* “AND 25% in FCT” is a MUST as declared by Supreme Court judgment.

* That Tinubu forfeited $460,000 drug proceed of narcotics trafficking is no longer in contention. All parties, including Tinubu, has accepted this reality.

- That the forfeiture was a civil one is technicality.

- That judgment is not registered in Nigeria is technicality.

*That Tinubu has dual citizenship but lied on oath to INEC that he had no other citizenship is no longer in contention.

- That the passport has expired is technicality (passport is not citizenship).

*Then there’s the Shettima nomination issues.

25% in FCT and other charges is keeping the judiciary in total shock, hence their silence.

They are looking for a suitable way to interpret it, but it's a bone in their throat.

As we approach a day closer to Presidential Election Petition Tribunal, PEPT, judgement these are the main issues;

Bola Tinubu got 7 strikes for disqualification under the Federal republic of Nigeria constitution 1999 as amended and Electoral Act 2022.

1. $460,000 for narcotics trafficking and money laundering.
2. Undisclosed dual citizenship.
3. Forged Chicago State University Certificate
4. Forged NYSC Certificate.
5. Forged NYSC exemption letter.
6. VP invalid nomination*
7. Shettima double nomination.

Apart from disqualification with lawful votes Tinubu came distant 3rd.

Justices do not aid and abet criminality, and forgery.

Justices do not turn Nigeria into a republic of criminality and forgery.

Justices disqualify Tinubu because he has earned himself disqualification and the federal republic of Nigeria constitution and Electoral Act 2022 say so.

Justices do not violate the Constitution and the Electoral Act 2022, the more just like the INEC chairman did.

Justices do not undermine the federal republic of Nigeria constitution 1999 as amended and the Electoral Act 2022.

25% IN FCT AND THE BONE IN TINUBU’S THROAT

After the 2007 elections, Muhammadu Buhari called for the cancellation of the election since Yaradua failed to win in FCT but it was resolved that winning the FCT is not mandatory but having 25% in FCT is very mandatory.

President Yaradua back then satisfied the basic requirements of 25% in 24 States “AND” 25% in FCT also having the highest number of total valid votes cast.

It was also stated that if there was no election in Abuja or election in Abuja was canceled, the election will automatically go into re-run regardless of satisfying other requirements which validated the importance and exceptional factor of FCT in our constitution.

It was established in 2008 by those justices that 25% in FCT is as mandatory as having highest number of total valid vote cast to win an election in Nigeria.

Justices that resolved the FCT case between President Yaradua and buhari are:

1. Justice Mohammed Lawal
2. Justice Idris kutigi
3. Justice Denis Edozie
4. Justice Sam Odemwingie
5. Justice Aloysius Iyorgyer
6. Justice Umaru Kalgo
7. Justice Ignatius Chukwudi

Why do you need to argue over something that is clearly stated in the constitution?

Do you want to SUSTAIN our democracy or BURN DOWN our Nation over just a few greedy power drunk charlatans?

#AllEyesOnJudiciary

https://twitter.com/safeeyanm/status/1693030498367308019?s=46&t=2AB_wrBea-oBYJf5ZCFV-A

did Abuja also get 25billion from the palliative...
since they have double head.

Why all these confusion in our law

The illegitimate unconstitutional imposter is a heavy baggage to any judge that wants to help his illegality.

You must have to destroy Nigeria patapata to help him.

Plz when will the judge pass their finally judgement base on matter on ground I mean PEPT?

hardniola:
did Abuja also get 25billion from the palliative...
since they have double head.

Which state in Nigeria got 25 billion naira as palliative?

See how idiocy will make you jump blindly into a thread only to be typing nonsense as if your brain has relocated to your boney chest!

Tinubu is gone

Rerun in sight and this time, Mahmoud won't save Tinubu

SpartaOfLagos:
Tinubu is gone

Rerun in sight and this time, Mahmoud won't save Tinubu

There was no such judgment

hardniola:
did Abuja also get 25billion from the palliative...
since they have double head.

I don't understand your question.

Penguin2:
* “AND 25% in FCT” is a MUST as declared by Supreme Court judgment.

