olugabbie:


The US most expensive weapon (aircraft carriers) are useless against Russia and China.
It can be used against Iraq, Libya, Afghanistan and the likes. But no against other super powers.

Russia and China have varieties of missiles that they can use to destroy the entire US strike group.

In a world war, missiles and submarines will play the major role. The billion dollar Zumwalt destroyer and other very expensive US weapon may not see battle.

A new world war is going to be a missile war. Nothing more and nothing less. This is the reason Russia invest more on defense systems. The US on the other side invest heavily on offensive weapon, strictly because it wants to be able to project power outside it territory. Majority of those weapons will not see battle in a new world war.

Exactly more ever all USA satalite will be destroyed that is the first thing that will happen USA will reformat immediately

It can't function again. That why it needs to manually stay near Russia and surround Russia lol but that can't happen.

olugabbie:


The US most expensive weapon (aircraft carriers) are useless against Russia and China.
It can be used against Iraq, Libya, Afghanistan and the likes. But not against other super power/powers.

Russia and China have varieties of missiles that they can use to destroy the entire US strike group.

In a world war, missiles and submarines will play the major role. The billion dollar Zumwalt destroyer and other very expensive US weapon may not see battle.

A new world war is going to be a missile war. Nothing more and nothing less. This is the reason Russia invests more on defense systems. The US on the other side invests heavily on offensive weapon, strictly because it wants to be able to project power outside it territory. Majority of those weapons will not see battle in a new world war.

Lmaooo!!!!
An aircraft carrier is useless in battle
So, you don't know that a destroyer does not even have the ability of an aircraft carrier? China and Russia have various missiles that they can use to destroy the entire US strike group Oh my God!!!
We are not talking of Nigerian army here. We are talking about the most experienced and battle tested military on planet earth and you are comparing China, whose army has NOT been battle tested in the last 50 years.
The only advantage China has over US is manpower (population) and that is even relatively useless considering the fact that 75% of US citizens know how to use a gun.
Please don't say what you just said here in an oratory debate.
Let me put it simple. An aircraft carrier is just like a whole and complete air base on water. Out of a total of 41 aircraft carriers in the world, US has 11, China has 2 and UK has two.

Gbadebo19:
Let's leave Ukraine and Russia aside. .
Help me win 10k from palmpay refer and win. Download palmpay and register with my referral code:
HFGJ8MY3
I need only 3 referrals to win 10k. I promise the three people who join through that code 1k each. Just contact the number in my signature via WhatsApp.
Less than 10 hours remaining. Let's help one another.

send am to zelensky

Gbadebo19:

Lmaooo!!!!
An aircraft carrier is useless in battle
So, you don't know that a destroyer does not even have the ability of an aircraft carrier? China and Russia have various missiles that they can use to destroy the entire US strike group Oh my God!!!
We are not talking of Nigerian army here. We are talking about the most experienced and battle tested military on planet earth and you are comparing China, whose army has NOT been battle tested in the last 50 years.
The only advantage China has over US is manpower (population) and that is even relatively useless considering the fact that 75% of US citizens know how to use a gun.
Please don't say what you just said here in an oratory debate.

The US may be able to use it strike group to defend itself. But using them in an offensive against China in South China sea or Russia, will result in the lost of those expensive ships.

The US naval power won't make it to the Chinese shore, incase of a war between the two. Likewise if the Chinese navy is on the offensive, her navy won't make it to the US shore/shores.

olugabbie:


The US may be able to use it strike group to defend itself. But using them in an offensive against China in South China sea or Russia, will result in the lost of those expensive shops.
The US naval power won't make it to the Chinese shore, incase of a war between the two. Likewise if the Chinese navy is on the offensive, her navy won't make it to the US shore/shores.

My dear, when it comes to war it will not. I am not just hyping the US but if you read about the abilities of these machines, China and Russia are nothing less than 30 years behind.
But then, you may be right in your opinion concerning their loss because a defending nation is always at an advantage. But again, the sheer number of these machines operated by US (11 out of 41 in the world and they are spread across every continent) is a very big problem for any country cos you don't know where the next attack will come from.
Did I mention that only the US operates nuclear powered aircraft carriers? Those machines can work for 15 years without refueling.

olugabbie:


The US may be able to use it strike group to defend itself. But using them in an offensive against China in South China sea or Russia, will result in the lost of those expensive ships.

The US naval power won't make it to the Chinese shore, incase of a war between the two. Likewise if the Chinese navy is on the offensive, her navy won't make it to the US shore/shores.

