keymatt:
Fail for where? Is that why the mandate thief is begging Peter Obi to withdraw his so called failed case?
E go shock 🤯 you
The mandate thief's reign in Aso Rock is over!!! 😎

famology:


They were dumping materials on the judges without linking them to the issues before the court. These lawyers are criminals sha. They scammed obi and Atiku. They've collected their share. Even the Abuja 25perc matter was abandoned. Everything was just social media noise in the end.

senatordave1:


No na.it is just commonsensical

senatordave1:


Obi just dumped polling results without showing them before the court.his calculations show tinubu still won.changing of results happened in just two states.he hasn't been able to prove non transmission or upload

meolaniyi:
keep fooling yourself. While Tinubu is begging Obi and Atiku to withdraw their against him

senatordave1:
The lord works in a mysterious way.both atiku and obi's star witnesses fumbling on the final day at the dying minute.atiku witness literally used his mouth to destroy all the evidences he presented.tinubu's enemies are falling into the pit they dug for him..apcccc

danijesus:
oga stop spreading falsehood,how did you knw Obi's calculation shows a Tinubu win? You go just dy lie up and down

seunmsg:
Atiku and Peter Obi have both closed their respective cases without proving how they won the election. So, the idea of the court declaring any of them the winner of the election is out of the equation.

The second part of their plea is to get Tinubu disqualified on three grounds. Shettima’s so called double nomination that has now been thrashed by the Supreme Court. 25% of FCT that the two parties seems to have abandoned as they didn’t push this argument seriously. Even if they’ve pushed it, section 299 already made it clear FCT should be treated like a state so it won’t even matter.

The third argument is to get him disqualified by a combination of certificate forgery, dual citizenship and drug conviction.

The certificate forgery is of two nature. Chicago state university and NYSC. As regards Chicago state university, the University already issued a public statement that Bola Tinubu graduated from the University. That alone is enough to settle the matter. All the gymnastic about the color or font of certificate is nonsense.

On NYSC, I would have expected Atiku’s legal team to subpoena NYSC to prove the authenticity of the certificate submitted by Tinubu but they failed to do that. So, how did they arrive at the conclusion that the certificate was forged? NYSC is the only authority that can confirm the authenticity or otherwise of an NYSC certificate.

On the drug conviction issue, it is as empty as the lawyer PDP brought to as witness to prove the case. The witness simply helped PDP to ruin a case that was faulty right from the start. There was no criminal conviction or indictment in the forfeiture. The communication from the US government to the IGP already cleared him of all allegation.

Overall, Atiku and Peter Obi simply wasted everyone’s time. They had no case of rigging so they had to throw in a lot of allegations hoping one will stick. Sadly, they proved none. The two cases will be dismissed with heavy cost to the petitioners.

keymatt:
A thread of agbados, by agbados, for agbados. Tinubu going to school or not doesn't matter. He's drug case alone is enough to bundle him out.
Whether you like it or not, your mandate thief must return our stolen mandate. 😎
The "Snatch it and runaway with it" philosophy is over!😎

keymatt:
Fail for where? Is that why the mandate thief is begging Peter Obi to withdraw his so called failed case?
E go shock 🤯 you
The mandate thief's reign in Aso Rock is over!!! 😎

GoodGovernance:
What is the essence of assembling SANs without senses?

As an "unlearned" person,all I needed to prove in court for both Atiku and Obi, is that the electoral process did not comply substantially with the electoral law as required in section 64(4) which states without ant ambiguity, that election results SHALL be transmitted DIRECTLY from polling units before any collation can be valid..They ignored that section only focusing on section 60.

All the witnesses examination and cross examination would be focused on section 64(4).

If the results of all the over 700,000 polling units were not transmitted directly from the polling units before collation,is that not substantial non compliance??

It is now clear that ab initio,there was a premeditated and grand conspiracy to rig the Presidential election alone.The NASS election results were transmitted directly from the polling units,in compliance with section 64(4).

INEC defense for non compliance for the Presidential election has so far been very contradictory and indicting. First they pleaded glitches ,then later, their lawyers came with a publication suggesting that INEC was no longer going to upload results to IREV.

So why upload only NASS results ?

I would have won this case by pleading just for cancellation of the presidential election,with only N25 million legal fees,only me as the lawyer.

casualobserver:


Nah Tinubu became president the moment, Obi left PDP. Tinubu faced many hurdles along the way, e.g cabal and anointed candidate, Muslim Muslim ticket,, Osinbajo betrayal, CBN currency change etc etc. there were also defining moments like the Abeokuta declaration (Emilokan), the decision of the Northern governors but all of them would have counted for nothing if Obi had stayed in PDP. If Obi had not left PDP, Atiku would be president today and he would have won handsomely.

The biggest obstacle to Tinubu was overcoming the damage by association with 8 yrs of the Buhari administration and perception of APC in the eyes (pockets) of Nigerians. The minute Obi left PDP, that otherwise insurmountable obstacle was removed. The damage and perception still remained but those votes were split weakening their effect.

