₦airaland Forum

spillo1:
I think we could realistically get between 30 to 40m for him plus he's not on big wages

MRTA7:
City just signed Ait Nouri for just 40m euros which is crazy. I'm pissed as that's who we should have gone for. SMH.

spillo1:
You are bringing examples of people in their 30s with high salaries and no sell values.

Mrviktor:
Charkie cooked in this game shaaaa..

This france keeper is not good at all.
That ac Milan.. Chelsea linked fraud

spillo1:
Ok

CapitalCee:
They said he has attitude problem. Ok oo. Person wey Liverpool and City de drag to sign. We wey dey 16th de look for St Peter to sign. We never wan comot from Tranches

akwesenana:
Arguing with someone who chooses to be deliberately obtuse. Which team in the world go let their most priced asset leave for free when the have an option to extend their contract, LoL.

Jamiuokolaa:
The discussion circled around his current contract situation which expires next summer, and not Brendford's future plans to extend

Mbappe - best player in the world at that time, also had the "option to extend" at Psg.
He later joined Madrid without them paying a dime in transfer fees.

A lot could happen within a short period of time - Personal decisions, financial struggles etc but that's even another conversation entirely.

*sneezes*

Oasis007:


......I don't know why it took you much long to drop the "ok". A KG Pupil would easily understand your point. So basic to be dragging it too long.

spillo1:
Why are your examples always so far off. The option was for Mbappe alone to decide to extend for a year not Psg, there was nothing the club could do. In this case Brentford are the one with the option not Mbuemo. I really don't get how something so simple is complicated for you to understand.

patrickmuf:
Fans of this club will criticise the players every match day but once you talk about selling the player, he becomes irreplaceable...

I saw a couple of guys try to downplay Cherki when someone suggested we sign him...I think it was you or Spillo that mentioned Cherki...

spillo1:
Why are your examples always so far off. The option was for Mbappe alone to decide to extend for a year not Psg, there was nothing the club could do. In this case Brentford are the one with the option not Mbuemo. I really don't get how something so simple is complicated for you to understand.

spillo1:
Why are your examples always so far off. The option was for Mbappe alone to decide to extend for a year not Psg, there was nothing the club could do. In this case Brentford are the one with the option not Mbuemo. I really don't get how something so simple is complicated for you to understand.

akwesenana:
If you think Brentford wouldn't use the option to extend the contract as a bargaining chip, I've got nothing left to say to you.

CapitalCee:
They said he has attitude problem. Ok oo. Person wey Liverpool and City de drag to sign. We wey dey 16th de look for St Peter to sign. We never wan comot from Tranches

Jamiuokolaa:
That's exactly the point - the way Mbappe wasn't obligated to extend is also the same way Brendford have no obligation whatsoever to trigger the extension.

None of the parties are obliged to trigger the extension so it cant be included as part of the contractual years signed. That is why it is clearly stated that Mbuemo's contract expires next summer.

Your attempts at maneovering with semantics are just as futile as pissing in the wind, even in the face of stone walled evidence!

TrebleChamp:
Bro this your argument no follow, Brentford hold the ace and will definitely trigger the extension so they don't lose him for free next season. Clubs will only opto out of triggering the extension for players they are eager to get rid off (e.g Scancho)

Mrviktor:
A player with only one year left on his contract... Another mount situation.. we better stand our ground with 47+3

Jamiuokolaa:
For the club to have made it an "option" clearly shows the uncertainty around the extension. They are obviously looking to reassess the player's form, club's financial status etc - a direct contradiction to the definitive statement you are trying to credit them with.

For the avoidance of doubt, What Brentford intend to do or not do in future is not relevant here - the current situation of the contract was the genesis of the conversation as highlighted below;



I am not interested in the reasons why players or clubs would decide to extend or not because that was not in the convo till it managed to sneak in. Like i said earlier, the actual expiration of the current contract is what is being discussed here.

patrickmuf:
How do you discuss that without looking at the option the club has to renew for a season? That's technically two years...

To base all your argument on the position that he has one year left, even when you can clearly see the club has an option to renew for a year, is you being disingenuous with the truth...

MrVictor:
A player with only one year left on his contract... Another mount situation.. we better stand our ground with 47+3

Jamiuokolaa:
His current contract expires next summer and that was the premise of the initial discussion below...



If you want to discuss the probability of futuristic/optional contract extensions, that is a different topic entirely.

It is you who has decided to be disingenuous with the truth concerning the expiry date of Mbuemo's current contract which is crystal clear!

patrickmuf:
The club hold the aces, we are negotiating with the club. If Mrviktor was wrong in his consideration, does it mean we all must follow the same path even when it is clearly stated there that the club has an option to extend his deal for a year?

patrickmuf:
Mbeumo has one year left on his contract, and the club has the exclusive right to extend it for another year. This effectively means they have him for the next two seasons. Also, the club is aware that he is a forward who can ensure a strong goal return, which significantly increases their chances of remaining a Premier League team over the next two seasons. This stability translates into greater earnings, so any potential suitor will be informed that the club can exercise its option to renew the contract for another year as a strong bargaining tool.

Jamiuokolaa:
And it is also clearly stated that his current contract expires next year - Mrvict.or was quite clear about that, same with the evidence at our disposal....



Like I said earlier, the bolded was the basis of the original convo and it has been found to be factually correct

Reasons and probabilities for extension are moot here...

Can Mbuemo leave for Free as we speak? ABSOLUTELY NOT!

Can he leave for free by this time next year?

ABSOLUTELY YES, IF BRENTFORD DECIDE NOT TO ACTIVATE THE OPTION OF EXTENSION AND/OR THE PLAYER ISNT HAPPY WITH THE NEW TERMS!

Like I said, I am not interested in the probability of the futuristic extension, as it is irrelevant here.

patrickmuf:
Brentford will let their best player leave for free when they have the option to extend even without his permission...A good joke...

Jamiuokolaa:
The "option" is obviously to reassess the situation and check wether a new contract would be in the club's best interest.

The definitive contract he signed expires by this time next year.

patrickmuf:
The club might also decide to keep for another season instead of losing him a season earlier...His goals will most likely see them stay up and earn big from the league's TV rights revenue...

The point in all these is that the club will most likely use the option to extend his deal as a bargaining chip, which is why they're likely holding out for a bit more money.