₦airaland Forum

triplechoice:
You are losing your mind .

Go meet the quack doctor to treat you.

Labeling others ignorant doesn't make them that.

It's what you say and do.

So look to yourself.

🥱
What does this mean “ By the time millions of people worldwide starts reporting the same thing, then it's time for science to intervene.”?

where did they gather enough data and evidences to work with?

Your ignorance will be exposed here, dullard.

Stop saying things you lack knowledge on, you are obviously empty.

Maynman:
When will science work to find out if Santa exist?

When loonies like you continue to report it everywhere.

triplechoice:
When loonies like you continue to report it everywhere.

So the “overwhelming evidence” science needs is just for people to be reporting it, is that what they taught you numbskull?

Workch:
According to me, I ask atheists for evidence against a deistic god, but I ask deists evidence for it. Because I don't know.

It's both of you guys who make up your mind without actual knowledge. At the end if the day, both deists and atheists always do not provide evidence

This what you said: if you don't believe it bring an evidence against it. So what evidence do you have against deism to not believe it?

LordReed:
This what you said: if you don't believe it bring an evidence against it. So what evidence do you have against deism to not believe it?

I don't disbelieve or believe it.

Why is it hard to understand?

Workch:
I don't disbelieve or believe it.

Why is it hard to understand?

That’s why you need to provide 2 evidence.
Why you don’t believe it, and why you disbelieve it.

According to you “if you don't believe it bring an evidence against it. ”
And since you also disbelieve you have to bring another evidence for it.

Workch:
I don't disbelieve or believe it.

Why is it hard to understand?

Did I say differently? If you don't believe what evidence do have against it with respect to what you said: “if you don't believe it bring an evidence against it. ”

LordReed:
Did I say differently? If you don't believe what evidence do have against it with respect to what you said: “if you don't believe it bring an evidence against it. ”

You can only provide that when you have taken a position.

I neither believe nor disbelieve you means neutrality, zero. Nothing to give until I can be sure

triplechoice:
You can only provide that when you have taken a position.

I neither believe or disbelieve you means neutrality zero. Nothing to give until I can be sure

You have taken 2 positions.
You disbelieve it and you also don’t believe it, according to workch, if you don't believe it bring an evidence against it.

triplechoice:
You can only provide that when you have taken a position.

I neither believe nor disbelieve you means neutrality, zero. Nothing to give until I can be sure

Well Workch says you need to bring evidence against what you don't believe.

LordReed:
Well Workch says you need to bring evidence against what you don't believe.

I think he didn't put it well.

Both you and the theist are the ones to present your case for judgement by the agnostic who is acting like a Judge now.
Judges are expected to be neutral .Is that not so?

The matter doesn't concern the agnostic. It's between you and those you are opposed to.

So defend or prove your case beyond reasonable doubt. That's all.

triplechoice:
I think he didn't put it well.

Both you and the theist are the ones to present your case for judgement by the agnostic who is acting like a Judge now.
Judges are expected to be neutral .Is that not so?

You are a dullard; a judge does not work on belief but facts and knowledge.
How will you explain to the judge why you don’t BELIEVE in a word called “god”?
If you are a reasonable judge, won’t you be asking the theist why someone has to BELIEVE in it, why can’t we KNOW?

triplechoice:
I think he didn't put it well.

Both you and the theist are the ones to present your case for judgement by the agnostic who is acting like a Judge now.
Judges are expected to be neutral .Is that not so?

The matter doesn't concern the agnostic. It's between you and those you are opposed to.

So defend or prove your case beyond reasonable doubt. That's all.

That's why the question is for him to answer.

Maynman:
You are a dullard; a judge does not work on belief but facts and knowledge.
How will you explain to the judge why you don’t BELIEVE in a word called “god”?
If you are a reasonable judge, won’t you be asking the theist why someone has to BELIEVE in it, why can’t we KNOW?

Then present your facts and knowledge for the judges to decide in your favour without biases or shut up .

It's because the analogy is lost on your dead brain, you are insulting yourself.

triplechoice:
Then present your facts and knowledge for the judges to decide in your favour without biases or shut up .

It's because the analogy is lost on your dead brain, you are insulting yourself.

Decide what in my favour?
That I don’t believe in gods?
Facts and knowledge on why I don’t believe in “gods” 😂

You are a dullard and you don’t even know it.

LordReed:
That's why the question is for him to answer.

How ?

I Judge should side with you over something that doesn't concern him?

