₦airaland Forum

jaephoenix:
Point out one logical fallacy. Lol. Or did you learn about fallacies today.
You can always pchat Jessica. We are not her PA

😂😂😂😂😂
Hit a vein🤣

jaephoenix:
Whats the house here?

Do you not know the earth is our House?

jaephoenix:
1.Dele Giwa has a wife and we can trace his kids. His kids are alive. We know his school and can check his name in their school registry.
Can the same be said about the deity of Jesus? No!
2. None of those disciples of Jesus knew him. And their words about him was written years after he supposedly lived. They never met him
Youre just another bumbling christian that doesn't know your left from your right

Why do you use we?
Oh, 😂You and sonmya.
What a legendary duo!

You will not only find dele giwa you will also trace the Caesar's and the so called "Alexander the great".

You can see the shortcomings of your logic!
Perhaps you can trace Genghis Khan.

It's simpler when the person is perhaps in the same generation as you but when it starts becoming centuries you see the difficult ledge you have put on your heads!

You have exemplified the method that you will use by going to house(dele's house👀) speaking to his children and his wife.

I implore you to use this self same method for Caesar, Cleopatra, Genghis Khan and Jesus amidst others.

kingxsamz:
I can see your madness hasn't been curéd. Chai.

Says the madman who thought a Unicorn a god!

jaephoenix:
1. Mr. Liar, both of us have already referred the readers to the thread to check for the truth if they can
2. First things first, are the screenshots true or lies, and you know I can't post all the posts o made there, since they were many, and we are limited to only 4 pics. Remember you lied that atheists avoided the thread.
3. Judas1X showed us a screenshot where he discovered your posts especially the ones you were replying hopefulLandlord are AI generated. His post is the first screenshot I sent. This is the link for anyone who cares to check
https://www.nairaland.com/8193100/completely-destroys-atheism-renders-atheists/8#131678562

4. The next screenshot is where he(Judas1X) was roasting u

5. Next screenshot was hopefulLandlord's reply when he read Judas1X's post that u used AI

6. Then hopefulLandlord found out your OP was still AI generated.
This is the link to his comment
thttps://www.nairaland.com/8193100/completely-destroys-atheism-renders-atheists/8#131679531
And the last screenshot showed it

As ya'll can see, this man is a born liar.
About Jessica, she told you clear that she doesn't want a Nairaland debate which would be muddled by other commenters but a one on one. And I see reason with her. A one on one would allow each of you to lay your points out without interruptions. And we would be viewers only. But you got scared and dodged it

You would have done well to add my response if you were truthful. But you in your mischief brought the accusations of the accusers without the response of the accused to justify the accusers. How does an accusation prove anything if the response to the accusation is not included in the presentation.

I mentioned on the thread that I had first debated AI and that I defeated the AI in the debate before bringing it to the forum. The thoughts presented on that thread are purely mine but if you don't believe, then you can prove AI wrong. Did any of you succeeded in proving the thoughts wrong whether they were written by me or AI? No! So, bringing a false narrative here won't work on intelligent readers.

At least I have successfully debunked your lies about me running away from the thread. Every thinking reader knows that you lied in one, hence you could have lied also in all. Let the readers judge who is lying by the evidences on the actual thread. I will not argue with you!

Gabrielshow24:
Coming from you am not surprised 🤭.
Give any layman my posts and he will be able to deduce from there the dictionary meaning of axiom and how it relates to the mathematical field!

I guess as usual you are just some graduate of the art sciences 🤧

Again lay out your arguments logically, if you care to take on me
Your deflection tactics are subpar. Axioms don't only relate to math but all walks of life, tho I heard of axioms in my sec school math in JS 2
Btw, I'm a physician, not a graduate of arts. 18 years of practice so stuff it

Gabrielshow24:
😂😂😂😂😂
Hit a vein🤣

Its nerve not vein. You can't even get your grammar right and you wanna take on me.
Back to the topic, well I guess there was no fallacies committed by me then. Next time get your accusations right

Dtruthspeaker:
Do you not know the earth is our House?

So who created that creator?

