Umm! Now the gullible followers of the invented jesus christ believes ChatGPT is the fake holy spirit promised by their invented jesus christ

When your ChatGPT is giving fake references to recent fake court cases that never existed, so if you are not the BIG fool you won't beleive that ChartGPT can tell you what happened 2000 years ago. I'm a programmer and I can created a ChatGPT for you to say any garbage you want.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


A New York lawyer is facing a court hearing of his own after his firm used AI tool ChatGPT for legal research.

A judge said the court was faced with an "unprecedented circumstance" after a filing was found to reference example legal cases that did not exist.

The lawyer who used the tool told the court he was "unaware that its content could be false".

ChatGPT creates original text on request, but comes with warnings it can "produce inaccurate information".

The original case involved a man suing an airline over an alleged personal injury. His legal team submitted a brief that cited several previous court cases in an attempt to prove, using precedent, why the case should move forward.

But the airline's lawyers later wrote to the judge to say they could not find several of the cases that were referenced in the brief.

"Six of the submitted cases appear to be bogus judicial decisions with bogus quotes and bogus internal citations," Judge Castel wrote in an order demanding the man's legal team explain itself.

Over the course of several filings, it emerged that the research had not been prepared by Peter LoDuca, the lawyer for the plaintiff, but by a colleague of his at the same law firm. Steven A Schwartz, who has been an attorney for more than 30 years, used ChatGPT to look for similar previous cases.

In his written statement, Mr Schwartz clarified that Mr LoDuca had not been part of the research and had no knowledge of how it had been carried out.

Mr Schwartz added that he "greatly regrets" relying on the chatbot, which he said he had never used for legal research before and was "unaware that its content could be false".

He has vowed to never use AI to "supplement" his legal research in future "without absolute verification of its authenticity".



Screenshots attached to the filing appear to show a conversation between Mr Schwarz and ChatGPT.

"Is varghese a real case," reads one message, referencing Varghese v. China Southern Airlines Co Ltd, one of the cases that no other lawyer could find.

ChatGPT responds that yes, it is - prompting "S" to ask: "What is your source".

After "double checking", ChatGPT responds again that the case is real and can be found on legal reference databases such as LexisNexis and Westlaw.

It says that the other cases it has provided to Mr Schwartz are also real.

Both lawyers, who work for the firm Levidow, Levidow & Oberman, have been ordered to explain why they should not be disciplined at an 8 June hearing.

Millions of people have used ChatGPT since it launched in November 2022.

It can answer questions in natural, human-like language and it can also mimic other writing styles. It uses the internet as it was in 2021 as its database.

There have been concerns over the potential risks of artificial intelligence (AI), including the potential spread of misinformation and bias.


Source: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-65735769

EruditeSupport:


Chatgpt is telling you fake history. You don't need the Holy Spirit to learn the truth about historical events. Do you?

Isn't it foolish of EruditeSupport to hold an opinion based on ChatGPT which was created by a nonentity who doesn't know what he was saying? Are the historical archives of YouTube not more accurate than that of an ignorant chatgpt?

EruditeSupport can Keep deceiving yourself. EruditeSupport have chosen your path and we can see where it's leading.

MindHacker9009:

EruditeSupport:


Can you see what EruditeSupport have done to himself?

Ride on. We'll soon know who's the big fool between you and I.

I can't believe that a fully grown human being like EruditeSupport would copy pasting all the jargons EruditeSupport posted above. EruditeSupport does not know what concerns chatgpt with court cases? Chai!!

MaxInDHouse:
If the Romans fabricated Jesus when they are ruling the world are they still in power today?
So why is it that the whole world is using dates agreed upon as the era when Jesus was born?
Well anyone can believe anything as long as they're avoiding the greatest evidence that Jesus walked this planet: His Witnesses! Act 1:8

No one wrote outside their invented New Testament that they saw their invented jesus christ.

Philo Judeas Born: 25 BC, Alexandria, Egypt, in the Roman province of Egypt, was a Hellenistic Jewish philosopher who was around during the time of Jesus Christ, during His ministry and after the ministry of Jesus Christ. Did not write about their invented jesus christ. But had this to write instead:

Philo Judeas wrote about Caesar Augustus Rome’s Greatest Emperor, in the eastern roman empire was claimed to being god's anointed one and the son of god. The account of the birth of Caesar Augustus in Rome also has some similarites to that of their invented jesus christ. So the Jews are correct that the Jewish Messiah has not yet come.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=limDa2wNmKg

sonmvayina:

So name one person who actually saw him and what he wrote about him ?
In the first person....not reported speach...