I don't think I understand you yet.

triplechoice:
Then present your facts and knowledge for the judges to decide in your favour without biases or shut up .

It's because the analogy is lost on your dead brain, you are insulting yourself.

When will yahweh worshippers provide facts and knowledge on why they don’t believe in Allah, the judge should also decide that too na

triplechoice:
How ?

I Judge should side with you over something that doesn't concern him?

I don't think I understand you yet.

Who brought the claim that “gods” exist and we should believe they exist?

Maynman:
Who brought the claim that “gods” exist and we should believe they exist?

Go ask your father you insult everyday.

I don't want to consort anymore with nairaland latest madman, sorry Maynman

Who brought the claim that “gods” exist and we should believe they exist?

triplechoice:
Go ask your father you insult everyday.

I don't want to consort anymore with nairaland latest madman, sorry Maynman

My father is not a dunce like yours, if not that you are worthless like your father; will you be “neutral” to what you lack knowledge on?
When we replace “god” with “dragon” you see how ridiculous you sound but you are sympathetic to the word “god”.
Son of a dummy Triplechoice

triplechoice:
How ?

I Judge should side with you over something that doesn't concern him?

I don't think I understand you yet.

Let him answer for himself.

If you are taken to court for an offence you didn't commit, you will need to defend yourself.

You don't just plead innocence and expect the judge to rule in your favour.

triplechoice:
If you are taken to court for an offence you didn't commit, you will need to defend yourself.

You don't just plead innocence and expect the judge to rule in your favour.

Illiterate, before you take someone to court you have to tender an explanation on oath on what the said person did, and your explanations have to match with current reality.
Even if you are raped you still have to provide some form of EVIDENCE.

Maynman:
Illiterate, before you take someone to court you have to tender an explanation on oath on what the said person did, and your explanations have to match with current reality.
Even if you are raped you still have to provide some form of EVIDENCE.

Off point and wayward as usual.

triplechoice:
Off point and wayward as usual.

You are the dullard that doesn’t understand the logic you are using.

When mendy was accused by those women, didn’t they provide a form of evidence to the court, do you think if it was random women that mendy has never met, police would have “believed” them?

Illiterate!

LordReed:
Did I say differently? If you don't believe what evidence do have against it with respect to what you said: “if you don't believe it bring an evidence against it. ”

But I don't disbelieve as well.
I don't know anything. It is you that claim to know. I not claiming to have any knowledge, you re the one claiming to have knowledge.

If you say god does not exist, how did you know?

LordReed:
Well Workch says you need to bring evidence against what you don't believe.

Do you know that you re committing a whataboutism fallacy.
Atheist are equally as illogical as theists, in the face of superior argument, you resort to fallacies 😂😂

Whether or not he doesn't provide evidence, it still doesn't mean that a god doesn't exist. Stop the red herring.
If you don't believe in God, then you have to bring evidence for it else your disbelief is an ad ignoratiam.

As far as I'm concerned, I don't know anything 😂😂

LordReed:
This what you said: if you don't believe it bring an evidence against it. So what evidence do you have against deism to not believe it?

I'm confused, I don't know anything. I have not taken a position yet.

That's why I'm asking atheists who have taken a position to substantiate it but they are on the defensive 😂.

I am not claiming to know anything. I don't know if a god exist or not. There's nothing lkk evidence for "I don't know"

I'm proving to you that atheists also can not substitiate their position with evidence. Thru position is based on ignorance, just like theists 😂

Workch:
But I don't disbelieve as well.
I don't know anything. It is you that claim to know. I not claiming to have any knowledge, you re the one claiming to have knowledge.

If you say god does not exist, how did you know?

Illiterate, go look up what “atheism” means.

Workch:
I'm confused, I don't know anything. I have not taken a position yet.

That's why I'm asking atheists who have taken a position to substantiate it but they are on the defensive 😂.

I am not claiming to know anything. I don't know if a god exist or not. There's nothing lkk evidence for "I don't know"

I'm proving to you that atheists also can not substitiate their position with evidence. Thru position is based on ignorance, just like theists 😂

Laughing stock 😂😂

Funny atheists, 15 pages on back and forth.

Even theists that are reading this thread will be laughing at you guys. 😂

After all said and done, their school of thought is still based on crass ignorance. No evidence to justify anything, just like theism

Workch:
If you don't believe in God, then you have to bring evidence for it else your disbelief is an ad ignoratiam.

As far as I'm concerned, I don't know anything 😂😂

Fool can’t see his folly.

When we replace god with dragon that’s when your common sense will come back.