OkCornel:


Put the screenshot of who Emperor Nero specifically blamed for the great fire of Rome in 64 AD.

If you can’t put something as specific as mine, don’t bother quoting me.

I only want to converse with intelligent folks. That’s a better use of my time.

Maynman:


The picture you are posting is a suetonius statement which he quoted from nero.
He mentioned Chrestus and it’s not Latin.

What’s there to argue again

OkCornel:


Put the screenshot. I'm not asking for too much.

And did you forget where I mentioned Tacitus' literary work was written in Latin?
Tacitus mentioned Christus with regard to the great fire of Rome.
See the link below, and the screenshot included.

https://web.archive.org/web/20090414174551/http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/txt/ah/tacitus/TacitusAnnals15.html

Suetonius wrote about this incident over a century later after Tacitus, which explains how Christus later evolved to Chrestus

If you don't have an intelligent reply to who Tacitus clearly identified as the ones blamed (and the name of the one they follow) for the great fire of Rome in 64 AD, don't bother mentioning me. I can't continue conversations with ignorant people. It's a sheer waste of time.

Cc: MaxinDHouse, NNTR

Maynman:


When the lie starts that’s when your picture becomes small, your tactics don cast.

OkCornel:


Another dumb response. Not surprised. I've included the link from where the screenshot was gotten, if the text is too small for your eyes to read via phone.

Don't waste everyone's precious time with pointless replies.

See the link here again. Read it, you won't die.
https://web.archive.org/web/20090414174551/http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/txt/ah/tacitus/TacitusAnnals15.html

Maynman:

Okay, Judas of Galilee worshipper.

OkCornel:


Your case is beyond redemption.

Go and brush up your O'Level English

guysbewise:

Even now if a person born after Nigerian independence is to write about the events before Nigerian independence the person's account cannot be authentic unless the person makes authentic references to documents and adult writers who wrote about events before the independence of Nigeria.

budaatum:

Sounds like, unless one provides authentic evidence for one's claims one's claims are not authentic.

Some say the same about Joseph Atwill, but I guess we can say they are biased.

https://www.catholic.com/magazine/online-edition/no-the-romans-did-not-invent-jesus

OkCornel:
The comedy continues.

The Gospel of Matthew and John who were disciples of Jesus Christ no longer counts as eye witness account of the events that happened?

New day, new jokes

MindHacker9009:


The books of Matthew and John were written about 3 decades after the ministry of Jesus and they were not written by Matthew and John the disciples of Jesus. So all the New Testament is a BIG JOKES BOX you base your tricks on.

I took this from one of the Jokes box you learn from:
The angel said to Joseph son of David and thou shalt call his name JESUS.

To show that the Jokes box itself is a BIG JOKE:
Peter is not an angel of God and also Peter is not Joseph the husband of Mary. Jesus was the name the angel told Joseph to name Him.
The angel God sent never mentioned this your Chrestus

OkCornel:


Dumbo, were the authors of Matthew and John no longer Jesus’ disciples? I've not even included the epistles of Peter, OR that of James and Jude who are the younger brothers of Jesus Christ.

They’re no longer eyewitnesses to the existence of Jesus Christ? It’s amazing how unlettered folks plumb into greater depths of idiocy to deny obvious evidences.

And regarding your points angels testifying Jesus born of Mary being the Christ, I’ve answered it before. But since you’re hopelessly unlettered, I’ll paste it here again.

Scripture lesson 101 for Mindhacker9009 the unlettered folk.

1) Read up on Angel Gabriel's visit to Mary and get the full context;

Luke 2 v 27-35;
27 The angel went to a virgin promised in marriage to a descendant of David named Joseph. The virgin’s name was Mary.
28 When the angel entered her home, he greeted her and said, “You are favored by the Lord! The Lord is with you.”
29 She was startled by what the angel said and tried to figure out what this greeting meant.
30 The angel told her, “Don’t be afraid, Mary. You have found favor  with God.
31 You will become pregnant, give birth to a son, and name him Jesus.
32 He will be a great man and will be called the SON OF THE MOST HIGH. The Lord God will give him the throne of his ancestor David.
33 Your son will be king of Jacob’s people forever, and his kingdom will never end.”
34 Mary asked the angel, “How can this be? I’m a virgin.”
35 The angel answered her, “The Holy Spirit will come to you, and the power of the Most High will overshadow you. Therefore, the holy child developing inside you will be called the SON OF GOD.


2) And Angel Gabriel's visit to Joseph;

Matthew 2 v 21-22
20 Joseph had this in mind when an angel of the Lord appeared to him in a dream. The angel said to him, “Joseph, descendant of David, don’t be afraid to take Mary as your wife. She is pregnant by the Holy Spirit.
21 She will give birth to a son, and you will name him Jesus [HE SAVES], because HE WILL SAVE HIS PEOPLE from their sins.”
22 All this happened so that what the Lord had spoken through the prophet came true:

3) Even demons acknowledge Jesus to be the Christ;

Luke 4 v 40-41;
40 When the sun was setting, all those who had any that were sick with various diseases brought them to Him; and He laid His hands on every one of them and healed them.
41 And demons also came out of many, crying out and saying, “YOU ARE THE CHRIST, the Son of God!”

