Penguin2:

Where did you get this because I can’t find it anywhere?

Post your source for verification.

Or are you saying Buhari never went to court because of the FCT?

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://www.electoralgeography.com/new/en/countries/n/nigeria/nigeria-presidential-election-2003.html&ved=2ahUKEwi0hdm83uuAAxXlS0EAHSSKABMQFnoECA0QAQ&usg=AOvVaw1Cm5sYiHGT0j9wghBS1yGz



You are just like obi,peddling falsehood everywhere.you claimed buhari went to court saying obj didn't win fct.now that you have been disgraced as usual,what will you come up with? Onye ara

garfield1:



FEDERAL CAPITAL TERRITORY
=========================================================
Registered voters: 628,100
Votes counted: 274,620 43.7%
Invalid votes: 13,457 04.9%
Valid Votes: 261,163 95.1%
---------------------------------------------------------
Candidate Party Votes %
---------------------------------------------------------
Muhammadu Buhari ANPP 99,220 38.0
Olusegun OBASANJO * PDP 130,243 49.9
Odumegwu Ojukwu APGA 22,481 08.6
17 others 9,219 03.5
---------------------------------------------------------
Total 261,163




Where did buhari win Fct? Buhari has never won fct.tjis this is not ordinary,the obidient camp do not know law no political history.you have lost it.you just keep disgracing yourself daily

some if them were born 2003 upward they just like making nosie

garfield1:


1) there was no judgement against tinubu,it was a mutual agreement between him and the us authorities where he simply released monies belonging to agbele while he kept his money.acvording to the mutual agreement act,it must be registered in nigeria.section 68 and 69 of the evidence act says a foreign law must be subjected here.

3) it is in the place of atiku or obi to prove that tinubu acquired foreign citizenship and they failed to.tje burden is on them not tinubu.

3) the apex court clearly said shettima was never guilty.i have told you this severally,I don't know what is wrong with you up there.better check at yabaleft

1) Was the case struck out? No. The case was decided in court and that’s why the court has records of the judgment. And because it was a civil case, Tinubu was not SENTENCED but FINED. Fine is also a judgment.

2) Atiku already proved his case by presenting Tinubu’s Guinean Passport which Tinubu didn’t deny. What else do you need to prove citizenship? The onus now lied on Tinubu to prove that the citizenship was FORCED on him.

3) Well, Supreme Court would have new facts now.

And hey, do away with the insults and stick to logical intercourse.

hardniola:
did Abuja also get 25billion from the palliative...
since they have double head.

Which state got 25 billion or you are daft?

walex2:
some if them were born 2003 upward they just like making nosie

Hmmm

Penguin2:
* “AND 25% in FCT” is a MUST as declared by Supreme Court judgment.

* That Tinubu forfeited $460,000 drug proceed of narcotics trafficking is no longer in contention. All parties, including Tinubu, has accepted this reality.

- That the forfeiture was a civil one is technicality.

- That judgment is not registered in Nigeria is technicality.

*That Tinubu has dual citizenship but lied on oath to INEC that he had no other citizenship is no longer in contention.

- That the passport has expired is technicality (passport is not citizenship).

*Then there’s the Shettima nomination issues.


https://twitter.com/safeeyanm/status/1693030498367308019?s=46&t=2AB_wrBea-oBYJf5ZCFV-A

Bro be serious, are you trolling or you really believe Tribunal will remove Tinubu from president and install Obi

Hehehe wetin person no go see

Penguin2:

1) Was the case struck out? No. The case was decided in court and that’s why the court has records of the judgment. And because it was a civil case, Tinubu was not SENTENCED but FINED. Fine is also a judgment.

2) Atiku already proved his case by presenting Tinubu’s Guinean Passport which Tinubu didn’t deny. What else do you need to prove citizenship? The onus now lied on Tinubu to prove that the citizenship was FORCED on him.

3) Well, Supreme Court would have new facts now.

And hey, do away with the insults and stick to logical intercourse.

1) there was no fine sir.go and read the records again.thete was never any court proceedings.if there was,they would have taken tinubu money instead of agbele own.they would have been a judgment finding him guilty and fining him son.

2) an expired document is inadmissible in law,this is a universal fact.therefore,atiku presented nothing.moreover he downloaded the passport from the net and refused to call the makers to testify.only the Guineans can testify conclusively on the citizenship status of tinubu.the onus is not on you to prove that he was a citizen but that he acquired it on his own

3) obi never presented any new evidence except a video showing when tinubu announced shettima to buhari which is very very very foolish and ridiculous from obi's lawyers.the case is highly vexatious and a waste of time.
Whatever comes your way is well deserved son

garfield1:



1) a civil case does not lead to a sentence or conviction.there was never any judgment and the money was not his.case dead

2) a judgment must be registered in Nigeria and technicality is not an illegality but part of the law

3) the constitution says voluntary acquisition of citizenship not dual citizenship.obi and atiku failed to prove that tinubu acquired another citizenship on his own.an expired passport is non-existent before the law

4) the apex court clearly said shettima wasnt guilty of double nomination.
The nuisance value of this boy is alarming.i call for him to be banned permanently

Penguin2 is losing it

He's still finding it so hard to recover from Obi Failure.

