₦airaland Forum

linearity:
The article I read cast US as a peacemaker and the only Country standing in the way of NK running over SK and you myopically think there would be peace if US was not there?

Agreed, US fights lots of wars, but can you point to one of such wars, where US was not first provoked?

It baffles me sometimes when you guys take the sides of dictators in China, Russia & NK and cries about Buhari. I am beginning to think that, Nigerians truly love dictators and we need one or a dictatorship party that will run things in Nigeria.

MangekyoAlt:
The USA might actually come to the rescue of South Korea should a conflict break out.
Meanwhile, China would definitely place boots on the ground for North Korea, 100%. Mother Russia would aid north Korea to some extents if they're winning, but imagine a scenario where they start losing, Russia would place boots too on the ground.
So in other words, both North and South Korea have powerful backups. But North Korea is nuclear armed, South Korea isn't.
South Korea is playing with fire!

princeeze1:
Good observation! Also ever wondered why every major conflict in the world has the US written over it? Wether it is open military confrontation, regime change, social uprising, insurgency/freedom fighting just name it. No matter how far from across the Atlantic it seems to be happening, the little fingers of the US is always somewhere lurking and playing devils advocate. From all major conflict since world war 2, look at the current political turmoil in Pakistan, the heavily divisive elections in Serbia and Hungary, how come the US is always mentioned? This will give you an idea of who is really destabilizing the world covertly or overtly. The world would be safer if the US stops interfering in sovereign affairs of other nations, and stop trying to divide nations into us or against us, stop trying to have sovereign governments subservient to US foreign policy and allow them chart courses that befits them more economically and politically.

BabaIbo:
Low budget Russia...

Even your papa/role model wey be Russia flopped, who come be you where South Korea dey, na once US go pound on una, people wey dey find means to do that before.

princeeze1:
After writing an epistle, Putin fan name calling and the visa choices blackmail, you ended up saying nothing to counter my points of the US having a hand in every conflict, it shows you go to an argument armed with emotional rants instead of fact. Talk about the lack of prosperity in the aforementioned nations? It is the making of the US simply because they failed to be subservient and tow their path and foreign policy. Cuba has been under an economic blockade for more than 5 decades, NK, Venezuelan has been under a form of economic sanctions or the other. Same economic pressures they have tried to initiate on Russia which backfired badly. My point being? Too many conflict has the US in it. Talk about the current chaos in pakistan, take a look of how they tried to create divisions in a civilized Serbia and Hungary just to advance their foreign policy.

princeeze1:
Good observation! Also ever wondered why every major conflict in the world has the US written over it? Wether it is open military confrontation, regime change, social uprising, insurgency/freedom fighting just name it. No matter how far from across the Atlantic it seems to be happening, the little fingers of the US is always somewhere lurking and playing devils advocate. From all major conflict since world war 2, look at the current political turmoil in Pakistan, the heavily divisive elections in Serbia and Hungary, how come the US is always mentioned? This will give you an idea of who is really destabilizing the world covertly or overtly. The world would be safer if the US stops interfering in sovereign affairs of other nations, and stop trying to divide nations into us or against us, stop trying to have sovereign governments subservient to US foreign policy and allow them chart courses that befits them more economically and politically.

useni1:
This according to the stupidity you filled your head with. Why don't vagabond America enter the war? Nah they pvssie and instead use propaganda to dumb idiots like you

Buddha3:
This one is clearly living in an alternate universe.

Betscoreodds:
Is it CNN that told you that they are hungry lol grow up there is no hunger there.

billyadam:
I am only made a little pointer to US foreign policy and why it goes the way u see it. I gave the narratives because of the way you castigated the United States. Every nation in the world has an ulterior motive in which there foreign policies centers around be it US, China, Russia, EU and what have u. Every war intervention by the United States is for a purpose and not for the sake of usurping a state which usually it leads to. Afghanistan war was a fall out of 9/11, Iraq war war a fall of Saddam WMD Claim as u see the playboy in North Korea doing today and repressive outburst on Kuwait and target on Israel who is a front at ally of the US in the middy east so his other wars.

The Hungarian situation is as a result of the romance btw the prime minister and Putin going by how strategic Hungary is for Ukraine and so on. Pls you can always reply bay without abusing. It's an intellectual discourse.

THANKS

useni1:
Bomb that shiihole South Korea from the world map and incinerate vagabond American military base there. Destroy japan too. Communists die hard

Betscoreodds:
Is it CNN that told you that they are hungry lol grow up there is no hunger there.

ruggedtimi:
he just tested one recently

heniford2:
No wahala boom!! Africa will receive Una as Refugees

princeeze1:
Good observation! Also ever wondered why every major conflict in the world has the US written over it? Wether it is open military confrontation, regime change, social uprising, insurgency/freedom fighting just name it. No matter how far from across the Atlantic it seems to be happening, the little fingers of the US is always somewhere lurking and playing devils advocate. From all major conflict since world war 2, look at the current political turmoil in Pakistan, the heavily divisive elections in Serbia and Hungary, how come the US is always mentioned? This will give you an idea of who is really destabilizing the world covertly or overtly. The world would be safer if the US stops interfering in sovereign affairs of other nations, and stop trying to divide nations into us or against us, stop trying to have sovereign governments subservient to US foreign policy and allow them chart courses that befits them more economically and politically.

