₦airaland Forum

gohf:
🤣 blasphemy to who?
Insubordination to who?

Maybe yet you claim according to, guy do you know or you don't know? Your assumptions are not helping you in anyway

So why was he executed?

gohf:
please close your mouth before the flies and Beelzebub have another feast from it

I called you a dummy because you don't know how to read and comprehend.

I will pass.

gohf:
so Jacob died without an offspring?

See what I mean.

The entire Jewish nation is referred to as Israel/Jacob. God sees them as a single entity. Like how Nigeria is one...
Got it now?

sonmvayina:
https://judaism.stackexchange.com/questions/26938/are-the-jews-today-still-waiting-for-the-messiah-to-come

🤣🤣🤣🤣so you cannot find where the bible confirms the statement below that you gave me:

When his number is up ...he would die and his son will take over. By then Israel will be a monarchy....

Sometimes I just wonder how you think.

sonmvayina:
Bye bye...you are a dummy

Abeg who is not a dummy in your eyes?

MaxInDHouse:
Abeg who is not a dummy in your eyes?

Did you not see his low IQ comprehension of my post...
I don't even know how to respond. He wound just be saying things that are not even in my post. So frustrating...

sonmvayina:
Did you not see his low IQ comprehension of my post...
I don't even know how to respond. He wound just be saying things that are not even in my post. So frustrating...

One thing i have observed in all your posts is you never agree that people are free to choose what they will believe anytime someone disagree with you it's the same thing: such a person is a dummy!

Truthseeker10:
🤣🤣🤣🤣so you cannot find where the bible confirms the statement below that you gave me:

When his number is up ...he would die and his son will take over. By then Israel will be a monarchy....

Sometimes I just wonder how you think.

You are also a dummy too..

Amen I a Jew?
It their tradition. It does not concern me one but. They created the idea of a Messiah. So I think them and only them has the power to define it's meaning. It is part of their tradition.
Even if it is not captured in their scriptures...

MaxInDHouse:
One thing i have observed in all your posts is you never agree that people are free to choose what they will believe anytime someone disagree with you it's the same thing: such a person is a dummy!

At least he should understand what I am saying, if he wants to point out what he is not comfortable with, he is free to do so. Not ask a question on what is not even captured in my post..

sonmvayina:
You are also a dummy too..

What i just said!

MaxInDHouse:
What i just said!

He is asking me a question on Jewish tradition? How am I going to know when I am not one of them. We only have what they wrote compiled in the Tanakh.

sonmvayina:
At least he should understand what I am saying, if he wants to point out what he is not comfortable with, he is free to do so. Not ask a question on what is not even captured in my post..

Each person is unique in his or her own way so the way you feel a conversation should go may not be the same way another person feels but one thing is sure: everyone has what captures their hearts and when they choose to deviate just because they have been outsmarted it's also a welcome development a wise person will leave each person to carry his or her own burden.
The weight of self deceit is enough punishment for a liar!

sonmvayina:
You are also a dummy too..

Amen I a Jew?
It their tradition. It does not concern me one but. They created the idea of a Messiah. So I think them and only them has the power to define it's meaning. It is part of their tradition.
Even if it is not captured in their scriptures...

So is it Jewish tradition that you are following or their scriptures?

sonmvayina:
At least he should understand what I am saying, if he wants to point out what he is not comfortable with, he is free to do so. Not ask a question on what is not even captured in my post..

I understood what you wrote and I pointed it out clearly where you missed the Tanakh but you can keep deceiving yourself

gohf:
I understood what you wrote and I pointed it out clearly where you missed the Tanakh but you can keep deceiving yourself

What was my point?

gohf:
I watched the video and as much as I understood her reasoning for suggesting some parts of the old testament do not belong there, I believe there's a purpose they were written and it may not be solely because men manipulated it.

I could use her logic and suggest Genesis 2 doesn't belong as there's already Genesis 1 or that Genesis 1 doesn't belong as it feels disconnected from Genesis 2-3.

Now for Absalom's account of sleeping with his father's concubine it was recorded in second Samuel where she suggests that it would take time to sleep with David's concubines and then mention there were 10 of them but the scripture suggests David left a few of which she says that's not David's nature to leave anyone behind. Now that's an assumption on her part. She says it will take time to sleep with all 10 because the next chapter of 2 Samuel 16, in 17 Ahitophel urges Absalom to move quickly.

I believe the act of sleeping openly with his concubines isn't a days thing but in hours, a man could easily go rounds on one woman in one night speak less of when it's not the same woman.

2Sam.16.21 - Ahithophel told him, "Go and sleep with your father's concubines, for he has left them here to keep the house. Then all Israel will know that you have insulted him beyond hope of reconciliation, and they will give you their support."
2Sam.16.22 - So they set up a tent on the palace roof where everyone could see it, and Absalom went into the tent to sleep with his father's concubines.

Saying it's against the law, well Absalom trying to kill David is already against the law.

Then about Abraham's test and sacrifice. The whole purpose of that test was revelation. Now first she says God doesn't need to test Abraham's faith. Did God need to test Job, or teach Jesus obedience by the things he suffered?

I think she forgets that a man sacrificed his daughter to God. And though the sacrifice was to offer her to God, I don't believe she was killed. Every offering to God, could be redeemed that was the law of Moses. At the point God proclaimed Isaac whom He gave Abraham to die, God redeemed the boy's life with that of a Lamb which Abraham did not bring.

It isn't just about what is written but about what we understand and it was their understanding and teaching of these texts that was leaven and corrupted.

Are you referring to Jephthah and his daughter? Because if you read the account, obviously she's still alive for years and years afterward. Seems your understanding of the scriptures is not what you make it out to be, lovey.🙂

epfa:
Are you referring to Jephthah and his daughter? Because if you read the account, obviously she's still alive for years and years afterward. Seems your understanding of the scriptures is not what you make it out to be, lovey.🙂

what are you talking about? You are quoting the wrong post or person. Did I write anything about Jephthah?