₦airaland Forum

TheRealOwner:
Wait o, na the wife dey work, husband make money, con go tell wife, wife vex to report give her Ogas, her Ogas con sack d wife, she con divorce husband

E get as this matter be o

nairalanda1:
They will notice, and they will get you in the end.

Relocating is not as easy as you think it is when you are on the run for crime. You cannot take out more than a certain sum, your money is likely to be frozen, and the US government would be looking for you.

Seriously, watch some crime channels if you get DSTV. It is not as easy as you think.

tuzle:
Wait, they could have just agreed that if the feds later found out, only the man will take the fall since that is what later happened. She would have just said she wasn't aware that was what he was doing and once he supports her statements won't she be let free.

nairalanda1:
Forget morality....she had to report. Any lawyer would have advised her to report...because SEC , if they start looking, would not believe her story that her husband was listening in on her calls without her knowledge.

It's like you don't get it....assuming SEC found out by other means, they would have accused her as an accesory. (She is the wife, therefore she must have been sharing information).

If she did not report , by now she would be on her way to jail too.

Iamzik:
Inside life

nairalanda1:
Then the SEC would have told her that 'But how sure are we that you are not lying to us madam? '

tochez24:
And you think her boses are innocent??🙄

You think the world is a place of justice and fairness right?😁

My brother, rich people in this world bypass alot of law and order.... That's the only way to get rich♂️

Do You think Elon Musk is following US Constitution and became the richest man on earth?🙄

Do everything the law says and you will die of penury in this world i tell you. I strongly believe her bosses are guilty too.

My point is, her husband knew and did what her bosses knew and was probably doing too, to get rich⚠️

They only sacked her to save their faces and her bosses too knew exactly how to maneuver their way!! So there's no SEC investigation whatsoever!!!

DeepSight:
Please better pause before making presumptions because I am a lawyer myself, and an international one at that.

There are both Fifth Amendment Rights and the convention against spousal testimony both of which can be played in interesting directions.

As a matter of fact it is not a question of what the SEC will be presumed to believe. If indeed she did not divulge to her husband, she has done no wrong.

And so long as the husband did not conspire with her, he has done no wrong either because he was not an insider.

This takes deep strategic legal thinking and analysis my friend. Don't look at it with simplicity.

Now I also spoke about business and political realities for a reason. And I added wisdom. Go figure.

Also you need to stop presuming the SEC would have found out.

nairalanda1:
Then the SEC would have told her that 'But how sure are we that you are not lying to us madam? '

nairalanda1:
The man did wrong, old boy. Don't justify it.

You are no lawyer either.

If he was as innocent as you are here trying to defend him, why is his govenrment prosecuting him.

I end it here. You guys should stop trying to justify evil.

PNomsule:
Na there u go see the worse betrayal... if I no fit trust my wife, na outsider I suppose con trust?!

DeepSight:
I repeat... I have said nothing whatsoever about morality. You claimed to understand that and yet you have raised morality twice here again. You even called it "evil."

There is a problem with that because not all legal wrong is morally evil, and this is one instance of such. There are things that are morally wrong but not legally wrong as well... And vice versa.

Evil requires that harm is inflicted on another person in some tangible way. This is not the case here.

As to me not being a lawyer, what a laugh. Do you think I need to prove that to some ignorant stranger on an anonymous platform who doesn't pay my fees. Joker.

Your analysis, understanding and presumptions are very shallow and we have not even touched the aspects of real politics, business and life wisdom involved here.

You have a small mind. A little one.

matify83:
What could have happened if she hadn't reported the case to bp authority leading to her sack?

Why was she against the husband's success even though she didn't willfully give out ''insider secrets'' to her husband?

This kind of husband go sabi do amebo. Must you explain how you came about privileged information that made you a millionaire?
Who ask you?

This case get as e be.

ThatCEO:
Mumu woman, the fool was probably expecting her employers to celebrate her, that's why she went to ass lick corporate.

Mumu Shd have talked a lawyer first before any move. T[b]he same move she went to report, probably all her bosses r doing it.[/b]

Now she has no job, no other company will employ her, n she has no husband too.

Forget, She was planning to divorce the man normally...no be this matter cause am.

nairalanda1:
You are not a lawyer, and you are here justifying evil.

If you don't , then no wahala. Life goes on. But evil must always be punished, big or small.

magnum247:
I honestly see nothing wrong in what he did as he was just privileged that his wife worked on the deal. A lot of people somewhere will also benefit from this kind of situation but won't go about exposing themselves. It happens in all works of life, people will always get privileged information before others and how you use it depends on you

immortalcrown:
Gagantuan gaga!

Self-centred commenters below claim the woman worked against her husband's success. Will your judgement be the same if you are the woman's employer? Will you say the same thing if your neighbour becomes like the man against you and a company you work for? So, because he married her makes it wrong for her to say the necessary truth? You people suffer from split personality disorder. Being ethical is a crime to you when it doesn't favour your interest.

The man betrayed his wife's trust. He makes her regret not treating him like an outsider or a stranger in the marriage.

I sincerely condemn his action. The wife felt safe in the presence of her husband but later got disappointed in him.

TWoods:
The company would have found out eventually. I work for a similar O&G, and we are required to fill out a conflict of interest form every year. That includes whether you have family working in an industry similar to ours, competitors, suppliers, or customers... and whether you or a relative may hold stock in sensitive organizations. They would have fired her had she reported her husband's stock dealings later... she had to report to save herself but ultimately lost.

nairalanda1:
The way you guys justify bad things by doing whataboutism on this site is painful to see. That is why Nigeria has no good leaders, seriously

A lot of rich people in the USA have gone to jail for insider trading, or have been made to pay heavy fines. What this man did was wrong. And yeah, just because some big people have gotten away with it does not mean that he should join them. (And many of those big people today, they often get caught tomorrow)

The man was wrong. Period. He nearly dragged his wife and his wife's company on top.

tochez24:
You're missing something bro...

I'm not justifying a bad thing or what the man did, I'm just opening your eyes to the other side of the coin⚠️

Remember I began my comment by condemning what the man did♂️

But with all said, life is always black and white you know, it will never be plain white only... Poor people will always keep rules while rich people will always bypass them.

It's what it's⚠️

DeepSight:
The same way you make this shallow assumption is the same way you have analysed this matter in a shallow fashion.

As I said, you have a little mind. A tiny one.



This has nothing to do with evil. You are simply ignorant. If I was as presumptuous as you, I would think you are some deluded goody-two-shoes church goer who knows nothing of the actual meaning of good and evil.

Ol boy, good morning.

immortalcrown:
Says a self-centred person.

JigsawKillah:
You'd have to torture a confession out of me though. I don't blame the wife. But the man should have kept his mouth shut and spend lowkey.

DeepSight:
Please better pause before making presumptions because I am a lawyer myself, and an international one at that.

There are both Fifth Amendment Rights and the convention against spousal testimony both of which can be played in interesting directions.

As a matter of fact it is not a question of what the SEC will be presumed to believe. If indeed she did not divulge to her husband, she has done no wrong.

And so long as the husband did not conspire with her, he has done no wrong either because he was not an insider.

This takes deep strategic legal thinking and analysis my friend. Don't look at it with simplicity.

Now I also spoke about business and political realities for a reason. And I added wisdom. Go figure.

Also you need to stop presuming the SEC would have found out.

talk2hb1:
Your View, Your Choice. My View, My Choice.