* That Tinubu forfeited $460,000 drug proceed of narcotics trafficking is no longer in contention. All parties, including Tinubu, has accepted this reality.

- That the forfeiture was a civil one is technicality.

- That judgment is not registered in Nigeria is technicality.

*That Tinubu has dual citizenship but lied on oath to INEC that he had no other citizenship is no longer in contention.

- That the passport has expired is technicality (passport is not citizenship).

*Then there’s the Shettima nomination issues.


https://twitter.com/safeeyanm/status/1693030498367308019?s=46&t=2AB_wrBea-oBYJf5ZCFV-A

Shove it in your anus

Penguin2:
* “AND 25% in FCT” is a MUST as declared by Supreme Court judgment.

* That Tinubu forfeited $460,000 drug proceed of narcotics trafficking is no longer in contention. All parties, including Tinubu, has accepted this reality.

- That the forfeiture was a civil one is technicality.

- That judgment is not registered in Nigeria is technicality.

*That Tinubu has dual citizenship but lied on oath to INEC that he had no other citizenship is no longer in contention.

- That the passport has expired is technicality (passport is not citizenship).

*Then there’s the Shettima nomination issues.


https://twitter.com/safeeyanm/status/1693030498367308019?s=46&t=2AB_wrBea-oBYJf5ZCFV-A

What an obsessed child.continue running amok,the hate is real.there was never such a judgment.both obj and buhari got 25% in fct so such judgment never arose.why didn't obi or atiku quote it? Post the exact excerpts from such judgments boy.obidients are deluded.

The only thing the court said was if there is any ambiguity in fct,they will adopt the most narrow and reasonable construction

It is still #ALLEYESONTHEJUDICIARY

Penguin2:
* “AND 25% in FCT” is a MUST as declared by Supreme Court judgment.

* That Tinubu forfeited $460,000 drug proceed of narcotics trafficking is no longer in contention. All parties, including Tinubu, has accepted this reality.

- That the forfeiture was a civil one is technicality.

- That judgment is not registered in Nigeria is technicality.

*That Tinubu has dual citizenship but lied on oath to INEC that he had no other citizenship is no longer in contention.

- That the passport has expired is technicality (passport is not citizenship).

*Then there’s the Shettima nomination issues.


https://twitter.com/safeeyanm/status/1693030498367308019?s=46&t=2AB_wrBea-oBYJf5ZCFV-A

1) a civil case does not lead to a sentence or conviction.there was never any judgment and the money was not his.case dead

2) a judgment must be registered in Nigeria and technicality is not an illegality but part of the law

3) the constitution says voluntary acquisition of citizenship not dual citizenship.obi and atiku failed to prove that tinubu acquired another citizenship on his own.an expired passport is non-existent before the law

4) the apex court clearly said shettima wasnt guilty of double nomination.
The nuisance value of this boy is alarming.i call for him to be banned permanently

Osu Mentality,

Abuja Voters are not Superior to all other Nigerians

Racoon:
It is still #ALLEYESONTHEJUDICIARY

Obi failed woefully in court

Tntsi:
The illegitimate unconstitutional imposter is baggage to any judge that wants to help his illegality.

You must have to destroy Nigeria patapata to help him.

Make you go find strong lasso for your neck, & high tree branch, you will need after you hear the judgement.

garfield1:



What an obsessed child.continue running amok,the hate is real.there was never such a judgment.both obj and buhari got 25% in fct so such judgment never arose.why didn't obi or atiku quote it? Post the exact excerpts from such judgments boy.obidients are deluded.

The only thing the court said was if there is any ambiguity in fct,they will adopt the most narrow and reasonable construction

They both got 25% in the FCT but Buhari won.

So Buhari took Obasanjo to court for not “winning” the FCT.

But in their ruling, the Honourable Justices of the Supreme Court ruled that a presidential candidate doesn’t need to “win” Abuja to be declared winner but must score “25% in the FCT”, a provision that Tinubu failed to meet and the law MUST never be bent for him.

