₦airaland Forum

MentalCase98:
Hahaha. I knew that person sounded familiar. So it is Obrigardo’s alternate account?

Let’s report him massively for violating nairaland rule 19 😂😂

Yeah.

Naaah. Don't report him. They make me laugh here.

budaatum:
You are the ignorant one relying on Gemini to know what to think or believe. Wolf calls them wtf bubbles that are designed to scam ignorons like you.

I have an interest AI. And logical thinking. I never believe everything I read or hear .Unlike you who believes kiddish cartoons akin Tom & Jerry
Europe is going nuts. Gemini opinion is welcome to this

EnlightenedUFO:
Criminal trump is a serial loser and an underperformer.

DC primary didn’t matter to Trump in 2016 😂😂

I can’t wait to see you cry in November.

basilico loco, It seems new charges are on the way for Criminal trump through this man, Na wa oooo
The criminal just can't live without crimes. What do you think?

Conservative group launches website to fact-check Biden administration lies about how well their economic policies are working.

https://www.bidenomics.com/

MentalCase98:
Conservative group launches website to fact-check Biden administration lies about how well their economic policies are working.

https://www.bidenomics.com/

I’m actually surprised nobody in the Biden administration thought to register this domain until some random conservative group got it first. Smh these people are really not very smart.

BREAKING:
U.S. Supreme Court has unanimously ruled that Trump’s name must be kept on the Colorado primary ballot, rejecting the state’s 14th Amendment arguments.

The Court held that it is Congress, not the states, that have the power to remove a presidential candidate from the ballot via section 3 of the 14th Amendment

PDPGuy:
BREAKING:
U.S. Supreme Court has unanimously ruled that Trump’s name must be kept on the Colorado primary ballot, rejecting the state’s 14th Amendment arguments.

The Court held that it is Congress, not the states, that have the power to remove a presidential candidate from the ballot via section 3 of the 14th Amendment

Just as expected.

P.S. As you reported it was a unanimous decision. Liberal and conservative Judges on the Bench. I hope when Liberal Judges rule against Trump next time he and his minions won't Whyne and cry..

PDPGuy:
BREAKING:
U.S. Supreme Court has unanimously ruled that Trump’s name must be kept on the Colorado primary ballot, rejecting the state’s 14th Amendment arguments.

The Court held that it is Congress, not the states, that have the power to remove a presidential candidate from the ballot via section 3 of the 14th Amendment

Unanimous decision to keep Trump on the ballot. Even Liberal judges think its ridiculous

“We conclude that states may disqualify persons holding or attempting to hold stage office. But states have no power under the Constitution to enforce Section 3, with respect to federal offices, especially the presidency..” - U.S. Supreme Court in the Trump v Colorado case

happney65:
Just as expected.

P.S. As you reported it was a unanimous decision. Liberal and conservative Judges on the Bench. I hope when Liberal Judges rule against Trump next time he and his minions won't Whyne and cry..

The Court would then become a disgrace 😁

raumdeuter:
Unanimous decision to keep Trump on the ballot. Even Liberal judges think its ridiculous

To be honest, it was always a long short to expect the U.S. Supreme Court to uphold state rules excluding candidates from a federal election

Wow. Unanimous ruling. This just shows how deranged democrats like Obrigardo are when even liberal Supreme Court judges trash their undemocratic attempts to take their opponents off election ballots.

PDPGuy:
The Court would then become a disgrace 😁

You get it .

happney65:
You get it .

Its the left that wanted to pack the court. The right don't critic the court like the left. But the fact they critic this activist courts that is making ridiculous judgement against trump is rational. This supreme Court decision is the receipt.

basilico:
I have an interest AI. And logical thinking. I never believe everything I read or hear .Unlike you who believes kiddish cartoons akin Tom & Jerry
Europe is going nuts. Gemini opinion is welcome to this

Do some research. It would help you not lie.

And while you are at it, learn what logical thinking entails so you don't come across as uninformed.

budaatum:
When I was like really young, these mates of mine who grew up in Obanikoro Village told me rats talk. Well, even at barely 7, I was atheistic in nature, so I argued that rats don't talk. Now there were like 5 of them, so they ganged up on me calling me all sorts of names and that I know nothing, "rats talk jo!"

One day, about two years later, we were in the home of one of them and NTA was showing Tom and Jerry. "There," they said, pointing to the telly. "I thought you said rats don't talk?"