Gabrielshow24:
Why do you use we?
Oh, 😂You and sonmya.
What a legendary duo!

You will not only find dele giwa you will also trace the Caesar's and the so called "Alexander the great".

You can see the shortcomings of your logic!
Perhaps you can trace Genghis Khan.

It's simpler when the person is perhaps in the same generation as you but when it starts becoming centuries you see the difficult ledge you have put on your heads!

You have exemplified the method that you will use by going to house(dele's house👀) speaking to his children and his wife.

I implore you to use this self same method for Caesar, Cleopatra, Genghis Khan and Jesus amidst others.

Cleopatra and Genghis Khan were written about copiously not only by many historians but we can find their remnants, specific writings etc
What do we have about Jesus?

Dtruthspeaker:
Says the madman who thought a Unicorn a god!

Some people worship unicorns, you bumbling fool

jaephoenix:
Cleopatra and Genghis Khan were written about copiously not only by many historians but we can find their remnants, specific writings etc
What do we have about Jesus?

🤦Shroud.
Now you rely on copious writing👀 to validate something.

That's weird 🤣🤣

FxMasterz:
You would have done well to add my response if you were truthful. But you in your mischief brought the accusations of the accusers without the response of the accused to justify the accusers. How does an accusation prove anything if the response to the accusation is not included in the presentation.

I mentioned on the thread that I had first debated AI and that I defeated the AI in the debate before bringing it to the forum. The thoughts presented on that thread are purely mine but if you don't believe, then you can prove AI wrong. Did any of you succeeded in proving the thoughts wrong whether they were written by me or AI? No! So, bringing a false narrative here won't work on intelligent readers.

At least I have successfully debunked your lies about me running away from the thread. Every thinking reader knows that you lied in one, hence you could have lied also in all. Let the readers judge who is lying by the evidences on the actual thread. I will not argue with you!

… and you also shot yourself in the foot by proving many atheists debated you on that thread, that we didn’t avoid it.
Btw, how can you debate with an AI when AIs aren't programmed to do religious, political arguments? They would simply back off. We pointed out that lie to you that AI devs and programmers dont input any religious stuff into AI to avoid annoying people. That's why we didn't believe that lie

jaephoenix:
Its nerve not vein. You can't even get your grammar right and you wanna take on me.
Back to the topic, well I guess there was no fallacies committed by me then. Next time get your accusations right

😂😂😂 That thread is littered with your hypocrisy.

Take you lovely for correcting me there, at least that's the only thing you have gotten right😊

Gabrielshow24:
🤦Shroud.
Now you rely on copious writing👀 to validate something.

That's weird 🤣🤣

What else do we rely on? Video or audio evidence?
Like I said, provide proof of Jesus's deity written by historians.
In case your brain cannot comprehend my post, I mean evidence of his miracles, resurrection etc written by scholars, apart from the bible(which has been proven to be filled with lies, contradictions etc)

Gabrielshow24:
😂😂😂 That thread is littered with your hypocrisy.

Take you lovely for correcting me there, at least that's the only thing you have gotten right😊

Again, for the umpteenth time, point out one hypocrisy or fallacy.
You see all the chances I give you to prove me wrong and all you do is tip and tap dance around the topic

jaephoenix:
Again lay out your arguments logically, if you care to take on me
Your deflection tactics are subpar. Axioms don't only relate to math but all walks of life, tho I heard of axioms in my sec school math in JS 2
Btw, I'm a physician, not a graduate of arts. 18 years of practice so stuff it

"You heard of" 😂😂😂.

And you get to judge me on " axioms"🙄

You really are a phoenix 🤧; one day you will surely be reborn but just not today!

Gabrielshow24:
"You heard of" 😂😂😂.

And you get to judge me on " axioms"🙄

You really are a phoenix 🤧; one day you will surely be reborn but just not today!

