₦airaland Forum

NigerianAngelo:
Your ancestors are in hell.

YES that's where the bodies of all dead people routine!

budaatum:
Rephrase your question without the gibberish and I might bother responding to you.

Even with the minor errors, I know you understood the question clearly. However, the corrections have been made. Go ahead and respond appropriately.

KnownUnknown:
Okay. It seems you can’t answer the question and there is no need to beat around the bush. Thanks

You refused to read the passages and, therefore, what is the need engaging you any further?

elated177:
Even with the minor errors,

Your minor errors are not a concern, your gibberish is. And I have edited so you know what I am talking about.

budaatum:
Your minor errors are not a concern, your gibberish is. And I have edited so you know what I am talking about.

Tribalist. Racist.

elated177:
Tribalist. Racist.

I'd same the same if you said such rubbish in my very own Yoruba, since it is intended to inflame and annoy and is not indicative of intelligence.

budaatum:
I'd same the same if you said such rubbish in my very own Yoruba, since it is intended to inflame and annoy and is not indicative of intelligence.

Racist. Tribalist.

elated177:
You refused to read the passages and, therefore, what is the need engaging you any further?

I read the passages and they don’t detract from my opinion that Numbers 31 is the epitome of evil and the evil was perpetrated by YHVH’s people with his consent. Yes, absolutely no need to engage further.

KnownUnknown:
I read the passages and they don’t detract from my opinion that Numbers 31 is the epitome of evil and the evil was perpetrated by YHVH’s people with his consent.

I am always amused whenever I read you say this, but we unfortunately are not yet at the point to explore it. Where did you get that a YHVH consented, I keep wondering.

Do you also think like elated does that a YHVH wrote the book we are discussing too?

budaatum:
I am always amused whenever I read you say this, but we unfortunately are not yet at the point to explore it. Where did you get that a YHVH consented, I keep wondering.

Do you also think like elated does that a YHVH wrote the book we are discussing too?

And I’m always amused that you think your observations make sense. Isn’t the “lord”(elated’s YHVH) one of the characters in the story who gives the command?

How does this discussion of events in a book and the actions of the characters indicate that I believe one of the characters (the most improbable and incredible) wrote the book?


When you discuss your favorite story of Adam and Eve and their Lord, do you think like elated does that a YHVH wrote the book?

KnownUnknown:
And I’m always amused that you think your observations make sense. Isn’t the “lord”(elated’s YHVH) one of the characters in the story who gives the command?

How does this discussion of events in a book and the actions of the characters indicate that I believe one of the characters (the most improbable and incredible) wrote the book?


When you discuss your favorite story of Adam and Eve and their Lord, do you think like elated does that a YHVH wrote the book?

First, I never said you believed, Unknown. That's not a mistake a reasonable person can make about you.

I obviously don't either, and for his sake I make it very clear that I don't. I just think it should be pointed out to him constantly that the writers are telling stories to convince his sort that his YHVH wrote the book, because it is the premise of all his arguments.

That said, progress. Because it's the first time you've acknowledged that buda is talking about a fictional figure in a story book.

budaatum:
First, I never said you believed, Unknown. That's not a mistake a reasonable person can make about you.

No, but you asked a ridiculous question. An unnecessary question.

budaatum:
I obviously don't either, and for his sake I make it very clear that I don't. I just think it should be pointed out to him constantly that the writers are telling stories to convince his sort that his YHVH wrote the book, because it is the premise of all his arguments.

Then point it out to him not me. I asked him the question based on that very premise because of his statement about “evil and wickedness”. I discussed at his level, so to speak, to see if he is the “Boko Haram” type. Also, the chapter is often neglected when they discuss the “word of god”. If a believer in the Bible is ever unfortunate or fortunate enough to speak to me in real life, Numbers 31 would be a litmus test. If they excuse the obvious moral depravity of their “lord”(based on the aforementioned premise), I would tickle their fancy by putting the holocaust “into context”. See, you don’t understand the Hutsi and Tutsi “vengeance” event because you are not putting it “into context”.

budaatum:
That said, progress. Because it's the first time you've acknowledged that buda is talking about a fictional figure in a story book.

Why do I need to acknowledge to you that you are speaking of fictional characters?!!!

Lol, as if that has ever been a point of contention.

Hell, if anyone appears confused that they are talking about fictional characters it would be you.

Thanks for your time.

KnownUnknown:
No, but you asked a ridiculous question. An unnecessary question.



Then point it out to him not me. I asked him the question based on that very premise because of his statement about “evil and wickedness”. I discussed at his level, so to speak, to see if he is the “Boko Haram” type. Also, the chapter is often neglected when they discuss the “word of god”. If a believer in the Bible is ever unfortunate or fortunate enough to speak to me in real life, Numbers 31 would be a litmus test. If they excuse the obvious moral depravity of their “lord”(based on the aforementioned premise), I would tickle their fancy by putting the holocaust “into context”.



Why do I need to acknowledge to you that you are speaking of fictional characters?!!!

Lol, as if that has ever been a point of contention?

Hell, if anyone appears confused that they are talking about fictional characters it would be you.

budaatum:
Thanks for your time.

You’re welcome.

KnownUnknown:
I read the passages and they don’t detract from my opinion that Numbers 31 is the epitome of evil and the evil was perpetrated by YHVH’s people with his consent. Yes, absolutely no need to engage further.

If you actually read them, then you didn't understand them.

Apt!

Apt.