₦airaland Forum

Ramanto:
Obidients are a always in support in anything destructive

was it Obedients that told Joy, the former NDDC woman who also accused your SP of se£ual harassment in the past?

Two uselèss people...
I care less

ibabz:
She didn’t deny it? Abeg which school did you attend? Perhaps you need to go back to primary school and learn comprehension

She simply plaid with words. Oby that I know will have scattered the whole space if she's completely clean. Her response get as e bi

jamafa:
Nah Ur people dey do drug most.

U just like pointing fingers

There are drug lords who run streets, and there are drug lords who run countries.

You don't respond to dogs barking, you'll be distracted

Lifestone:
Dr Oby should sue if she indeed knows it's a lie. She didn't outright come out to deny receiving money

You can't be ignorant to believe such lie. Don't be gullible

asfrank:
You collect money abi you no collect. She must act, after all the solidarity was paid for in full,

Tflex01:
Two clowns

😂

''Two Clowns''


Nollywood producers should assemble team to shoot that movie, featuring Akpoti & Ezeks

Tflex01:
The day a lady will falsely accuse you or your family member of harassment or rape, I sincerely pray that you or your family member is convicted based on the fact that "she's beautiful".

Imagine you are being sent to jail or even killed just because your accuser is beautiful? E for sweet oh! 😂

Obidients and their yeye reasoning.

Are you akpabio's preeck that knows everywhere it has entered or wanted to enter in the last 10 years

thesolutions:
Akpabio wife can not sue her. It is the accused that can sue her. So her case will be dismissed.
If she wants explanation, she should ask her husband. If she already did and she believes him, she should ask him to sue her.
If any court would want to proceed with the case tendered by Akpabio wife, Akpabio himself will be dragged to testify. You know he wouldn't want that.
So the story to keep him in office at least for the next 2 years is to use distractors which is working out fine.

now that the woman is saying Natasha lied with few evidence released and others on standby Incase it will be need.We expect Natasha to sue her for character defamation just same way u said Akpabio should she Natasha.Or is Natasha scared of the woman .Even aunty Oby Ezekwesili is expected to do the needful too if she is sure she didn't receive 100M.I expect them to sue.

The one she did to Reno Omokri is half truth? Has she held any public office before now to determine whether she would be accused of public theft or not?

Provide evidence, it's a a challenge, she was quick to sue Akpabio, quick to sue the other senator that said she was bearing children for different men, why is she not quick to sue the first person calling her out with evidence? [aquote author=ClearFlair post=135230653]Here's what we can tell for certain about Senator Natasha:

In Yoruba culture, they say people who lie will steal. Meaning thieves are known to be liars, but I've never seen EFCC invite Senator Natasha for stealing anything. Her people have also never accused her of anything, so the chances of her being a liar are extremely low.

In other words, the only thing we can say for sure about her is that she is very unlikely to tell lies. All other things some people are saying are just speculations.


People with a conscience will always choose the side of people with proven integrity and empathy. Senator Natasha will never walk alone.[/quote]

DMerciful:
You can't be ignorant to believe such lie. Don't be gullible

Same way you believe sexual allegations without evidence ko?

ozo13:
now that the woman is saying Natasha lied with few evidence released and others on standby Incase it will be need.We expect Natasha to sue her for character defamation just same way u said Akpabio should she Natasha.Or is Natasha scared of the woman .Even aunty Oby Ezekwesili is expected to do the needful too if she is sure she didn't receive 100M.I expect them to sue.

If she is considering herself as an asset to be used used in testimony against Natasha, she should meet the legal team of the Senate president and negotiate her terms. If Natasha proves her case, this same woman would be held for false testimony under oath. Natasha wouldn't need to spend extra money and time chasing litigation against her. She would be made to pay damages for false testimony. But if Natasha fails to prove her case, we can go on and crucify her on an alter of delusion.
Natasha is smart not to pay attention to distractors.

