BasedUsername:


All I see is kids with essential survival skills

If you do not have children, based, you at least were a child once, so do you teach those "essential survival skills to your children and do you survive today because your parents taught you those "essential survival skills or can you just not see?

BasedUsername:


The UK even went further to ban assault knives in public settings to crack down on stabbings. Next they'll ban assault cars to crack down on hit-and-run. Come to think of it, didn't the Aussies just come out of their draconian lockdown situation?

People don't intentionally hit and run with cars, based, and if you do you'd very likely be caught because we made you do a test to get a license and made you register your car and we installed licence number recognition to identify you.

But of course that wouldn't stop you who buys an "assault car" as opposed to a car for transport that most buy. Thankfully, you are very few.

BasedUsername:


"We just want common sense Islam control."
"Ban assault Muslims."

Did you not say such labels are meaningless, based?

What is an "assault Muslim"?

feedthenation:
Video: Proud Boy member denied entry to Trump rally because PB or QAnon symbols are not be allowed

https://twitter.com/i/status/1531741630268579840

They must have hired Democrats to man the door and apply cancel culture.

What is happening to these people?

You can't ride the subway in NYC without an incident these days...

Ibime:


It surely is

Woah, cool it with the racism.

budaatum:


Did you not say such labels are meaningless, based?

What is an "assault Muslim"?

You really saw those statements and thought I was being serious?

I was highlighting how ridiculous gun grabbers sound

budaatum:


People don't intentionally hit and run with cars, based,

Then what did I do to that herdsman's bull?

budaatum:

and if you do you'd very likely be caught because we made you do a test to get a license and made you register your car and we installed licence number recognition to identify you.

There really hasn't been a problem tracking mass shooters down after the fact, now has there?

budaatum:

But of course that wouldn't stop you who buys an "assault car" as opposed to a car for transport that most buy. Thankfully, you are very few.

You buy cars for transportation, I buy cars to disrupt the supply chain of beef. We are not the same.

budaatum:


If you do not have children, based, you at least were a child once, so do you teach those "essential survival skills to your children and do you survive today because your parents taught you those "essential survival skills or can you just not see?

Imagine not knowing how to build a fire, hunt, fish, farm, perform first-aid, or defend yourself. You will be useless during any crisis.

Printing 80% of circulating supply of money in 1.5 years. Biden's admin is set to destroy the nation.

Inflation is biting

benalvino3:
Printing 80% of circulating supply of money in 1.5 years. Biden's admin is set to destroy the nation.

Inflation is biting

You are certainly an uneducated fool.

The major growth in M1 supply occured during the pandemic in 2020 under Trump (graph below)

Knowing what they had printed during the pandemic and the effects that would unwind over the months, they immediately coined the term Bidenflation before Biden had even entered the seat, just waiting for those juicy prints of 2020 to start to take effect. Like having prepared the rope themselves, the Republicans started predicting the dogs hanging. Not that I have an issue with the printing as reaction to the pandemic, but I have an issue with the dishonesty and misleading of the populace for political reasons, treating citizens and fools like you as mugus. That's why I said all these would occur early last year and Lincoln who thought I was relating it to Biden Presidency took it the wrong way. I talk markets, not politics.

However the USA has been surprisingly resilient given the increase in Money Supply. Funny enough the inflation we have is not due to too many dollars chasing too few goods but mostly due to supply chain issues due to Omicron and China. What we are finding is the world has an insatiable appetite for new dollars hitting the market and they are still selling their currencies to buy dollar which is the third best performing currency this year. So what we are seeing is not demand-pull inflation but cost-push inflation.

Ibime:


You are certainly an uneducated fool.

The major growth in M1 supply occured during the pandemic in 2020 under Trump (graph below)

Knowing what they had printed during the pandemic and the effects that would unwind over the months, they immediately coined the term Bidenflation before Biden had even entered the seat, just waiting for those juicy prints of 2020 to start to take effect. Like having prepared the rope themselves, the Republicans started predicting the dogs hanging. Not that I have an issue with the printing as reaction to the pandemic, but I have an issue with the dishonesty and misleading of the populace for political reasons, treating citizens and fools like you as mugus. That's why I said all these would occur early last year and Lincoln who thought I was relating it to Biden Presidency took it the wrong way. I talk markets, not politics.

However the USA has been surprisingly resilient given the increase in Money Supply. Funny enough the inflation we have is not due to too many dollars chasing too few goods but mostly due to supply chain issues due to Omicron and China. What we are finding is the world has an insatiable appetite for new dollars hitting the market and they are still selling their currencies to buy dollar which is the third best performing currency this year. So what we are seeing is not demand-pull inflation but cost-push inflation.

