₦airaland Forum

senatordave1:
Which drug case? Was he a convict

seunmsg:
Your knowledge of law is shallow. Transmission of result from where to where? Were results not transmitted directly from polling units to collation centers? You really think you know more than the lawyers? Even if some of the results were not transmitted from the polling units to IREV on election day, how did that substantially affect the outcome of the election? Are the collated results different from what were signed by agents and given to police officers and party agents? Are you aware that even if original results, BVAS and IREV results are all not available or damaged, or not uploaded, INEC can simply collate the results given to the police officers posted to each polling units and declare a winner?

LADEMINUS:
That's why nobody will give you 25 naira talk less of 25 million. Section 64 as you stated did not mandate that results be transmitted via BVAS or IREV. If you followed the case closely, you will have heard both PDP and LP witnesses admit that it was NOT MANDATORY to be uploaded by IRev despite insisting to have Mahmoud on tape saying so.
Under cross, they all agreed that physical transmission which was done was valid. The LP last witness even went further to confirm that LP agreed to the results and signed the result sheets accross the levels of collation

keymatt:
A thread of agbados, by agbados, for agbados. Tinubu going to school or not doesn't matter. He's drug case alone is enough to bundle him out.
Whether you like it or not, your mandate thief must return our stolen mandate. 😎
The "Snatch it and runaway with it" philosophy is over!😎

senatordave1:
Begging them where? Did you read this post or you just came to disgrace yourself as usual? Didn't you read that obi star witness disgraced obi yesterday

Karlosorji:
in what way was Obi disgraced? The only person that was disgraced and still disgracing himself is Tinubu. The allegations against him are too enormous

Karlosorji:
the question you should be asking is, did Tinubu forfeit money? What for?

Timmi:
The witness lawyer that called himself a lawyer might be one to his village people but he just exhibited his shallowness and lack of understanding of law and jurisdiction by faulting what happened in the US Court. He needs to first educate himself on the rudimentary of law and then take time to understand the US law and Court system before opening his mouth as if he is in his village's yam festival.

And these are the kind of witnesses, so-called experts and lawyers representing the LP and the PDP throughout this case. It is very sad that the Election Panel has to witness these kind of charades and clowns wasting their time and the resources of the Court system in Nigeria.

GoodGovernance:
Lazy youth, oya read:

64.—(1) The presiding officer shall endorse the word “rejected” on the
ballot paper rejected under section 52 (1) of this Act and for any other reason,
and the ballot papers shall not be counted except otherwise allowed by the
returning officer who may overrule the presiding officer.
(2) If an objection to the decision of a presiding officer to reject a ballot
paper is raised by a candidate or a polling agent at the time the decision is
made, the presiding officer shall add to the word “rejected”, the phrase “but
objected to”.
(3) The presiding officer shall prepare a statement on rejected ballot
papers, stating the number rejected, the reason for rejection and their serial
number, and he or she shall on request, allow a candidate or a polling agent to
copy the statement.
(4) A collation officer or returning officerat an election shall collate and
announce the result of an election, subject to his or her verification and
confirmation that the—
(a) number of accredited voters stated on the collated result are correct
and consistent with the number of accredited voters recorded and transmitted
directly from polling units under section 47 (2) of this Act ; and
(b) the votes stated on the collated result are correct and consistent with
the votes or results recorded and transmitted directly from polling units
under section 60 (4) of this Act.

seunmsg:
Atiku and Peter Obi have both closed their respective cases without proving how they won the election. So, the idea of the court declaring any of them the winner of the election is out of the equation.

The second part of their plea is to get Tinubu disqualified on three grounds. Shettima’s so called double nomination that has now been thrashed by the Supreme Court. 25% of FCT that the two parties seems to have abandoned as they didn’t push this argument seriously. Even if they’ve pushed it, section 299 already made it clear FCT should be treated like a state so it won’t even matter.

The third argument is to get him disqualified by a combination of certificate forgery, dual citizenship and drug conviction.

The certificate forgery is of two nature. Chicago state university and NYSC. As regards Chicago state university, the University already issued a public statement that Bola Tinubu graduated from the University. That alone is enough to settle the matter. All the gymnastic about the color or font of certificate is nonsense.

On NYSC, I would have expected Atiku’s legal team to subpoena NYSC to prove the authenticity of the certificate submitted by Tinubu but they failed to do that. So, how did they arrive at the conclusion that the certificate was forged? NYSC is the only authority that can confirm the authenticity or otherwise of an NYSC certificate.