Racoon:
It is still #ALLEYESONTHEJUDICIARY

Shameless old Obidient Wailer, Keep deceiving yourself.

garfield1:
Obi failed woefully in court

And when did supporter of the operators of the structure of corruption and criminality became the competent court of law?

favor914:
Shameless old Obidient Wailer, Keep deceiving yourself.

Naso it pain you reach? More tears for you. Evil does not always prevail for long.

hardniola:
did Abuja also get 25billion from the palliative...
since they have double head.

Are we still at the level of understanding? FCT residents are not special; it is FCT it self that is special. Pls let's not keep disgracing our selves because of these politicians that do not even know we exist. I support Obi but I cannot disgrace my self for him. NEVER.

Tntsi:
The illegitimate unconstitutional imposter is baggage to any judge that wants to help his illegality.

You must have to destroy Nigeria patapata to help him.

This is the same thing I always say.

The courts would have to empty the Constitution and the Electoral Act 2022 into the Atlantic Ocean in order to uphold Tinubu’s election.

Penguin2:

They both got 25% in the FCT but Buhari won.

So Buhari took Obasanjo to court for not “winning” the FCT.

But in their ruling, the Honourable Justices of the Supreme Court ruled that a presidential candidate doesn’t need to “win” Abuja to be declared winner but must score “25% in the FCT”, a provision that Tinubu failed to meet and the law MUST never be bent for him.

If you really believe what you said, why not just wait till The PEPT pass their judgement, it seems you need to keep consoling yourself?

Penguin2:

They both got 25% in the FCT but Buhari won.

So Buhari took Obasanjo to court for not “winning” the FCT.

But in their ruling, the Honourable Justices of the Supreme Court ruled that a presidential candidate doesn’t need to “win” Abuja to be declared winner but must score “25% in the FCT”, a provision that Tinubu failed to meet and the law MUST never be bent for him.

FEDERAL CAPITAL TERRITORY
=========================================================
Registered voters: 628,100
Votes counted: 274,620 43.7%
Invalid votes: 13,457 04.9%
Valid Votes: 261,163 95.1%
---------------------------------------------------------
Candidate Party Votes %
---------------------------------------------------------
Muhammadu Buhari ANPP 99,220 38.0
Olusegun OBASANJO * PDP 130,243 49.9
Odumegwu Ojukwu APGA 22,481 08.6
17 others 9,219 03.5
---------------------------------------------------------
Total 261,163




Where did buhari win Fct? Buhari has never won fct.tjis this is not ordinary,the obidient camp do not know law no political history.you have lost it.you just keep disgracing yourself daily

Racoon:
And when did supporter of the operators of the structure of corruption and criminality became the competent court of law?


Naso it pain you reach? More tears for you. Evil does not always prevail for long.

Did buhari win Fct in 2003?

Penguin2:


This is the same thing I always say.

The courts would have to empty the Constitution and the Electoral Act 2022 into the Atlantic Ocean in order to uphold Tinubu’s election.

Out of shame you will retire this your Penguin2 moniker next month, and also racoon the milad’s pikin.

Or maybe as shameless ipob sympathizers turned Obidients that you are, you will choose to delay it until the Supreme Court of Nigeria, sends you running naked into the Atlantic Ocean?

Na wa o! Let me kuku blame our teachers for not teaching comprehension very well and students for refusing to shift from seeing things from a biased and narrow perspective. The "carry and pour" system has done a lot of damage.

The 25% issue is easy to understand for those who studied English well. GMB didn't have 25% in FCT by the way.

garfield1:



1) a civil case does not lead to a sentence or conviction.there was never any judgment and the money was not his.case dead

2) a judgment must be registered in Nigeria and technicality is not an illegality but part of the law

3) the constitution says voluntary acquisition of citizenship not dual citizenship.obi and atiku failed to prove that tinubu acquired another citizenship on his own.an expired passport is non-existent before the law

4) the apex court clearly said shettima wasnt guilty of double nomination.
The nuisance value of this boy is alarming.i call for him to be banned permanently

1) A civil case leads to conviction or fine, at least. If it didn’t, then why do people institute a civil proceeding in the first place? What is usually the end product of a civil case?