You getting it wrong. Aircraft carriers have the license to enter any territorial waters in the absence of hostilities between the two nations. In fact, US aircraft carriers are ever present on south China seas.

Gbadebo19:

You getting it wrong. Aircraft carriers have the license to enter any territorial waters in the absence of hostilities between the two nations. In fact, US aircraft carriers are ever present on south China seas.

I am talking about war between super powers.

Gbadebo19:

My dear, when it comes to war it will not. I am not just hyping the US but if you read about the abilities of these machines, China and Russia are nothing less than 30 years behind.
But then, you may be right in your opinion concerning their loss because a defending nation is always at an advantage. But again, the sheer number of these machines operated by US (11 out of 41 in the world and they are spread across every continent) is a very big problem for any country cos you don't know where the next attack will come from.
Did I mention that only the US operates nuclear powered aircraft carriers? Those machines can work for 15 years without refueling.

The biggest threat to aircraft carriers/battle strike group are missile and submarines. Superpowers like China and Russia have enough missile and submarines to deal with them.

They can be tracked and they can be knocked out of operations.

Vl3ly:
send am to zelensky

Lol.

Gbadebo19:

Lmaooo!!!!
An aircraft carrier is useless in battle
So, you don't know that a destroyer does not even have the ability of an aircraft carrier? China and Russia have various missiles that they can use to destroy the entire US strike group Oh my God!!!
We are not talking of Nigerian army here. We are talking about the most experienced and battle tested military on planet earth and you are comparing China, whose army has NOT been battle tested in the last 50 years.
The only advantage China has over US is manpower (population) and that is even relatively useless considering the fact that 75% of US citizens know how to use a gun.
Please don't say what you just said here in an oratory debate.
Let me put it simple. An aircraft carrier is just like a whole and complete air base on water. Out of a total of 41 aircraft carriers in the world, US has 11, China has 2 and UK has two.

so what will happen if russia lunches 200 sahed drones to it and even if only 20% of the drones hit the ship, so what will happen oga?

WrriterNig:
⚡"The more territory 🇺🇦 Ukraine controls," the better cards it will have at the negotiating table," NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg said in an interview with 🇩🇪 Welt am Sonntag.

The problem with this type of logic is that Russia could also think the same way and then the negotiations would never happen since both sides can not be having most of the land at the same time...

Gbadebo19:

My dear, when it comes to war it will not. I am not just hyping the US but if you read about the abilities of these machines, China and Russia are nothing less than 30 years behind.
But then, you may be right in your opinion concerning their loss because a defending nation is always at an advantage. But again, the sheer number of these machines operated by US (11 out of 41 in the world and they are spread across every continent) is a very big problem for any country cos you don't know where the next attack will come from.
Did I mention that only the US operates nuclear powered aircraft carriers? Those machines can work for 15 years without refueling.

is it the same USA that lancet and sahed drones are destroying their weapons? Are you high? Usa can't even flex on iran? Not to talk of Russia or China, USA haven't fought a worthy opponent for decades only flexing on nations like libya and iraq, the war in Ukraine is their first war fighting their mate and they are losing horribly using, they couldn't even defeat Wagner are you high bro? Stop watching Hollywood movies and face the truth. Russia is destroying their million dollars weapons with lancet drones stop cappin dust man.

Stoplying:

The problem with this type of logic is that Russia could also think the same way and then the negotiations would never happen since both sides can not be having most of the land at the same time...

make nato dey play

olugabbie:


The biggest threat to aircraft carriers/battle strike group are missile and submarines. Superpowers like China and Russia have enough missile and submarines to deal with them.

They can be tracked and they can be knocked out of operations.

You are right but the problem is that china and Russia have limited submarines plus the fact that US knows the exact location of their submarines anytime anyday. I got this info too:

The aircraft carrier is vulnerable to gunfire, submarine attack, and air attack, and aircraft carriers have been sunk in this war by all three of these means. There is no excuse for an aircraft carrier being sunk by either gunfire or submarine attack and any carrier so sunk was being very poorly operated at the time

dvkot:
is it the same USA that lancet and sahed drones are destroying their weapons? Are you high? Usa can't even flex on iran? Not to talk of Russia or China, USA haven't fought a worthy opponent for decades only flexing on nations like libya and iraq, the war in Ukraine is their first war fighting their mate and they are losing horribly using, they couldn't even defeat Wagner are you high bro? Stop watching Hollywood movies and face the truth. Russia is destroying their million dollars weapons with lancet drones stop cappin dust man.