What Is M2?
M2 is a calculation of the money supply that includes all elements of M1 as well as "near money." M1 includes cash and checking deposits, while near money refers to savings deposits, money market securities, and other time deposits (in amounts less than $100,000). These assets are less liquid than M1 and not as suitable as exchange mediums, but they can be quickly converted into cash or checking deposits.1

You posted a graph you do not understand. shame. every time you do Sabi Sabi meanwhile you don't have a clue. could you at least contrast M1 with M2 to see if you will see the same spike or at least know why that spike is there in the first place. that spike you are seeing there in M1 is them including savings account, something they did for the first time which is the spike you are seeing. M2 has always included savings accounts which is why you didn't see the same spike in M2. I too sabi just to lick Biden's arse

benalvino3:




You posted a graph you do not understand. shame. every time you do Sabi Sabi meanwhile you don't have a clue. could you at least contrast M1 with M2 to see if you will see the same spike or at least know why that spike is there in the first place. that spike you are seeing there in M1 is them including savings account, something they did for the first time which is the spike you are seeing. M2 has always included savings accounts which is why you didn't see the same spike in M2. I too sabi just to lick Biden's arse

Kikikikiki benaldino isa destroy ah lab ah rat Ibime kikikikiki

benalvino3:




You posted a graph you do not understand. shame. every time you do Sabi Sabi meanwhile you don't have a clue. could you at least contrast M1 with M2 to see if you will see the same spike or at least know why that spike is there in the first place. that spike you are seeing there in M1 is them including savings account, something they did for the first time which is the spike you are seeing. M2 has always included savings accounts which is why you didn't see the same spike in M2. I too sabi just to lick Biden's arse

You are a big mumu. Not only did I pull M1, M2 but also MB, and only M1 correlated with your statement of that 80% of Money Supply was printed recently, so I figured you must be talking about M1 (though I know you have no clue what you are talking about)

benalvino3:
Printing 80% of circulating supply of money in 1.5 years. Biden's admin is set to destroy the nation.

Inflation is biting

M1 in the first graph grew from $5trln to $21trln - so about $16trln increase from a total of $21trln, which is roughly the 80% you must be speaking of.

Now you are claiming it's M2 (having just learned about it) having had your foolishness called out.

M2 in the 2nd graph grew from $15trln to $22trln - that means only 30% of M2 ($7trln) was added since 2020

So mumu, which money supply were you talking about for which 80% was printed in the last couple of years

You are out of your depth already based on the above, and to hammer home your stüpidity, most of the growth in both M1 and M2 occured in 2020

So once again, Mr make-it-up-as-I-go along, which money supply are you talking about?

Ibime:

[s]
You are a big mumu. Not only did I pull M1, M2 but also MB, and only M1 correlated with your statement of that 80% of Money Supply was printed recently, so I figured you must be talking about M1 (though I know you have no clue what you are talking about)



M1 in the first graph grew from $5trln to $21trln - so about $16trln increase from a total of $21trln, which is roughly the 80% you must be speaking of.

Now you are claiming it's M2 (having just learned about it) having had your foolishness called out.

M2 in the 2nd graph grew from $15trln to $22trln - that means only 30% of M2 ($7trln) was added since 2020

So mumu, which money supply were you talking about for which 80% was printed in the last couple of years

You are out of your depth already based on the above, and to hammer home your stüpidity, most of the growth in both M1 and M2 occured in 2020

So once again, Mr make-it-up-as-I-go along, which money supply are you talking about?[/s]

Take your L and sit down... Always acting like you know anything.

Embarrassing yourself as usual.

Take your lesson and relax

The only thing you figured is that you think you know top much but you don't.

Weregonnalose:


Kikikikiki benaldino isa destroy ah lab ah rat Ibime kikikikiki

Ya isa ah gargle Ben balls mah Dan ah mouthwash kokopig dah addicted arse munching gay rainbow monkeyyyy

Joe Biden spent more money in the first eight months of his presidency than trump did in 2018 and 2019 put together. Their deficits is the highest since 2nd world War , and their national debt is on track to double by 2031. Because of that the Federal Reserve is
printing $100 billion each month just to keep up. When they have to print money to keep up, the dollar is worth less, that's the putin's inflation we see tearing through the roof.

Americans are lucky, they have a President who quickly tells them who to blame or what to blame (just never himself) for every pain and failure from his day one of office.

benalvino3:


Take your L and sit down... Always acting like you know anything.

Embarrassing yourself as usual.

Take your lesson and relax

The only thing you figured is that you think you know top much but you don't.

This is how your respond when you've been totally found out.

You done run having disgraced yourself

Oga which particular money supply was 80% printed in the last 18 months

Name it or admit you are out of your depth

benalvino3:
Joe Biden spent more money in the first eight months of his presidency than trump did in 2018 and 2019 put together. Their deficits is the highest since 2nd world War , and their national debt is on track to double by 2031. Because of that the Federal Reserve is
printing $100 billion each month just to keep up. When they have to print money to keep up, the dollar is worth less, that's the putin's inflation we see tearing through the roof.

Of course 2021 was a Covid year, so why not compare to 2020

Infact the first year budget of a Presidency is set by his predecessor in the preceding year. Another L

Ibime:


This is how your respond when you've been totally found out.

