IfnobeGod20:

This is more of a hostile witness than anything. The respondents are hearing it hot like hot iron. Thumb up guy.

you will soon pity him

senatordave1:


1) the shettima case has been settled by the supreme court.it is an internal affair of a party to be raised before elections.

2) the 25% case is ambiguous but I can tell you that the judges will likely thrash it.moreover,a rerun emanating from it will involve only tinubu and atiku.obi so far has not canvassed anything on that and his case ends tomorrow.

3) obi only cast fractional and isolated doubts not enough to affect the overall outcome.those blurred results was from irev which is secondary copy.he should have used the hard copy from his agents or inec to compare and contrast.
Obi is no more saying he won because he didn't,he just wants to castigate the elections as much as he can damaging inec public reputation.
So far,peter has not proven anything.it us like throwing sand in a river.

Very correct 👌. He has only proven that he has no case at all. Look at all the witnesses he called, none of them is to be taken serious at all. 95% of them are from same region and testified on hearsay

Need.

Next topic pls.........

IamV:


Q. You did not attach your Interrogation to your report.

A. I did

Q. Mention the pages where you interrogated the AWS in respect of these 12 documents.

A. In para 24, last sentence there refer to an attachment.
[he reads it].
What else do you want?

Q. There are 3 items mentioned there.

A. There are 3 items mentioned here

Q. Are you aware that there are 176,000 polling units ?

A. Actually, there are 176,846.

Q. And you picked 12 ?

A. With proof of consent

LO FAGBEMI:
I'm angry, I'm not asking you any questions again .

[ ]

[ That's that for the cross examination of the witness by the 4th Respondent ]

This is fatality like mortal Kombat. This is truly expert witness.

Lovelive:
Your INEC chair that stole and give it to another thief who knows that the item given to him is certainly stolen one will not end up in prison , right ?


Dey play !

Can't you see that the guy called was just there to defend the rubbish he conceived? He did not contact anybody nor try to verify but just deduced everything by himself? This is the high definition of,...dey play

OfoIgbo:


So far, Peter Obi's people have submitted enough evidence to prove that
1. Shettima had another nomination before he was declared Tinubu's running mate
2. Tinubu didn't get 25% of Abuja votes, which is a constitutional requirement
3. Cast doubt on how INEC arrived at the decision that Tinubu won, especially as there were thousands of blurred results, and huge discrepancies in certain states.

The only point Peter Obi now has to prove is that he actually won that election. Even though I know he has submitted EC8A forms for the election, the prosecution still needs to collate the exact results in those forms, as the court may not have time to go through that mountain of evidence.

All I can say at the moment is that Peter Obi has proven enough points for the judges to cancel that election and call for a re-run. He needs to do a bit more for the courts to have enough evidence to declare him the winner.

Let us wait for the defence, and what points they have

Shetima actually withdrew from being a senatorial candidate, he wrote his constituents and his party, a fresh nomination was conducted.


What I don't understand is when witness' statements are objected but court adminting them.

IamV:


The court now adjourns till tomorrow, Friday June 23, 2023 at 2pm for continuation of hearing.


-----------
Thank you all for keeping the thread going.
My beautiful & handsome audience, you're all appreciated.

Tomorrow, we go HARDER !

For now,you all take care and do have a great day.

Omo today's witnesses chop gun powder oo!!...inec lawyers just dey vex anyhow .

IamV thanks for today's update. More grease to your elbows.

Tomorrow is another day to go harder!🔨⚒️ 🔥

IamV:
Please,my beautiful & handsome gentlemen and ladies,spare five seconds of your time to stand up and applaud this witness,Chibuike Ugboke,a cyber security expert.

He deserves the standing ovation guys.

Thank you .

Please I am in love with this guy already. He just ridicule the respondents with his expertise. Please more standing ovation for the guy. Is too much.

Issue:

INEC certified blurred result sheets.

So how did INEC determine the winner when the electoral act requires that the IRev results must tally with what is collated ?

18,000 blurred results from polling units.

There are averagely 500 voters in a polling unit,equating to 9million voters!

QuantAnalyst:


It was a trick. The guy was smart enough to dodge it.

12/176k isn't enough though.

I like your objectivity from the bolded.obi's evidences are simply not enough.his smartness bore no fruit,pennywise pound unwise from lp lawyers

fredoooooo post=1
1
23968988:
Bush baby .. cry ... Obituarists.. die.. Obingoe.. bark

your deficiencies is understandable, I just pray and hope it's not hereditary
may the good Lord help you

pacesetting:
It seems you've not been following. Obi has submitted all the facts. It's now left for INEC to prove that those facts are not admissible. What do you think they have been objecting to since last week?

Apc need not prove anything but inorder to bury obi,they will simply call presiding officers and collation officers that will attest to upload.
Secondly,they will provide hardcopies of 18000 unit results and also show that obi didn't have agents in most of them.
They will show that inec can have a glitch locally.
They will show that tinubu won in all result copies.
The nitda dg will reject the staff that came.aws will be called to reject their so called staff

IamV:


Okay.

Be truthful to yourself. Does this guy sound intelligent?

Is he an institution that his findings can be given any consideration? So anybody either sane or insane can put things together without field research, survey or even little interview and then come up with conclusion?

No interviews, he doesn't even know much about the LG he quoted, no interaction with any soul, just mix things up by himself and is telling everyone with bold chest that he right?

I can place on this very witness that he will be heavily fined or send to jail

IfnobeGod20:

This is more of a hostile witness than anything. The respondents are hearing it hot like hot iron. Thumb up guy.

Guy,so you don't know what a hostile witness is and you have been arguing with me? Why can't you lp guys be objective for once?