BoldBrainz:


Which state in Nigeria got 25 billion naira as palliative?

See how idiocy will make you jump blindly into a thread only to be typing nonsense as if your brain has relocated to your boney chest!

too bad you didn't understand his point yet your already insulting him.

jumper524:
too bad you didn't understand his point yet your already insulting him.

You can't make any point(s) with false data. The moment he quoted untrue information, whatever point he was driving at as regards the efficacy of the FCT constitutional status, became void.

And yes, I very much understand where he was headed.

garfield1:


https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://www.electoralgeography.com/new/en/countries/n/nigeria/nigeria-presidential-election-2003.html&ved=2ahUKEwi0hdm83uuAAxXlS0EAHSSKABMQFnoECA0QAQ&usg=AOvVaw1Cm5sYiHGT0j9wghBS1yGz



You are just like obi,peddling falsehood everywhere.you claimed buhari went to court saying obj didn't win fct.now that you have been disgraced as usual,what will you come up with? Onye ara

The mix up is from the author.

The judgment was in 2008 and not 2003.

That means the case was between Yaradua and Buhari.

What is paramount here is that Buhari has once gotten an interpretation from the Supreme Court on the interpretation of the provision on the place of the FCT in Nigeria’s presidential election.

hardniola:
did Abuja also get 25billion from the palliative...
since they have double head.

Lame!!!

BoldBrainz:


You can't make any point(s) with false data. The moment he quoted untrue information, whatever point he was driving at as regards the efficacy of the FCT constitutional status, became void.

And yes, I very much understand where he was headed.

but you know the 25% in FCT is a must is pure trash and media/Obidient lawyers would make it seem as though they had a valid arguement.
Lawyers must engage.
Enjoy the troll while it lasts.

jumper524:
but you know the 25% in FCT is a must is pure trash and media/Obidient lawyers would make it seem as though they had a valid arguement.
Lawyers must engage.
Enjoy the troll while it lasts.

If it was trash, you wouldn't be concerned enough to be talking about it right now.

Relax bros. Everything go dey alright.

garfield1:


1) there was no fine sir.go and read the records again.thete was never any court proceedings.if there was,they would have taken tinubu money instead of agbele own.they would have been a judgment finding him guilty and fining him son.

2) an expired document is inadmissible in law,this is a universal fact.therefore,atiku presented nothing.moreover he downloaded the passport from the net and refused to call the makers to testify.only the Guineans can testify conclusively on the citizenship status of tinubu.the onus is not on you to prove that he was a citizen but that he acquired it on his own

3) obi never presented any new evidence except a video showing when tinubu announced shettima to buhari which is very very very foolish and ridiculous from obi's lawyers.the case is highly vexatious and a waste of time.
Whatever comes your way is well deserved son

1) Why are you confusing yourself? If there was no court proceeding, how did the court records come about?

Again, if forfeiture is not a fine, what is it?

Lastly, if you make your account available for fraud dealings, tell me why I should not see you as a fraudster as well?

2) Expired or not, its purpose has been served. And that is that Tinubu has Guinean Citizenship that he did not state in his records to INEC.

3) You only saw videos but didn’t know it was also backed up with INEC certified documents? And why your fixation on Obi? Is he the only person in court?

Obi must be giving you nightmares.

Deogratiasfx:


Are we still at the level of understanding? FCT residents are not special; it is FCT it self that is special. Pls let's not keep disgracing our selves because of these politicians that do not even know we exist. I support Obi but I cannot disgrace my self for him. NEVER.

You have never supported Obi.

BoldBrainz:


If it was trash, you wouldn't be concerned enough to be talking about it right now.

Relax bros. Everything go dey alright.

ohh, that's where you want to tread?
Cos I replied means it's a serious issue??. OK.
The matter dey fear Tinubu for villa.

hardniola:
did Abuja also get 25billion from the palliative...
since they have double head.

U supposed ask people wey make our constitution

maticar:

Which state got 25 billion or you are daft?

No be you Mumu talk say Abuja get special status? So that means there 5 billion Naira palliative money must be times five.

Penguin2:


1) Why are you confusing yourself? If there was no court proceeding, how did the court records come about?

Again, if forfeiture is not a fine, what is it?

Lastly, if you make your account available for fraud dealings, tell me why I should not see you as a fraudster as well?

2) Expired or not, its purpose has been served. And that is that Tinubu has Guinean Citizenship that he did not state in his records to INEC.

3) You only saw videos but didn’t know it was also backed up with INEC certified documents? And why your fixation on Obi? Is he the only person in court?

Obi must be giving you nightmares.

Shameless man, you made more noise about ipob & biafra than this, you will retire Penguin2 next month, 100% guaranteed.

Penguin2:


1) Why are you confusing yourself? If there was no court proceeding, how did the court records come about?

Again, if forfeiture is not a fine, what is it?

Lastly, if you make your account available for fraud dealings, tell me why I should not see you as a fraudster as well?

