railone:


I know it's a bad take but I hope He does.

When people fail to learn from history, they are bound to repeat the mistake of the past.

With or without the help of the "West", Russia in his current format is close to a revolution just like the Soviet Union and other fascism regime in the past.

This I attribute to the increase in the number of opposition voices. Those opposition will start bonding together to form a force that can't be stop.

Opening a second war threatre with Finland might be the push necessarily to hasten that.

OR

I might be wrong and the Russians enjoy being dictated to on how to live and express themselves

Soffyh:
I will send my own #100 let 19people send #100 each

WriterNig:

credit: Dailymail UK || AU News


Breaking News: https://www.nairaland.com/7068971/russia-drops-poisonous-gas-ukranian

Truvelisback:
Putin is a Fearless Pig.

gambojimeta:

Lies.

Hitler never defeated the UK. Infact, UK stood up to Germany while Hitler and Stalin were initially both axis powers and on the same side.

tutudesz:

Countries should stop interfering in other countries decisions simple

Dybala11:

With who did NATO made the agreement??
Russia didn't even exist as an independent nation when the so called verbal agreement was reached. Abeg talk true jor.

WATCHOVER:
There is no way I would not blame NATO, an agreement was reached stopping further NATO expansion but NATO is going against the rules, that is why am Supporting Russia not that am happy for War.
Agreement is Agreement

WATCHOVER:
There is no way I would not blame NATO, an agreement was reached stopping further NATO expansion but NATO is going against the rules, that is why am Supporting Russia not that am happy for War.
Agreement is Agreement

Obafavour:

Nope, so?

Dybala11:

With who did NATO made the agreement??
Russia didn't even exist as an independent nation when the so called verbal agreement was reached. Abeg talk true jor.

Awesometouch1:

You need to understand that Russia is actually the one pushing countries to join NATO.
They do so out of perennial existential threat from Russia.
You can't blame people for seeking the security of their people.
Russia is a country that hates peace.

Excuzeme:


And America is a Country that loves Peace, right?
Nigerians sef, l don tire for their level of reasoning.

This takes us back to what Russia has been saying:: You can be trying to ensure your own Security (Baltic EU States) at the expense of your neighbour's (Russia) Security.
It wont work! It will only result in bigger and bigger Conflicts.

If they say it is the fear of Russia that is sending them to NATO and Russia says it is their joining NATO that is causing an Existential threat for it, then which comes first: The Chicken or the Egg?

Take Sweden for example: Russia has not threatened nor invaded them, before the Ukrainian War. That is the situation on ground, as of today.
But all of a sudden, it says it wants to join NATO< knowing that will spook Russia. That is the first Move.
If Russia not invades it (the second Move), can we blame Russia?
Why not just maintain the "Status Quo" and negotiate further "Security Guarantees" with Russia?
Why are they so certain that NATO (America in particular), will go into a Nuclear War, on their behalf?

They better reason their brains, before what they did not plan for, happens.
Ukraine will be a lesson in "How not to be foolish, based on Westenr Promise of support".

Appleyard:

Nonesense again. Dutch forces acting outside the territory of Netherland doesn't fall under the protection of article 5 of NATO if they come under attack by an enemy in a crisis they're engaged in. You keep manufacturing baseless excuses. Did the Serbian attack on Dutch forces triggers the article 5? No. Why? Because it falls short of the provisions of the article and NATO charter.

NATO got involved out of pure emotions.

The only scenario where article 5 has been triggered was when the 9/11 attack happened in the US, and even that too was faulty because it wasn't the Taliban that did it, but so-called Al Qaida.

baralatie:

Of course the nation or nations that even tried to send their own nukes towards Russia will get times 100

Frankiss44:


And how many nukes does Russia has again compared to all the nations they want to fight? Jokers everywhere... Deploring nukes will forever remain a threat. Only a mad man will deplore nuke in the 21st century because the mutual assured destruction is real

baralatie:

That is why I said everybody will collect from Russia nau!
Then we will count who will remain on earth!