EruditeSupport:

I never expected more from EruditeSupport. I already studied EruditeSupport and knew his intellectual capacity. EruditeSupport didn't dissapoiint. Kudos.

MaxInDHouse:


Matthew and John were two of his friends whom he called "apostles" both of them penned down what they saw him did and heard from him!

Caveatemptor:

This is why I always say,"You are a fraud!"
You know what you are writing is false. None of the four Christian gospels bear the real names of their writers. They are only pseudonyms. The writers of the four canonical gospels are all unknown. The leaders of the early Christian Church choose to ascribe names of disciples to the gospels for reasons best known to them.
Desist from these lies!

MaxInDHouse:



According to the Bible each writer signed by his own personal name so if you heard another thing contrary to this just calm down because neither you nor i nor the one who told you nor the one who told me lived 2000 years ago when all these things were thought to have happened.

MaxInDHouse:



According to the Bible each writer signed by his own personal name so if you heard another thing contrary to this just calm down because neither you nor i nor the one who told you nor the one who told me lived 2000 years ago when all these things were thought to have happened.

Caveatemptor:

Having a discourse with you is just an exercise in futility. It is like talking with a personality that lives in his own parallel universe. It is like banging my head on a concrete wall because you always argue in a circular way.
So because me and you were not born 2,000 years ago,we cannot arrive at the truth or a semblance of the truth? This your circular argument even shows the bible to be untrue and a book of falsehood since me and you were not there when the book was written. You see how senseless circular reasoning leads to anarchy because it means any book written before anyone is born cannot be investigated or verified.
Once again,"You are a fraud!" None of the gospel writers was an eyewitness to the stories they wrote. None of the names of the writers on the gospels are real names,they are pseudonyms. Mark was the first written gospel which Mathew,Luke and John copied and embellished with material from other sources. This accounts for the contradictions and differences in the stories.

MaxInDHouse:


Ọmọ since you and i aren't there the only way to figure out the truth is the BENEFIT gained.

If someone say your great grandfather was a blacksmith but none of his descendants practice such a profession it may be difficult to agree that you had such a person as ancestor.
But what if you now find some of his children whose lineage has become experts in that field surely it will make no sense arguing that your great grandfather never existed.

Jesus is the promised Prince of Peace {Isaiah 9:6} and according to what is found written in the gospels his disciples will serve as evidence that he existed {Act 1:8} so if by today a big and happy family of peace loving worshipers suffice on this same planet and they are using what Jesus taught to accomplish this then whoever say Jesus never existed should tell us how come a global family of peace loving worshipers came about in a world that's filled with violence! Revelations 6:3-4

Jesus never said it's the record of his story that will serve as prove that he once walked this planet rather this is what he said:

"But you will receive power when the holy spirit comes upon you, and you will be witnesses of me in Jerusalem, in all Ju·deʹa and Sa·marʹi·a, and to the most distant part of the earth.” Act 1:8

Ọmọ use your brain nah!

If Jesus' story was fabricated did the fabricators also force millions of people from different geographical locations on this planet to agree with their fabrication and live as one big and happy family of peace loving worshipers in the name of Jesus of Nazareth?

Guy with the emergence of Jehovah's Witnesses there's no further need of scrutiny Jesus is a real historical figure!

Caveatemptor:

You keep arguing round and round in circles. Your arguments are so infantile that I sometimes feel ashamed for you. You are arguing based on blind faith and emotions. Never rationality, never engaging your brain. Just going round in circles based on myths, fears and delusion fed you since your birth.
I think I am done with you for today there is a limit to the amount of rubbish I can take from you for a day.
Phew!

MaxInDHouse:


Matthew and John were two of his friends whom he called "apostles" both of them penned down what they saw him did and heard from him!

sonmvayina:

Ntchew....
Rubbish ...
I thought you had a good evidence..
The gospels are the claims...
Back them up with evidence..

MaxInDHouse:


Ọmọ whatever we found WRITTEN can't be discarded as long as we never lived during the time it was thought to have occurred.
So everything in history should be discarded since we never lived by the time of it's record all written documents are false.
Do you agree?

sonmvayina:

It is a story...
That's why they where written in the third person...
The authors never said who they are. It was the Catholic church who added those titles...

MaxInDHouse:


Ọmọ whatever we found WRITTEN can't be discarded as long as we never lived during the time it was thought to have occurred.
So everything in history should be discarded since we never lived by the time of it's record all written documents are false.
Do you agree?

sonmvayina:


So name one person who actually saw him and what he wrote about him ?

In the first person....not reported speach...

SIRTee15:

Matthew and John

Maynman:

😂

EruditeSupport:

Maynman:

😂

Aemmyjah:

Wow
You can use a fish hook to catch an insect