged you my dear.l

MaxInDHouse:
Ọmọ, next time you come in contact with a JW try to meditate thoroughly before saying anything.
WHY?
Because there's no weapon formed against our faith that can have any success, any tongue that rises against us we will silence, that is our HERITAGE and as for our righteousness don't bother it's from our own God JEHOVAH! Isaiah 54:17

Learn from the way i outsmarted you knowing fully well that you came to support the critics and form alliance with them against God's people. But i pretended as if i don't know your mission until i pushed you to a corner where you lost it and condemned God's word instead of condemning God's people (Jehovah's Witnesses)

So according to you now all what your friends have been saying against Jehovah's Witnesses is meaningless because even God's word upon which everyone on this thread wants to build their arguments is NOT COMPLETE!

That's what smartness means and what it means to be one of Jehovah's Witnesses!

tctrills:
You are quite dishonest. You called me a liar because I disagreed with you. I said you asked a stupid question and you got all sensitive. I even apologize if I hurt your feelings.
And I made special effort to answer your question.
Then you came on my business thread which I was not comfortable with. I did not want to look unprofessional on a business thread.
Where have I wronged you my dear.l

Where have I wronged you my dear

achorladey:
Reality tells me MaxInDHouse coming to your business thread get motive. I will not go beyond that or I rest my case on that.

I don tell you, he must save his face and image.

tctrills:
You are quite dishonest. You called me a liar because I disagreed with you. I said you asked a stupid question and you got all sensitive. I even apologize if I hurt your feelings.
And I made special effort to answer your question.
Then you came on my business thread which I was not comfortable with. I did not want to look unprofessional on a business thread.
Where have I wronged you my dear.l