Turns out oyinbo rats do talk, silly me!

Please! I am trying to respect you. Stop scraping the barrel. We all know what having a conversation is. Next you'd claim Siri is not just saying what it has been programmed to say!

I hope I'm not late 😂😂😂😂
I came as soon as I can.

Obrigdo anti-trump would definitely not be sleeping well this night

TrumpBiden:
I hope I'm not late 😂😂😂😂
I came as soon as I can.

Obrigdo anti-trump would definitely not be sleeping well this night

Lol. Obrigardo the psycho has been banned. He now goes by the monicker “enlightenedUFO” or some crap like that.

But yeah, he will definitely cry himself to sleep tonight. I can’t wait for November when he will get the final heart attack.

MentalCase98:
Lol. Obrigardo the psycho has been banned. He now goes by the monicker “enlightenedUFO” or some crap like that.

But yeah, he will definitely cry himself to sleep tonight. I can’t wait for November when he will get the final heart attack.

I can't believe you didn't know already since that he's got over 4 alternates here.

Lol

November should come quickly ooo. Biden is driving us to world war 3,

Hopefully things don't go south before November

PDPGuy:
BREAKING:
U.S. Supreme Court has unanimously ruled that Trump’s name must be kept on the Colorado primary ballot, rejecting the state’s 14th Amendment arguments.

The Court held that it is Congress, not the states, that have the power to remove a presidential candidate from the ballot via section 3 of the 14th Amendment

It was an expected ruling. Every honest person who watched what transpired should have thought it was a coup attempt. But with the revelations of the secret Twitter account that was revealed last week, that one of Trump's attorneys lied to prosecutors about having, it should have been clear to anyone on the fence that the plan was to fraudulently put Trump in office.

I don't fault the state courts for doing what they did. But I understand the Supreme Court's aversion to allowing states to decide this. However, I also disagree with the conservative majority creating new "law" by allowing the House to decide this. It's a fundamental flaw given that the House is no longer representative of the US because of things like gerrymandering.

basilico:
I am inclined to believe that's one of your credible sources. This is the real meat.


Lovebirds 2.0- Willis and wade broke the law, multiple times. They failed to disclose a secret relationship that would disqualify all prosecutors, then lied about it under oath to the presiding judge. Any other prosecutor would have been thrown off the case, had it dismissed entirely, and most importantly be held in contempt of court for lying to the presiding judge and the world. This can be the only ruling if our system of justice is to defeat the two tiers of injustice created by these government gangsters.

It was you who repeatedly posted the cell phone data as a way to prove they lied to the court. So I was referring to you when I said people who don't critically review the information they read.

To no surprise of any rational person, the Trump team cherry-picked the cell phone data. Wade was in that area on a greater percentage of days (23 out of 92 in Jan-Mar) when Willis didn't live in that area than he was (35 out of 244 in Apr-Nov) when Willis did live in that area.

DaHighLife:
It was an expected ruling. Every honest person who watched what transpired should have thought it was a coup attempt. But with the revelations of the secret Twitter account that was revealed last week, that one of Trump's attorneys lied to prosecutors about having, it should have been clear to anyone on the fence that the plan was to fraudulently put Trump in office.

I don't fault the state courts for doing what they did. But I understand the Supreme Court's aversion to allowing states to decide this. However, I also disagree with the conservative majority creating new "law" by allowing the House to decide this. It's a fundamental flaw given that the House is no longer representative of the US because of things like gerrymandering.

Have you ever faulted anything against trump?

You expected this which is a lie. Look at what you wrote. It's you in conflict trying to remain rational and unbiased.

bemeruca:
Have you ever faulted anything against trump?

You expect this which is a lie. Look at what you wrote. It's you in conflict trying to remain rational and unbiased.

I thought the words in the Constitution are clear regarding insurrections. I believe the question should have been about the mechanism of disqualification. The states believed they were the mechanism, and from what I have heard, the Supreme Court believed the House is the mechanism. Again, I think it would be hard for a nonpartisan, unbiased person to say Trump didn't commit an insurrection.

Your posts always seem so emotional, and your arguments and writing are impacted by that emotion. I can even barely understand your posts at times. In my humble opinion, if you were more dispassionate, I'm sure you would make better rational arguments and could have more fulsome discussions with people.