Still waiting on your evidence of my fallacies, hypocrisy etc. And also evidence of your Jesus deity
Thank you

jaephoenix:
Again, for the umpteenth time, point out one hypocrisy or fallacy.
You see all the chances I give you to prove me wrong and all you do is tip and tap dance around the topic

He really needs me to point it out🤦.

jaephoenix:
What else do we rely on? Video or audio evidence?
Like I said, provide proof of Jesus's deity written by historians.
In case your brain cannot comprehend my post, I mean evidence of his miracles, resurrection etc written by scholars, apart from the bible(which has been proven to be filled with lies, contradictions etc)

Technically scholars wrote the bible.
Ingenious scribes😁

Seemingly catching cruise at the expense of these atheists that don't know their stuff.

Gabrielshow24:
He really needs me to point it out🤦.

Ok then. Since you're this empty and dumb, I guess you are as daft as all these theists I have debated. Just a waste of time. Have a nice day then, sire

Gabrielshow24:
Technically scholars wrote the bible.
Ingenious scribes😁

Seemingly catching cruise at the expense of these atheists that don't know their stuff.

Nope, dvmmy.
The bible was collated by religious folks like bishops etc at the behest of Emperor Constantine, who was amongst the first people to make christianity as an organized religion. And it was collated from many books. The actual writers of those books are anonymous, some of the books are Epic of Gilgamesh, Code of Hammurabi etc.
And I thought u knew a few stuff

jaephoenix:
… and you also shot yourself in the foot by proving many atheists debated you on that thread, that we didn’t avoid it.
Btw, how can you debate with an AI when AIs aren't programmed to do religious, political arguments? They would simply back off. We pointed out that lie to you that AI devs and programmers dont input any religious stuff into AI to avoid annoying people. That's why we didn't believe that lie

I said most of the prominent atheists on this forum avoided the thread. Then, I mentioned that some made attempts without mentioning their names. How did I shoot myself in the foot?

I didn't debate AI on religious stuff. I only told AI to prove the theory of evolution to me against creation, then, I debated it. It presented very intelligent arguments which i countered until it succumbed. It was more of an academic argument than religious. We didn't mention any God or made reference to any deity. After AI failed, I decided to bring the debates to humans. That's what I did.

jaephoenix:
Nope, dvmmy.
The bible was collated by religious folks like bishops etc at the behest of Emperor Constantine, who was amongst the first people to make christianity as an organized religion. And it was collated from many books. The actual writers of those books are anonymous, some of the books are Epic of Gilgamesh, Code of Hammurabi etc.
And I thought u knew a few stuff

Oh they also copied the level system of Hammurabi🤧

Likewise they copied the accidental creation of humans from the epic of Gilgamesh🤦

Am currently in transit and will attend to all your statements soon

Now am home let me reprove this erring child of God!

You claim they copied epic of Gilgamesh.

Give me concepts other than Noah's flood and supposed gods falling. That are present in both the bible and epic of Gilgamesh!

Now do you even know what that code of Hammurabi entails.
Have you even read it?
Does it sound similar to the general theme of the biblical laws given in Exodus?

🤕Once again you just quote things you have no idea of.

Dtruthspeaker:
Says the madman who thought a Unicorn a god!

You call yours "god", I call mine unicorn. We're all allowed to make use of our imagination.
Someone offered to help you in your mental state. You better accept.

FxMasterz:
I said most of the prominent atheists on this forum avoided the thread. Then, I mentioned that some made attempts without mentioning their names. How did I shoot myself in the foot?

I didn't debate AI on religious stuff. I only told AI to prove the theory of evolution to me against creation, then, I debated it. It presented very intelligent arguments which i countered until it succumbed. It was more of an academic argument than religious. We didn't mention any God or made reference to any deity. After AI failed, I decided to bring the debates to humans. That's what I did.

Oh, I remember now. You're the niggah who debated chatgpt and forced it to acknowledge your argument as superior. You screenshotted the convo and then brought it here to rejoice and celebrate. 😂
Very pathetic stuff.

kingxsamz:
Oh, I remember now. You're the niggah who debated chatgpt and forced it to acknowledge your argument as superior. You screenshotted the convo and then brought it here to rejoice and celebrate. 😂
Very pathetic stuff.

Oh oh oh, this your assertion is arrant nonesense. When I brought it here, did I force you too to acknowledge my argument as superior? Can you post the screenshot to prove the forceful acknowledgement?

