₦airaland Forum

iLegendd:
The same you that have abused me nonstop for 3 years? I don't forgive, you know that, right?

If not for my stubbornness, today, I would've been broke and depressed like you. Those other small giveaways I gave you in the past were out of pity, not because I care. I have zero empathy towards you. I still remember all the mean things you said.

With your gambling habit, I pity who will help you financially—we already know where the money is going.

I have stopped gambling completely

You didn't beat him mam but you're the first female that stood with him toe-to-toe and I must commend you for that. Other women that attempted what you did ended up proving him right. You're very intelligent being no cap

budaatum:
Everyone here can see you quit because you lost to an educated woman who beat you so much she educated you.

And trust me. You learnt.

0neal:
If this is practiced, most relationship will last long haul

I'd even say husband and wife should have the same password to their phones or finger prints access which most modern phones have to their phones.

Yes in my case we don't even have energy for passwords, we both have same unlocking pattern.
All d phones we both have used had that same pattern.

musicwriter:
Are you Reno Omokri?

Well, since you first dared me, I am going to dare you. Drop your religious emotions, you're not addressing a religious fool. And this is not your political post.

Yes, there was no place for women in Europe. Yes, women weren't allowed to vote in Britain till the 1920's, whereas, for thousands of years Africans have had women (queens) ruling entire nation.

Queen Mertyt-Neith was Female Pharaoh during the 1st Dynasty of Egyptian monarchy- 3000 BC.

Queen Khentkaus was Female Pharaoh during the 4th Dynasty of Egyptian monarchy- 2613-2494 BC.

Queen Ankhnesmeryre II was Female Pharaoh during the 6th Dynasty of Egyptian monarchy- 2345–2181 BC.

Queen Neithhikret was also a Female Pharaoh during the 6th Dynasty of Egyptian monarchy- 2148-2144 BC.

Queen Ashotep was Female Pharaoh during the 18th Dynasty of Egyptian monarchy- 1550–1295 BC.

Queen Ahmose was also a Female Pharaoh during the 18th Dynasty of Egyptian monarchy- 1550-1525 BC.

Queen Hatshepsut was Female Pharaoh during the 18th Dynasty of Egyptian monarchy- 1479-1425 BC.

Queen Nefertiti was Female Pharaoh during the 18th Dynasty of Egyptian monarchy- 1353-1336 BC.

Queen Tausret was Female Pharaoh during the 19th Dynasty of Egyptian monarchy- 1187-1185 BC.

Queen Sobeknefru was Female Pharaoh during the 12th Dynasty of Egyptian monarchy- 1767-1759 BC.

This was thousands of years when the British monarchy and the others you cited have not begun!!.

Fact over feelings

I get you want to be pro African, but come correct

1. in your first post I quoted, you wrote "women weren't considered as human beings in Western cultured and didn't participate in anything"

Which is total balderdash, there were queens across European countries right from the 15th century.

2. In the New Testament (Luke 8 Jesus had women who were Donors of him ministry, one of them was the wife to a high ranking official of King Herod.

3. You didn't fact check me about the influence of Christianity on western culture, which is what I dared you to do.

Christianity which began after Jesus died and resurrected preached and practiced dignity to every human being, made women drawn to the followers of Christ during the first century AD.

So your argument on women not being treated as human being in Western culture which was largely influenced by Christianity is wrong.

4. Yes the female Pharaohs you listed were mostly pure Egyptian natives or mixed blood with Nubians...you are right on this.

The women Queen you listed were either wife of a King who died and had no heir or daughters of a King.

There have to be a King before they could become a Queen.

So how does it relates to checking one's serious girlfriend that could lead to marriage phone?

0neal:
Fact over feelings

I get you want to be pro African, but come correct

1. in your first post I quoted, you wrote "women weren't considered as human beings in Western cultured and didn't participate in anything"

Which is total balderdash, there were queens across European countries right from the 15th century.

2. In the New Testament (Luke 8 Jesus had women who were Donors of him ministry, one of them was the wife to a high ranking official of King Herod.

3. You didn't fact check me about the influence of Christianity on western culture, which is what I dared you to do.

Christianity which began after Jesus died and resurrected preached and practiced dignity to every human being, made women drawn to the followers of Christ during the first century AD.

So your argument on women not being treated as human being in Western culture which was largely influenced by Christianity is wrong.

4. Yes the female Pharaohs you listed were mostly pure Egyptian natives or mixed blood with Nubians...you are right on this.

The women Queen you listed were either wife of a King who died and had no heir or daughters of a King.