I don't trust the Nigerian judiciary.From inception,Tinubu has been influencing the judges to favour most governors who sacked their predecessors from office through the tribunal.

senatordave1:

[/b]

I like your objectivity from the bolded.obi's evidences are simply not enough.his smartness bore no fruit,pennywise pound unwise from lp lawyers

Yeah.

The 12/176k and the websites link included in his report were his shortfall. Other than those the witness did a good job.

Novarisammy2:


your deficiencies is understandable, I just pray and hope it's not hereditary

may the good Lord help you

oga, if you want attention go to ya mama go and suck some breast . I'm not responsible for ya generational frustration.
STAY ON YA LANE ...

Novarisammy2:


how exactly did he fumble?

give vivid instances

The problem was that, even in the 12 he examined, he went on to say he did not question anybody, nor confirm the physical copies. So the physical copies may have as well been same as the metadata.


He was judge and jury on his activities. It's difficult to prove that results were wrong online when you admit you never checked what was declared to actually confirm if they were wrong

Unseen:



I hope you know your details being requested will expose your identity.... Just Be careful

He can always use a pos operator anonymously if he decides to engage. But none of this is necessary. OP is not a #30k/M pauper like they are.

Exactement.


Especially that senatordave1 and other agbadorians.

MrColdsweat:

Simple. I don't get it when people argue with paid miscreants. They are here to spread false narratives and not to be convinced. Just ignore them.

IfnobeGod20:

Please I am in love with this guy already. He just ridicule the respondents with his expertise. Please more standing ovation for the guy. Is too much.

He ridiculed himself. Is it that you didn't check his response? He was asked questions and he was bluffing. No concise response! Honestly, the guy needs to be check. I am not sure he is 70% sane

IfnobeGod20:

This is fatality like mortal Kombat. This is truly expert witness.

You are using 12 to determine 176,000? Sir are you ok? Or you just want to console and comfort yourself

Abemy:


Shetima actually withdrew from being a senatorial candidate, he wrote his constituents and his party, a fresh nomination was conducted.


What I don't understand is when witness' statements are objected but court adminting them.

They admitted them because of a prior agreement to admit all inec documents and to save time as time is of essence

loosecanon50:


Omo today's witnesses chop gun powder oo!!...inec lawyers just dey vex anyhow .

IamV thanks for today's update. More grease to your elbows.

Tomorrow is another day to go harder!🔨⚒️ 🔥

You mean he fumbled seriously

IfnobeGod20:

Please I am in love with this guy already. He just ridicule the respondents with his expertise. Please more standing ovation for the guy. Is too much.

He ridiculed himself.stop forcing my hands to use words I don't want to.stop this,behave mr

LADEMINUS:


The problem was that, even in the 12 he examined, he went on to say he did not question anybody, nor confirm the physical copies. So the physical copies may have as well been same as the metadata.


He was judge and jury on his activities. It's difficult to prove that results were wrong online when you admit you never checked what was declared to actually confirm if they were wrong

THANK YOU!!! I don't understand why others are not reading it even including the guy giving update.

Very laughable scenerio. He did the findings himself and concluded by himself. If the judge is merciful, he should be sentence to a very long term. Others would have sentence him first to a psychiatric hospital and if confirmed well, he will be sentence to death

Alhari:
He hasn't proven a point on the past election, you also need to go and read about past elections in Nigeria, no elected president has ever won Abuja during presidential election. Peter obi never won the election and didn't come close to winning it's high time you wake up from your slumber.

Baba talk what you know.
Many Presidents have won Abuja. And I believe all previous presidents have gotten at least 25%

OfoIgbo:


So far, Peter Obi's people have submitted enough evidence to prove that
1. Shettima had another nomination before he was declared Tinubu's running mate
2. Tinubu didn't get 25% of Abuja votes, which is a constitutional requirement

Don't close your eyes to reality, open it so you can see properly.

These two up there, the drug case and Irev irregularities are DOA. What Peter Obi must prove is:

1. That he got 25% in 8 more states
2. That he won the election with a majority of the votes.

GoodGovernance:
Issue:

INEC certified blurred result sheets.

So how did INEC determine the winner when the electoral act requires that the IRev results must tally with what is collated ?

18,000 blurred results from polling units.

There are averagely 500 voters in a polling unit,equating to 9million voters!

Those 18000 blurred sheets are irev copies which may be blurred due to bad bvas camera or the posture of the photographer.all lp needed to do was to confirm from the physical copies

QuantAnalyst:


Yeah.

The 12/176k and the websites link included in his report were his shortfall. Other than those the witness did a good job.

Yes,him and the prof of last week did well.but still,it is like a drop in the sea

Majesty7:


Be truthful to yourself. Does this guy sound intelligent?

Is he an institution that his findings can be given any consideration? So anybody either sane or insane can put things together without field research, survey or even little interview and then come up with conclusion?

No interviews, he doesn't even know much about the LG he quoted, no interaction with any soul, just mix things up by himself and is telling everyone with bold chest that he right?

I can place on this very witness that he will be heavily fined or send to jail

The highlighted statement alone is the exact reason I won't be expending my time & energy with you.
We have different understanding of what it means to be "truthful" & attributes we consider "intelligent".
Honestly, it's not worth it.

No disrespect intended,take care.

saintbillion:

Your so call lawyers don't even know the exact numbers of pu's. Lol but the witness corrected him by stating the exact number. Who is in for business? That alone should tell u he means business. If out of 12 units he Carried out his research and saw different pictures in all and discrepancies in the 12 units, what's the needs of wasting time in the remaining faulty 176?

You don't get it. He didnt cross check the physical copies of those twelve.

For example, in one of the units concerned, APC got zero votes in the hard copy. So unless he is trying to prove that the whole election is a waste including LP votes......