Senate Replies IPU: Natasha Was Suspended For Gross Misconduct, Not Allegation - Politics (5) - Nairaland
Nairaland Forum › Nairaland General › Politics › Senate Replies IPU: Natasha Was Suspended For Gross Misconduct, Not Allegation (17690 Views)
| Re: Senate Replies IPU: Natasha Was Suspended For Gross Misconduct, Not Allegation by kabillion(m): 8:40am On Mar 13, 2025 |
thesolutions:Explain |
| Re: Senate Replies IPU: Natasha Was Suspended For Gross Misconduct, Not Allegation by BadBradley: 8:41am On Mar 13, 2025 |
kingbee90:let her produce the evidence. How many people want to Bleep her self? |
| Re: Senate Replies IPU: Natasha Was Suspended For Gross Misconduct, Not Allegation by BadBradley: 8:42am On Mar 13, 2025 |
deji17:the serial blackmailer and demonic rabble-rouser wants to use her womanhood to promote and advance her political career through blackmail and victim-hood |
| Re: Senate Replies IPU: Natasha Was Suspended For Gross Misconduct, Not Allegation by nkpommpko(m): 8:46am On Mar 13, 2025 |
DMCY:no talk am now, so make you no talk say na wetin you talk. |
| Re: Senate Replies IPU: Natasha Was Suspended For Gross Misconduct, Not Allegation by Cmanforall: 8:48am On Mar 13, 2025 |
deji17:How does one start investigating such allegation that happened years ago? |
| Re: Senate Replies IPU: Natasha Was Suspended For Gross Misconduct, Not Allegation by Jd10k(m): 8:49am On Mar 13, 2025 |
zombieHUNTER:So you are not So wise to know that the allegations of sexual harassment is an Afterthought. |
| Re: Senate Replies IPU: Natasha Was Suspended For Gross Misconduct, Not Allegation by Ushman333: 8:55am On Mar 13, 2025 |
Natasha keeps embarrassing herself and showing her true nature, no integrity at all, just vindictive and egotistic...she did not even mention her gross violation of senate rules and ignoring the senate President when he told her to go to her designated sitting position, she caused rancour and acrimony in the house and refused to listen to deliberations, even sat down when others were on their feet to signal the commencement of deliberations. Natasha you are paid to VT respectful and contribute to the benefit of your constituents not trying to become a star over this embarrassing situation. It shows the character and sinister aims of her supporters, they don't respect our senate and nation, people who hate the nation they live and benefit from. |
| Re: Senate Replies IPU: Natasha Was Suspended For Gross Misconduct, Not Allegation by adekolaelect(m): 9:00am On Mar 13, 2025 |
Asonaijaaso:Your writeup sound well but like that of poeple in support of Kanu. Do you expect presidency /Executives or inspector general of police to intervene in the internal affairs of the Senate ? Natasha was alleged of violation of senate rules and ready to be dealt with before her allegation of sexual harassment. The Senate had done theirs for violating of rules ( suspend her) then she had approached the court of law for the sexual harassment . It is now left to her to pursue her case with evidences against the Senate President in the court of law. Senate is not where you can insult and behave anyhow or to bring out allegation against the president without reasonable evidences and expect the Senate to remove their leaders without proper investigation.( If I can suggest your mind " You like if the senate President can be Stepdown or remove for based on that mater"? But have you seen Natasha reasonable evidences to back her claims since all these days ? Even in the Court of law ,Evidences will determine the geudgement.thank you. |
| Re: Senate Replies IPU: Natasha Was Suspended For Gross Misconduct, Not Allegation by udemzyudex(m): 9:10am On Mar 13, 2025 |
Lol.. Senators wey no get regard for rule of law. Even your own house law says it's 14 days even though it is illegal. |
| Re: Senate Replies IPU: Natasha Was Suspended For Gross Misconduct, Not Allegation by Basicend: 9:11am On Mar 13, 2025*. Modified: 11:02am On Mar 13, 2025 |
OnionBandit:Thank God, the above quoted is a woman's view. Because, some would say our opinion as men on this matter is one-sided. That nathasha's husband must be a very gentle and absolving man. BCoz the lady is truly stubborn, aggressive and manipulative. I learnt she even sued her current husband and threatened his life before the guy married her by force. |
| Re: Senate Replies IPU: Natasha Was Suspended For Gross Misconduct, Not Allegation by Hyperchi(m): 9:20am On Mar 13, 2025 |