Were you not the one who was denying that the topic had nothing to do with atheism? What's this forceful acknowledgement now all about?

kingxsamz:
You call yours "god", I call mine unicorn. We're all allowed to make use of our imagination.
Someone offered to help you in your mental state. You better accept.

Does it matter? that's the Lord of your soul be happy with it! 🙃

A lot of people are glad being subjects of the devil.

It's just a matter of perspective 😊
Enjoy brother,
May the Unicorn bless and favor you! 😁

FxMasterz:
I said most of the prominent atheists on this forum avoided the thread. Then, I mentioned that some made attempts without mentioning their names. How did I shoot myself in the foot?

I didn't debate AI on religious stuff. I only told AI to prove the theory of evolution to me against creation, then, I debated it. It presented very intelligent arguments which i countered until it succumbed. It was more of an academic argument than religious. We didn't mention any God or made reference to any deity. After AI failed, I decided to bring the debates to humans. That's what I did.

1.Lol. What are the properties of prominent atheists? I have been an atheist on NL for 10 years, hopefulLandlord has been here older than me, and we both contributed. So what are you on about?
2. So talking about creationism isnt a religious topic? What is the definition of creationism? Lol. Youre dvmber than I thought

Gabrielshow24:
Oh they also copied the level system of Hammurabi🤧

Likewise they copied the accidental creation of humans from the epic of Gilgamesh🤦

Am currently in transit and will attend to all your statements soon

Now am home let me reprove this erring child of God!

You claim they copied epic of Gilgamesh.

Give me concepts other than Noah's flood and supposed gods falling. That are present in both the bible and epic of Gilgamesh!

Now do you even know what that code of Hammurabi entails.
Have you even read it?
Does it sound similar to the general theme of the biblical laws given in Exodus?

🤕Once again you just quote things you have no idea of.

1. So if I say someone or a book copied another book, it has to copy the whole damn book before you agree about the copying?
I clearly told you the bible copied many books which predated it, including those 2 books I mentioned and the dead sea scrolls. The flood story was the stand-out example. And the Epic was written thousands of years before the bible was written.

jaephoenix:
1.Lol. What are the properties of prominent atheists? I have been an atheist on NL for 10 years, hopefulLandlord has been here older than me, and we both contributed. So what are you on about?
2. So talking about creationism isnt a religious topic? What is the definition of creationism? Lol. Youre dvmber than I thought

Ah, the wise Jae Phoenix, as if life hasn’t already thrown enough curveballs his way—because who wouldn’t want to add a touch of mythical rebirth to their jaded existence? 🦅✨

jaephoenix:
1. So if I say someone or a book copied another book, it has to copy the whole damn book before you agree about the copying?
I clearly told you the bible copied many books which predated it, including those 2 books I mentioned and the dead sea scrolls. The flood story was the stand-out example. And the Epic was written thousands of years before the bible was written.

It doesn't mean the flood was copied.
Even in science two mathematicians independently invented calculus.

It points to show rather that they have a common origin and the story then was a norm among the people!

Contrary to your pathetic indications of plagiarism!

Mention another is it only Noah's flood you can think of👀

Think boy, think!

jaephoenix:
1.Lol. What are the properties of prominent atheists? I have been an atheist on NL for 10 years, hopefulLandlord has been here older than me, and we both contributed. So what are you on about?
2. So talking about creationism isnt a religious topic? What is the definition of creationism? Lol. Youre dvmber than I thought

1. I said "Most of the prominent atheists." Did I say all of them? Out of all the prominent atheists that rush into debates on this forum, only you and hopefullandlord appeared. I didn't even know Jessicarabbit until that day when she mentioned me on that thread. So, I don't see her as a Nairaland prominent atheist. So, am I not right? Only two atheists among all the known prominent atheists on this forum responded. I didn't know kingxamz too until that day.

2. Is creationism exclusively a religious topic? You mean even when it is debated in academia, they're discussing religion? You still added your regular insults in your folly. Well, if the screenshot below doesn't school you, I wonder what will.