Bring on your next excuse. And I hope it would be an intelligent one.

OkCornel:


Dumbo, were the authors of Matthew and John no longer Jesus’ disciples? I've not even included the epistles of Peter, OR that of James and Jude who are the younger brothers of Jesus Christ.

They’re no longer eyewitnesses to the existence of Jesus Christ? It’s amazing how unlettered folks plumb into greater depths of idiocy to deny obvious evidences.

And regarding your points angels testifying Jesus born of Mary being the Christ, I’ve answered it before. But since you’re hopelessly unlettered, I’ll paste it here again.

Scripture lesson 101 for Mindhacker9009 the unlettered folk.

1) Read up on Angel Gabriel's visit to Mary and get the full context;

Luke 2 v 27-35;
27 The angel went to a virgin promised in marriage to a descendant of David named Joseph. The virgin’s name was Mary.
28 When the angel entered her home, he greeted her and said, “You are favored by the Lord! The Lord is with you.”
29 She was startled by what the angel said and tried to figure out what this greeting meant.
30 The angel told her, “Don’t be afraid, Mary. You have found favor  with God.
31 You will become pregnant, give birth to a son, and name him Jesus.
32 He will be a great man and will be called the SON OF THE MOST HIGH. The Lord God will give him the throne of his ancestor David.
33 Your son will be king of Jacob’s people forever, and his kingdom will never end.”
34 Mary asked the angel, “How can this be? I’m a virgin.”
35 The angel answered her, “The Holy Spirit will come to you, and the power of the Most High will overshadow you. Therefore, the holy child developing inside you will be called the SON OF GOD.


2) And Angel Gabriel's visit to Joseph;

Matthew 2 v 21-22
20 Joseph had this in mind when an angel of the Lord appeared to him in a dream. The angel said to him, “Joseph, descendant of David, don’t be afraid to take Mary as your wife. She is pregnant by the Holy Spirit.
21 She will give birth to a son, and you will name him Jesus [HE SAVES], because HE WILL SAVE HIS PEOPLE from their sins.”
22 All this happened so that what the Lord had spoken through the prophet came true:

3) Even demons acknowledge Jesus to be the Christ;

Luke 4 v 40-41;
40 When the sun was setting, all those who had any that were sick with various diseases brought them to Him; and He laid His hands on every one of them and healed them.
41 And demons also came out of many, crying out and saying, “YOU ARE THE CHRIST, the Son of God!”

Bring on your next excuse. And I hope it would be an intelligent one.

Cc: NNTR, MaxinDHouse

MindHacker9009:
@ OkCornel

You are the BIG Dumbo and unlettered dummy if not you would have known that none of the New Testament were written by an eye witness of you Chrestus character in one of the jokes box you learn from

Maynman:


It was the Church fathers that chose who they want to be authors of those book
All were anonymous

Heard of Catholic epistle

OkCornel:


Which of the church Fathers DETERMINED THE AUTHORS?

I hope I will see something intelligent today.

Maynman:


What do you understand by church fathers?

OkCornel:

I hope I will see something intelligent today.

OkCornel:


State the names of the “Church Fathers” that determined the authors of the New Testament.

Ireneaus? Origen? Polycarp?

KnownUnknown:


Hey, intelligent guy!!
Who is the white dude on your profile?

OkCornel:


He’s a Middle Easterner (Jew to be precise)

OkCornel:

A painting of Jesus by Akiane Kramarik.

OkCornel:

You can read up more on her story. Quite an interesting one. Also look out for Colton Burpo too.

MindHacker9009:



Rephrased: references to documents and adult writers who wrote about events before the independence of Nigeria, during the same periods the events took place

The most important question now were all all the writings of Jewish historians during the time of Jesus it will be very biased to say there were no Jewish historians during the time of Jesus as the Book of Moses was written sometime in the 15th century B.C.

OkCornel:

And the supreme clown of the multiverse now tells us Matthew and John who were disciples of Jesus Christ and James and Jude who were the younger brothers of Jesus Christ are no longer eye witnesses.

A deeper level of idiocy on display

budaatum:


I don't think Jesus or Christianity could possibly have been significant enough for much to have been written about him or it during his time, and if anything was written it likely would not have survived. He was not exactly known outside his stomping ground until he was allegedly killed.

I think it would be like Moses of whom nothing at all was written about until many century's later, and not by or from eyewitness accounts or anything of the sort but from tales and stories passed down from mouth to mouth.

budaatum:


I don't think Jesus or Christianity could possibly have been significant enough for much to have been written about him or it during his time, and if anything was written it likely would not have survived. He was not exactly known outside his stomping ground until he was allegedly killed.

I think it would be like Moses of whom nothing at all was written about until many century's later, and not by or from eyewitness accounts or anything of the sort but from tales and stories passed down from mouth to mouth.

KnownUnknown:

Not to support the asinine @KnownUnknown that he was created by the Romans, but what if he wasn’t known inside or outside his stomping grounds because he didn’t exist at all.

KnownUnknown:

Lol. Your multiple semester hours of YouTube education is something to behold.

MindHacker9009:


Shows how backward you are, you think youtube is only used by jokers like yourself, @OkCornel, @MaxInDHouse and co