DaHighLife:
I thought the words in the Constitution are clear regarding insurrections. I believe the question should have been about the mechanism of disqualification. The states believed they were the mechanism, and from what I have heard, the Supreme Court believed the House is the mechanism. Again, I think it would be hard for a nonpartisan, unbiased person to say Trump didn't commit an insurrection.

Your posts always seem so emotional, and your arguments and writing are impacted by that emotion. I can even barely understand your posts at times. In my humble opinion, if you were more dispassionate, I'm sure you would make better rational arguments and could have more fulsome discussions with people.

Have you charged him with insurrection?

I had a chance to listen to the Willis hearing over the weekend and also read a good article/discussion on the legal aspects of the decision.

Honestly, to me, the defense didn't seem to have made their case and resorted to proverbially 'banging on the table' to create a PR issue and bias the jury pool, which they may have succeeded in doing. The prosecutor's attorney who presented the case was a little weak in his approach, but I think he was on point regarding the legal issues and case law, especially in critiquing the judge's understanding.

It seems the case will come down to what standard Judge McAfee uses, either the standard of 'actual conflict of interest' or 'appearance of impropriety.' My understanding is that the based on Georgia law the defense must show an 'actual conflict of interest.' I don't think, and I don't believe anyone else thinks, that the defense has met that burden.

One of the cases cited involved a married couple who were on opposing sides—one was a prosecutor and the other a defense counsel. The court was asked to disqualify them, but the court said they couldn't find a reason. These were people with an intimate relationship on opposing sides. If they weren't disqualified, why would two non-married people on the same side be?

See Jones, 258 Ga. at 354–355 (“We have found no authority, and none has been cited to us, for the proposition that married lawyers who are involved in active litigation on opposing sides of a case must be disqualified.”). Georgia courts have explained that, “[w]hile we cannot disagree with the proposition that the marital relationship may be the most intimate relationship of a person’s life, it does not follow that professional people allow this intimacy to interfere with professional obligations.” Ventura, 346 Ga. App. at 311, 816 S.E.2d at 154.

DaHighLife:
I thought the words in the Constitution are clear regarding insurrections. I believe the question should have been about the mechanism of disqualification. The states believed they were the mechanism, and from what I have heard, the Supreme Court believed the House is the mechanism. Again, I think it would be hard for a nonpartisan, unbiased person to say Trump didn't commit an insurrection.

Your posts always seem so emotional, and your arguments and writing are impacted by that emotion. I can even barely understand your posts at times. In my humble opinion, if you were more dispassionate, I'm sure you would make better rational arguments and could have more fulsome discussions with people.

So in other words, the house is now suddenly useless because it's no longer ran by crazy Nancy pelosi?
I get it

TrumpBiden:
So in other words, the house is now suddenly useless because it's no longer ran by crazy Nancy pelosi?
I get it

If that is the interpretation you derived from my post, it raises concerns.
Let me ask you: Do you believe that Gerrymandered districts are fair?

Jack smith will be the next to cry

bemeruca:
Have you ever faulted anything against trump?

You expect this which is a lie. Look at what you wrote. It's you in conflict trying to remain rational and unbiased.

Any liberal on this platform who tells you they expected a unanimous decision in favour of Trump is a big liar who should never be taken seriously.

What they expected in a worse-case scenario was a split decision where all the conservative judges sided with Trump and the liberal judges sided with Colorado. This unanimous decision is a massive shock to them all. Any one of them saying otherwise is just spewing 100% copium.

MentalCase98:
Any liberal on this platform who tells you they expected a unanimous decision in favour of Trump is a big liar who should never be taken seriously.

What they expected in a worse case scenario was a split decision where all the conservative judges sided with Trump and the liberal judges sided with Colorado. This unanimous decision is a shock to them all. Any one of them sayin go otherwise is just spewing 100% copium.

You can see the conflict in his tone. Even the Colorado all liberal judges did not get unanimous decision.

The partisan courts in DC, newyork and other liberal states are destroying this country.

Nikki Haley, by wining the D.C. Republican presidential caucus, became the first woman ever to win a Republican presidential primary/caucus..

PDPGuy:
Nikki Haley, by wining the D.C. Republican presidential caucus, became the first woman ever to win a Republican presidential primary/caucus..

3000 voters turned out in an irrelevant DC 😂