God1000:
Russia and Finland should sit down and settle this amicably.

Ukraine should be a lesson to both of them.

Finland took the right step ...puttin will be mad to attack a nato country . He is still fighting Ukraine go's Ukraine is not yet a nato country . The strategy of puttin is to crab enough land now that Ukraine us not a nato country ...he knows the consequences of fighting nato ..This is why nato has to speed up the acceptance of Ukraine...that will automatically end the war

Historically, Russia is known for honouring agreements and the west is known for breaking them.
The propaganda these days is saying the opposit.

Ghostagain:

I have no idea of why you quoted me. You sound like a kid throwing temper tantrums.

Are you shivery from guilt?

Firstcitizen:


Stop saying what you do not know with confidence. lol
Below is an extract from Final Report by the UN Committee Established to Review the NATO Bombing Campaign Against the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia
"NATO’s resort to force was not authorized by the Security Council or in self-defence, that the resort to force was illegal and, consequently, all force"



Interesting, very interesting. Your defence alliance does not need UN approval before bombing another country that is NOT a NATO
member....but Russia does. Anyway the final report by the UN comittee says it all or should we take your own personal report



Really, Unilaterally bombing another nation is justified by US definition but Russian intervention in Ukraine is not justified by Russian definition. lol


I will have to agree with you on this only although I did not include Afghanistan on my list.

Waiting patiently for your response on the reckless, offensive attack on Libya, regime change and total reduction of the country to failed state by Nato , the almighty defence alliance which destabilised sub saharan Africa by free flow of weapons.

Like I said in my first write up about the Libya intervention, NATO was enforcing a UN Security council resolution,
You can verify it yourself.
Nigeria was also a non perment member of the UN security council at that time and it voted to support it,
NATO choose to enforced the resolution,
Try and Google the resolution and see it's cardinal points,
The united nationa voted and NATO choose to enforced it.
China, and Russia are permanent members they did not oppose the resolution.
Just to remind you that before NATO intervention in Libya, there was already a civil war going for year's.

On the Yugoslavia intervention, NATO was enforcing a no flight zone, but it's jets started coming under attacks by Yugoslavia Sams

The first USA military involvement in Somalia was as part of Unified Task Force UNITAF
This was in 1992 even Nigeria military men participated
Them also in the United's state's also participated during the UN led UNOSOM in 1995
Then after 9/11 the USA started bombing terrorists site in Somalia used by Al-Shabaab
Terrorist, who are also being sponsored by Alcadea
There is justification by the USA to attack terrorists cells, over 5000 Americans died after 9/11 attacks, if not for the USA war on terrorism and terrorism sponsors state, the world won't be as safe as it is.

My question is this how dose the USA military intervention the same as Russia barbaric invasion of Ukraine,
The USA invaded Afghanistan after 9/11 to remove the Taliban government who shelter and sponsored Osama bin Laden's, the intervention in Yugoslavia to stop the killing of ethnic Albanians, the intervention in Somalia to stop Mohamed Farrah Aidid who was killing his people,
Give me a reason why Putin attacked Ukraine?

Abrahamweb:

It's strategic.
Russia and the collective South is dragging the collective West into different battle grounds thereby stretching their forces and resources thin.
By the time they realize it, it'll be too late.
Ukraine, Israel and now Finland.
Trouble for the collective West o
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

All those conflicts it is those who are backed by Russia that are suffering the most.

Firstcitizen:


Stop saying what you do not know with confidence. lol
Below is an extract from Final Report by the UN Committee Established to Review the NATO Bombing Campaign Against the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia
"NATO’s resort to force was not authorized by the Security Council or in self-defence, that the resort to force was illegal and, consequently, all force"



Interesting, very interesting. Your defence alliance does not need UN approval before bombing another country that is NOT a NATO
member....but Russia does. Anyway the final report by the UN comittee says it all or should we take your own personal report



Really, Unilaterally bombing another nation is justified by US definition but Russian intervention in Ukraine is not justified by Russian definition. lol


I will have to agree with you on this only although I did not include Afghanistan on my list.

Waiting patiently for your response on the reckless, offensive attack on Libya, regime change and total reduction of the country to failed state by Nato , the almighty defence alliance which destabilised sub saharan Africa by free flow of weapons.

Like I said in my first write up about the Libya intervention, NATO was enforcing a UN Security council resolution,
You can verify it yourself.
Nigeria was also a non perment member of the UN security council at that time and it voted to support it,
NATO choose to enforced the resolution,
Try and Google the resolution and see it's cardinal points,
The united nationa voted and NATO choose to enforced it.
China, and Russia are permanent members they did not oppose the resolution.
Just to remind you that before NATO intervention in Libya, there was already a civil war going for year's.