2) Expired or not, its purpose has been served. And that is that Tinubu has Guinean Citizenship that he did not state in his records to INEC.

3) You only saw videos but didn’t know it was also backed up with INEC certified documents? And why your fixation on Obi? Is he the only person in court?

Obi must be giving you nightmares.

1) fbi went to court via exparte motion freezing tinubu accounts not a formal court proceedings.tinubu never appeared in court.him and the fbi reached a deal that was supervised the court.nobody was found guilty of anything..

2) oga,inec form if asks have you ever voluntarily acquired citizenship elsewhere? It does not ask whether you have dual citizenship.spot the diff kid. He said no.atiku must prove this is false sufficiently that tinubu is a citizen of guinea by registration or naturalization.

3) the court clearly said shettima resignation took place when he submitted his form to apc on the 6th of july.i hope when obi is fined,you will partake in the payment

Penguin2:

The mix up is from the author.

The judgment was in 2008 and not 2003.

That means the case was between Yaradua and Buhari.

What is paramount here is that Buhari has once gotten an interpretation from the Supreme Court on the interpretation of the provision on the place of the FCT in Nigeria’s presidential election.

There was never any judgment,if there was quote the exact page.secondly,yaradua won fct.

Penguin2:


1) A civil case leads to conviction or fine, at least. If it didn’t, then why do people institute a civil proceeding in the first place? What is usually the end product of a civil case?

2) Judgment MUST be registered only when it’s a payment judgment that you are trying to enforce in Nigeria. For instance, your business partner in France runs away to Nigeria after a French Court ruled that he should compensate you with €1million in order to evade paying that money. To enforce the French judgment, you MUST register it in Nigeria. Asides that, that provision doesn’t apply.

3) Did Tinubu show any evidence in court that the Guinean Citizenship was forced on him?

4) The Apex Court ruled on LOCUS. After the election, all parties were now bestowed with locus to sue Shettima.

Stop praying for my ban, face me.

It is obvious that having not passed judgement up till now after the adoption of addresses, most likely Tinubu is guilty. Whenever judgement is delayed, the big man is guilty. This is clear reasoning.

Penguin2:

They both got 25% in the FCT but Buhari won.

So Buhari took Obasanjo to court for not “winning” the FCT.

But in their ruling, the Honourable Justices of the Supreme Court ruled that a presidential candidate doesn’t need to “win” Abuja to be declared winner but must score “25% in the FCT”, a provision that Tinubu failed to meet and the law MUST never be bent for him.

Quote an extract of the judgement and tell us why LPDP refused to reference the case in their submission to the court?

favor914:
Na interpretation of the constitution, you will wail profusely you ipob that claims you are not from Zoo Nigeria.

and here u prove yourself a terrorist again with the smelling odour from the gutter u called mouth

favor914:
Na interpretation of the constitution, you will wail profusely you ipob that claims you are not from Zoo Nigeria.

I can perceive your mouth odour from here

Penguin2:
* “AND 25% in FCT” is a MUST as declared by Supreme Court judgment.

* That Tinubu forfeited $460,000 drug proceed of narcotics trafficking is no longer in contention. All parties, including Tinubu, has accepted this reality.

- That the forfeiture was a civil one is technicality.

- That judgment is not registered in Nigeria is technicality.

*That Tinubu has dual citizenship but lied on oath to INEC that he had no other citizenship is no longer in contention.

- That the passport has expired is technicality (passport is not citizenship).

*Then there’s the Shettima nomination issues.


https://twitter.com/safeeyanm/status/1693030498367308019?s=46&t=2AB_wrBea-oBYJf5ZCFV-A

Story composed by an Obidient who opens a Twitter account in 2022 with a Hausa name.

Keep deceiving yourself

Penguin2:
* “AND 25% in FCT” is a MUST as declared by Supreme Court judgment.

* That Tinubu forfeited $460,000 drug proceed of narcotics trafficking is no longer in contention. All parties, including Tinubu, has accepted this reality.

- That the forfeiture was a civil one is technicality.

- That judgment is not registered in Nigeria is technicality.

*That Tinubu has dual citizenship but lied on oath to INEC that he had no other citizenship is no longer in contention.

- That the passport has expired is technicality (passport is not citizenship).

*Then there’s the Shettima nomination issues.


https://twitter.com/safeeyanm/status/1693030498367308019?s=46&t=2AB_wrBea-oBYJf5ZCFV-A

Penguin2:


1) Why are you confusing yourself? If there was no court proceeding, how did the court records come about?

Again, if forfeiture is not a fine, what is it?

Lastly, if you make your account available for fraud dealings, tell me why I should not see you as a fraudster as well?

2) Expired or not, its purpose has been served. And that is that Tinubu has Guinean Citizenship that he did not state in his records to INEC.

3) You only saw videos but didn’t know it was also backed up with INEC certified documents? And why your fixation on Obi? Is he the only person in court?

Obi must be giving you nightmares.

We love Obi so much
We don't want him to rule the ZOO.

Abi una don change una mind

We are not fools Bro
OBI CAN NEVER BE THE PRESIDENT OF NIGERIA