The irony is that the Lekki people are the ones that made Tinubu president by wasting their votes on Obi. They gave Obi the confidence to leave PDP.

seunmsg:
Atiku and Peter Obi have both closed their respective cases without proving how they won the election. So, the idea of the court declaring any of them the winner of the election is out of the equation.

The second part of their plea is to get Tinubu disqualified on three grounds. Shettima’s so called double nomination that has now been thrashed by the Supreme Court. 25% of FCT that the two parties seems to have abandoned as they didn’t push this argument seriously. Even if they’ve pushed it, section 299 already made it clear FCT should be treated like a state so it won’t even matter.

The third argument is to get him disqualified by a combination of certificate forgery, dual citizenship and drug conviction.

The certificate forgery is of two nature. Chicago state university and NYSC. As regards Chicago state university, the University already issued a public statement that Bola Tinubu graduated from the University. That alone is enough to settle the matter. All the gymnastic about the color or font of certificate is nonsense.

On NYSC, I would have expected Atiku’s legal team to subpoena NYSC to prove the authenticity of the certificate submitted by Tinubu but they failed to do that. So, how did they arrive at the conclusion that the certificate was forged? NYSC is the only authority that can confirm the authenticity or otherwise of an NYSC certificate.

On the drug conviction issue, it is as empty as the lawyer PDP brought to as witness to prove the case. The witness simply helped PDP to ruin a case that was faulty right from the start. There was no criminal conviction or indictment in the forfeiture. The communication from the US government to the IGP already cleared him of all allegation.

Overall, Atiku and Peter Obi simply wasted everyone’s time. They had no case of rigging so they had to throw in a lot of allegations hoping one will stick. Sadly, they proved none. The two cases will be dismissed with heavy cost to the petitioners.

danijesus:
oga stop spreading falsehood,how did you knw Obi's calculation shows a Tinubu win? You go just dy lie up and down

keymatt:
It's good to dream dear agbado. Unfortunately your dream is an impossible one

JAMO84:
The moment Tinubu survived that Lekki toll gate grand conspiracy, I knew he was the next President. That was the only event that could have killed his political career, the plotters just needed to actually kill a few youths and the plot would have succeeded, just like Saraki with the Offa robbery. God had his own special plan for the old man, they laboured in vain on that night.

keymatt:
A thread of agbados, by agbados, for agbados. Tinubu going to school or not doesn't matter. He's drug case alone is enough to bundle him out.
Whether you like it or not, your mandate thief must return our stolen mandate. 😎
The "Snatch it and runaway with it" philosophy is over!😎

GoodGovernance:
What is the essence of assembling SANs without senses?

As an "unlearned" person,all I needed to prove in court for both Atiku and Obi, is that the electoral process did not comply substantially with the electoral law as required in section 64(4) which states without ant ambiguity, that election results SHALL be transmitted DIRECTLY from polling units before any collation can be valid..They ignored that section only focusing on section 60.

All the witnesses examination and cross examination would be focused on section 64(4).

If the results of all the over 700,000 polling units were not transmitted directly from the polling units before collation,is that not substantial non compliance??

It is now clear that ab initio,there was a premeditated and grand conspiracy to rig the Presidential election alone.The NASS election results were transmitted directly from the polling units,in compliance with section 64(4).

INEC defense for non compliance for the Presidential election has so far been very contradictory and indicting. First they pleaded glitches ,then later, their lawyers came with a publication suggesting that INEC was no longer going to upload results to IREV.

So why upload only NASS results ?

I would have won this case by pleading just for cancellation of the presidential election,with only N25 million legal fees,only me as the lawyer.

iwaeda:



The evidences are overwhelming. If only our court, Appeal and Supreme will do the right thing. Bayo want to spin again

ba7man:
When you tell these Atikulates and Obidients to read, get knowledge and stop relying on beer parlour gossip, propaganda WhatsApp messages and media sensationalism and misinformation from AriseTV and AIT (Owned by PDP media wing) they'll insult you.

keymatt:
A thread of agbados, by agbados, for agbados. Tinubu going to school or not doesn't matter. He's drug case alone is enough to bundle him out.
Whether you like it or not, your mandate thief must return our stolen mandate. 😎
The "Snatch it and runaway with it" philosophy is over!😎

meolaniyi:
keep fooling yourself. While Tinubu is begging Obi and Atiku to withdraw their against him

favor914:
So who won the election, Atiku that came 2nd, or Gringory that came 3rd?

Okoroawusa:

He hasn't? Why? I remember immediately after the election he said that he won the election and he will prove it in court. Has he not?

keymatt:
A thread of agbados, by agbados, for agbados. Tinubu going to school or not doesn't matter. He's drug case alone is enough to bundle him out.
Whether you like it or not, your mandate thief must return our stolen mandate. 😎
The "Snatch it and runaway with it" philosophy is over!😎

LADEMINUS:


He is correct. Follow the trial. The respondents repeatedly asked them what Thier own figures added up to. The petitioners claimed not to know. PDP star witness Dino finally said that APC won despite claiming transmission irregularities. LP star witness Tanko said APC won as "allocated" by INEC on the CTC results

senatordave1:


https://dailypost.ng/2023/06/23/atikus-witness-faults-us-court-on-tinubus-forfeiture-of-460-000/?amp=1