On the Yugoslavia intervention, NATO was enforcing a no flight zone, but it's jets started coming under attacks by Yugoslavia Sams

The first USA military involvement in Somalia was as part of Unified Task Force UNITAF
This was in 1992 even Nigeria military men participated
Them also in the United's state's also participated during the UN led UNOSOM in 1995
Then after 9/11 the USA started bombing terrorists site in Somalia used by Al-Shabaab
Terrorist, who are also being sponsored by Alcadea
There is justification by the USA to attack terrorists cells, over 5000 Americans died after 9/11 attacks, if not for the USA war on terrorism and terrorism sponsors state, the world won't be as safe as it is.

My question is this how dose the USA military intervention the same as Russia barbaric invasion of Ukraine,
The USA invaded Afghanistan after 9/11 to remove the Taliban government who shelter and sponsored Osama bin Laden's, the intervention in Yugoslavia to stop the killing of ethnic Albanians, the intervention in Somalia to stop Mohamed Farrah Aidid who was killing his people,
Give me a reason why Putin attacked Ukraine?

gare:
Well-done Mr. Updated are they both same circumstances, you are just going around trying to make people feel you are updated

I thought you would refute my claim or counter it but...🥴🤷

obedience4:



But has China invaded it's neighbours?
Is China isolated like Russia?
Xi just visited it's America counterpart biden just last two months
The USA China trade is an excess of over a trillion dollars
Yet this two countries are so distinct, with two different ideology's yet they always make a way to make things work
Unlike Russia who thinks it can be relevant by simply brutal force,

No one is talking about trade as far as I can remember. You're deflecting from the main subject matter.

obedience4:


Like I said in my first write up about the Libya intervention, NATO was enforcing a UN Security council resolution,
You can verify it yourself.
Nigeria was also a non perment member of the UN security council at that time and it voted to support it,
NATO choose to enforced the resolution,
Try and Google the resolution and see it's cardinal points,
The united nationa voted and NATO choose to enforced it.
China, and Russia are permanent members they did not oppose the resolution.
Just to remind you that before NATO intervention in Libya, there was already a civil war going for year's.

On the Yugoslavia intervention, NATO was enforcing a no flight zone, but it's jets started coming under attacks by Yugoslavia Sams

The first USA military involvement in Somalia was as part of Unified Task Force UNITAF
This was in 1992 even Nigeria military men participated
Them also in the United's state's also participated during the UN led UNOSOM in 1995
Then after 9/11 the USA started bombing terrorists site in Somalia used by Al-Shabaab
Terrorist, who are also being sponsored by Alcadea
There is justification by the USA to attack terrorists cells, over 5000 Americans died after 9/11 attacks, if not for the USA war on terrorism and terrorism sponsors state, the world won't be as safe as it is.

My question is this how dose the USA military intervention the same as Russia barbaric invasion of Ukraine,
The USA invaded Afghanistan after 9/11 to remove the Taliban government who shelter and sponsored Osama bin Laden's, the intervention in Yugoslavia to stop the killing of ethnic Albanians, the intervention in Somalia to stop Mohamed Farrah Aidid who was killing his people,
Give me a reason why Putin attacked Ukraine?

So Resolution 1973 authorizing member states to take measures to protect Libyan civilians means regime change and use of drones to attack Ghaddafi as he escaped. Please clap for yourself Have the civilians been protected now? The overstepping of the mandate erodes the credibility of NATO.

So in essence what you are saying is Bleep the UN prosecutor review and investigation with subsequent statement about NATO's illegal aggression in Yugoslavia.

At the end of the day you just confimed that NATO is not a defence alliance. Hope you can read the charter and understand what it means. That is if you know what a defence alliance stands for.

FreeStuffsNG:
US don buy market for tiny Finland.

Naive Finland that has been forming Van Damme by keeping a wanted IPOB terrorist in their country. Smh.

Now Finland too have been jinxed by the unpatriotic elements, naysayers, cyberbullies, criminal defamers and bigots with their bad luck they gave GEJ, Donald Trump, Alhaji Atiku, Peter Obi ati be be lo. Everyone and every organisation they support will always end with bad luck.Smh.

I pity Sim Fubara. Check my signature for free stuffs!

Thought you said they would jinx Israel?

Israel is winning

Thought you said they would jinx Fubara? Fubara is winning.

They are supporting Jesus Christ over Muhammad, hope they would jinx Jesus Christ too since they jinx anyone they support?

