Why Did The Bible Not Continue After The Book Of Revelations? - Christianity Etc (2) - Nairaland
Nairaland Forum › Nairaland General › Christianity Etc › Why Did The Bible Not Continue After The Book Of Revelations? (3972 Views)
| Re: Why Did The Bible Not Continue After The Book Of Revelations? by GreatAchiever1: 8:32am On Nov 12, 2023 |
I testify to everyone who hears the words of the prophecy of this book: if anyone adds to them, God will add to him the plagues which are written in this book; — Revelation 22:18 No one is receiving any divine revelation from God outside of His Holy Word. |
| Re: Why Did The Bible Not Continue After The Book Of Revelations? by AbuTwins: 8:38am On Nov 12, 2023 |
tctrills:The Catholic Bible and KJV has 73 books while majority protestant Bibles contain 66 books. The difference in the book are called apocrypha! They are dubious to some! So this is clear! |
| Re: Why Did The Bible Not Continue After The Book Of Revelations? by tctrills(op): 8:43am On Nov 12, 2023 |
AbuTwins:It's seems you are saying that anyone or any organization could add whatever books they want. Again, the Apocrypha was written in the bible era, my question is about books written after the bible era. |
| Re: Why Did The Bible Not Continue After The Book Of Revelations? by Dtruthspeaker: 8:49am On Nov 12, 2023 |
tctrills:If you had common sense then you would have known that this question was foolish and D.O.A because anyone with good training would have immediately seen that God finished all He wanted Say in Revelations hence why He warned that nothing should be added to it or taken away from it. Yet, you still went ahead to ask about adding to the bible, ain't you Satan? |
| Re: Why Did The Bible Not Continue After The Book Of Revelations? by AbuTwins: 9:00am On Nov 12, 2023 |
tctrills:What is Bible era? Was there a direct order from Jesus or God to write down anything called Bible? It is just some books approved by some sets of early church fathers! |
| Re: Why Did The Bible Not Continue After The Book Of Revelations? by tctrills(op): 9:02am On Nov 12, 2023 |
Dtruthspeaker:God never said that he finished all he wanted to say, that's just your opinion. The warning not to add or subtract is also written in Deuteronomy 4.2. Are you saying that every verse written after Deuteronomy 4.2 is unauthorized? Also, God says we should not add or subtract but he never said he will not add to his words. God is free to add more to his words, he is able to reveal his words to human beings at all eras. He is still able to talk to man. The idea that God has finished all he wants to say to man and that the last person he ever spoke to was John is actually your personal opinion. It is not scriptural. You are free to keep up with the insults but at least try to quote from the scriptures and stop spreading your personal opinions. |
| Re: Why Did The Bible Not Continue After The Book Of Revelations? by tctrills(op): 9:04am On Nov 12, 2023 |
AbuTwins:I agree that the bible is a collection of books approved by early church fathers but my question is, does God still speak to man the way he did in the bible era? If do, what evidence do we have to show for this? |
| Re: Why Did The Bible Not Continue After The Book Of Revelations? by Dtruthspeaker: 9:07am On Nov 12, 2023 |
tctrills:Please now let it me go for the more I keep talking the more you keep thinking I am insulting you whereas you lack the common sense to know that when a person stops talking, it clearly means that he has said all he wished to say even if he does not say "I have finished talking". It's simple ordinary common sense but your generation obviously lack it. Damn many parents should answer for this evil. |
| Re: Why Did The Bible Not Continue After The Book Of Revelations? by AbuTwins: 9:14am On Nov 12, 2023 |
tctrills:There's no evidence God spoke to men then! Even Luke said it in Luke 1:1-4. He just wrote what many were saying happened at that time! |
| Re: Why Did The Bible Not Continue After The Book Of Revelations? by tctrills(op): 9:35am On Nov 12, 2023 |
AbuTwins:Yea Luke wrote what he learnt from others but Moses heard directly from God, so did John and most others. |
| Re: Why Did The Bible Not Continue After The Book Of Revelations? by tctrills(op): 9:39am On Nov 12, 2023 |
Dtruthspeaker:You are right, you should go and leave the space for intelligent people who don't insult to cover up their ignorance and stupidity. I showed you a verse in Deuteronomy which I am certain you have never come across because you pastor has not shown it to you. Proud ignoramus. |
| Re: Why Did The Bible Not Continue After The Book Of Revelations? by AbuTwins: 9:43am On Nov 12, 2023 |
tctrills:What did they hear from God? Many pastors have been hearing from God too. Infact the last election was really a disgrace that won't be forgotten easily. |
| Re: Why Did The Bible Not Continue After The Book Of Revelations? by paxonel(m): 9:45am On Nov 12, 2023 |
tctrills:That Christ should restore life back to mankind which was lost when Adam and Eve sinned from the beginning. 1 Cor 15:22 2. Are you saying that God's covenant with man was not completed until after the book of Revelations was written?the book of Revelation is part of the new testament which is also part of the new covenant that commences from the book of Acts of the Apostles down to the book of Revelation 3. Many Christians died before the book of revelations was written, did they not have a covenant with God?So long these Christians started being Christians from the book of Acts of the Apostles, they all have covenant with God |
| Re: Why Did The Bible Not Continue After The Book Of Revelations? by tctrills(op): 9:50am On Nov 12, 2023 |
paxonel:Good so you and I can't decide that the book of revelations ended the covenant. Only God can make such pronouncement. Since the writings continued after the death of Christ, why did you decide that covenant abruptly ended after the book of revelations? Or is it written anywhere? |