You done run having disgraced yourself

Oga which particular money supply was 80% printed in the last 18 months

Name it or admit you are out of your depth

Ibime:


M1 in the first graph grew from $5trln to $21trln - so about $16trln increase from a total of $21trln, which is roughly the 80% you must be speaking of.

I didn't answer you because even you basic maths is not adding up.

5trillion to 10trillion is 100% increase oga.

That na basic primary 4 maths you just failed. Keep lying saying you think I meant this or that when I said 80%.

Show us more of your ignorance oga.

The simple maths is not 80% increase its 320% ask your school fees back.

How do you do in this field if you don't know how to calculate percentage?

benalvino3:




I didn't answer you because even you basic maths is not adding up.

5trillion to 10trillion is 100% increase oga.

That na basic primary 4 maths you just failed. Keep lying saying you think I meant this or that when I said 80%.

Show us more of your ignorance oga.

The simple maths is not 80% increase its 320% ask your school fees back.

How do you do in this field if you don't know how to calculate percentage?

You keep embarrassing yourself more. This is why you failed in Obodo Oyibo

You can't even do simple Maths

benalvino3:
Printing 80% of circulating supply of money in 1.5 years. Biden's admin is set to destroy the nation.

Inflation is biting

You said 80% of all supply was printed in the last 1.5 years

You did not say 80% increase

That means if there are 10 dollars in circulation today $8 were printed in the last 1.5 years and there were only $2 before

$2 to $10 is a 500% increase.

$5trln to $21trln in M1 means $16trln was printed recently. $16trl is about 80% of M1 total supply of $21trln give or take

So mumu, which money supply were you talking about before you disgrace yourself further with your primary level failure of simple Maths

Eediot went to Google M1, found M2 and tried to wriggle out while disgracing yourself further

Ibime:

M1 in the first graph grew from $5trln to $21trln - so about $16trln increase from a total of $21trln, which is roughly the 80% you must be speaking of.

Leftist moment

Ibime:



You keep embarrassing yourself more. This is why you failed in Obodo Oyibo

You can't even do simple Maths




You said 80% of all supply was printed in the last 1.5 years

You did not say 80% increase

That means if there are 10 dollars in circulation today $8 were printed in the last 1.5 years and there were only $2 before

$2 to $10 is a 500% increase.

$5trln to $21trln in M1 means $16trln was printed recently. $16trl is about 80% of M1 total supply of $21trln give or take

So mumu, which money supply were you talking about before you disgrace yourself further with your primary level failure of simple Maths

Eediot went to Google M1, found M2 and tried to wriggle out while disgracing yourself further

Sign... Look at the bold from your calculation.

Ibime:


M1 in the first graph grew from $5trln to $21trln - so about $16trln increase from a total of $21trln, which is roughly the 80% you must be speaking of.

Why are you still making excuses?

BasedUsername:


Leftist moment

Lol, he is still embarrassing himself.

benalvino3:


Sign... Look at the bold from your calculation.



Why are you still making excuses?

What is misrepresented in my calculation. Or you want to embarrass yourself further?

I said M1 has $16trln added. From the total of $21trln, that must be roughly the 80% in circulation you were talking about, certainly not the 30% in circulation in M2

BasedUsername:


Leftist moment

Go and read your books or wãnk off to a Japanese cartoon. I am rounding up obviously to find the closest thing to 80% that Benalvino mentioned. It's clearly not M2 which is roughly 30% which the eediot embarrassed himself by saying he was talking about M2

Ibime:


What is misrepresented in my calculation. Or you want to embarrass yourself further?

I said M1 has $16trln added. From the total of $21trln, that must be roughly the 80% in circulation you were talking about, certainly not the 30%=in circulation in M2

grew from $5trln to $21trln - so about $16trln increase from a total of $21trln, which is roughly the 80%

Your calculation


Let it go. You mess up basic maths

Ibime:


Go and read your books or wãnk off to a Japanese cartoon. I am rounding up obviously to find the closest thing to 80% that Benalvino mentioned. It's clearly not M2 which is roughly 30% which the eediot embarrassed himself by saying he was talking about M2

Rounding up should be 300% not 80% maths is taking a beating

Ibime:


Go and read your books or wãnk off to a Japanese cartoon.

"Japanese cartoon."

Boomer moment

benalvino3:


grew from $5trln to $21trln - so about $16trln increase from a total of $21trln, which is roughly the 80%

Your calculation

Get your calculator out and tell me what's wrong with that statement

If it grew from $5 to $21, that means it increased by $16 which was printed recently

You said 80% in circulation was printed recently

16/21 is 76% which is close to your 80%, so you must be talking about M1

You foolishly went to say you were talking about M2 whose circulation of new money since 2020 is roughly 30%.

So was it M1 or M2 you were talking about, or you picked up some nonsense on Twitter you don't even understand to bring here

Dp