Aloof:


Thought you said they would jinx Israel?

Israel is winning

Thought you said they would jinx Fubara? Fubara is winning.

They are supporting Jesus Christ over Muhammad, hope they would jinx Jesus Christ too since they jinx anyone they support?

Isreal winning
https://www.nairaland.com/7943654/lose-soldier-every-5-minutes

FreeStuffsNG:

Isreal winning
https://www.nairaland.com/7943654/lose-soldier-every-5-minutes

But Russia are also loosing men, that's normal in war na

Aloof:


But Russia are also loosing men, that's normal in war na

War is bad. Those grieving families are real people and I sympathise with all the grieving families on both sides.

Firstcitizen:


So Resolution 1973 authorizing member states to take measures to protect Libyan civilians means regime change and use of drones to attack Ghaddafi as he escaped. Please clap for yourself Have the civilians been protected now? The overstepping of the mandate erodes the credibility of NATO. By the way they still have bases.

So in essence what you are saying is Bleep the UN prosecutor review and investigation with subsequent statement about NATO's illegal aggression in Yugoslavia.

At the end of the day you just confimed that NATO is not a defence alliance. Hope you can read the charter and understand what it means. That is if you know what a defence alliance stands for.

Dude, why do policemen have weapons? Ain't them meant to protect civilians
You are funny, let me quote a key parts of the resolution


(1)demands the immediate establishment of a ceasefire and a complete end to violence and all attacks against, and abuses of, civilians;

(2)imposes a no-fly zone over Libya;

(3)authorizes "all necessary measures [...] to protect civilians and civilian populated areas under threat of attack in the Libyan Arab Jamahiriya, including Benghazi, while excluding a foreign occupation force of any form on any part of Libyan territory";

(4)strengthens the arms embargo and particularly action against mercenaries, by allowing for forcible inspections of ships and planes;
imposes a ban on all Libyan-designated flights;

(5)imposes an asset freeze on assets owned by the Libyan authorities, and reaffirms that such assets should be used for the benefit of the Libyan people;
extends the travel ban and assets freeze of United Nations Security Council Resolution 1970 to a number of additional individuals and Libyan entities;

(6)establishes a panel of experts to monitor and promote sanctions implementation.


Key point 1 demanded a unilateral cease fire which Gaddafi refuse to,

Key point 2,, did you see were the UN authorised all "necessary measures"to protect civilians,
All necessary measures may include airstrike against Gaddafi pro forces attacking civilians
Was is the USA that removed Gaddafi, it's people removed him,after year's of slavery
Gaddafi a known supporter of terrorism.
Is either you are blinded by hate, Gaddafi repeatedly attack civilians, killed thousands, also his revolutionary guards also fired upon NATO jets enforcing the no fly zone.

There are no USA base in Libya,

Read on the legitimacy of NATO intervention in Yugoslavia,
Many are of the opinion that the intervention was necessary to stop the deliberate attempt to commit genocide against ethics Albanians.
the UN review of the issue is subjective doesn't hold water, did the UN general assemble not voted against Russia war in Ukraine is illegal, has that stopped mad man Putin,


NATO is and will always be a defence alliance,
Your opinion simply doesn't change
That doesn't mean it's has to wait till one member is attacked before it makes it move.
Let me quote article 1 of NATO charter

"The Parties undertake, as set forth in the Charter of the United Nations, to settle any international dispute in which they may be involved by peaceful means in such a manner that international peace and security and justice are not endangered, and to refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force in any manner inconsistent with the purposes of the United Nations"


You can read from above that NATO ain't just formed to attend to members issues, but to Settle and intervene in international dispute, as approved by the United's Nations
So the intervention in Libya, Bosnian, Yugoslavia are consistent with the basis for which the organisation was formed.


.If NATO secretary general
Jens Stoltenberg during the last NATO general meeting calls the alliance the biggest defence alliance in the world, while the f**k will I care about your opinion.

KanuSE:


I thought you would refute my claim or counter it but...🥴🤷

There nothing to counter or refute, we know your type, you are amongst those supporting a man without a certificate to becoming president.

obedience4:





Like I said in my first write up about the Libya intervention, NATO was enforcing a UN Security council resolution,
You can verify it yourself.
Nigeria was also a non perment member of the UN security council at that time and it voted to support it,
NATO choose to enforced the resolution,
Try and Google the resolution and see it's cardinal points,
The united nationa voted and NATO choose to enforced it.
China, and Russia are permanent members they did not oppose the resolution.
Just to remind you that before NATO intervention in Libya, there was already a civil war going for year's.

