Jodera:
it's just so funny.
Na only Haaland we dey always hear agent fees, bonus for performances, Papa fees like say other players no get agent, Papa or doesn't get performance related bonus

Anything to deride Man city and guardiola sha

Lol..if u be thief..anything wey lost omo na u everybody go point ooh

Jodera:
I don't do on commissions and you won't see me start with Haaland. Anytime anybody is bought even on this thread, nobody adds Salary, add-ons fees and agent fees. But suddenly we should start with Haaland because you don't believe in his price tag.

And yet you call me treacherous?

Did Richarlison cost Spurs more than Haaland cost Man city? That's the argument and the answer is NO, he didn't cost more. You can't be dancing shakushaku around the simple answer feigning ignorance of commission paid to Haaland's agent and father, just because you are pursuing an agenda.

Ibime:


Mbappe was a free transfer since January for any club willing to pay him what he wants. His contract expired last summer

Like I said, keep foolish takes to yourself. Haaland transfer has never been in the category of Richarlison. Clubs that have the wherewithal to sign Haaland no pass 3 - PSG, City and Madrid at a stretch. That transfer comes with £900k salary, €40m agents fee, €30m father's fee, God knows what sign on fee for Haaland himself, and a release clause. Same reason they kept the release clause low at Dortmund so they would be the ones to profit from the sale, not the selling club. Same thing Neymars dad did with Santos fee, until we later saw the real cost of the deal to Barcelona

Don't mind that Jodera guy. They always trying to defend Fraudiola's spending spree.

Dirtyyansh:
.


Read the transfer contracts again.
Haaland annual salary is x10 of Richarlison.
What about the money paid to his father?
City cooked alot of books & Uefa knows about it, but they will not sat anything because infantino has collected riba

I didn't even know you guys have educated that ignorant Arsenal guy.

WhoDeyHause:

So what is stopping him from playing rw easily for us?

Check and you will see that he excels at that position for us


It’s the same position he played in that final against city, he cuts in from the right into 10 and plays through balls or runs into the right crosses or plays a cut back

You can check

raumdeuter:


Did Chelsea sign their players for free? No be money una spend on Lukaku Sterling and Harvetz

The money chelsea spent on this ororo players can't buy haaland alone..no dis & no peace

Jodera:
He has an opportunity to extend in Jan with either PSG or sign new contract with some else, yet he signed with PSG. So I ask, how was he free??

All players have agent yet I never see person talk say Havertz agent get even if na £1m pounds for his move to Chelsea or Werner. But e don reach Haaland turn and we should now be looking into it.

Most clubs include performance related bonus to their salary and availablity (esp Liverpool players) but it isn't a problem until Haaland came into the fray.

Like I said, on this thread nobody is talking about those things until Haaland came, so we should just keep the same energy

If you know anything about football contracts, you will know agents typically get 10% of the transfer fees so you can apply that to Havertz, Lukaku and whoever

Everybody except the dumbest rock knows Haaland is majorly owned by his father and agent, and they are the ones you really pay when you sign Haaland, just like many contracts for Brazilian players where the agents own the equity. Only a fool will be talking about the release clause paid to Dortmund. The person to buy out is the father and the agent. They parked Haaland at Dortmund with low release clause for that very reason, same way Brazilians often get parked in Portuguese league until the agent can cash out. Let me even shock you, Man City have not paid off the father and Agents equity in the player which is why they agreed to £150m release clause in 2 years, so the father and agent can chop again from their equity. Man City is on a similar deal to Dortmund, that's why they are already trying to sign new contract with Haaland just two months into the season, so they can finally buyout the agent and father's interest. . . despite already paying Haaland £900k per week.

Haaland on the open market is a £300-£400m player and the father and agent will expect to cake out £150m to £200m from him before handing over all his contractual rights, since they loosely own 50% of hlm.

If you don't know how football contracts work, just be quiet on Haaland matter. Neymar transfer from Santos to Barca should have taught even the most casual.football follower what it's like to buy out 3rd party interest in a player. The fee paid to Dortmund is just to buy out Dortmunds minute interest in the player. His father and agent have leveraged out portions of their interest 3 times (to Salzburg, Dortmund and City). His.next transfer or next contract will be their final leveraged buyout. Between these 4 contracts, they would expect to have recouped half the true market value of the player, then the contractual relationship going forward will be strictly between the player and club.