There have to be a King before they could become a Queen.

So how does it relates to checking one's serious girlfriend that could lead to marriage phone?

First of all, Jesus never existed, so any talk of Jesus embracing women is mythology.

Let's concentrate on history.

When I said, women weren't allowed to participate in anything in Europe, of course, I mean in ancient time. I also said their participation in society is recent.

Egypt was the climax of African culture at that point in history, whether white people wants you to call is Nubia or Ethiopia or whatever. But it was a classic African society. You need to know that.

But if you don't like that, Queen Ida ruled Benin kingdom from 1504 some years before the first Queen of England.

By the way, go ahead and let me know what women wrote in the Bible's new testament.

NB: Don't attach me any political Quora answers. I am also on Quora and those white "learned people" don't come near me cause I'll shut them down. Write from your own mind or quote a credible source

greypencils:
What part of BE FAITHFUL don't you understand? The spelling or the meaning? You think if I have boys, my message will be different? Please, what is the ABC of safe sex? A-Abstinence,
B-Be faithful,
C-Use a condom
Being faithful to your own partner is for your own benefit. All this talk of not wanting to be open is because you don't intend being faithful. All this talk is because you want your partner to be faithful to you but you don't want to be faithful to your partner. Does that make any sense to you? How many high class women will forgive infidelity? Men like you have never met or been with high class women and with this your mentality, you CAN NEVER. My dear, keep on with your mentality. When you cheat on that one woman you really love and she refuses to forgive you, don't say I didn't warn you.

Bro you got it twisted ! You said my daughter will not faithful if i"m not faithful... so i ask you to think, does it make sense.

Logically, a female daughter should use her mother as a model, i know daughters are endear to there father and some might want to marry a man like their dad ...however becos i drink beer irresponsibly should i be worried my daughter will go from brewery to brewery it doesnt match that way

So una get ABC for common sex, nawa oo we are sinners sha!
Do you know the option to be faithful undo abstinence and the option of use condom minimizes be faithful. infact, what i see is a guide if you must cheat


Bro Openness nd faithfull are not even the same, i have friends there wife know there every details but they even cheat pass david, they are so open minded they invite side chicks to family functions
Me wey dey uptight about privacy, i cant even look at another woman when babe is nearby .. outside stays outside 100%

i agree faithful and openness can strengthen a marriage but it doesnt guarantee a happy marriage, most pastor marriage are boring did you notice

Fairness is my own priority ... let Fair play rule, there is more to marriage than sex alone. madam can be faithful nd stil show you shege or you dont know imagine open shege 🤣🤣🤣

Zooposki:
This chatGPT comparison is just too stupid to even bother with. Or is that your own analogy?

interesting. Yes, this was my analogy. Perhaps, not understood? You've not acknowledged the misinterpretation of the data, though.

iamtoofan:
Bro you got it twisted ! You said my daughter will not faithful if i"m not faithful... so i ask you to think, does it make sense.

Logically, a female daughter should use her mother as a model, daughter as endear to there father and some might want to marry a man like there dad thats all ... becos i drink beer irresponsibly should i be worried my daughter will go from brewery to brewery

So una get ABC for common sex, nawa oo we are sinners !
Do you know the option to be faithful undo abstinence and the option of use condom minimizes be faithful. what i see is guide if you must cheat


Bro Openness nd faithfull are not even the same, i have friends there wife know there every details but they even cheat pass david, they are so open minded they invite side chicks to family functions
Me wey dey uptight about privacy, i cant even look at another woman when babe is nearby .. outside stays outside

i agree faithful and openness can strengthen a marriage but it doesnt guarantee a happy marriage, most pastor marriage are boring you notice

Fairness is my own priority ... let Fair play rule, there is more to marriage than sex alone. madam can be faithful nd stil show you shege or you dont know

I said your daughter's husband will not be faithful IF YOU ARE NOT. You want to reap where you didn't so? You want your daughter to be disciplined, of self worth and draw the line how to deal with men without showing her HOW to. Where is she supposed to learn it, outside?

If you cheat and your wife accepts it as normal, your daughter would either accept it as normal or would hate marriage altogether. She will never learn how to have self worth WHY? You as a father didn't SHOW her that women have worth.

musicwriter:
First of all, Jesus never existed, so any talk of Jesus embracing women is mythology.

Let's concentrate on history.

When I said, women weren't allowed to participate in anything in Europe, of course, I mean in ancient time. I also said their participation in society is recent.

Egypt was the climax of African culture at that point in history, whether white people wants you to call is Nubia or Ethiopia or whatever. But it was a classic African society. You need to know that.