Honestey:Imagine Ur self with no brain, can the police even carry out such case without the president go ahead, can they investigate such with pure hands. Trump was charged to court for such harassment, but the woman involved was older than him and a porn actress. Why not look into the case. |
| Re: Senate Replies IPU: Natasha Was Suspended For Gross Misconduct, Not Allegation by Exceed15: 9:21am On Mar 13, 2025 |
kingthreat:Donald Trump humbled her. |
| Re: Senate Replies IPU: Natasha Was Suspended For Gross Misconduct, Not Allegation by jattopeter(m): 9:26am On Mar 13, 2025 |
Am glad we still have people like you that take time to understand what's going. Am sorry to say , what the lady is trying to do is Pure manipulation , trying to shift focus from what lead to her suspension. What a pity that a Sen of Fed. Republic of Nigeria can be acting in this manner. Funny enough , she was given opportunity to apologize, can a single person more than 108 people. Was she the only one that her sit was changed that day, why all these? Pathokpo: |
| Re: Senate Replies IPU: Natasha Was Suspended For Gross Misconduct, Not Allegation by thesolutions(m): 9:39am On Mar 13, 2025 |
badoh:Alleged. I am not the judge. I did not assume he did. She alleged he did. |
| Re: Senate Replies IPU: Natasha Was Suspended For Gross Misconduct, Not Allegation by thesolutions(m): 9:43am On Mar 13, 2025*. Modified: 10:02am On Mar 13, 2025 |
yommen:She is an agent. an NPC AI. she can't act unless triggered. They walk with eyes closed. They see nothing, they hear nothing as long as they have what they want. You deny her that, you trigger something you don't know was there all along. That she has made such allegations in the past that turned out to be false doesn't give anyone right to conclude on her case before it is even started. Let the appropriate body do the right thing. But unfortunately, the body that was supposed to hear her petition was the same that recommended her suspension without any hearing. So no justice expected. |
| Re: Senate Replies IPU: Natasha Was Suspended For Gross Misconduct, Not Allegation by thesolutions(m): 9:57am On Mar 13, 2025 |
kabillion:While we are keeping her claim to be alleged, it is possible that there has been tension between the two that the public are not aware of. For her to claim that the seating rearrangement that affected her seating position was an attempt to silence her must have originated from possible disagreement outside the house. If she believes her repositioning was a deliberate vendetta against her. She has the right to be heard. Again, the speedy suspension resolution makes it more obvious. Now,she can't be heard. Mission accomplished. But this is just a theory. The national Assembly has only focused on her actions and conduct about her seating position. They did not hear her petition and has not invited her to explain her actions. If she has made mistakes on due process, she was to be corrected and she make amends and follow due process to pass her petition. The power play is huge. She is outnumbered. |
| Re: Senate Replies IPU: Natasha Was Suspended For Gross Misconduct, Not Allegation by KORLAR(m): 10:08am On Mar 13, 2025 |
kingbee90:You people amaze me. What will IPU do in Nigeria? It is common sense for the senate to respond to such body of parliamentarians, it is not dear but expected protocol. Senators have been going to Arise TV and even brekete fm, does that mean they’re scared of them? Make we try dey use gumption sometimes. |
| Re: Senate Replies IPU: Natasha Was Suspended For Gross Misconduct, Not Allegation by luminouz(m): 10:27am On Mar 13, 2025*. Modified: 2:12pm On Mar 13, 2025 |
Asonaijaaso:Will you go and cover your face in shame? She did the same to Reno and had to settle out of court and paid Reno for defaming him. You still think that kind of woman is innocent? Why y'all don't use your brains baffle me? Zombie!! |
| Re: Senate Replies IPU: Natasha Was Suspended For Gross Misconduct, Not Allegation by OnionBandit(f): 10:31am On Mar 13, 2025 |
cjfavour:You are obviously an obi supporter. Most of you lack objectivity and are disgusting hypocrites. You would support anything that tarnishes the image of Akpabio and the senate because it's an APC government. Ask yourself, would you have supported Natasha if Obi was the senate president or if LP was in power? |