On the Yugoslavia intervention, NATO was enforcing a no flight zone, but it's jets started coming under attacks by Yugoslavia Sams

The first USA military involvement in Somalia was as part of Unified Task Force UNITAF
This was in 1992 even Nigeria military men participated
Them also in the United's state's also participated during the UN led UNOSOM in 1995
Then after 9/11 the USA started bombing terrorists site in Somalia used by Al-Shabaab
Terrorist, who are also being sponsored by Alcadea
There is justification by the USA to attack terrorists cells, over 5000 Americans died after 9/11 attacks, if not for the USA war on terrorism and terrorism sponsors state, the world won't be as safe as it is.

My question is this how dose the USA military intervention the same as Russia barbaric invasion of Ukraine,
The USA invaded Afghanistan after 9/11 to remove the Taliban government who shelter and sponsored Osama bin Laden's, the intervention in Yugoslavia to stop the killing of ethnic Albanians, the intervention in Somalia to stop Mohamed Farrah Aidid who was killing his people,
Give me a reason why Putin attacked Ukraine?

if USA can attack terrorist cell any where because of 3k+ Americans that died in 9 /11 then Russia can attack every nazi because of 1m+ Russian that died due to Nazi attack on Russia,

If us can attack Yugoslavia because of ethnic killing of Albanians then Russia can attack Ukraine because of killing Russian ethnics in Ukraine.

obedience4:


Dude, why do policemen have weapons? Ain't them meant to protect civilians
You are funny, let me quote a key parts of the resolution


(1)demands the immediate establishment of a ceasefire and a complete end to violence and all attacks against, and abuses of, civilians;

(2)imposes a no-fly zone over Libya;

(3)authorizes "all necessary measures [...] to protect civilians and civilian populated areas under threat of attack in the Libyan Arab Jamahiriya, including Benghazi, while excluding a foreign occupation force of any form on any part of Libyan territory";

(4)strengthens the arms embargo and particularly action against mercenaries, by allowing for forcible inspections of ships and planes;
imposes a ban on all Libyan-designated flights;

(5)imposes an asset freeze on assets owned by the Libyan authorities, and reaffirms that such assets should be used for the benefit of the Libyan people;
extends the travel ban and assets freeze of United Nations Security Council Resolution 1970 to a number of additional individuals and Libyan entities;

(6)establishes a panel of experts to monitor and promote sanctions implementation.


Key point 1 demanded a unilateral cease fire which Gaddafi refuse to,

Key point 2,, did you see were the UN authorised all "necessary measures"to protect civilians,
All necessary measures may include airstrike against Gaddafi pro forces attacking civilians
Was is the USA that removed Gaddafi, it's people removed him,after year's of slavery
Gaddafi a known supporter of terrorism.
Is either you are blinded by hate, Gaddafi repeatedly attack civilians, killed thousands, also his revolutionary guards also fired upon NATO jets enforcing the no fly zone.

There are no USA base in Libya,

Read on the legitimacy of NATO intervention in Yugoslavia,
Many are of the opinion that the intervention was necessary to stop the deliberate attempt to commit genocide against ethics Albanians.
the UN review of the issue is subjective doesn't hold water, did the UN general assemble not voted against Russia war in Ukraine is illegal, has that stopped mad man Putin,


NATO is and will always be a defence alliance,
Your opinion simply doesn't change
That doesn't mean it's has to wait till one member is attacked before it makes it move.
Let me quote article 1 of NATO charter

"The Parties undertake, as set forth in the Charter of the United Nations, to settle any international dispute in which they may be involved by peaceful means in such a manner that international peace and security and justice are not endangered, and to refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force in any manner inconsistent with the purposes of the United Nations"


You can read from above that NATO ain't just formed to attend to members issues, but to Settle and intervene in international dispute, as approved by the United's Nations
So the intervention in Libya, Bosnian, Yugoslavia are consistent with the basis for which the organisation was formed.


.If NATO secretary general
Jens Stoltenberg during the last NATO general meeting calls the alliance the biggest defence alliance in the world, while the f**k will I care about your opinion.

Your inane vitriol against Russia still does not expain how this mandate fits into the attack of a convoy of a Nation's leader by drone and gleefully celebrating like savages "We came, we saw, he died"

Still can't explain how the UN ruled that the actions of NATO in Yugoslavia were illegal. Again your neigbour breeding leopards claiming they are for his protection.

NATO is a monster that has gone beyond the reason for it's formation and thank goodness the Russians have shown were the red lines are.