2) Judgment MUST be registered only when it’s a payment judgment that you are trying to enforce in Nigeria. For instance, your business partner in France runs away to Nigeria after a French Court ruled that he should compensate you with €1million in order to evade paying that money. To enforce the French judgment, you MUST register it in Nigeria. Asides that, that provision doesn’t apply.

3) Did Tinubu show any evidence in court that the Guinean Citizenship was forced on him?

4) The Apex Court ruled on LOCUS. After the election, all parties were now bestowed with locus to sue Shettima.

Stop praying for my ban, face me.

Penguin2:

They both got 25% in the FCT but Buhari won.

So Buhari took Obasanjo to court for not “winning” the FCT.

But in their ruling, the Honourable Justices of the Supreme Court ruled that a presidential candidate doesn’t need to “win” Abuja to be declared winner but must score “25% in the FCT”, a provision that Tinubu failed to meet and the law MUST never be bent for him.

he doesn't understand that it is what has kept the judgement up till this moment. But they can never change the constitution

Penguin2:


1) A civil case leads to conviction or fine, at least. If it didn’t, then why do people institute a civil proceeding in the first place? What is usually the end product of a civil case?

2) Judgment MUST be registered only when it’s a payment judgment that you are trying to enforce in Nigeria. For instance, your business partner in France runs away to Nigeria after a French Court ruled that he should compensate you with €1million in order to evade paying that money. To enforce the French judgment, you MUST register it in Nigeria. Asides that, that provision doesn’t apply.

3) Did Tinubu show any evidence in court that the Guinean Citizenship was forced on him?

4) The Apex Court ruled on LOCUS. After the election, all parties were now bestowed with locus to sue Shettima.

Stop praying for my ban, face me.

Guy why the agitation this Sunday, it seems no Niger news to wail over?

Jeyun:
he doesn't understand that it is what has kept the judgement up till this moment. But they can never change the constitution

Na interpretation of the constitution, you will wail profusely you ipob that claims you are not from Zoo Nigeria.

Penguin2:


1) A civil case leads to conviction or fine, at least. If it didn’t, then why do people institute a civil proceeding in the first place? What is usually the end product of a civil case?

2) Judgment MUST be registered only when it’s a payment judgment that you are trying to enforce in Nigeria. For instance, your business partner in France runs away to Nigeria after a French Court ruled that he should compensate you with €1million in order to evade paying that money. To enforce the French judgment, you MUST register it in Nigeria. Asides that, that provision doesn’t apply.

3) Did Tinubu show any evidence in court that the Guinean Citizenship was forced on him?

4) The Apex Court ruled on LOCUS. After the election, all parties were now bestowed with locus to sue Shettima.

Stop praying for my ban, face me.

1) there was no judgement against tinubu,it was a mutual agreement between him and the us authorities where he simply released monies belonging to agbele while he kept his money.acvording to the mutual agreement act,it must be registered in nigeria.section 68 and 69 of the evidence act says a foreign law must be subjected here.

3) it is in the place of atiku or obi to prove that tinubu acquired foreign citizenship and they failed to.tje burden is on them not tinubu.

3) the apex court clearly said shettima was never guilty.i have told you this severally,I don't know what is wrong with you up there.better check at yabaleft

garfield1:



FEDERAL CAPITAL TERRITORY
=========================================================
Registered voters: 628,100
Votes counted: 274,620 43.7%
Invalid votes: 13,457 04.9%
Valid Votes: 261,163 95.1%
---------------------------------------------------------
Candidate Party Votes %
---------------------------------------------------------
Muhammadu Buhari ANPP 99,220 38.0
Olusegun OBASANJO * PDP 130,243 49.9
Odumegwu Ojukwu APGA 22,481 08.6
17 others 9,219 03.5
---------------------------------------------------------
Total 261,163




Where did buhari win Fct? Buhari has never won fct.tjis this is not ordinary,the obidient camp do not know law no political history.you have lost it.you just keep disgracing yourself daily

Where did you get this because I can’t find it anywhere?

Post your source for verification.

Or are you saying Buhari never went to court because of the FCT?