Abi dis one dey ment??
Shahed drones are evading air defence systems because they fly at low altitudes which makes them difficult to track. And you are here saying shahed drones are destroying aircraft carriers. You dey ment??
Do you even know what an aircraft carrier is We are talking of a full and complete air base on water, you are talking of shahed abi na Saheed. Mtcheeeeeewww!!!!

Gbadebo19:

You are right but the problem is that china and Russia have limited submarines plus the fact that US knows the exact location of their submarines anytime anyday. I got this info too:

The aircraft carrier is vulnerable to gunfire, submarine attack, and air attack, and aircraft carriers have been sunk in this war by all three of these means. There is no excuse for an aircraft carrier being sunk by either gunfire or submarine attack and any carrier so sunk was being very poorly operated at the time

Russia has enough submarines to protect it territory.

In the wwIi military aircrafts struggle to find aircraft carriers. But nowadays, drones, satellite and surveillance aircraft can find and track aircraft carriers with ease.

Gbadebo19:

You don't always have to show your stupidity on a public forum. You are stupid, yes we already know.
All you had to do was to counter everything written there with an intellectual and non propaganda point of view. Do we really have to be slamming this into your dumb brain again and again? Even a bot would have learned faster.

Move on, whom you want to troll has zero regards for you.

Gbadebo19:

Lmaooo!!!!
An aircraft carrier is useless in battle
So, you don't know that a destroyer does not even have the ability of an aircraft carrier? China and Russia have various missiles that they can use to destroy the entire US strike group Oh my God!!!
We are not talking of Nigerian army here. We are talking about the most experienced and battle tested military on planet earth and you are comparing China, whose army has NOT been battle tested in the last 50 years.
The only advantage China has over US is manpower (population) and that is even relatively useless considering the fact that 75% of US citizens know how to use a gun.
Please don't say what you just said here in an oratory debate.
Let me put it simple. An aircraft carrier is just like a whole and complete air base on water. Out of a total of 41 aircraft carriers in the world, US has 11, China has 2 and UK has two.

Those Aircraft carriers will be nothing but a turkey 🦃 shoot for Russia. I have no doubts Russia will sink a few of them should US decides to get orgasms at their fancy weak weapons and get trigger-happy facing Russians.

Yh... Most experienced and battle-tested against weak countries like Afghanistan and Iraq. Have they ever got the balls to mess with Russia directly like they do to those Talibans?.. man GTFOH.

Badassniggga:
Those Aircraft carriers will be nothing but a turkey 🦃 shoot for Russia. I have no doubts Russia will sink a few of them should US decides to get orgasms at their fancy weak weapons and get trigger-happy facing Russians.

Yh... Most experienced and battle-tested against weak countries like Afghanistan and Iraq. Have they ever got the balls to mess with Russia directly like they do to those Talibans?.. man GTFOH.

You know I don't take nonsense, so I advise you to stay off my posts. The last time I dealt with you, you know how you cried to the mods to help you in banning me.

Gbadebo19:

Abi dis one dey ment??
Shahed drones are evading air defence systems because they fly at low altitudes which makes them difficult to track. And you are here saying shahed drones are destroying aircraft carriers. You dey ment??
Do you even know what an aircraft carrier is We are talking of a full and complete air base on water, you are talking of shahed abi na Saheed. Mtcheeeeeewww!!!!

aircraft carrier is indestructible abi? You dey ment na.. Kinzhal go ruin.. You just dey play carry USA for head like gala

HornyTave1:


Move on, whom you want to troll has zero regards for you.

Good that you have realized your limits.

Badassniggga:
Those Aircraft carriers will be nothing but a turkey 🦃 shoot for Russia. I have no doubts Russia will sink a few of them should US decides to get orgasms at their fancy weak weapons and get trigger-happy facing Russians.

Yh... Most experienced and battle-tested against weak countries like Afghanistan and Iraq. Have they ever got the balls to mess with Russia directly like they do to those Talibans?.. man GTFOH.

are you minding him, na only talibans usa fit fight.. They cant even face iran

olugabbie:


Russia has enough submarines to protect it territory.

In the wwIi military aircrafts struggle to find aircraft carriers. But nowadays, drones, satellite and surveillance aircraft can find and track aircraft carriers with ease.

Like I said, aircraft carriers can only be destroyed by submarines if they are being very poorly operated at that time. Besides, they also have their own defense mechanisms.

dvkot:
are you minding him, na only talibans usa fit fight.. They cant even face iran

Lmaoooo. The same Iran that US took out the right hand man of their president during Donald trump regime. Abeg, go and rest. And don't forget to read, it doesn't hurt to read a few things beyond your academic textbooks.