₦airaland Forum

I just went through a thread from a few days ago about saving a mother's life during a delivery over the child. That's the gist of the thread. For those who haven't read it:
https://www.nairaland.com/8485590/anything-goes-wrong-during-labor

Whilst reading, it wasn't the subject matter that I found interesting, but rather the replies from guys on the thread. The female in question had stated that in the event of some complication during childbirth her life should be prioritised over the child - and there was an overwhelming verdict that she was right. She's technically right though, but you see that's what's interesting about it...

Did her statement sound logical? Yes, it did. Rather, to be precise, her statement coincides with logic. What's interesting is the (supposed) oversight on the part of the male commenters. There was no mistake in trying to ascertain the logic in what was said, but the issue is that they didn't deem it necessary to go further and ask themselves "Where is this statement coming from exactly?"

Woman is inherently selfish, thus solipsistic. She can have no true/sincere input without a motive, and if there is no motive it's because it doesn't appeal to her, and if it doesn't appeal to her then it doesn't concern her to begin with. Woman does not do anything that doesn't benefit her in some shape or form. She sees only self and cannot fixate her sight on what is past self. As a consequence, woman is anti-logical as logic demands an objective view upon what is outside of oneself first and foremost.

When whatever comes out of a woman's mouth coincides with logic it's actually just a Trojan horse of selfishness (though they don't see it that way). It looks like the gift of logic and sound reasoning on the outside, and on the surface that's good enough. You let them wheel this horse past the walls of your city---into your mind, and then, it is not until the dark of night---in hindsight---do you see a small battalion of soldiers quietly springing forth from within the horse to slit the throats of their enemies in their sleep does it then become apparent that this "gift" had always been self-serving; that this gift was not an ends itself - but, as always, a means to an end.
This is how women use a man's logic against him and turn him into a tool to serve her wants and whims.

It's no different from how women say they want a really sweet, caring guy, who is nice and respects them. Though they speak from feelings of the moment, it does sound logical to men. Why wouldn't they want a nice guy who respects them? Why would a man listen to woman if what she said didn't, at first, sound logical?
So you listen and don't think to look beneath the surface... Until you start seeing a disconnect between what you've been told and what you're seeing. If you then decide to apply wisdom by disregarding what women say and start doing what actually works you'll see an even bigger disconnect. You'll start, for instance, noticing that their natural craving for drama and emotional stimulation is not even compatible with that respect which they claim to want.
Because at the kernel of their words and "logic"---in making you a beta/simp, in this example---is something tailored solely for their benefit.

The child, like woman, is neither logical nor rational; hence, when presented with a statement that seems built on logic, one ought to always ask themselves "What are they peddling (to me)?" If you ask yourself this question in truth, and deduce their angle/pov in the matter, then, you'll be surpised on how you'll begin to see the feelings and self-serving prompts in their "logic".

Look deeply upon any woman or at the below picture even. Does this look like a creature of truth, capable of logic and of magnanimity?

Source: Dizzyish

EmperorIsaac:
Woman is inherently selfish, thus solipsistic. She can have no true/sincere input without a motive....

I see you did not write this and your source is Dizzyish, otherwise I would be asking why you are irrational.

Fact is, humans are inherently selfish. That's why some men might rather the woman die and their child live.

That said, this toxic view of women as expressed in this piece is not your own view or opinion it seems, and I hope, because it's ignorant and very stupid much.

"What a misfortune to be a woman! And yet, the worst misfortune is not to understand what a misfortune it is.
Politeness is pleasing – essentially – to woman, and the fact that she accepts it without hesitation is explained by nature’s care for the weaker, for the unfavoured being, and for one to whom an illusion means more than a material compensation. But this illusion, precisely, is fatal to her ... To feel oneself freed from distress thanks to something imaginary, to be the dupe of something imaginary, is that not a still deeper mockery? ... Woman is very far from being verwahrlost (neglected), but in another sense she is, since she can never free herself from the illusion that nature has used to console her."
- Søren Kierkegaard