But if you don't like that, Queen Ida ruled Benin kingdom from 1504 some years before the first Queen of England.

By the way, go ahead and let me know what women wrote in the Bible's new testament.

NB: Don't attach me any political Quora answers. I am also on Quora and those white "learned people" don't come near me cause I'll shut them down. Write from your own mind or quote a credible source

I had to quote your first post mainly because you tied your inaccuracies with the Bible specifically the New Testament.

The New Testament also mentioned Emperor Augustus is he a Myth?

greypencils:
I said your daughter's husband will not be faithful IF YOU ARE NOT. You want to reap where you didn't so? You want your daughter to be disciplined, of self worth and draw the line how to deal with men without showing her HOW to. Where is she supposed to learn it, outside?

Should we now say chioma father is unfaithful thats why borda david cant zip up ..... you just dey crack me up for here

i understand my daughter can use me as a model for a choice of man but to be like me when she has a mother .. please lets make sense
whats now mother figure in a daughter life then,

0neal:
I had to quote your first post mainly because you tied your inaccuracies with the Bible specifically the New Testament.

The New Testament also mentioned Emperor Augustus is he a Myth?

Do you need Jesus to prove that Augustus was a Roman emperor? Ask yourself why you always need a historical figure like emperor Augustus to prove Jesus.

Answer: Because the mythical story of Jesus was interwoven into real history.

The story of Jesus was written like someone saying that "in 1997 spider man came to Nigeria during Abacha's regime, and in broad daylight many people saw him flew from third mainland bridge to Victoria Island without an airplane."

Jesus is a fictional character intruded into a historical setting. This is why you always need historical people to prove Jesus, instead of using Jesus to prove a historical person.

You don't need Jesus to prove that Augustus was a Roman emperor.....in same way that you don't need spider man to prove that Abacha existed.

musicwriter:
Do you need Jesus to prove that Augustus was a Roman emperor? Ask yourself why you always need a historical figure like emperor Augustus to prove Jesus.

Answer: Because the mythical story of Jesus was interwoven into real history.

The story of Jesus was written like someone saying that "in 1997 spider man came to Nigeria during Abacha's regime, and in broad daylight many people saw him flew from third mainland bridge to Victoria Island without an airplane."

Jesus is a fictional character intruded into a historical setting. This is why you always need historical people to prove Jesus, instead of using Jesus to prove a historical person.

You don't need Jesus to prove that Augustus was a Roman emperor.....in same way that you don't need spider man to prove that Abacha existed.

Your argument was skewed from your first post just because you don't believe in Jesus.

So you believe women were not treated with dignity in western culture citing the New Testament, but believe women in ancient African empires were treated with dignity citing only female Monarchs, and their ascendancy to the top hierarchy as reason they were treated as human beings.

So from your argument, Wives all the four Ceasars mentioned in the New Testament and the kings with their wives.

One who even killed John the Baptist because of his Adopted daughter and proven to be accurate recorded history, were treated as lesser than human beings right??

And Pontius Pilate (also a proven historical figure) who washed his hands off the blood of Jesus because his wife had a dream that Jesus was innocent, she was regarded lesser than a human being?

Because non of them ascended the top hierarchy of the Roman, Jewish or Palestine empire?

0neal:
Your argument was skewed from your first post just because you don't believe in Jesus.

So you believe women were not treated with dignity in western culture siting the New Testament, but believe women in ancient African empires were treated with dignity siting only female Monarchs, and their ascendancy to the top hierarchy as reason they were treated as human beings.

So from your argument, Wives all the four Ceasars mentioned in the New Testament and the kings with their wives.

One who even killed John the Baptist because of his Adopted daughter and proven to be accurate recorded history, were treated as lesser than human beings right??

And Pontius Pilate (also a proven historical figure) who washed his hands off the blood of Jesus because his wife had a dream that Jesus was innocent, she was regarded lesser than a human being?

Because non of them ascended the top hierarchy of the Roman, Jewish or Palestine empire?

Tell me about European Queens in BC period. I used that as the climax of what a woman can become in any free society (where they could keep their messages private) If you can't, stop talking about European women being free.

I actually was a Christian and used to believed in Jesus when I was a fool. But that was then.

I was not arguing about John the Baptist. Historians believe he actually existed but that doesn't mean Jesus is real. As I said previously, Jesus is a mythical character intruded into a historical setting.

And again, you don't need Jesus to prove that Pontius Pilate was a historical person. You can go to the Vatican (or even Google online) for the list of Roman emperors. Their existence is not a question of religion, it's a matter of history.