ButterBurger:
Human being and their neighbors Sha.
Na so Russia self talk say Dem go take Ukraine in less than a week.
America truly controls the world.
There would have been war disasters in the world till today.
America is trying to make the world true democracy.
I think it's a welcome idea
Afterall na dem develop this World pass in discoveries and technologies.
Even socially we come to be today.
Only idiots will not support them
We all saw all the good relief they gave to their citizens during the covid. And na still Dem suffer the loss of lives pass.

Emmyxclusive:
Hyundai, Kia, LG, Samsung, all from SOUTH Korea etc. They have solid economy, even north Koreans risk thier life to escape to the south but here u are calling them shithole. Even thier border guards often escape to the south.

MangekyoAlt:
The USA might actually come to the rescue of South Korea should a conflict break out.
Meanwhile, China would definitely place boots on the ground for North Korea, 100%. Mother Russia would aid north Korea to some extents if they're winning, but imagine a scenario where they start losing, Russia would place boots too on the ground.
So in other words, both North and South Korea have powerful backups. But North Korea is nuclear armed, South Korea isn't.
South Korea is playing with fire!

Betscoreodds:
If you suddenly decide to declare Russia an international aggressor, read these facts and figures. Over 3 million people - that's how many foreigners the US military has killed in 60 invasions of sovereign nations under the pretext of bringing "democracy"?
Cuba (1906) - ?
Nicaragua (1912) - ?
Haiti (1915) - ?
Dominican Republic (1916) - ? 29
Russia (1918) - 2,000
Japan (1945)- 246000
Philippines (1948-1953) - 160,000
Puerto Rico (1950) - 29
Korea (1950-1953) - 570
Guatemala (1954) - 100000
Lebanon (1958) - ?
Panama (1958) - 734
Laos (1959) - 3,000
Haiti (1959) - 2204
Ecuador (1960) - ?
Guatemala (1960) - ?
Dominican Republic (1965) - 2500
Vietnam (1964-1975) - ? 850132
Guatemala (1966) - ?
Indonesia (1966) - ?
Philippines (1966) - ?
Cambodia (1967) - ? 300.000
Laos (1971-1973) - ?
Nicaragua (1972) - ?
El Salvador (1977) - ? 75.000
Grenada (1983) - ?
Libya (1986) - ?
Iran (1980) - ?
Lebanon (1982) - ? 144000
Grenada (1983) - 141
Libya (1986) - 45
Honduras (1988) - ?
Iran (1988) - 290
Virgin Islands (1989) - ?
Panama (1989) - ? 734
Iraq (1991) - ?
Bosnia and Herzegovina (1992 - 1995) - ? 98.000
Somalia (1992 -1994) - ? 1,000
Haiti (1994) - ? 200
Sudan (1998) - ?
Yugoslavia (1999) - 5,700
Afghanistan (2001-2021) - 103000
Iraq (2003-2011) - 690000
Iraq (2011-2017) - 170000
Liberia (2003) - 150000
Pakistan (2004) - 108000
Libya (2011) - 40000
Syria (2013) - 2286
Yemen (2015) - 11000
Cameroon (2015) - ?
Libya (2015) - 1,000
And then there were the color revolutions perpetrated (or thwarted) by the US in Georgia (2003), Ukraine (2004, 2014), Kyrgyzstan (2005), Tunisia (2011), Armenia (2008, 2015), Russia (2010, 2013), Belarus (2020), and Kazakhstan (2022).
The sanctions imposed on the US for this age-old international terrorism are 0.
Judge for yourself. No politics, just numbers.

MangekyoAlt:
The USA might actually come to the rescue of South Korea should a conflict break out.
Meanwhile, China would definitely place boots on the ground for North Korea, 100%. Mother Russia would aid north Korea to some extents if they're winning, but imagine a scenario where they start losing, Russia would place boots too on the ground.
So in other words, both North and South Korea have powerful backups. But North Korea is nuclear armed, South Korea isn't.
South Korea is playing with fire!

ifex370:
Why can't we live peacefully

Benny6944:
Nuke country don't threaten nuke country. North Korea is just full of empty threats

useni1:
Bomb that shiihole South Korea from the world map and incinerate vagabond American military base there. Destroy japan too. Communists die hard

onadana:
They are not.Follow students of history.The United States have nuclear weapons stationed in South Korea.The North knows it.It is just brinkmanship from the North looking for concessions from the US.And so far so good they are being ignored by President Biden.It is really irks Kim.

hisexcellency34:
Try it and see what the giant of Africa Nigeria will do to you

patrickcollins:
Japan, South Korea have the technology and resources to develop nuclear weapons, why can't they chose that option than allow technological inferior countries threaten them.

MangekyoAlt:
The USA might actually come to the rescue of South Korea should a conflict break out.
Meanwhile, China would definitely place boots on the ground for North Korea, 100%. Mother Russia would aid north Korea to some extents if they're winning, but imagine a scenario where they start losing, Russia would place boots too on the ground.
So in other words, both North and South Korea have powerful backups. But North Korea is nuclear armed, South Korea isn't.
South Korea is playing with fire!

ifex370:
Why can't we live peacefully