Kobojunkie:
You don't like the authors words and would rather assert your own ideas, right?

I'm just wondering what Lucifer is looking for there?
How And why it found its way to the passage

Kobojunkie:
Quote me? I never said any of what you pretend. So again, why do you reject the intended message of the writer in order to assert in its stead that which is of you?

God himself wrote the passage ?
I just want to know please

Zaheertyler:
God himself wrote the passage ? I just want to know please

Read what is written as is written!

Zaheertyler:
I'm just wondering what Lucifer is looking for there? How And why it found its way to the passage

The Lucifer idea was invented by King James thousands of years after the author of the book had penned his message down.

Kobojunkie:
The Lucifer idea was invented by King James thousands of years after the author of the book had penned his message down.

Who was the first translator??

Kobojunkie:
The Lucifer idea was invented by King James thousands of years after the author of the book had penned his message down.

Are you denying the existence of lucifer?

Zaheertyler:
Who was the first translator??

You don't know your way to google to ask that?

Zaheertyler:
Are you denying the existence of lucifer?

Do you generally ignore context when reading any work communicated in human language?

Kobojunkie:
Do you generally ignore context when reading any work communicated in human language?

You dun see am na

Zaheertyler:
You dun see am na

I asked a question.

Kobojunkie:
I asked a question.

I don't..do you??
Because we are not the authors so we both shouldn't have the same understand

Zaheertyler:

I don't..do you??
Because we are not the authors so we both shouldn't have the same understand

Lol... What you are pretty much saying is the author is the one who failed to communicate properly his message here, this despite the fact that you clearly ignore the context established by the author in order to establish a meaning and hence an understanding different from that which he, the author, intended?

Kobojunkie:
Lol... What you are pretty much saying is the author is the one who failed to communicate properly his message here, this despite the fact that you clearly ignore the context established by the author in order to establish a meaning and hence an understanding different from that which he, the author, intended?

By the author you mean God?

Zaheertyler:
∆ By the author you mean God?

How did you come to suppose God authored the book of Isaiah?

Kobojunkie:
How did you come to suppose God authored the book of Isaiah?

Your words not mine

Zaheertyler:
■ Your words not mine

It seems you major problem stems from lack of language compression skills. You were told by me that Isaiah, the author, instead wrote of God singing a dirge to the King of Babylon, but somehow you twisted that so you could accuse me of saying God wrote the dirge?

Zaheertyler:

Your mind is Satan?
You're making more sense self
Please explain better sir

You can start by researching on yetzer hara.