| Re: Senate Replies IPU: Natasha Was Suspended For Gross Misconduct, Not Allegation by Asonaijaaso: 10:33am On Mar 13, 2025 |
adekolaelect:Strong write-up, and I must emphasize—Donald Trump was impeached during his first term as a sitting U.S. President, actively investigated over alleged quid pro quo involving Ukraine and Russia. The global community watched it unfold in real time, because even the most powerful office isn’t above scrutiny. That’s why Nigeria must not pretend this is business as usual. No matter what Senator Natasha may have done, a sexual harassment accusation made by one senator against another is not minor. It warrants a full, formal, and transparent investigation. If Natasha fails to present credible evidence, I fully support an extension of her suspension to 12 months. But sweeping this under the carpet is not an option. Doing so only reinforces the image that our Senate operates more like a lawless jungle than a democratic institution. The world is watching — and this silence is loud. |
| Re: Senate Replies IPU: Natasha Was Suspended For Gross Misconduct, Not Allegation by kabillion(m): 10:34am On Mar 13, 2025 |
thesolutions:As per the sitting arrangement, she wasn't the only one affected and it was a routine activity in the house. I hoped you watched her vituperation on the said day. Have you also consider the angle that she could be the one making advances at the SP? Perhaps, the SP didn't want to have anything amorous with her hence she felt rejected and decided to whip up sentiments against the sp to force his pants down. Natasha, because of her supposed beauty must have expected she would get preferential treatment which the SP might not be ready to accord her. The thing tie wrapper my brother. If I am in my right sense, I shouldn't be bothering myself about them because whatever they do there never affected me positively. |
| Re: Senate Replies IPU: Natasha Was Suspended For Gross Misconduct, Not Allegation by luminouz(m): 10:34am On Mar 13, 2025 |
Eagleways:You don't have sense. Do you even know what you are saying at all? The guy you quoted is right. Your brain is full of relaxers!!! |
| Re: Senate Replies IPU: Natasha Was Suspended For Gross Misconduct, Not Allegation by loganx: 11:13am On Mar 13, 2025 |
bdon12:Investigate with what? she has nothing to show, no text, no calls, no email, no 3rd party who heard the request for "come let's hang-out". what are you investigating with? Since when does asking someone to "come let's hang-out" or "come and let's have a good time" become sexual assualt? If that was sexual assualt, it means every man or woman who had asked an opposite sex out had sexually assualted that person. Akpabio asked and she claimed to have declined, without any threat nor favours been made two years ago, and suddenly, after two years, you are screaming sexual assualt due to an unruling behaviour that is been addressed. Has anyone seen the video where she was seductively responding to her been cautioned at the senate? Do you guys understand what it will mean when a woman or man can just wake up and scream that he or she was sexually assualted or harassed without an iota of evidence or prove and the next thing is to call for the acussed to step down or resign? Enemies and opposition will latch on this and create chaos by setting foes and friends alike up with sexual assualt. At the very minimum, provide evidence that could be investigated, text, emails, recordings from calls or a 3rd party willing to testify as a witness. For anything, I do not like that fellow called Akpabio, he is uncut, uncivilised and very crued as a man, but do you want to set precendent that would create an unsafe enviroment for everyone, where anyone can wake up and shout, he or she harassed me by asking me out? or asking to come for a good time without any evidence to back up that claim? |
| Re: Senate Replies IPU: Natasha Was Suspended For Gross Misconduct, Not Allegation by Charleys: 11:25am On Mar 13, 2025 |
iampeterben:Tell me you don't know what separation of power is. |
| Re: Senate Replies IPU: Natasha Was Suspended For Gross Misconduct, Not Allegation by thesolutions(m): 12:01pm On Mar 13, 2025 |