Consider Haaland only half-purchased by City and just to get to this stage they have paid €70m combined in agents and father's fees, €70m in transfer fees, who knows the sign-on fee, and £900k weekly wage.

raumdeuter:
Newcastle leading Spurs away yet na Newcastle dey press Cuntay like this. First 5mins of the 2nd half have been practically half field for a team trailing by 2 goals at home

Yet some call Cuntay a top coach

No they underate this newcastle players..them no get joy ooh

raumdeuter:


Before na net spend when that one no favor their argument again it turned into agency fee kindergarten fee flight ticket

Actually it started with spending, when Chelsea started spending very high, it moved to net spend. Now it's no longer netspend since Man city had a good netspend this summer, so we don dey hear meal ticket and voucher fees

Ibime:


If you know anything about football contracts, you will know agents typically get 10% of the transfer fees so you can apply that to Havertz, Lukaku and whoever

Everybody except the dumbest rock knows Haaland is majorly owned by his father and agent, and they are the ones you really pay when you sign Haaland, just like many contracts for Brazilian players where the agents own the equity. Only a fool will be talking about the release clause paid to Dortmund. The person to buy out is the father and the agent. They parked Haaland at Dortmund with low release clause for that very reason, same way Brazilians often get parked in Portuguese league until the agent can cash out. Let me even shock you, Man City have not paid off the father and Agents equity in the player which is why they agreed to £150m release clause in 2 years, so the father and agent can chop again from their equity. Man City is on a similar deal to Dortmund, that's why they are already trying to sign new contract with Haaland just two months into the season, so they can finally buyout the agent and father's interest. . . despite already paying Haaland £900k per week.

Haaland on the open market is a £300-£400m player and the father and agent will expect to cake out £150m to £200m from him before handing over all his contractual rights, since they loosely own 50% of hlm.

If you don't know how football contracts work, just be quiet on Haaland matter. Neymar transfer from Santos to Barca should have taught even the most casual.football follower what it's like to buy out 3rd party interest in a player. The fee paid to Dortmund is just to buy out Dortmunds minute interest in the player. His father and agent have leveraged out portions of their interest 3 times (to Salzburg, Dortmund and City). His.next transfer or next contract will be their final leveraged buyout. Between these 4 contracts, they would expect to have recouped half the true market value of the player, then the contractual relationship going forward will be strictly between the player and club.

Consider Haaland only half-purchased by City and just to get to this stage they have paid €70m combined in agents and father's fees, €70m in transfer fees, who knows the sign-on fee, and £900k weekly wage.

This is what made people like dead barka president to run away after finessing his fans he will sign haaland. The release clause is not even up to what they paid for raphina.

WhoDeyHause:

Haaland that bought expensive customized Rolex watches worth for all his Dortmund teammates before leaving to City. What salary were they paying him before at age 21 that made him buy them?

Na like that G boys they do if maga pays na

lordfalcao:
this is total of what haaland deal cost.. as reported by a very reputable the athletic..

I no know where una dy get una own figures…

Athletic only reported his base salary. Nothing contradicts anything I've said here as they did not disclose his full salary and agents fees. And if you believe Athletic, then you should corroborate my statement that he has £150m ($200m as reported by Athletic) release clause, for which Man City will soon pay tens to hundreds of millions to his father to get rid of. Like I said, he is.just being parked at Man City till ether they, PSG or Madrid finally buy out the father and agent who really own him.

Ibime:


If you know anything about football contracts, you will know agents typically get 10% of the transfer fees so you can apply that to Havertz, Lukaku and whoever

Everybody except the dumbest rock knows Haaland is majorly owned by his father and agent, and they are the ones you really pay when you sign Haaland, just like many contracts for Brazilian players where the agents own the equity. Only a fool will be talking about the release clause paid to Dortmund. The person to buy out is the father and the agent. They parked Haaland at Dortmund with low release clause for that very reason, same way Brazilians often get parked in Portuguese league until the agent can cash out. Let me even shock you, Man City have not paid off the father and Agents equity in the player which is why they agreed to £150m release clause in 2 years, so the father and agent can chop again from their equity. Man City is on a similar deal to Dortmund, that's why they are already trying to sign new contract with Haaland just two months into the season, so they can finally buyout the agent and father's interest. . . despite already paying Haaland £900k per week.

Haaland on the open market is a £300-£400m player and the father and agent will expect to cake out £150m to £200m from him before handing over all his contractual rights, since they loosely own 50% of hlm.

If you don't know how football contracts work, just be quiet on Haaland matter. Neymar transfer from Santos to Barca should have taught even the most casual.football follower what it's like to buy out 3rd party interest in a player. The fee paid to Dortmund is just to buy out Dortmunds minute interest in the player. His father and agent have leveraged out portions of their interest 3 times (to Salzburg, Dortmund and City). His.next transfer or next contract will be their final leveraged buyout. Between these 4 contracts, they would expect to have recouped half the true market value of the player, then the contractual relationship going forward will be strictly between the player and club.

Consider Haaland only half-purchased by City and just to get to this stage they have paid €70m combined in agents and father's fees, €70m in transfer fees, who knows the sign-on fee, and £900k weekly wage.

most people don't know this...if Haaland only cost the release clause at Dortmund, City would find it difficult have him...not when Bayern, Real, Barca, Liverpool are around even Chelsea and Juve.

He's Dad and Agent put everyone off with their demands.