Appleyard:


Tell me how weak is the Russian military?

NairaMaster1:


For planning a week military operation that has taken them forever and claimed thousands of their men. Shame!!!

baralatie:

Can you swear with ya balls that zelensky is in control of Chernobyl ?

railone:


Tueehhh... at this point you're beyond help.
Go back I read what I said from beginning and provide where I mentioned anything about Article 5.
Did NATO said the fought the Serbian because of Article 5?
you just manufacture baseless nonsense and attribute it to me.

I ask you a simple question you refuse to answer instead you blab over nothing. An attack on Dutch forces on a peacekeeping mission, is it not considered an attack on Netherland?
The UN declared those regions a safe space and yet the Serbians attacked it which is why NATO was dragged into it.

Why is it that when Assad formally requested Russia help in the Civil War, Russia delegations had to meet the US delegations that were already in Syria fighting ISIS to ensure that both side don't attack each other even by mistake?

You can attack forces that are not at war with you. If you don't know something that is that simple then why do you even comment on military threads.
you need enlightenment, seriously

Smartgunna:


��� don't tell me you're a perv. Pls NTA won't help you.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.deccanherald.com/amp/dh-galleries/photos/ukraine-regains-full-control-of-chernobyl-nuclear-power-plant-1098719

Appleyard:

Stop beating around the bush like a caged animal. What was the purpose of NATO? The wars they have engaged in, does it meet the criteria of the bloc's rousing charter? No. They just entered those war because they feel the need to, not that they were attacked directly. In other words, NATO have done more attack than defend. Stop making stupid excuses for them.

railone:


You're the one that don't even understand the alliance yet you're talking about them.

At least before you criticized someone, get to know the first.

Since the fall of communism in Europe, the purpose of the alliance changed. At the time, there was debate of whether to disband it or not.

NATO purpose right now is security of Europe and North America and fight against Terrorism.

Read their manifesto, it's right there.

Yet you people that haven't upgraded your brain since 19th century will always come upon with NATO was created to oppose Russia.

NATO as an alliance don't give a crap about Russia. It's Putin that want to keep hold of the Russian Government that needs an imaginary enemy to give its ancient view of life some legitimacy that will come up with such excuse and you guys swallow it hook line and sinker.

Check history, there have been more corporation between Russia and NATO states than disagreement yet somehow they are enemies.

How do you guys reason??

Excuzeme:




You are saying Finland will obliterate Russia?
Even as a Joke, if is distasteful.


I am sure you will one day, say Nigeria will just obliterate Russia.
Russia has become like Nigeria's Presidency, every Clown wants to belong.

Appleyard:


It took the United States 6 months to plan Operation Desert storm and another month to start it's implementation even with the help of an ally. War no be moi moi.

The US fought for many months in Vietnam and left without achieving a single objective with body bags more than 50,000 returned home.

NairaMaster1:


What's this one saying? May be you did not know Russia has been on this since 2016.

The same US crippled Iraq, the 4th largest army of then in 5 days and captured Saddam with minimal accidental civillian casualty.

Has Russia won any war? Only to be killing civillians. They have lost a lot of men and equipment. They ran away from Afghanistan.

Like you rightly said war is no joke. That is why I want the war to stop.

Excuzeme:


You people jut like saying what you know (or dont even know!), is not true!

The agreement was made, as part of the "Perestroika and Glasnot" initiative, preceding the "American engineered" breakdown of the USSR and the dissolution of the Warsaw Pact (the alternative to NATO).

And Yes, the agreement was made with Russia.
But America has repeatedly breached the agreement, by expanding (using all forms of mischief,, including fear, threat, Carrot,sanctions, etc to lure Russia's neighbours) right to the border of Russia.

That is an Existential threat to Russia and that is one of the reasons l have Zero, as in Zilch! sympathy for Ukraine's Govt.

DerrickzB:
[s][/s]

Western media has brainwashed you lots..