| Re: Why Did The Bible Not Continue After The Book Of Revelations? by tctrills(op): 9:51am On Nov 12, 2023 |
AbuTwins:They heard the word of God as written in the scriptures. And yes we have false prophets but that's not the topic for now. |
| Re: Why Did The Bible Not Continue After The Book Of Revelations? by paxonel(m): 10:00am On Nov 12, 2023 |
tctrills:no one is saying the new covenant ended with revelation. Rather, the point is, revelation ended with John who wrote it , but the new covenant continues. |
| Re: Why Did The Bible Not Continue After The Book Of Revelations? by AbuTwins: 10:17am On Nov 12, 2023 |
tctrills:I agree Moses heard but that John ehn! |
| Re: Why Did The Bible Not Continue After The Book Of Revelations? by Hohenheim(m): 10:20am On Nov 12, 2023 |
Because the old Catholic church decided to end it in revelations. |
| Re: Why Did The Bible Not Continue After The Book Of Revelations? by tctrills(op): 10:27am On Nov 12, 2023 |
AbuTwins:Anyone can pick and choose what to believe but that is not the point here. The questions I am asking are? Did God stop speaking to man at some point? If so, why? And if not, does his words spoken in modern times have the same impact as in times of old? |
| Re: Why Did The Bible Not Continue After The Book Of Revelations? by tctrills(op): 10:31am On Nov 12, 2023*. Modified: 11:03am On Nov 12, 2023 |
paxonel:Yes my point is, how do you know that revelations ended with John. The idea that John is the last person God spoke to is not biblical or is it? Unless you mean that the very book of revelations ended with John. Please indicate if what you wrote are just your opinions or if it's based on the word of God. Maybe we should start by answering, what is a revelation? |
| Re: Why Did The Bible Not Continue After The Book Of Revelations? by OgaNightmare(m): 11:33am On Nov 12, 2023 |
tctrills:It handles the question you raised that is why I recommend it |
| Re: Why Did The Bible Not Continue After The Book Of Revelations? by paxonel(m): 11:52am On Nov 12, 2023 |
tctrills:Exactly! And every other person God spoke to after then, is not included again in the bible.
|
| Re: Why Did The Bible Not Continue After The Book Of Revelations? by tctrills(op): 11:55am On Nov 12, 2023 |
paxonel:So in short' are there other books or revelations as relevant as the bible? If yes, please mention them. |
| Re: Why Did The Bible Not Continue After The Book Of Revelations? by paxonel(m): 11:58am On Nov 12, 2023 |
tctrills:no other book |
| Re: Why Did The Bible Not Continue After The Book Of Revelations? by tctrills(op): 11:58am On Nov 12, 2023 |
OgaNightmare:This is a platform for many. Share your ideas first then recommend. We can't have interest in reading the book unless you give us a reason to. Hope you understand my point here. You book may have all the answers but you need to properly introduce it to us. |
| Re: Why Did The Bible Not Continue After The Book Of Revelations? by tctrills(op): 12:02pm On Nov 12, 2023 |
paxonel:But you just said God continued to reveal even after the bible? Sir which side are you on. You are speaking from both sides of your mouth, You agree that God spoke to people outside of the bible but according to you, what he said to them is not as relevant as what he said to the people in the bible. Is that your opinion or God's? |
| Re: Why Did The Bible Not Continue After The Book Of Revelations? by paxonel(m): 1:27pm On Nov 12, 2023 |
tctrills:your question says as relevant as the bible. Other books have their own relevance, but not as relevant as the bible pertaining to his new covenant |
| Re: Why Did The Bible Not Continue After The Book Of Revelations? by tctrills(op): 1:47pm On Nov 12, 2023 |
paxonel:So let's get what you are saying, You mean God's words have grades? Grade 1, the bible and grade 2, his words outside the bible. Is this your personal opinion or are you speaking for God? If it's your opinion, I respect it but then we need to know that it's just you. |
| Re: Why Did The Bible Not Continue After The Book Of Revelations? by paxonel(m): 3:33pm On Nov 12, 2023 |
tctrills:do you know any book as relevant as the bible pertaining to the death and resurrection of Christ? Mention it let's see |
| Re: Why Did The Bible Not Continue After The Book Of Revelations? by slickbak(m): 4:07pm On Nov 12, 2023 |
tctrills:I’m not saying I’m right but I think the Bible is a cumulation of historical fact relevant to christianity. Thus, our current times as christians will be part of this history for generations unborn. |
| Re: Why Did The Bible Not Continue After The Book Of Revelations? by tctrills(op): 5:38pm On Nov 12, 2023 |
slickbak:You may be right but there are some moral questions not answered in the bible such as 1. Slavery 2. Genocide and war crimes 3. Marrying underaged girls Today we see all these as sins but maybe not in bible times. Don't you think that God's revelations are needed now just as in bible times? |
| Re: Why Did The Bible Not Continue After The Book Of Revelations? by tctrills(op): 5:42pm On Nov 12, 2023 |
paxonel:The question isn't about books, it's about God's revelations. You should be asking if God has spoken again to mankind since after the book of revelations. You seem to believe that everything God said outside the compiled books in the bible is of less quality. And I need to know if you have scriptures to back that up or if it's just your opinion. |
Does Life Continue After Death. Psalm 146 Vs 4, Genesis 3 Vs 19, Job 14 Vs 14 Ex • Nigeria And The Book Of Revelations • Why Was The Book Of Enoch Removed From The Bible? • 2 • 3 • 4
Where Are All The Black Atheist? • Why Non-tithing Xtians Remain Poor & How Tithing Xtians Can Become Rich • If You Have Any Question Concerning Christian Faith, Ask