cl0r0x:


Who told you I'm not from Kano?

Because of people like you Nigeria will never move forward.

Mynd44:


I said this earlier and someone was arguing with me. If you cannot call the desponent to testify in court, it is mere hearsay as it is assumed that the respondent didn't have a chance to ask questions thereby not defended his/herself. The deposition itself is merely a waste of time if it was not in open court.

As for this
forgery being a criminal offence have to be proved beyond any doubt else you are just playing around

NEIGHBOUR:


Atiku just used Obi's head. Why not ask for a rerun btw him and Obi.?
Obedients really carried the matter more than even Atiku.
Atiku's lawyers aren't smart. He should pay them half of their legal fees.

2BabaNairaland:
The law doesn't permit that. Or have any of your employer permitted such for your credentials ?

tolue42:



Without sentiment, they have no case.

LegendHero:
The court should slam Siddiq Abubakar with 15billion damages for wasting their time on this nonsense case.

Even Atiku Kojoli know he is just wasting his time and I am sure his emergency headless mob supporters also know they are just catching cruise and nothing serious will come out of their clownery.

seeteazain:
Why will a judge who is suppose to be neutral ask a lawyer, "what will you gain if you win this appeal"?. That comment is enough reason to demoralize the lawyer, thus, he had no option than to withdraw the appeal.

StOla:
We have long celebrated Tinubu's victory and his eventual swearng in.


Those who have been searching for mandate to steal should go and prepare like Tinubu did.

seeteazain:
Why will a judge who is suppose to be neutral ask a lawyer, "what will you gain if you win this appeal"?. That comment is enough reason to demoralize the lawyer, thus, he had no option than to withdraw the appeal.

Celepope:

On your assertion that the CSU Registrar ought to enter the witness box and testify against Tinubu for it to be accepted by the Nigerian Supreme Court, if this is correct then I think Atiku need some refunds from his US Lawyers for not thinking towards this direction.

StreetFight:


Aisha Yesufu, the woman who saw tomorrow.

Unfortunately, she is now fighting the tomorrow she saw yesterday

seanfer:
Mr Olanipekun jokingly points out the contradictions in Atiku’s prayers, where he prayed the court to disqualify Mr Tinubu as a candidate in the election, and in another breath, called for a rerun to be conducted between him and Mr Tinubu.

This is most important point the case..... A whole SAN is so confused about what he wants.....

tolue42:



https://www.premiumtimesng.com/news/headlines/636110-supreme-court-hears-appeals-filed-by-atiku-obi-apm-against-tinubus-victory-live-updates.html

thedio:

If the lawyer could not answer that simple question,he has no reason to be at supreme court,he is nothing but a distraction.
It means he has no purpose,he just wanted to appear,mark attendance and take pictures

Mynd44:


I said this earlier and someone was arguing with me. If you cannot call the desponent to testify in court, it is mere hearsay as it is assumed that the respondent didn't have a chance to ask questions thereby not defended his/herself. The deposition itself is merely a waste of time if it was not in open court.

As for this
forgery being a criminal offence have to be proved beyond any doubt else you are just playing around

Deepthoughts:
There are some funny things i noticed in this record of proceedings,how come only the Igbo judges asked all the questions?, does it mean all the other judges had no questions to ask or their minds are already made up?, secondly,if justice okoro said,there were two conflicting letters from CSU on the authenticity of Tinubu's certificate,who submitted the letters?,n doesn't that in itself show that something is definitely not right with Tinubu's certificate and there's the need for the supreme Court to examine the issue very critically? like Atikus lawyer said,is the deposition under path not supposed to be Superior to the conflicting letters?, the way i see the whole of this is that,the supreme Court, wants to pass their judgement n there by shifting the responsibility to the NASS should the FBI files returns a damning results against Tinubu,to claim that their hands were tied but deep down within them they all know there's something very dubious about Tinubu's certificate.

Deepthoughts:
No I don't agree with you,was the respondent no represented by his lawyers during the deposition?, besides is deposition not legal?,but can a third party vendor reproduce a certificate without any clearance or confirmation from the primary source?,if the primary source gives such clearance or confirmation why would they refused to authenticate what the third party vendor reproduce then?,look I can understand if the supreme Court chooses to refuse admitting the new evidence based on consitutional provision n lack of precedence n there by leaving everything to the NASS if the FBI files eventually turns out odious, but you all know that there is something dubious about Tinubu's certificate,in fact the two conflicting letters from CSU is a clear pointer to it.

richiemcgold:


This Atiku's legal team are clowns

TemplarLandry:
Atiku and Hoe B should continue fetching water with baskets.

keymatt:
Tifffnubu going down.
We Nigerians say no to political criminal and international certificate forger. 😎

tolue42:



Go down where? You people are really funny 🤣🤣

Modified********
Atiku and Obideints don't want to accept a third party "VENDOR CERTIFICATE" from US but they want us to accept a deposition in a lady's office(Atiku lawyers) in that same US and your claiming it's a normal practice. Are you people normal like this?? They are confused political jobbers

Watinhapen:
I can see APC lawyer saying the constitution should be interpreted as it is. So now it should be interpreted as it is while the 25% mandatory votes in Abuja shouldn’t be interpreted as it is. I can see the double standard. Weldone APC.

GboyegaD:
The country is not worth putting hopes on. If it is constitutional that the president should meet some basic educational standards, if he is deficient on this (as his credentials seems fraudulent and he is not ready to clear the air), I am not sure there is a need for this much legal proceedings to do things rightly.

tolue42:


I just pity Obi and Atiku lawyers, their "shopping" of money is coming to an end as soon as possible.

tolue42:



https://www.premiumtimesng.com/news/headlines/636110-supreme-court-hears-appeals-filed-by-atiku-obi-apm-against-tinubus-victory-live-updates.html

tolue42:



Without sentiment, they have no case.

Deepthoughts:
There are some funny things i noticed in this record of proceedings,how come only the Igbo judges asked all the questions?, does it mean all the other judges had no questions to ask or their minds are already made up?, secondly,if justice okoro said,there were two conflicting letters from CSU on the authenticity of Tinubu's certificate,who submitted the letters?,n doesn't that in itself show that something is definitely not right with Tinubu's certificate and there's the need for the supreme Court to examine the issue very critically? like Atikus lawyer said,is the deposition under path not supposed to be Superior to the conflicting letters?, the way i see the whole of this is that,the supreme Court, wants to pass their judgement n there by shifting the responsibility to the NASS should the FBI files returns a damning results against Tinubu,to claim that their hands were tied but deep down within them they all know there's something very dubious about Tinubu's certificate.

Deepthoughts:
Right from the on set, Atikus prayers were that Tinubu was not qualified to run for the elections,he was not duely declared winner amongst others, it's up to the judges to decide,Atiku is simply pursing all the possible options,I don't see anything clownish in his arguments.

EDOLUWA:
Infact in a sane country like US and UK, the likes of Tinubu would have resigned quietly!!!!