kabillion:You spoke conclusively like someone that has all the evidence. It is believed as claimed by other female senators that Natasha enjoys preferential treatment from Akpabio already. I don't see why she would be whipping sentiment to enjoy what she was already enjoying. My words or yours can only keep us idling away and won't make any impact in the games they are playing. If you defend Akpabio without him answering some trivial questions, it makes you either a paid agent or a person of interest. Unbiased is rare when interest is in it. |
| Re: Senate Replies IPU: Natasha Was Suspended For Gross Misconduct, Not Allegation by zombieHUNTER: 12:21pm On Mar 13, 2025 |
theophorus:Hahaha olodo this is what you said when you brought Buhari |
| Re: Senate Replies IPU: Natasha Was Suspended For Gross Misconduct, Not Allegation by Omoawoke(m): 12:32pm On Mar 13, 2025 |
thesolutions:That she has made a false accusation in the past is a solid reason to doubt her What’s wrong with you people! Maybe you will learn when someone put false allegations on your head someday Imagine if Reno had no evidence to back it up, do you know what sexual allegations is?? So until they start calling him a sex offender for the rest of his life?? What she did to Reno is enough for her image to be tarnished forever because she almost succeeded in ruining an innocent man’s life |
| Re: Senate Replies IPU: Natasha Was Suspended For Gross Misconduct, Not Allegation by Omoawoke(m): 12:36pm On Mar 13, 2025 |
cjfavour:So they should damage the life of another man because a woman made false allegations Akpabia is someone’s husband and father of daughters… he is someone’s son as well.. so the women in his life don’t matter? The daughter’s lives should be ruined and become a mockery when people call their father a sex offender? The wife should become a mockery when people call her husband a sex offender? And this is the same useless Satan Natasha that accused Reno in broad daylight of sexual assaults Na only you sabi use women victimization ba? Go and buy sense |
| Re: Senate Replies IPU: Natasha Was Suspended For Gross Misconduct, Not Allegation by chukseric504869: 12:45pm On Mar 13, 2025 |
Do you know what is sexual harassment, sef,do you know ingredient that make up sexual harassment,do you know points to prove sexual harassment.if what Natasha is narrating as sexual harassment really amount to sexual harassment,then all men will be in prison Fiscus105: |
| Re: Senate Replies IPU: Natasha Was Suspended For Gross Misconduct, Not Allegation by thesolutions(m): 12:58pm On Mar 13, 2025 |
Omoawoke:I would have asked if something is wrong with you for claiming that her past allegation involving Reno was a lie should mean that every other allegation involving another person is a lie too. Reno provided proofs and he was paid compensation for defamation. The proofs were provided in a court of law. Shouldn't Akpabio provide proof if he is innocent of the allegation in a court of law or before the floor of the Senate and make Natasha to pay heavily should she be found lying. Oh no. He can not risk becoming a floor member for a day to be questioned by his colleagues. Unfortunately, she was suspended. She has not received any subpoena from Akpabio bothering defamation over the sexual harassment allegation. That would have been his first action against her since she is temporarily no longer a member of the Senate pending the expiration of the six months suspension with possible resolution of the house to extend or dismiss her. You really sounds stimulated and the stimulus seems to be in abundance. |
| Re: Senate Replies IPU: Natasha Was Suspended For Gross Misconduct, Not Allegation by Omoawoke(m): 1:35pm On Mar 13, 2025 |
thesolutions:Do you have a functioning brain? Even an illiterate just waking up from coma should have heard it repeated times that she was suspended for her misconduct in the house! Again what is wrong with you?? They accused him of something, then where are the evidences against him?? Okay I’m accusing you right now of being an arm robber… you came to my house yesterday to steal… So please provide evidence you are not an arm robber? Are you feeling unwell? Do you need your brain checked? |
"Your statement based on political frustrations" - Senate replies Bakare • Natasha Akpoti Reporting Her Suspension At UN IPU (Video) • Alleged N3.7trn Budget Padding: ‘Akpabio Will Not Resign’ – Senate Replies PDP • 2 • 3 • 4
Buhari Should Speak On $48m, Nigerians Doubting His Corruption War – SERAP • Reno Omokri Reacts To Hausa Man's Comment As Buhari Addresses Nigerians In Hausa • PHOTOS: Kano Dangi To Zoo Road Underpass And Flyover Model

