CrystalTiger:
Silly favouritism is ETH major problem..

There's no reason Amrabat and Amad had less games this season..

Ballzproblem2:
thank you ten hag , you made yourself useful for once

chrisley024:
what's even the usefulness of today's win

post=129917230]
What would have happened differently if Bruno was in the game today?[/quote]
[quote author=hatakekakashi:

We would have surely attacked better and likely scored.

chrisley024:
Amrabat 🙄

Jokerman:
So we allowed Chelsea qualify for Europa ...

Lol... United too useless 🤕🙈

eph12:
Lol because Bruno missed one or two matches, everyone is now sounding like he missed all our matches where we played poorly and struggled to create good chances. He is our best player, but the standard has been very low this season abeg.

eph12:
Lol because Bruno missed one or two matches, everyone is now sounding like he missed all our matches where we played poorly and struggled to create good chances. He is our best player, but the standard has been very low this season abeg.

TrebleChamp:
No thanks to Bald Fraud shitty tactics.....

maik99:


Bruno himself has been a victim of whatever rubbish tactics we have been playing this season

eph12:
Lol because Bruno missed one or two matches, everyone is now sounding like he missed all our matches where we played poorly and struggled to create good chances. He is our best player, but the standard has been very low this season abeg.

eph12:


Agreed. So what guarantee do we have that things might have been different if Bruno played against Arsenal? Because that is the narrative now. Bruno has not been Bruno this season because of ETH tactics, yeah? So why do we want to change the narrative and expect something different if Bruno had played that game? All the many other loses and rubbish we played, Bruno fully participated and there are hundreds of comments calling Bruno out. But because he missed this one and we lost, it is because Bruno didn't play

eph12:


Agreed. So what guarantee do we have that things might have been different if Bruno played against Arsenal? Because that is the narrative now. Bruno has not been Bruno this season because of ETH tactics, yeah? So why do we want to change the narrative and expect something different if Bruno had played that game? All the many other loses and rubbish we played, Bruno fully participated and there are hundreds of comments calling Bruno out. But because he missed this one and we lost, it is because Bruno didn't play

hatakekakashi:

In the arsenal game, the attack was very blunt. Arsenal sat back and we needed someone to give penetrating passes and also take shots from outside the box, that's were Bruno would have improved the attack. Amrabat on one occasion had a good chance to put Hojlund through on goal, he failed.

maik99:


I think it's because we actually played well against Arsenal to the surprise of many
With the extra quality that would be present if Bruno played, maybe we would have gotten a result

eph12:

Can you tell me how many clean chances Hojlund has gotten from Bruno this season? The one he scored yesterday was not even a chance. Rasmus managed to score that from nowhere.

Bruno is supposed to even be better when opponents don't sit back so he can throw his quick long passes for an attacker to run into. Their sitting back creates a big problem for him and Arsenal would have found a solution for him easily. He was there in the first leg

hatakekakashi:

Bruno is top 3 big chances creator in the league, it's not his fault his teammates are not converting. Also, arsenal didn't play the same way in the first leg.