₦airaland Forum

achorladey:
I am.

Who you are?

oteneaaron:
Lol.

Go and read those threads very well.

No de loose guard.

Give ticket for wetin?

cornelboy:
Your evidence is not convincing enough to prove that Jesus didn't exist.

No be you wan give Max and cornelboy tickets to relax overseas and do our research on Jesus historicity?

MaxInDHouse:
What he failed to grasp is that agents of the intelligence don't just rely on stories because it could be fabricated or edited due to the interest of each narrator. But the outcome will never deceive you, truth will always prevail no matter the damage falsehood might have caused.
Oteneaaron is just a victim of his own selfish cravings so his mind will listen attentively to stories that's in tune with the intentions of his mind while all others remains false to him.
The challenge is simple. Whatever research he could make to falsify Jesus' historicity will definitely nullify any other historical figure.
So we must discard all stories of people that lived in ancient times because there is no evidence enough to prove that they really lived!

cornelboy:
Everyone in one way or the other is peddling something

cornelboy:
Make e tell when and how Mathew, Mark, Luke and John got access to the stone at the temple of Luxor. And how they decode the language and wrote their accounts from it.
The book of Acts probably was copied from the stone.

Pls Oteneaaron give us the full myths written on Horus and let's compare it with the accounts of Luke John Mathew and Mark

oteneaaron:
If after finding out that -

1. There is no archeological proof to show that he existed...

2. Paul's letters been the first books of the new testament and he never spoke about a literal Jesus but a spiritual Christ-in-you,

3. The Gospel of Mark was the first to be written and the others copy almost word for word from Mark,

4. The Gospels contradict each other, and

5. The story of Jesus mirrors the story of Horus from 2,000 years before Bible

And you still believe that Jesus was a real figure in history, then that one na for your own back pocket.

If only you take your time to read before jumping into conclusions, you would have known that I wasn't the one who offered to buy you and Max tickets.

Like I said, take your time read thru the thread again.

No go de misyarn.

oteneaaron:
Lol.

Try harder.

The information is out there for you find.

Go and look for it.

achorladey:
Who are you?

cornelboy:
Na your atheists friend promised the ticket then. I no wan stress myself jare. It's not that relevant.

You believe Paul wasn't a myth?

Show us the contradictions if it's strong enough to discredit the whole new NT.

cornelboy:
Na you wan bring evidence now.

Ain't looking for shit

cornelboy:
Nobody

achorladey:
At least we know deactivated account here indicates NOBODY but yours display what?

Who are you?

Make I help you small

I am not a JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES yet. Two or three days later, I am a JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES

Na so una mode of operation be.

oteneaaron:
Then why you asking?

oteneaaron:
Like I mentioned earlier, go and read the thread.

I had to ask - Is calling someone an Atheist supposed to be an insult or what exactly?

Cos if that is a name calling technique, it is the weakest I have ever seen.

cornelboy:
Why the challenge for Max anyways cos I've seen anything tangible in what you presented.
It's like story story story.

oteneaaron:
If you can't see anything tangible in any of the points I presented, that is your problem, not mine.

cornelboy:
That's not me. Perhaps it's time you helped yourself.
Who are you? You have no religion?
If you think religion defines someone then why did you hide yours?

That's not me.

Perhaps it's time you helped yourself.

Who are you?

You have no religion?

If you think religion defines someone then why did you hide yours?

oteneaaron:
Like I mentioned earlier, go and read the thread.

I had to ask - Is calling someone an Atheist supposed to be an insult or what exactly?

Cos if that is a name calling technique, it is the weakest I have ever seen.

cornelboy:
Why the challenge for Max anyways cos I've seen anything tangible in what you presented.
It's like story story story.

MaxInDHouse:
He doesn't know what a challenge really means!
He first made this move but i ignored him since i noticed he doesn't believe in God, i knew it's going to be a time wasting.
But since he raised the issue here again and his so called friends are scared to stand up for their faith i decided to humiliate him along with his friends by demanding we do so on a fresh thread.
Today he could see for himself that it's all about things he believes against what i believe and not a research at all because he's just telling stories of what he chose to believe against the Bible nothing more!

oteneaaron:
Hahahahahahha
Is this why you insisted that I should create a new thread?
So that you can "humiliate" me?
I admire your over confidence sha.
The thread is there, and the internet does not forget.
Anybody can read it and decide for themselves, if you actually humiliated me.
I still standby my words.
Jesus is not a real figure in history, but is only a myth based on stories of the ancient Egyptian mystery religions.
You can take that to bank and deposit it.

MaxInDHouse:
You and i have had issues on other threads so i want this one to be free of those abuses and insults that's why i choose my words carefully here.
Please go ahead and summarize your epistles in just few sentences the same way i just did.

Kí ẹ tó sọ irọ́ di òtítọ́ á pẹ́, kí ẹ tó sọ pé màálù ló ń ṣe ọkọ ewúrẹ ẹ̀ẹ́pìtàn àpaǹpatán!

oteneaaron:
Well, I have done that.

I am still still waiting for you to show me how you have "humiliated" me on that thread.

oteneaaron:
Well, I have done that.
I am still still waiting for you to show me how you have "humiliated" me on that thread.

MaxInDHouse:
Come on, i was expecting something really tough not just arguments from people who never knew what happened in the first century.

I told you i'm an agent of the intelligence, we don't dwell on what people say rather we try to find out the motive behind their speeches and actions!

achorladey:
At least you know their mode of operation well well.

Na self glorification and self righteousness.

I don't know how deciding to go into a debate with some about beliefs or topics of interest becomes the criteria to lose friends or accumulate enemies.

The discussion you had on that thread I don't think it reached page 2 before self righteousness and glorification set in.

Including his need to start peddling STUPIDITY

From their own very publications.......

MAINTAIN A POSITIVE ATTITUDE
4. Why can we keep a positive attitude?

4 Be Positive. Every year, there are nonreligious people who become Jehovah’s Witnesses. Many already had high moral standards and felt disgusted by religious hypocrisy. Others had low moral standards and many had bad habits that they needed to abandon. With Jehovah’s help, we can be sure that we will find those who are “rightly disposed for everlasting life.”​—Acts 13:48; 1 Tim. 2:3, 4.

Who are these non religious people and where do they get their high moral standards.

MaxInDHouse:
Come on, i was expecting something really tough not just arguments from people who never knew what happened in the first century. I told you i'm an agent of the intelligence, we don't dwell on what people say rather we try to find out the motive behind their speeches and actions!

achorladey:
Even those easy discussion will still incur the wrath of you peddling STUPIDITY about it.

Na your mode of operation.

According to your awake.....


Awake 2000...........
........ Some people insult those who disagree with them by questioning character or motives instead of focusing on the facts............


When discussion get locked. You will start seeking for motives and best performance performing group.

Na classic case of religious hypocrisy talked about in the other magazines mentioned above.

These are the basis people leave the organisation you belong. When they raise issues and point out errors which your religious leaders already states clearly that they are prone to mistakes and errors, instead of looking into the error and addressing the error they will start looking for characters and motives of no relevance to disfellowshipped or made such ones subservient to their whims.

oteneaaron:
You have told me a million times that you are an agent of the intelligence, an intelligence officer, etc.

How does it prove that you "humiliated" me on that thread?

And how does that prove that Jesus was an actual figure in history?

oteneaaron:
You have told me a million times that you are an agent of the intelligence, an intelligence officer, etc.
How does it prove that you "humiliated" me on that thread?
And how does that prove that Jesus was an actual figure in history?

oteneaaron:
Lol.

This is a blow below the belt!

Their own publications are their own greatest enemy.