Akwamkpuruamu:
Because Hope Uzodimma is not in Tinubu's good books the now brought back a case filed three years ago to now adjudicate. They won't remember it's time barred.

Nigeria politicians are crude, brutal and barbaric

complexstuffs:



Who told you they will remove him?

Kukutente23:

Fine? Why's that? This was one of my many issues with the SC judgement then. The issue of nomination was a constitutional issue and the SC should have suo moto made a pronouncement on whether Hope was a valid nominee based on the judgement it gave against Uche Nwosu.
The SC's refusal to pronounce on that matter when it gave judgement just recently smirks of deliberate amnesia if you ask me

Beverlyjean:
Criminals... y dint they give judgement years ago...they waited for 3 yrs... its certain that they will announce a fresh election.... but its same election thats coming. No difference

Varunpulyani:
In Nigeria the sitting governor is always innocent and wins a court case

fergie001:

It's an abuse of Court process and the Supreme Court has no jurisdiction.

It is akin to APGA trying to review a Supreme Court decision. The Court has a maximum 60 days to sit on same but it's already 3 years.

The SC on Oct 31 will simply tell us that it is functus officio and without jurisdiction.

fergie001:

It's an abuse of Court process and the Supreme Court has no jurisdiction.

It is akin to APGA trying to review a Supreme Court decision. The Court has a maximum 60 days to sit on same but it's already 3 years.

The SC on Oct 31 will simply tell us that it is functus officio and without jurisdiction.

discusant:

Continue to support evil in the name of tribalism.

Kukutente23:

Really? What about the fact that the SC displayed amnesia in the case. I mean does anyone need to remind them they just gave judgement against Uche Nwosu then?
I think this particular case will always reign in ignominy as far as SC is concerned

fergie001:
The reason why they will cite it as an example.
Why?
The case is neither pre-election nor post-election. They have many spaces to hide under in order to dismiss same.

fergie001:

Well, no problem.

Their fine won't be much, Soludo might pay.

discusant:

Continue to support evil in the name of tribalism.

Kukutente23:

Really? What about the fact that the SC displayed amnesia in the case. I mean does anyone need to remind them they just gave judgement against Uche Nwosu then?
I think this particular case will always reign in ignominy as far as SC is concerned

fergie001:
The reason why they will cite it as an example.
Why?
The case is neither pre-election nor post-election. They have many spaces to hide under in order to dismiss same.

Kukutente23:
garfield1 fergie001

BluntCrazeMan:
But..

After that Judgement in 2020,, what were the parties supposed to do?

Go back to the High-Court and start afresh to determine that Hope was never a candidate - going by the decision of the Supreme Court??

OR WHAT EXACTLY.??

BluntCrazeMan:
This goes to bring back the fact that the Imo Judgement was a hoax and a mandate heist..

Even after the judgement was reviewed..


E no go ever better for Tanko

fergie001:
Actually, do nothing because there is no jurisdiction.

It cannot fall either in pre or post-election. This type of case first existed in Imo between Ararume v. Rochas Okorocha in 2012, then Sylva v INEC the following year.

So, the actual thing to do is nothing. This is because APGA did not sue Nwosu neither did they go to the tribunal. So, the truth is they should and will be fined.

It is already functus officio.

Kukutente23:

The big elephant in the room was Buhari and APC
They intimidated the judges with the DSS and the Onnoghen treatment.
The fact of Buhari suspending a CJN being allowed to stand killed the judiciary's independence.
Go check throughout our democracy. Any autonomous body whose head was suspended successfully soon became subservient to the executive. From efcc with Yaradua to CBN with Jonathan and now Judiciary with Buhari.
What is lost on almost all sane minds is that all those suspensions are clearly illegal

fergie001:
Actually, do nothing because there is no jurisdiction.

It cannot fall either in pre or post-election. This type of case first existed in Imo between Ararume v. Rochas Okorocha in 2012, then Sylva v INEC the following year.

So, the actual thing to do is nothing. This is because APGA did not sue Nwosu neither did they go to the tribunal. So, the truth is they should and will be fined.

It is already functus officio.

Smarte724:
APC have two validly nominated candidate for imo state, uche nwosu and hope uzodinma, they strike uche nwosu out and accepted hope uzodinma, wonders of Nigeria supreme court.