Finally, you haven't told me of "free woman" participating in the writing of the new testament Bible

dipsx:
Yes in my case we don't even have energy for passwords, we both have same unlocking pattern.
All d phones we both have used had that same pattern.

wish you more years of marital bliss 🙏

I like you and your wife's understanding, will surely adopt it.

Thanks for sharing

iamtoofan:
Should we now say chioma father is unfaithful thats why borda david cant zip up ..... you just dey crack me up for here

i understand my daughter can use me as a model for a choice of man but to be like me when she has a mother .. please lets make sense
whats now mother figure in a daughter life then,

I see you are just here to dance around the topic. My message is not to convince you to change. Definitely not! It is to convince other misguided young men to value who they have as lovers. If your partner (girlfriend/fiancee/wife) has PROVEN herself to truly love and be loyal to you, the least you can do is reciprocate. Dont take that love for granted. It is going to hurt and haunt you till your dying day. Yul Edochie bleeped around and found out. He lost a wife, lost a son and lost the respect of his other children. Being faithful to your partner will do yourself good on the long run. I am not saying you should reduce yourself to a simp. Definitely not! You can be a man without sampling several pussies after marriage. Let your wedding vows mean something to you. When you cheat on your partner, you lose the love and respect of your children. You wont always be young forever you know! Age 60 - 70 is closer than you think. By then, you will be all alone with your shrivelled dick. I'm done with this issue. The rest is up to y'all.

musicwriter:
Tell me about European Queens in BC period. I used that as the climax of what a woman can become in any free society (where they could keep their messages private) If you can't, stop talking about European women being free.

I actually was a Christian and used to believed in Jesus when I was a fool. But that was then.

I was not arguing about John the Baptist. Historians believe he actually existed but that doesn't mean Jesus is real. As I said previously, Jesus is a mythical character intruded into a historical setting.

And again, you don't need Jesus to prove that Pontius Pilate was a historical person. You can go to the Vatican (or even Google online) for the list of Roman emperors. Their existence is not a question of religion, it's a matter of history.

Finally, you haven't told me of "free woman" participating in the writing of the new testament Bible

So did your beloved BC climaxed African Queens which symbolises what a woman can become in a free society used mobile phones during their reign

What about the millions of peasant, low-born women in the empire which will makeup majority of the female population.

did they all have mobile phones aswell that they could keep their messages private?

Or they were no women slaves in that era? all were high-born females and Monarchs?

You've been strawmanning

Now you have shifted goal post to "women participating in writing the New Testament"

So because no woman's name was mentioned as an author of the New Testament or a woman's life not the main character of the Books that makeups the New Testament; they were all not considered as human beings in the Bible times to when western culture/civilization became majorly shaped by Christianity around 4th century AD?

I made time for this back and forth because you tied your inaccurate opinion to the New Testament, now that I know you believe John the Baptist existed based on hictorical record that's progress...

I can deduce one of your grievances with Christainity is that no woman writings/account/letter made it to the compiled books that makesup the New Testament or a book(s) dedicated to the life of a woman like the Old Testament.

Jesus followers grew based on eye witness accounts which a woman Mary Magdalene was the first to see the resurrected Jesus, she told the disciples, before He showed Himself to His disciples, and over 500 other eye witnesses.

If it was inaccurate I don't think it would have survived this long and still spreading.

Emperor Neros persecution and other persecution would have crushed the Nazarene sect as it was called.

I have no business with any womans phone. Even if you drop it for me with the password, I still will not be interested.
Insecure little men are the one looking for the phones of their ladies.

0neal:
So did your beloved BC climaxed African Queens which symbolises what a woman can become in a free society used mobile phones during their reign

What about the millions of peasant, low-born women in the empire which will makeup majority of the female population.

did they all have mobile phones aswell that they could keep their messages private?

Or they were no women slaves in that era? all were high-born females and Monarchs?

You've been strawmanning

Now you have shifted goal post to "women participating in writing the New Testament"

So because no woman's name was mentioned as an author of the New Testament or a woman's life not the main character of the Books that makeups the New Testament; they were all not considered as human beings in the Bible times to when western culture/civilization became majorly shaped by Christianity around 4th century AD?

I made time for this back and forth because you tied your inaccurate opinion to the New Testament, now that I know you believe John the Baptist existed based on hictorical record that's progress...

I can deduce one of your grievances with Christainity is that no woman writings/account/letter made it to the compiled books that makesup the New Testament or a book(s) dedicated to the life of a woman like the Old Testament.