On the drug conviction issue, it is as empty as the lawyer PDP brought to as witness to prove the case. The witness simply helped PDP to ruin a case that was faulty right from the start. There was no criminal conviction or indictment in the forfeiture. The communication from the US government to the IGP already cleared him of all allegation.

Overall, Atiku and Peter Obi simply wasted everyone’s time. They had no case of rigging so they had to throw in a lot of allegations hoping one will stick. Sadly, they proved none. The two cases will be dismissed with heavy cost to the petitioners.

senatordave1:
The lord works in a mysterious way.both atiku and obi's star witnesses fumbling on the final day at the dying minute.atiku witness literally used his mouth to destroy all the evidences he presented.tinubu's enemies are falling into the pit they dug for him..apcccc

keymatt:
Fail for where? Is that why the mandate thief is begging Peter Obi to withdraw his so called failed case?
E go shock 🤯 you
The mandate thief's reign in Aso Rock is over!!! 😎

keymatt:
Fail for where? Is that why the mandate thief is begging Peter Obi to withdraw his so called failed case?
E go shock 🤯 you
The mandate thief's reign in Aso Rock is over!!! 😎

casualobserver:
Nah Tinubu became president the moment, Obi left PDP. Tinubu faced many hurdles along the way, e.g cabal and anointed candidate, Muslim Muslim ticket,, Osinbajo betrayal, CBN currency change etc etc. there were also defining moments like the Abeokuta declaration (Emilokan), the decision of the Northern governors but all of them would have counted for nothing if Obi had stayed in PDP. If Obi had not left PDP, Atiku would be president today and he would have won handsomely.

The biggest obstacle to Tinubu was overcoming the damage by association with 8 yrs of the Buhari administration and perception of APC in the eyes (pockets) of Nigerians. The minute Obi left PDP, that otherwise insurmountable obstacle was removed. The damage and perception still remained but those votes were split weakening their effect.

The irony is that the Lekki people are the ones that made Tinubu president by wasting their votes on Obi. They gave Obi the confidence to leave PDP.

senatordave1:
https://dailypost.ng/2023/06/23/atikus-witness-faults-us-court-on-tinubus-forfeiture-of-460-000/?amp=1

Gbogbowa:
Already Tinubu has been nailed 1 on the guinea passport Olaonipekun said the passport has expired but that doesn't exempt Tinubu from being a Guinea citizen so Tinubu committed perjury,2 Inec letter said shettima resign from senate on 6 but a video was played in the court where Tinubu was telling Buhari of his interest to make shettima his running mate also said shettima is yet to know his intention 3 the guidelines stated by Inec play in the court shows clearly that Inec failed to live up to expectation so Inec need to explain why presidential result was not uploaded and senate and law maker result went through,the pu and the ward results did not tally with the state and the result announced hence the only reason Yakubu ran away from court true out.Tinubu is a gunner like arsenal

femisplash:
What amazes me the most was the ignorance of star witnesses of Atiku and Obi. When confronted with documents from source or courts, exonerating Tinubu of any crime, they all claimed " i don't know" or " i am not aware". How can you rely on social media gossips without carrying out your own fact finding and think it would fly in a court of law. Dumb people everywhere.

GoodGovernance:
Lazy youth, oya read:

64.—(1) The presiding officer shall endorse the word “rejected” on the
ballot paper rejected under section 52 (1) of this Act and for any other reason,
and the ballot papers shall not be counted except otherwise allowed by the
returning officer who may overrule the presiding officer.
(2) If an objection to the decision of a presiding officer to reject a ballot
paper is raised by a candidate or a polling agent at the time the decision is
made, the presiding officer shall add to the word “rejected”, the phrase “but
objected to”.
(3) The presiding officer shall prepare a statement on rejected ballot
papers, stating the number rejected, the reason for rejection and their serial
number, and he or she shall on request, allow a candidate or a polling agent to
copy the statement.
(4) A collation officer or returning officerat an election shall collate and
announce the result of an election, subject to his or her verification and
confirmation that the—
(a) number of accredited voters stated on the collated result are correct
and consistent with the number of accredited voters recorded and transmitted
directly from polling units under section 47 (2) of this Act ; and
(b) the votes stated on the collated result are correct and consistent with
the votes or results recorded and transmitted directly from polling units
under section 60 (4) of this Act.

keymatt:
A thread of agbados, by agbados, for agbados. Tinubu going to school or not doesn't matter. He's drug case alone is enough to bundle him out.
Whether you like it or not, your mandate thief must return our stolen mandate. 😎
The "Snatch it and runaway with it" philosophy is over!😎

Benwallt:
I watch with absolute dismay the way obidients celebrate admittance of evidence by the court as if they were actual ground for conviction. Evidences admitted and not logically proven is as useless as the last 't' in the word 'duvet'.