Ghostagain:

Denys Davydov is a Ukrainian propagandist. You are just chewing in propaganda.

You must be dum
They guy reported losses at a certain time for close to 2weeks
Russia is not the God of war
He has thousands of videos go figure

Putin,[color=#000099][/color]the only Man with Balls against West

SaLongs1:
All those conflicts it is those who are backed by Russia that are suffering the most.

Di you guys do any form of research or watch independent journalist?
Or do you just pull data out of thin air?
Some of the European countries are in recession.

11doubledee:

Putin doesn't want expansion of NATO but yet you threaten your neighbours.
What other choice do you have other than to join an alliance that will protect you.
Does Putin have any intentions to normalise talks with Ukraine or return Crimea if Ukraine withdraw it's bid to join NATO?
You'd be surprised he has an ulterior motive to seize the whole of Ukraine because he knows he can easily bully them.
This has been Ukraine's fear all along.

No superpower in the world will watch or tolerate any kind of threat anywhere especially in it's neighborhood. US did the same in 1962 and it ended with the infamous Bay of Pigs invasion. NATO expansions to the East was discussed and the Russians were given Assurances on three occasions that there will be no Expansion eastwards of NATO. The whole story about NATO is to see the downfall of Russia in order for them to lay their hands on its natural resources. It's not about keeping peace. We saw that in Libya and we know how it ended.

When you relegate Russia to only Putin, you may not see the real picture. The real picture is Russia will be encircled and it's economy stiffled to capitulation because some very greedy countries wants it's resources for free.

The other picture is forty percent of Ukrainians especially to the East of Russia, Donbass and Other surrounding countries are Russian by heritage and are bound by the language. The Ukrainians don't want trouble with Russia until that comedian became president and this is the result. Trouble dey sleep, yanga go wake am.

Abrahamweb:

Di you guys do any form of research or watch independent journalist?
Or do you just pull data out of thin air?
Some of the European countries are in recession.

Some comments deserve to have their originators flogged with cudgels.

gare:


There nothing to counter or refute, we know your type, you are amongst those supporting a man without a certificate to becoming president.

I wonder how Nigerians want a good country when the leader has No certificate

FaithELEFAN:

I wonder how Nigerians want a good country when the leader has No certificate

Please tell them.

obedience4:


Like I said in my first write up about the Libya intervention, NATO was enforcing a UN Security council resolution,
You can verify it yourself.
Nigeria was also a non perment member of the UN security council at that time and it voted to support it,
NATO choose to enforced the resolution,
Try and Google the resolution and see it's cardinal points,
The united nationa voted and NATO choose to enforced it.
China, and Russia are permanent members they did not oppose the resolution.
Just to remind you that before NATO intervention in Libya, there was already a civil war going for year's.

On the Yugoslavia intervention, NATO was enforcing a no flight zone, but it's jets started coming under attacks by Yugoslavia Sams

The first USA military involvement in Somalia was as part of Unified Task Force UNITAF
This was in 1992 even Nigeria military men participated
Them also in the United's state's also participated during the UN led UNOSOM in 1995
Then after 9/11 the USA started bombing terrorists site in Somalia used by Al-Shabaab
Terrorist, who are also being sponsored by Alcadea
There is justification by the USA to attack terrorists cells, over 5000 Americans died after 9/11 attacks, if not for the USA war on terrorism and terrorism sponsors state, the world won't be as safe as it is.

My question is this how dose the USA military intervention the same as Russia barbaric invasion of Ukraine,
The USA invaded Afghanistan after 9/11 to remove the Taliban government who shelter and sponsored Osama bin Laden's, the intervention in Yugoslavia to stop the killing of ethnic Albanians, the intervention in Somalia to stop Mohamed Farrah Aidid who was killing his people,
Give me a reason why Putin attacked Ukraine?

if USA has the right to attack every terrorist cell in the world because they lost 5000 Americans to terrorist attack,then Russia has the right to attack every NAZI INCLUDING THOSE IN UKRAINE THEY'RE CURRENTLY ELIMINATING because they lost More than a million citizens to NAZI attack

Watcharena:
if USA has the right to attack every terrorist cell in the world because they lost 5000 Americans to terrorist attack,then Russia has the right to attack every NAZI INCLUDING THOSE IN UKRAINE THEY'RE CURRENTLY ELIMINATING because they lost More than a million citizens to NAZI attack

Do you even know what the term "NAZI" is?
And what its represent?

gare:


Please tell them.

Good morning ma

FaithELEFAN:

Good morning ma

Good morning compliments of the season