CJStarz:
When an Igbo man or woman supports you, he or she does so full chested.

like they supported Fubara ,Kanu and other politicians that are no more to be found?

dettolgel:
Sue so as to acknowledge the existence of Sandra Duru

The memo didn't indirectly acknowledge madam Duru?

thesolutions:
If she is considering herself as an asset to be used used in testimony against Natasha, she should meet the legal team of the Senate president and negotiate her terms. If Natasha proves her case, this same woman would be held for false testimony under oath. Natasha wouldn't need to spend extra money and time chasing litigation against her. She would be made to pay damages for false testimony. But if Natasha fails to prove her case, we can go on and crucify her on an alter of delusion.
Natasha is smart not to pay attention to distractors.

the same smartness she exhibited by quickly deleting her post against Reno abi.dey play

ozo13:
the same smartness she exhibited by quickly deleting her post against Reno abi.dey play

Reno proved his case and she bore the consequences. If she fails to prove his own against Akpabio, she will still bear the grave consequences.
So we concerned Nigerians are waiting for the case to be filed and hearing proceedings announced.

rinzaugustine:
Continue standing by a serpent until she bites you

Lol

thesolutions:
Reno proved his case and she bore the consequences. If she fails to prove his own against Akpabio, she will still bear the grave consequences.
So we concerned Nigerians are waiting for the case to be filed and hearing proceedings announced.

but it was exactly the same way she accused Reno on media of sexual wahala with salt and pepper added to it to make it real and believable but Reno tactically was able to present his own case too to prove her wrong.I for one can never believe such a lady again.if she can do it to one just to destroy him , she can also do it to another person.
She was the one jumping from one media house to another and Nigerians are now asking her to present just one evidence even if it's a fone chat or text message, she no gree show us for media again.
Back to the question I wanted asking.was Natasha the person that approach the court as regards the sexual allegation or Akpabio wife.Because when she presented her case to the Senate( in my own opinion instead of court) the Senate according to there rule ask if same case was in any competent court ,she answered No and there after she was now asked to submit the allegation to the Senate.
You can see alot of people are asking same question.Shehu sani is asking too

Oh so now they have all found their voices. Una go explain tire

ozo13:
but it was exactly the same way she accused Reno on media of sexual wahala with salt and pepper added to it to make it real and believable but Reno tactically was able to present his own case too to prove her wrong.I for one can never believe such a lady again.if she can do it to one just to destroy him , she can also do it to another person.
She was the one jumping from one media house to another and Nigerians are now asking her to present just one evidence even if it's a fone chat or text message, she no gree show us for media again.
Back to the question I wanted asking.was Natasha the person that approach the court as regards the sexual allegation or Akpabio wife.Because when she presented her case to the Senate( in my own opinion instead of court) the Senate according to there rule ask if same case was in any competent court ,she answered No and there after she was now asked to submit the allegation to the Senate.
You can see alot of people are asking same question.Shehu sani is asking too

Natasha approached the the court. Akpabio was invited but dismissed the invite stating that the legislature operates separate from the judiciary. He asked that she present the case before one of the house committee. The petition was rejected by the committee but she was given hasty suspension and bared from accessing the premises of the national assembly. This means she can not present her petition pending the expiration of the suspension with possible chance to extend the suspension period
Everything is calculated. I don't support her. But sometimes you have to look at events to understand the intensions behind every action.

thesolutions:
Natasha approached the the court. Akpabio was invited but dismissed the invite stating that the legislature operates separate from the judiciary. He asked that she present the case before one of the house committee. The petition was rejected by the committee but she was given hasty suspension and bared from accessing the premises of the national assembly. This means she can not present her petition pending the expiration of the suspension with possible chance to extend the suspension period
Everything is calculated. I don't support her. But sometimes you have to look at events to understand the intensions behind every action.

Natasha case to court is to bar the national assembly from suspending her which the assembly replied them it wasn't a case the court have jurisdiction due to separation of power or was there another court case detailing sexual harassment against akpabio.i don't think so but I stand to be corrected