Jesus followers grew based on eye witness accounts which a woman Mary Magdalene was the first to see the resurrected Jesus, she told the disciples, before He showed Himself to His disciples, and over 500 other eye witnesses.

If it was inaccurate I don't think it would have survived this long and still spreading.

Emperor Neros persecution and other persecution would have crushed the Nazarene sect as it was called.

Your comments doesn't deserve a response as you couldn't tell me of European Queens in BC period or a woman that participated in writing the new testament Bible to prove your point.

tete7000:
The unfortunate thing about this is that all these boys just deprive themselves of fruitful and enduring relationship with womanfolk while they delude themselves with the idea of being alpha makes as if they are male lions

Oh, they will learn the hard way

Sapasenator:
I have no business with any womans phone. Even if you drop it for me with the password, I still will not be interested.
Insecure little men are the one looking for the phones of their ladies.

Such men look in womens draws and read their diary too. Yuk!

GloriousGbola:
i see - if some poor uneducated white trash is better than you and you accept that - thats on you.

small wonder i can see 10 year old white kids call you boy and you dropping to your knees - yes massa - and then going home to beat your wife who is carrying the household

You see how common Libya(half white) dey treat your millionaire brothers?

Another rubbish write up, to hell with your submissiveness as a Nigeria man, women submit to real men, women submit to men that love them , and are faithful, women submit to men they see have their interest at heart, only a mad woman will submit to a cheat, a liar an uncaring man, a stingy man, a selfish man, or a man that beats her . submissiveness is what you earned.

It is better to be a baby mama than to be married to an idiot that does not know what it means to be a man, but want a woman to put her complete being on him.

Submissiveness is not a problem to any woman ,we know when to submit when we see a real man.


You want to have access to a woman's phone and you do not want her to have access to yours and you call that submission ?

It is not submission it is destruction.

To hell with your narrative about men want a submissive woman. Your narrative only shows you want a weak woman, a daft woman without direction in life, that will see you as an all, so that you can subdue her and have free access to misbehave.

iLegendd:
Everyone should learn to live good and honest lives and there won't be anything to hide.

If my rich, young and stunning Asian ex allows me access to her phone, emails and account details, etc. yet I never stole her money or even thought of it (cuz a woman's money is NOTHING to me) na one Nigerian mgbeke with cheap bleaching cream go deny me access all because she wants to protect her promiscuity.

I'm outta here. Lemme go check my crypto long trade that I started when BTC was 59k and I think it's 63k now. Make I go take profit exercise, shower, watch Tiktok and sleep off.

Equality will never work in Nigeria. For the ladies, we love you all, but we'll never tolerate second class behaviour. There are SIMPs who are ready for that, not us.

Lol. Ngbeke

Ishilove:
Just wasted several minutes of my life reading crap. I have always known this OP always posts rubbish, so I blame myself for not exiting the thread when I saw his username on the first post.

Darn it, I need less social media in my life because of these kinds of silly articles🤦🏿‍♂️🤦🏿‍♂️

Be honest. The article touch where e no supposed touch for your body.

iLegendd:
All my girls have access to my phone and ATM pins. I can hide something in a phone and no living thing will see it.

My phone is like a computer. Different operating systems: Window, iOS, Ubuntu, Linux, etc. You won't even see option to switch. If you do see, you're just way to good in IT. Even after that, how do you gain access with multiple authentications?

This is just to protect my crypto accounts from everything incase I'm travelling with my phone and I get into trouble with men in uniform. I'm not hiding a crime, just protecting my money from uniform criminals.

Linus is that you?

Livelystone01:
Lol, story of my life bro. My wallets are hidden far from anything.
The wallet I use as my first page on trust is also one with just $500, the main ones with real USDT are not exposed. My security code is my finger print.

My exchanges are also hidden too.

A y other app you need that's not money related is open for the the public.

My reason is the police or wicked people.

How do you hide these apps please. Which app do you recommend for hiding them.




iLegendd

lovediehatelive:
How do you hide these apps please. Which app do you recommend for hiding them.




iLegendd

I use redmi product.
You can naturally hide apps on redmi phones.

Livelystone01:
I use redmi product.
You can naturally hide apps on redmi phones.

I know of hiding media files on Redmi, but not apps.

lovediehatelive:
I know of hiding media files on Redmi, but not apps.

One of the apps on the phone or settings can help you hide your apps.

Livelystone01:
One of the apps on the phone or settings can help you hide your apps.

Thanks.

I'll look it up