Tinubu is not even aware of any court case as the man faces governance with firm grip. Election rustlers are there in court entertaining us with different episodes of badly prepared drama.

seunmsg:
Atiku and Peter Obi have both closed their respective cases without proving how they won the election. So, the idea of the court declaring any of them the winner of the election is out of the equation.

The second part of their plea is to get Tinubu disqualified on three grounds. Shettima’s so called double nomination that has now been thrashed by the Supreme Court. 25% of FCT that the two parties seems to have abandoned as they didn’t push this argument seriously. Even if they’ve pushed it, section 299 already made it clear FCT should be treated like a state so it won’t even matter.

The third argument is to get him disqualified by a combination of certificate forgery, dual citizenship and drug conviction.

The certificate forgery is of two nature. Chicago state university and NYSC. As regards Chicago state university, the University already issued a public statement that Bola Tinubu graduated from the University. That alone is enough to settle the matter. All the gymnastic about the color or font of certificate is nonsense.

On NYSC, I would have expected Atiku’s legal team to subpoena NYSC to prove the authenticity of the certificate submitted by Tinubu but they failed to do that. So, how did they arrive at the conclusion that the certificate was forged? NYSC is the only authority that can confirm the authenticity or otherwise of an NYSC certificate.

On the drug conviction issue, it is as empty as the lawyer PDP brought to as witness to prove the case. The witness simply helped PDP to ruin a case that was faulty right from the start. There was no criminal conviction or indictment in the forfeiture. The communication from the US government to the IGP already cleared him of all allegation.

Overall, Atiku and Peter Obi simply wasted everyone’s time. They had no case of rigging so they had to throw in a lot of allegations hoping one will stick. Sadly, they proved none. The two cases will be dismissed with heavy cost to the petitioners.

7lives:
That Rufai of AriseTV really did them strong thing.
Imagine that loser saying Lagos was sold to the British, by who?.
What the British tried in Hong Kong and failed is what they tried in Lagos Island, and still failed.
All I see is a one eyed man leading a pack of blinds and this is precisely who Rufai and his followers are.

Boyooosa:
Dey play



I agree with you tho, that he was destined to be great but notwithstanding, lekki protest wasn't about tinubu nor a plot against him, it was the true reflection of the anger in the Nigerian masses, the oppressed but sadly, the hands of the oppressors were bigger, not bigger than God's tho.


Na you give am intelligence??

If the current administration doesn't change the narratives, things like that will always suffice because it's a ripple effect.

I pray God gives him the required strength to drive the nation aright




If you were to be the judge in this case, with the evidences and counter evidence available at your disposal so far, how would you judge this case?

What will be your final verdict?

Kindly add substantial reason and reference possibly.

Thanks as I wil like to read your intelligent response

meolaniyi:
keep fooling yourself. While Tinubu is begging Obi and Atiku to withdraw their against him

senatordave1:
How did inec violate this?

Boyooosa:
Dey play



I agree with you tho, that he was destined to be great but notwithstanding, lekki protest wasn't about tinubu nor a plot against him, it was the true reflection of the anger in the Nigerian masses, the oppressed but sadly, the hands of the oppressors were bigger, not bigger than God's tho.

If the current administration doesn't change the narratives, things like that will always suffice because it's a ripple effect.

I pray God gives him the required strength to drive the nation aright




If you were to be the judge in this case, with the evidences and counter evidence available at your disposal so far, how would you judge this case?

What will be your final verdict?

Kindly add substantial reason and reference possibly.

Thanks as I wil like to read your intelligent response

iwaeda:
The evidences are overwhelming. If only our court, Appeal and Supreme will do the right thing. Bayo want to spin again

duro4chang:
Which evidences are many? You still dey carry this election mata for ya head? I tell you no evidence at all. All you have been reading are propaganda.

GoodGovernance:
Were the Presidential election results transmitted DIRECTLY from the polling units,before collation?

This is the only debatable issue I would have pursued in court and then leave the court to decide. Then to some extent,the 25% controversy.

Other prayers sought by Obi and Atiku's lawyers ,are a disgrace to "SANhood".Issues that had been decided by various courts.