City and Psg are the two clubs that can give in to such demands without thinking twice

Ibime:



Athletic only reported his base salary. Nothing contradicts anything I've said here as they did not disclose his full salary and agents fees. And if you believe Athletic, then you should corroborate my statement that he has £150m ($200m as reported by Athletic) release clause, for which Man City will soon pay tens to hundreds of millions to his father to get rid of. Like I said, he is.just being parked at Man City till ether they, PSG or Madrid finally buy out the father and agent who really own him.

City paid Dortmund £51million to sign Haaland, but the whole deal, including agent fees and bonuses, reached around £85million.

As reported by athletic. Agent fees are what made it 85M£..

WhoDeyHause:

This is what made people like dead barka president to run away after finessing his fans he will sign haaland. The release clause is not even up to what they paid for raphina.

You see am abi... football business get dark side o.

They just put that release clause to avoid ffp

Joelinton's remontada is beyond remarkable. From one of the biggest PL flops in recent memory - if not all time - to one of the best B2B midfielders in the league. The position change from striker to midfielder was a masterstroke from Howe.

Aside agenda, why person go even think say 50-60m go secure Halland.

Nawao for una oo!!

Halland deal go fold most top football clubs.

Barcelona never even recover from Messi and Neymar deal till date.

WhoDeyHause:

Because it is true. We almost paid more than 150 million for him last year before the deal spolit and we moved on to lukaku. How many clubs were ready to do that last season?

Haaland was last year in the contract compared to two years left when you went for him. It's logical that his price suppose to be high compared to this summer

BlueMann:
Joelinton's remontada is beyond remarkable. From one of the biggest PL flops in recent memory - if not all time - to one of the best B2B midfielders in the league. The position change from striker to midfielder was a masterstroke from Howe.

Are you sure it was Howe that changed him?
He has been playing behind CF since they got Wilson

donstan18:
Aside agenda, why person go even think say 50-60m go secure Halland.

Nawao for una oo!!

Halland deal go fold most top football clubs.

Barcelona never even recover from Messi and Neymar deal till date.

They know but would not agree because of agenda. Everybody has his own commission and agent fees that will be paid but just like some people's transfer fee is higher than others that's the way some players package will be higher than everybody.

Ballzproblemm:
still mad at him though but he comes ,I won't mind ,a perfect frello replacement ,now all we need is like to DMs and one attacking Midfielder

We need RWF that can take out defenders and not goal-shy.

WhoDeyHause:

Haaland that bought expensive customized Rolex watches worth for all his Dortmund teammates before leaving to City. What salary were they paying him before at age 21 that made him buy them?

Man was earning 132K per week at Dortmund ,But a certain whodeyhause from Iwo road Ibadan is asking where he got money to buy Rolex for his teammates

youngZee23:
So pep can win the league with this our players?

Shebi una Dey yab sterling

No be Wetin pep take Dey win league be that

andrewbaba44:


Shebi una Dey yab sterling

No be Wetin pep take Dey win league be that

Na fake sterling mancity sell give us o,they don suck better ball comot sterling body

Sniper04:

Na fake sterling mancity sell give us o,they don suck better ball comot sterling body

But pep is a check book coach ,na boehly hold check book so oooo and we have seen what he got at the market

He paid 80 million for fufuna ,someone that chalobah looks like a better player than

WhoDeyHause:

This is what made people like dead barka president to run away after finessing his fans he will sign haaland. The release clause is not even up to what they paid for raphina.

Sharrap

Haaland release clause was more than what Barca paid for raphinha

Bartomeu has killed Barca finances that’s why we couldn’t get him ,griezman package at Barca will cover Haaland .

donstan18:
Aside agenda, why person go even think say 50-60m go secure Halland.

Nawao for una oo!!

Halland deal go fold most top football clubs.

Barcelona never even recover from Messi and Neymar deal till date.

Jodera dey disappoint me.

People are either pushing agenda or are naive to think halaand didn't cost man city more than 150m.

donstan18:
Aside agenda, why person go even think say 50-60m go secure Halland.

Nawao for una oo!!

Halland deal go fold most top football clubs.

Barcelona never even recover from Messi and Neymar deal till date.

Barca never recover from griezman and floptinho deal

andrewbaba44:


But pep is a check book coach ,na boehly hold check book so oooo and we have seen what he got at the market

He paid 80 million for fufuna ,someone that chalobah looks like a better player than

Chalobah is not better than fofana, but he's good in his own way. And most managers in big clubs na checkbook coach na, but Pep still be Baba for that level, you sef know na, normally

Sniper04:

Chalobah is not better than fofana, but he's good in his own way. And most managers in big clubs na checkbook coach na, but Pep still be Baba for that level, you sef know na, normally

Looks like a better player than him doesn’t mean he is better .

raumdeuter:


Is it not Pep style that made City a premium attacking style.

How else does a confused player like Sterling score double digits if not for the coaching system?

Sterling will waste 3 chances and still score 2 goals in a game for City

That should be 60+ goals in a season.